You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are 19 species records that have no scientificname, genus, species, or commonname. All are associated with citation_id 199 (Xiaohui Feng, field data).
Some are apparently plant communities. A few appear to be specific species, and four have no information.
For communities please give a descriiption that we can put in the commonname field (similar to how the USDA plants database has entries for plant types ("Tree", "Subshrub") or at least the name of a specific community.
Notably, all of these records are for c2n_[root, leaf, stem] or seedling_mortality; none are associated with a particular site, and although they were collected pre 2000, all have checked = -1 are not associated with their original citation. One option would be to delete these.
These were discussed three years ago in Redmine 737.
Presumably "PFTs" would be a better place for such community level definitions, but is beyond the scope of what we can do presently with the database.
select id, AcceptedSymbol from traits join species ontraits.specie_id=species.idwhere scientificname =''and commonname ='' ;
These data are not my field data collected from EBI farm. EBI farm did not have these species planted. In addition, all my data from EBI farm are on species level. I have looked but not found the literature for these data. I think you can delete them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@dlebauer commented on Tue Mar 17 2015
There are 19 species records that have no scientificname, genus, species, or commonname. All are associated with citation_id 199 (Xiaohui Feng, field data).
Some are apparently plant communities. A few appear to be specific species, and four have no information.
For communities please give a descriiption that we can put in the commonname field (similar to how the USDA plants database has entries for plant types ("Tree", "Subshrub") or at least the name of a specific community.
Notably, all of these records are for
c2n_[root, leaf, stem]
orseedling_mortality
; none are associated with a particular site, and although they were collected pre 2000, all havechecked = -1
are not associated with their original citation. One option would be to delete these.These were discussed three years ago in Redmine 737.
Presumably "PFTs" would be a better place for such community level definitions, but is beyond the scope of what we can do presently with the database.
(19 rows)
@mdietze commented on Wed Mar 18 2015
This should be assigned to Sunny since it's her data
@dlebauer commented on Wed Mar 18 2015
Does she have a github account?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:42 AM Michael Dietze [email protected]
wrote:
@mdietze commented on Wed Mar 18 2015
@lovelilyinfall
@lovelilyinfall commented on Tue Mar 24 2015
These data are not my field data collected from EBI farm. EBI farm did not have these species planted. In addition, all my data from EBI farm are on species level. I have looked but not found the literature for these data. I think you can delete them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: