Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

git tags #10

Closed
noraj opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

git tags #10

noraj opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Milestone

Comments

@noraj
Copy link
Contributor

noraj commented Sep 11, 2023

Ref. byt3bl33d3r/CrackMapExec#800

If this become the official cme community fork, could you please recreate at least all previous git tags and create new git tags and github release for cme 6.0 and 6.1 please.

@noraj
Copy link
Contributor Author

noraj commented Sep 11, 2023

One example among many, this is required by many distribution packages.

Packaging status

@XiaoliChan
Copy link
Contributor

XiaoliChan commented Sep 11, 2023

If this become the official cme community fork.

At present, this is impossible... ¯\(ツ)

Published this repository into the package source will cause another unnecessary conflict with porchetta

@noraj
Copy link
Contributor Author

noraj commented Sep 11, 2023

If this become the official cme community fork.

At present, this is impossible... ¯_(ツ)_/¯

byt3bl33d3r/CrackMapExec#801 was locked, it's pretty clear that the community will continue to work on CME on the fork and that bytebleeder wi'll abandon cme or shutdown prochetta.

Published this repository into the package source will cause another unnecessary conflict with porchetta

But anyway I'm just asking for git tags here, each package manager of each distro will choose which upstream repository to follow. And I guess if the community push changes here while porchetta repository stay stale or is archived this is just a question of time before the change will be reflected everywhere.

@Marshall-Hallenbeck
Copy link
Collaborator

Marshall-Hallenbeck commented Sep 11, 2023

We can do this. Since we'll have to rename, we will need to do a whole bunch of work, including pip/apt configuration, etc. I assume with the rename we'll start at version 1, but internal discussion is on-going.

@NeffIsBack NeffIsBack added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 17, 2023
@Marshall-Hallenbeck
Copy link
Collaborator

We have started using tags with the release of v1.0.0: https://github.com/Pennyw0rth/NetExec/releases/tag/v1.0.0

@Marshall-Hallenbeck Marshall-Hallenbeck added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Oct 2, 2023
@Marshall-Hallenbeck Marshall-Hallenbeck self-assigned this Oct 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants