You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for providing this great software as an opensource product.
Before moving to OTOBO I tried OTRS and Znuny, but settled with OTOBO due to PSGI support (behind Caddy).
Regardless, I was monitoring the development of Znuny over time.
Znuny is a great piece of software similar to OTOBO - no argument in that. But the recent version of Znuny has significant changes made to the layout - both customer and agent portal.
Whilst looking great, I couldn't help but to notice how much screen real estate is wasted in the new format.
For me, I don't see any requirement for the layout to be wasted on so much space between elements.
So, I am here to kindly ask OTOBO please not to follow the same path in regards to layout changes.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi All,
Thanks for providing this great software as an opensource product.
Before moving to OTOBO I tried OTRS and Znuny, but settled with OTOBO due to PSGI support (behind Caddy).
Regardless, I was monitoring the development of Znuny over time.
Znuny is a great piece of software similar to OTOBO - no argument in that. But the recent version of Znuny has significant changes made to the layout - both customer and agent portal.
Whilst looking great, I couldn't help but to notice how much screen real estate is wasted in the new format.
For me, I don't see any requirement for the layout to be wasted on so much space between elements.
So, I am here to kindly ask OTOBO please not to follow the same path in regards to layout changes.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions