Is PEAR supposed to be required?

[mikehaas763]

Following the websites "Installation" page, I was getting an exception when trying to run phr relating to a file not being found. I figured out that when I installed PEAR (sudo apt-get install php-pear) it would then work. Aren't the PEAR dependencies supposed to be included in the phrozn package? If PEAR is a dependency, it should be included on the installation page.

[farazdagi]

This should not be an issue once #74 hits the master branch (should be next week when I plan to go through some due pull requests and issues).

[kenjis]

0.5.4 still requires PEAR.

PHP Warning: require_once(PEAR/Exception.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in .../phrozn/vendor/pear/console_commandline/Console/CommandLine/Exception.php on line 28

[haruair]

Is it fixed? I got a same warning in 0.5.4.

Warning: require_once(PEAR/Exception.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /Users/dev/phrozn/vendor/pear/console_commandline/Console/CommandLine/Exception.php on line 28

[mikehaas763]

Not that I'm saying console_commandline is inferior but I think it would be pretty neat to see a PR come in replacing it with Symfony/Console. Even though I haven't created a static site since about oh 8 months ago.

[Pawka]

It was temporary fixed on #101. If anybody wants get rid all PEAR stuff, you are welcome :-)