-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TLE data? #9
Comments
Basically you're right. However there will be ~70 satellites deployed one by one, so I will be hard to determine at very beginning which TLE is for PW-Sat2. We'll be trying and sharing our investigations :) |
Right, I understand. So, you are saying you will be pointing the antenna at some point in the sky and trying to pick up the signal from PWSat2. All good, but I imagine you would have to have a rough estimate on Az/El angles for your first attempts, correct? Oh, or maybe this is the part where you look for support from the community (if your telemetry can tell you enough about the position of the sat) 👍 |
We've got a rough estimate - derived from parameters of the launch place/time and destination orbit. Soon after the launch we should receive TLE of upper stage (not exactly stage, rather a deployer, so called free flyer). During very first passes (estimated from TLE of the deployer) we'll use QFH antenna (omni-directional) just to figure out if our estimate is correct. Then we'll have a data from NORAD about 70 objects deployed from SSO-A and try to find the PW-Sat2. For sure community help will be very helpful, it's also the reason why we have a contest for the first received frame from the satellite :) Unfortunately the launch is delayed to not earlier than Dec. 1st due to weather conditions... we have to wait a little bit longer... |
Thank you so much. This gives me the idea on how to prepare my equipment to receive the signal from PWSat2. All my tests will be done in southern Poland (either near Opole, Kraków, or Przemyśl ;) ) |
@begreeen what software did you use to calc the passes? |
ok. I've found it: http://gpredict.oz9aec.net/ |
alright, but tell me (I have not checked / tried) - can the user enter only those orbital parameters that are known to them (say: preliminary, as is the case with PWSat2) and gpredict will calculate the passes over a given point on the surface of the Earth? |
@begreeen I want to use it for tracking PW-SAT2. Will GPredict see PW-SAT2 after launch? |
We'll publish a TLE file, you can add it using 'Update TLE from local files' or sth similar in GPredict. |
Where? I don't want to miss it. I have prepared UHF antenna and I'm looking forward receiving data from PW-SAT2. |
Over there: https://github.com/PW-Sat2/HAMRadio/wiki/Orbit-and-Tracking-(TLE)#tle-data |
For some reason gpredict doesn't believe that preliminary TLE is valid and refuses to load it. Why is that? Should I tweak the data taken from your WIKI manually somehow? |
This is a prediction data. Real data should be known a bit after midnight. I hope guys from pw-sat2 will put it online asap. |
I've attached a file: |
@begreeen is it proper or predicted? |
I guess gpredict insists on the file name having "proper" extension (.tle) - as soon as I added it, Now... we'll see if anything can be received with the poor man's Quick question: is there any forum where we could discuss technical (software) matters - this is hardly the proper place, I think... |
It is based on real after-launch parameters, however it's not for PW-Sat2 but FreeFlyer structure (deployer). Those things should be close to one another from our point of view. It will be getting more and more accurate in the future.
Yep, I'll answer asap, sorry it missed it among tons of other mails :( |
Sorry for that but we don't have any forum. We can discuss maybe on some existing HAM radio forum? (Can you propose some forum?) |
Please, excuse my lacking space knowledge (this is really new to me) - will TLE data set be known and published only after PWSat2 is inserted into its orbit (and then we can predict its visibility from any given point on the Earth's surface)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: