Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configuration of voting choices per proposal #23

Open
fbaile opened this issue Mar 19, 2011 · 4 comments
Open

Configuration of voting choices per proposal #23

fbaile opened this issue Mar 19, 2011 · 4 comments

Comments

@fbaile
Copy link

fbaile commented Mar 19, 2011

The "yes/no/abstention" schema is not enough for certain use cases. For instance, voting for a type of tree to plant in given zone choices should be a list of tree types

@jorgegorka
Copy link
Contributor

I am working on it

@jorgegorka
Copy link
Contributor

Right now there is only one type of proposals (yes/no/abstention).

I am going to add an extra table called Choices where i am going to store the values for the differente choices a proposal can have. (Proposal has many choices)

As most of the proposals will be of the (yes/no/abs) type I think we can left those values "hardcoded" with the buttons as they are right now.

For the new choices there will be two types of choices one and multiple.

For multiple choices there will be check buttons to allow the voter to select one or more of the available choices.

For single option choices the voter will be presented with radio buttons.

If the number of choices is very big maybe we should switch from radio buttons and check boxes to select (not sure about this)

@bglusman
Copy link

This might be wrong place to ask, or may be covered elsewhere, but is there any discussion of including capability for IRV (instant runoff voting) as an option into the software? It's sort of related to lists like this, and seems generally in keeping with liquid democracy ideas, but I'm new :-)

@afcapel
Copy link
Contributor

afcapel commented Oct 23, 2011

At the moment there is no support for IRV, although for sure it would be a very useful option to have.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants