fix(api): Opentrons simulate pick up tip message formatting

[CaseyBatten]

Overview

Cover RQA-3129

Originally we were printing only the primary well referenced in a pick up tip action in simulate. This has lead to confusion and incomplete information when engaging in partial tip extraction. This PR seeks to ensure we trace the selecition of tips being removed back to the edge-well of a given cluster of tips.

As a result, the follow case would be true:

Flex 8ch Partial tip Pickup using 2 nozzles picking up from a tiprack would print:
Picking up tips from A1-B1 of Opentrons Flex 96 Tip Rack 1000 µL on slot B2

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Ensure all configurations of pipette layout list tip extraction well reference in sensible order.

Changelog

String formatting on outgoing pick up tip command.

Review requests

Risk assessment

Low - only effects outgoing string.

This has had the unfortunate knock-on effect of making the simulate print log more accurate than the current run-preview log.

[sfoster1]

Okay, looks good to me for pick up tip. I think we want this for anything else that is relevant though, right? drop_tip, aspirate, dispense, anything that targets wells

[ecormany]

I agree with Seth. Especially within a transfer, the pickup, aspirate, and dispense all get written out right next to each other. With this change, it can look like this:

Transferring 100.0 from D1 of Corning 96 Well Plate 360 µL Flat on slot B2 to D2 of Corning 96 Well Plate 360 µL Flat on slot B2
	Picking up tip from A1-D1 of Opentrons Flex 96 Tip Rack 1000 µL on slot D1
	Aspirating 100.0 uL from D1 of Corning 96 Well Plate 360 µL Flat on slot B2 at 716.0 uL/sec
	Dispensing 100.0 uL into D2 of Corning 96 Well Plate 360 µL Flat on slot B2 at 716.0 uL/sec

That's aspirating from A1–D1 and dispensing into A2–D2.

[y3rsh]

We have made the call to add it this as a known issue due to the amount of work yet needed and other bugs taking priority.