-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different slabs for the same miller index #12
Comments
There could be multiple slabs for a miller index because of different shifts and if the top and bottom aren't symmetric. No. of layers should be the same though; let us know if you find otherwise. |
That definitely looks buggy, especially the gap between some of the layers.. Could you share the atoms object for @mshuaibii any thoughts? |
@gihanpanapitiya Where did you create |
Thanks! The issue can be reproduced using the following code.
|
I see. Yeah, it looks like you've created a 111 surface, and then are feeding that into the Slab creator, which is not the correct use case. You should feed in a bulk structure, as follows:
If you are interested in other bulk structures, you can look for them in the following database - https://github.com/Open-Catalyst-Project/Open-Catalyst-Dataset/blob/main/ocdata/databases/pkls/bulks.pkl. |
If we want to use a bulk not in |
We would like to use our own slabs to find the heuristic placements. Is the method below a valid way to use
|
I am following the example at adsorbml_walkthrough.ipynb. Do you know why we get different slabs for the same miller index? I want to select the slab that has the same number of layers as that of the bulk. Is there a way to do this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: