Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revamp site to fit under Fastcode.org #234

Open
behoppe opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #235
Open

Revamp site to fit under Fastcode.org #234

behoppe opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #235
Assignees

Comments

@behoppe
Copy link
Member

behoppe commented Dec 4, 2024

Issue
Now that we have Fastcode.org, we need to update OpenCilk.org so that it reflects the current ecosystem without duplicating too much of the big-picture SPE content on Fastcode.org

Suggested improvements

  • Point to Fastcode.org from many places, such as Community, About us, Contribute
  • Migrate the blog, which is being reborn on Fastcode.org
  • Migrate the glossary
  • Point to Speedcode.org from pages like Getting started (and maybe Install)
  • Reference NSF ACCESS support for OpenCilk on pages like Getting started and Install
@behoppe behoppe self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
@behoppe behoppe linked a pull request Dec 13, 2024 that will close this issue
@behoppe behoppe linked a pull request Dec 13, 2024 that will close this issue
@behoppe
Copy link
Member Author

behoppe commented Dec 13, 2024

@neboat @DorothyCurtis @dcurtisatmit would you like to give any feedback on this (revamping OpenCilk so that it fits under the Fastcode umbrella)? I have just created a PR #235 that addresses the first two points raised above. The PR does not actually migrate the blog (which is practically empty) but renames it as "OpenCilk news," with the idea being that we'd still announce releases and tutorial workshops on this site.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant