You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
When mapping gufe protein components that were built using multimeric PDBs, I'm observing that the map is only done to a part of the multimer, apparently only one of the monomers is mapped. I would expect kartograf to be able to map the components correctly, or complain if it doesn't.
It seems to map only the chain "B" for some reason.
Expected behavior
I expect the length of the mapping to be the number of atoms of the protein components minus the mutated ones, which should be just a few of them.
Screenshots
Additional context
This would enable handling protein mutations in a more streamlined way. As far as I can tell, the way to do it right now would be to separate each monomer (each chain in the PDBs) to its own component and then mapping those independently, but that can be cumbersome for users.
PDB files to test in the following zip archive: Archive.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@ijpulidos
I marked in the PR the code bits, where I think the new features need to be implemented to :)
let me know what you think? :)
P.s.: I implemented an initial suggestion for splitting the protein chains into components, can you test that one?
Describe the bug
When mapping
gufe
protein components that were built using multimeric PDBs, I'm observing that the map is only done to a part of the multimer, apparently only one of the monomers is mapped. I would expectkartograf
to be able to map the components correctly, or complain if it doesn't.To Reproduce
It seems to map only the chain "B" for some reason.
Expected behavior
I expect the length of the mapping to be the number of atoms of the protein components minus the mutated ones, which should be just a few of them.
Screenshots
Additional context
This would enable handling protein mutations in a more streamlined way. As far as I can tell, the way to do it right now would be to separate each monomer (each chain in the PDBs) to its own component and then mapping those independently, but that can be cumbersome for users.
PDB files to test in the following zip archive:
Archive.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: