You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description: If a motions contains at least two amendments in the same part of the motions text, the motions show a warning sign. If this motion is projected in the diff-version, the projection misses a warning sign about the existent conflicts.
Motion text with conflicts:
Projection without warning sign:
Reproduction:
open a meeting
open motions > create a new motion with two paragraphs
create two amendments at the same place. change the status of each one to accepted.
head back to the main motion: warning signs should now be visible. > project the motion in Diff version.
What should happen:
The projection should include warning signs of the conflicts of amendments and/or recommendation changes.
The projection should follow the visuals of the motion like in image one with information about the amendment. With one small change; Warning sign and information about amendmend should be in one line. So the users could easily spot the changes.
Note: The warning signs in the projection are still missing in the diff projection to easily spot the conflict.
But, another problem has been solved since creation of the issue: The line numbers were wrong in diff projection.
MSoeb
changed the title
Projection of amendments with conflicts miss information of them
Projection of amendments with conflicts needs to be improved
Dec 19, 2023
Description: If a motions contains at least two amendments in the same part of the motions text, the motions show a warning sign. If this motion is projected in the diff-version, the projection misses a warning sign about the existent conflicts.
Motion text with conflicts:
Projection without warning sign:
Reproduction:
What should happen:
Note: #3110 is a follow up to this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: