Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

model2owl requirements for ePO #609

Open
AchillesDougalis opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

model2owl requirements for ePO #609

AchillesDougalis opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
act: for internal discussion it needs to be discussed within the team module: none no module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release
Milestone

Comments

@AchillesDougalis
Copy link
Contributor

AchillesDougalis commented May 7, 2024

Proposed tasks for model2owl maintenance from the ePO perspective.

@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release act: for internal discussion it needs to be discussed within the team module: none no module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature labels May 7, 2024
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added this to the 4.2.0 milestone May 7, 2024
@cristianvasquez
Copy link
Contributor

cristianvasquez commented May 31, 2024

Added: OP-TED/model2owl#219

@andreea-pasare andreea-pasare modified the milestones: 4.2.0, miscellaneous Jul 9, 2024
@cristianvasquez
Copy link
Contributor

@andreea-pasare
It would be convenient to have a Github issue related to:

  • The OWL/RDF exports contain several owl:imports for the same vocabulary.

Perhaps is it already somewhere?

@cristianvasquez
Copy link
Contributor

Added: OP-TED/model2owl#220

@andreea-pasare
Copy link
Collaborator

@andreea-pasare It would be convenient to have a Github issue related to:

  • The OWL/RDF exports contain several owl:imports for the same vocabulary.

Perhaps is it already somewhere?

I added the following issue OP-TED/model2owl#213 for this purpose. I noticed it is already mentioned in the description of this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
act: for internal discussion it needs to be discussed within the team module: none no module in particular because the issue is of technical or documentation nature type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants