From 9498cf1457d96a2b33e5456355dfc2d1b58f4c69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Neteler Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:19:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] manual: fix broken HTML tags This PR fixes some broken HTML tags identified with a test run of the HTML validation with super-linter. See https://github.com/echoix/grass/actions/runs/12001379426/job/33451802353?pr=303#step:4:8310 --- raster/r.texture/r.texture.html | 12 ++++++------ scripts/v.clip/v.clip.html | 2 +- temporal/t.rast.extract/t.rast.extract.html | 6 +++--- vector/v.surf.rst/v.surf.rst.html | 8 ++++---- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/raster/r.texture/r.texture.html b/raster/r.texture/r.texture.html index 93b089a86fe..3fc8f557770 100644 --- a/raster/r.texture/r.texture.html +++ b/raster/r.texture/r.texture.html @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@

Performance


Figure 1: Benchmark shows execution time for different number of cells (1M, 2M, 4M, and 8M) and - the fixed size of window (3×3). + the fixed size of window (3×3).
Performance
Figure 2: Benchmark shows efficiency for different numbers of cells (1M, 2M, 4M, and 8M) and - the fixed size of window (3×3). + the fixed size of window (3×3).
Performance
Figure 3: Benchmark shows execution time for different sizes of windows - (3×3, 9×9, - 15×15, and 27×27) + (3×3, 9×9, + 15×15, and 27×27) and the fixed number of cells (1M).
@@ -225,8 +225,8 @@

Performance

alt="efficiency benchmark for r.texture with different window sizes" border="0">
Figure 4: Benchmark shows efficiency for different - sizes of windows (3×3, 9×9, - 15×15, and 27×27) + sizes of windows (3×3, 9×9, + 15×15, and 27×27) and the fixed number of cells (1M).
diff --git a/scripts/v.clip/v.clip.html b/scripts/v.clip/v.clip.html index b4d93121d9a..17d364d713c 100644 --- a/scripts/v.clip/v.clip.html +++ b/scripts/v.clip/v.clip.html @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@

NOTES

and/or lines can be achieved using v.overlay. Clipping of points can be performed -with v.select. +with v.select.

EXAMPLES

diff --git a/temporal/t.rast.extract/t.rast.extract.html b/temporal/t.rast.extract/t.rast.extract.html index bc3b0b30f7c..f8e366250e4 100644 --- a/temporal/t.rast.extract/t.rast.extract.html +++ b/temporal/t.rast.extract/t.rast.extract.html @@ -27,16 +27,16 @@

NOTES

-t.rast.extract input=tempmean_monthly where="start_time > '2010-01-05'" \
+t.rast.extract input=tempmean_monthly where="start_time > '2010-01-05'" \
                output=selected_tempmean_monthly basename=new_tmean_month \
-               expression="if(tempmean_monthly < 0, null(), tempmean_monthly)"
+               expression="if(tempmean_monthly < 0, null(), tempmean_monthly)"

EXAMPLE

 t.rast.extract input=tempmean_monthly output=tempmean_monthly_later_2012 \
-               where="start_time >= '2012-01-01'"
+               where="start_time >= '2012-01-01'"
 
 t.rast.list tempmean_monthly_later_2012
 name|mapset|start_time|end_time
diff --git a/vector/v.surf.rst/v.surf.rst.html b/vector/v.surf.rst/v.surf.rst.html
index 199ca4fc3ca..8194aef36d9 100644
--- a/vector/v.surf.rst/v.surf.rst.html
+++ b/vector/v.surf.rst/v.surf.rst.html
@@ -305,14 +305,14 @@ 
Performance

   benchmark for v.surf.rst
   

   Figure 1: Benchmark shows execution time for different
-    number of cells (1M, 2M, 4M, and 8M).
+    number of cells (1M, 2M, 4M, and 8M).
benchmark for cross-validation of v.surf.rst
Figure 2: Benchmark shows execution time for running cross-validation on - different number of cells (100k, 200k, 400k, and 800k). + different number of cells (100k, 200k, 400k, and 800k).

EXAMPLE

@@ -355,10 +355,10 @@

Usage of the where parameter

v.db.univar -e elevrand column=value # interpolation based on subset of points (only those over 1st quartile) -v.surf.rst input=elevrand zcolumn=value elevation=elev_partial npmin=100 where="value > 94.9" +v.surf.rst input=elevrand zcolumn=value elevation=elev_partial npmin=100 where="value > 94.9" r.colors map=elev_partial raster=elevation d.rast elev_partial -d.vect elevrand where="value > 94.9" +d.vect elevrand where="value > 94.9"

REFERENCES