Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new entries #28

Open
amilan17 opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

new entries #28

amilan17 opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@amilan17
Copy link
Contributor

Hello -
We are planning on using LinkPropertyLookupTable terms for our ISO metadata in NOAA and request that you add the following:

HTTPS
URL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2818

FTP
URL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc959

OPeNDAP:Hyrax
URL: http://docs.opendap.org/index.php/Hyrax

Thanks,
Anna

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Member

@amilan17 for HTTPS, we already have a WWW:LINK entry which can cover both HTTP and HTTPS. Does this work for you?

@tomkralidis tomkralidis changed the title New new entries Sep 20, 2016
@amilan17
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @tomkralidis - According to the current list, WWW:LINK is defined by the XLink standard (http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/) and this doesn't match the "secure HTTP connections over
the Internet" definition for HTTPS. Furthermore, I think we will have a use case where we need to clarify the type of link...

@rsignell-usgs
Copy link
Member

So @amilan17, the idea is that...

OPeNDAP:Hyrax should be used for endpoints like this:
https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/opendap/ghrsst/L4/GLOB/DMI/DMI_OI/

while

UNIDATA:THREDDS should be used for endpoints like this:
https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/thredds/catalog/ghrsst/L4/GLOB/DMI/DMI_OI/

Is that right?

@amilan17
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe so.

Anna
~~~~~~Metadata Adds Meaning~~~~~~
[email protected], 303-497-5099
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information
(formerly NOAA’s National Geophysical Data Center)
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/metadata/emma
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Rich Signell [email protected]
wrote:

So @amilan17 https://github.com/amilan17, the idea is that...

OPeNDAP:Hyrax should be used for endpoints like this:
https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/opendap/ghrsst/L4/GLOB/DMI/DMI_OI/

while

UNIDATA:THREDDS should be used for endpoints like this:
https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/thredds/catalog/ghrsst/L4/GLOB/DMI/DMI_OI/

Is that right?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#28 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE7e4rPZqcjOCLJrG2fhwTXhnhHMq5dPks5qs9wTgaJpZM4KBt6o
.

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Member

@amilan17 implemented in master. What's the difference between OPeNDAP:OPeNDAP and OPeNDAP:Hyrax, then?

@BobSimons
Copy link

I don't know the intent of the people who created those entries, but I
would interpret them as:
OPeNDAP:OPeNDAP - applicable to any service that follows the DAP
specification.
OPeNDAP:Hyrax - specifically to identify a Hyrax server (the DAP server
made by the OPeNDAP organization) (as opposed to other DAP servers like
THREDDS, GRADS, ERDDAP, PyDAP, ...).

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Tom Kralidis [email protected]
wrote:

@amilan17 https://github.com/amilan17 implemented in master. What's the
difference between OPeNDAP:OPeNDAP and OPeNDAP:Hyrax, then?


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#28 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABarOAQj1tyxVjP3Ev8vBa8pQ43sgR-kks5quHalgaJpZM4KBt6o
.

Sincerely,

Bob Simons
IT Specialist
Environmental Research Division
NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center
99 Pacific St., Suite 255A (New!)
Monterey, CA 93940 (New!)
Phone: (831)333-9878 (New!)
Fax: (831)648-8440
Email: [email protected]

The contents of this message are mine personally and
do not necessarily reflect any position of the
Government or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Member

@BobSimons thanks for the clarification. If this means that a Hyrax server is just an OPeNDAP instance then I would propose we remove. Thoughts?

@BobSimons
Copy link

No. Please don't remove it.

Lots of servers use the DAP protocol: Hyrax, THREDDS, ERDDAP, PyDAP, GRADS,
...
But each one implements a different subset of the DAP specification.
And each one adds other features that aren't part of the DAP specification
(e.g., THREDDS adds the THREDDS catalog system, ERDDAP adds Make-A-Graph).
So each server is has a common core (DAP) and parts that are different.

Names like OPeNDAP:HYRAX are great because they say both:

  • This is a DAP server (so if I have a DAP client library, I can get data
    from this server).
  • Specifically, this is a HYRAX server. So if I have a choice, and if I
    like some specific extra feature offered by HYRAX, I might prefer this
    server.

"OPeNDAP" alone, or "HYRAX" alone doesn't convey that information.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Tom Kralidis [email protected]
wrote:

@BobSimons https://github.com/BobSimons thanks for the clarification.
If this means that a Hyrax server is just an OPeNDAP instance then I would
propose we remove. Thoughts?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#28 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABarOFP6aVzHOwc81OgJ4FHrv204F0rcks5quTXtgaJpZM4KBt6o
.

Sincerely,

Bob Simons
IT Specialist
Environmental Research Division
NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center
99 Pacific St., Suite 255A (New!)
Monterey, CA 93940 (New!)
Phone: (831)333-9878 (New!)
Fax: (831)648-8440
Email: [email protected]

The contents of this message are mine personally and
do not necessarily reflect any position of the
Government or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><

@tomkralidis
Copy link
Member

@BobSimons thanks for the helpful clarification. OK.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants