Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Pyramid cards? #185

Open
victorhooi opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Support for Pyramid cards? #185

victorhooi opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@victorhooi
Copy link

Is there any chance of adding support for Pyramid tags in Chameleon?

For example, I have some Pyramid tags - I can read them successfully with a Proxmark RDV4:

[usb] pm3 --> lf pyramid reader
[+] Pyramid - len: 81 -unknown- Card: 21134, Raw: 000101375b0101010101016e34XXXXXX
[usb] pm3 --> lf pyramid demod
[+] Pyramid - len: 81 -unknown- Card: 21134, Raw: 000101375b0101010101016e34XXXXXX
[usb] pm3 --> lf search
​
[=] NOTE: some demods output possible binary
[=] if it finds something that looks like a tag
[=] False Positives ARE possible
[=] 
[=] Checking for known tags...
[=] 
[!] ⚠️  Specify one authentication mode
[+] Pyramid - len: 81 -unknown- Card: 21134, Raw: 000101375b0101010101016e34XXXXXX
​
[+] Valid Pyramid ID found!
​
[=] Couldn't identify a chipset

However, if I try to read it with the LF read on Chameleon Ultra, it says no tag found.

@victorhooi victorhooi added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 20, 2023
@wrenchii
Copy link

Yes please! Facing the same problem on a pentest (easily read and emulated on RDV4 and FZ). While I got the FZ to do the task (and / or a T5577), I would ideally want to consolidate everything into the Chameleon Ultra where I can.

@Spider624
Copy link

still no info and no support for this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants