You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
this is currently a mess due to changing code and aliasing covering up inconsistencies:
studyID ot_9 is in study/ot__9/ot_9/ot_9.json
studyID pg_09 is study 9 in phylografter and is in pg_09/pg_09/pg_09.json
this is not an emergency because the studyID's listed in the files, resolve.
But I should clean it up at some point. Probably no point in fixing the code that generated the mess (because we are passed single digit IDs in both the ot and pg namespaces), but better aliasing (in peyotl) and some git mv operations would make the system more transparent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@mtholder: Is this bug restricted to code that imports from phylografter? Or could this become a problem again if introduce a third "namespaced" source for studies?
I'm sorry to say that this would bite us if we added a new namespace... (a hack would be to add 10 bogus studies in a new namespace so that it would not affect any real studies )
this is currently a mess due to changing code and aliasing covering up inconsistencies:
studyID ot_9 is in study/ot__9/ot_9/ot_9.json
studyID pg_09 is study 9 in phylografter and is in pg_09/pg_09/pg_09.json
this is not an emergency because the studyID's listed in the files, resolve.
But I should clean it up at some point. Probably no point in fixing the code that generated the mess (because we are passed single digit IDs in both the ot and pg namespaces), but better aliasing (in peyotl) and some
git mv
operations would make the system more transparent.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: