diff --git a/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-core.rdf b/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-core.rdf index ab63c7f0..a299a355 100644 --- a/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-core.rdf +++ b/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-core.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -52,16 +54,16 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - cat - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology core specification. - This version is automatically generated from eCatalogue_CM.xml on 2023-08-09 + eProcurement Ontology - eCatalogue + This module provides the definitions for the eCatalogue of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology eCatalogue specification. + This version is automatically generated from eCatalogue_CM.xml on 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -91,53 +93,6 @@ WG approval 16/05/2023 - - - Certificate - - - Proof of conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. - -Additional Information: -Certificates provide assurance of credibility, trust, and transparency in the procurement process. - -WG approval 16/05/2023 - - - - - - - - Certifier - - - The role of an agent who issues a certificate. - -Additional Information: -The certifier is responsible for verifying and confirming the conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. - -WG approval 16/05/2023 - - - - - - - Certification label - - - Concept that stands for a set of norms, expectations, standards and policies. - -Additional Information: -Such standards may relate to social, ethical and quality etc. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 - - - - - Item complementary relation @@ -191,19 +146,6 @@ WG Approval: 30/06/2022 - - - Catalogue fragment - - - A part of the Catalogue. - -Additional Information: -The Catalogue fragment generally represents a difference between two Catalogue versions, but there may be other use cases. - - - - Item model @@ -429,6 +371,13 @@ WG approval 16/05/2023 + + + Post award document + + + + Document-type @@ -436,6 +385,8 @@ WG approval 16/05/2023 Peppol uses a Document Type code including the code list UNCL1001: +https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ + https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/syntax/Catalogue/cac-CatalogueLine/cac-Item/cac-ItemSpecificationDocumentReference/cbc-DocumentTypeCode/ https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1001/ https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/Image/ @@ -468,15 +419,6 @@ https://service.unece.org/trade/untdid/d00a/tred/tred5153.htm Additional Information: https://service.unece.org/trade/untdid/d97a/uncl/uncl5305.htm - - - - Certification-label-type - - - * environmental/ecological/green, -* quality, -* social, etc. @@ -484,7 +426,9 @@ https://service.unece.org/trade/untdid/d97a/uncl/uncl5305.htm This reference stands for a context dependent controlled list: -CPV, UNSPC, UNCL7143 (for ordering) +CPV, UNSPC, UNCL7143 (for ordering) + +Needs to be aligned with eCatalogue in order to chose a codelist to be used. @@ -492,6 +436,24 @@ CPV, UNSPC, UNCL7143 (for ordering) Waiting for code list. + +Code that defines how the line should be applied to an existing eCatalogue. + +Additional information: + +Catalogue: +Legal codes on Catalogue header level: + +Add – Used when a catalogue is sent for the first time to the Catalogue Receiver referring to the contract in the header of the catalogue. +Replace – Replaces the entire catalogue referring to the contract. This is the default action. +Update – Updates a current catalogue. +Delete – deletes the entire catalogue + +Catalogue lines: + +Add – Used to add items to the catalogue. +Update – Used to update an item. The entire Catalogue Line is updated. Only used if Action code on header level is Update +Delete – Used to delete an entire Catalogue line. Only used if Action code on header level is Update. @@ -531,10 +493,6 @@ For example the list of possible Item types is available here: https://www.gs1.o Waiting for code list. - - - Vat-category - Plain literal @@ -638,21 +596,26 @@ For example the list of possible Item types is available here: https://www.gs1.o - - + + + + + + + + + + + Will this ever be a controlled vocabulary? To be proposed to EUVocabularies for publication. - - - To be checked in eInvoicing the relation to VAT code. -Awaiting a new change request on other types of TAX. Waiting for code list. @@ -727,68 +690,6 @@ Awaiting a new change request on other types of TAX. - - - Has validity period - - - The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Certificate -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) - - - - - - - Issued by certifier - - - Relation indicating the Certifier responsible for providing the ItemCertificate. - -Additional Information: -Certifier is a role played by an organisation. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-cat:Certificate -> epo-cat:Certifier (+epo-cat:issuedByCertifier)) - - - - - - - Attested by label - - - Relation indicating which label the certificate is about. - -WG approval 28/07/2022 (epo-cat:Certificate -> epo-cat:CertificationLabel (+epo-cat:attestedByLabel)) - - - - - - - Has certification - - - Relation to the proof of conformance. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (foaf:Person -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Item -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (org:Organization -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) - - - - - - - Has label type - - - - Is related to item @@ -803,27 +704,6 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023 (org:Organization -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCert - - - Updates catalogue - - - Relation indicating (epo-cat:CatalogueFragment -> epo-cat:Catalogue (+epo-cat:updatesCatalogue)) - - - - - - - Has activity code - - - Code that defines how the line should be applied to an existing eCatalogue. - (epo-cat:CatalogueFragment -> at-voc-new:activity-code (+epo-cat:hasActivityCode)) - - - - Has item classification @@ -872,10 +752,21 @@ WG Approval 16/05/2023 + + + Has activity code + + + + Has hazardous item u n d g code + + Specification of the hazardous nature of an item according to the UNDG classification schema. Provides detail of the classification and nature of a hazardous item. + (epo-cat:Item -> at-voc-new:dangerous-goods-list (+epo-cat:hasHazardousItemUNDGCode)) + @@ -1100,6 +991,18 @@ WG Approval: 30/06/2022 (epo-cat:Item -> epo-cat:Item (+epo-cat:hasAccessoryI + + + Has certification + + + Relation to the proof of conformance. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Item -> epo:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) + + + + Has seller item i d @@ -1331,17 +1234,6 @@ Some countries however may allow multiple contracts per order (i.e Italy). (epo - - - Has v a t category - - - Value-added tax category of the item. - (epo-ord:TaxInformation -> at-voc-new:vat-category (+epo-cat:hasVATCategory)) - - - - Is specific to line @@ -1356,51 +1248,21 @@ Some countries however may allow multiple contracts per order (i.e Italy). (epo Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-cat:Line -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) - - - Has certification number + + + Has document status - - The unique identifier of the certificate. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-cat:Certificate) + + https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ (epo-cat:PostAwardDocument -> at-voc-new:document-status (+epo:hasDocumentStatus)) - + - - - Has u r l - - - The identifier of a resource. - -Additional Information - -For example: - -1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; -2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; -3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; -4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) -5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; - -WG Approval 30/09/2019 - (epo-cat:Certificate) - - - - - - - Has reference u r i - - - A reference to where the label specification (norms, expectations, standards and policies) can be found. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-cat:CertificationLabel) + + + Has associated document - + @@ -1427,6 +1289,17 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023 WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Item) + + + Has manufacture date + + + The day of production. + (epo-cat:Batch) + + + + Has best before date @@ -1452,17 +1325,6 @@ WG approval 10/03/2021 - - - Has manufacture date - - - The day of production. - (epo-cat:Batch) - - - - Has attribute type @@ -1552,6 +1414,16 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Line) + + + Is in stock + + + Indicator whether an item is in the supplier's stock. If not in stock the supplier has to order the item. (epo-cat:Item) + + + + Has keyword @@ -1565,24 +1437,14 @@ WG Approval 7/04/2022 - - - Is in stock - - - Indicator whether an item is in the supplier's stock. If not in stock the supplier has to order the item. (epo-cat:Item) - - - - - - - Has orderable quantity increment + + + Is orderable - - Orderable quantity increment: The increment of Orderable units that can be ordered. (epo-cat:CatalogueLine) + + Indicator, if the item is orderable or not, e.g. because it is temporarily out of stock. (epo-cat:CatalogueLine) - + @@ -1595,14 +1457,14 @@ WG Approval 7/04/2022 - - - Has transaction conditions + + + Has orderable quantity increment - - Textual description of the specific transaction conditions (purchasing, sales, payment) for an item. (epo-cat:CatalogueLine) + + Orderable quantity increment: The increment of Orderable units that can be ordered. (epo-cat:CatalogueLine) - + @@ -1625,14 +1487,14 @@ WG Approval 7/04/2022 - - - Is orderable + + + Has transaction conditions - - Indicator, if the item is orderable or not, e.g. because it is temporarily out of stock. (epo-cat:CatalogueLine) + + Textual description of the specific transaction conditions (purchasing, sales, payment) for an item. (epo-cat:CatalogueLine) - + diff --git a/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-core.ttl b/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-core.ttl index cd50e717..eea75c12 100644 --- a/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-core.ttl +++ b/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-core.ttl @@ -34,14 +34,12 @@ WG acceptance 10/03/2022 """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Brand"@en . -:CatalogueFragment a owl:Class ; +:Catalogue a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - rdfs:subClassOf :Catalogue ; - skos:definition """A part of the Catalogue. - -Additional Information: -The Catalogue fragment generally represents a difference between two Catalogue versions, but there may be other use cases."""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Catalogue fragment"@en . + rdfs:subClassOf :PostAwardDocument ; + skos:definition """A Document describing a set of Items offered for purchase that can be processed in an electronic way. +"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Catalogue"@en . :CatalogueLine a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; @@ -65,38 +63,6 @@ Composition: e.g. information referring to its description, how to order it, wha """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Catalogue line"@en . -:Certificate a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """Proof of conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. - -Additional Information: -Certificates provide assurance of credibility, trust, and transparency in the procurement process. - -WG approval 16/05/2023 -"""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Certificate"@en . - -:CertificationLabel a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """Concept that stands for a set of norms, expectations, standards and policies. - -Additional Information: -Such standards may relate to social, ethical and quality etc. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 -"""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Certification label"@en . - -:Certifier a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """The role of an agent who issues a certificate. - -Additional Information: -The certifier is responsible for verifying and confirming the conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. - -WG approval 16/05/2023"""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Certifier"@en . - :ChargeInformation a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:definition """Information about tax, fee or duty imposed. @@ -239,6 +205,7 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022"""@en ; :ProductSpecification a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; + rdfs:subClassOf :PostAwardDocument ; skos:definition """Document providing information about an Item. WG approval 07/04/2022 @@ -246,13 +213,6 @@ WG approval 07/04/2022 """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Product specification"@en . -:attestedByLabel a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """Relation indicating which label the certificate is about. - -WG approval 28/07/2022 (epo-cat:Certificate -> epo-cat:CertificationLabel (+epo-cat:attestedByLabel)) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Attested by label"@en . - :comprisesCatalogueLine a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:prefLabel "Comprises catalogue line"@en . @@ -270,10 +230,12 @@ WG Approval: 30/06/2022 (epo-cat:Item -> epo-cat:Item (+epo-cat:hasAccessoryItem :hasActivityCode a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """Code that defines how the line should be applied to an existing eCatalogue. - (epo-cat:CatalogueFragment -> at-voc-new:activity-code (+epo-cat:hasActivityCode)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has activity code"@en . +:hasAssociatedDocument a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; + skos:prefLabel "Has associated document"@en . + :hasAttributeType a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:definition """The property defined in a classification scheme. @@ -323,20 +285,9 @@ WG Approval 16/05/2023 rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:definition """Relation to the proof of conformance. -WG approval 30/05/2023 (foaf:Person -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Item -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (org:Organization -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) """@en ; +WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Item -> epo:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has certification"@en . -:hasCertificationNumber a owl:DatatypeProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """The unique identifier of the certificate. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-cat:Certificate) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has certification number"@en . - :hasChargeInformation a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:prefLabel "Has charge information"@en . @@ -383,6 +334,11 @@ WG Approval: 19/05/2022 skos:definition "Textual description of the item's dimensions. (epo-cat:Item) "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has dimension description"@en . +:hasDocumentStatus a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; + skos:definition "https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ (epo-cat:PostAwardDocument -> at-voc-new:document-status (+epo:hasDocumentStatus)) "@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Has document status"@en . + :hasDocumentType a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:prefLabel "Has document type"@en . @@ -424,6 +380,8 @@ WG approval 10/03/2021 :hasHazardousItemUNDGCode a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; + skos:definition """Specification of the hazardous nature of an item according to the UNDG classification schema. Provides detail of the classification and nature of a hazardous item. + (epo-cat:Item -> at-voc-new:dangerous-goods-list (+epo-cat:hasHazardousItemUNDGCode)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has hazardous item u n d g code"@en . :hasItemClassification a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -455,10 +413,6 @@ WG Approval 7/04/2022 (epo-cat:Item) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has keyword"@en . -:hasLabelType a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:prefLabel "Has label type"@en . - :hasLiteralValue a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:definition """Simple value of the property, which is defined in a classification scheme. @@ -584,13 +538,6 @@ WG approval 28/07/2022 (epo-cat:ItemProperty -> epo:Quantity (+epo-cat:hasQualif rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:prefLabel "Has quantity threshold"@en . -:hasReferenceURI a owl:DatatypeProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """A reference to where the label specification (norms, expectations, standards and policies) can be found. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-cat:CertificationLabel) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has reference u r i"@en . - :hasSellerItemID a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:definition """ The general identifier for the concept as defined by the seller. @@ -653,39 +600,6 @@ The unit must be indicated in the Quantity, with a quantity value of 1. (epo-cat (epo-cat:CatalogueLine -> at-voc-new:transaction-conditions (+epo-cat:hasTransactionConditionsCode)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has transaction conditions code"@en . -:hasURL a owl:DatatypeProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """The identifier of a resource. - -Additional Information - -For example: - -1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; -2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; -3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; -4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) -5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; - -WG Approval 30/09/2019 - (epo-cat:Certificate) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has u r l"@en . - -:hasVATCategory a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """Value-added tax category of the item. - (epo-ord:TaxInformation -> at-voc-new:vat-category (+epo-cat:hasVATCategory)) """@en ; - skos:editorialNote """To be checked in eInvoicing the relation to VAT code. -Awaiting a new change request on other types of TAX. """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has v a t category"@en . - -:hasValidityPeriod a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Certificate -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has validity period"@en . - :hasWarrantyInformation a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:definition "Warranty information that applies to the catalogue line item. (epo-cat:CatalogueLine) "@en ; @@ -728,16 +642,6 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Certificate -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPerio rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:prefLabel "Is subordinated to contract"@en . -:issuedByCertifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """Relation indicating the Certifier responsible for providing the ItemCertificate. - -Additional Information: -Certifier is a role played by an organisation. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-cat:Certificate -> epo-cat:Certifier (+epo-cat:issuedByCertifier)) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Issued by certifier"@en . - :refersToCatalogue a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:definition """ @@ -777,22 +681,29 @@ The reference to the catalogue line is for information only, to trace the source rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:prefLabel "Specifies seller"@en . -:updatesCatalogue a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition "Relation indicating (epo-cat:CatalogueFragment -> epo-cat:Catalogue (+epo-cat:updatesCatalogue)) "@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Updates catalogue"@en . - at-voc-new:activity-code a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:definition """Waiting for code list. + +Code that defines how the line should be applied to an existing eCatalogue. + +Additional information: + +Catalogue: +Legal codes on Catalogue header level: + +Add – Used when a catalogue is sent for the first time to the Catalogue Receiver referring to the contract in the header of the catalogue. +Replace – Replaces the entire catalogue referring to the contract. This is the default action. +Update – Updates a current catalogue. +Delete – deletes the entire catalogue + +Catalogue lines: + +Add – Used to add items to the catalogue. +Update – Used to update an item. The entire Catalogue Line is updated. Only used if Action code on header level is Update +Delete – Used to delete an entire Catalogue line. Only used if Action code on header level is Update. """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Activity-code"@en . -at-voc-new:certification-label-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; - skos:definition """* environmental/ecological/green, -* quality, -* social, etc."""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Certification-label-type"@en . - at-voc-new:dangerous-goods-list a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:editorialNote """Will this ever be a controlled vocabulary? @@ -818,6 +729,8 @@ For example the list of possible Item types is available here: https://www.gs1.o at-voc-new:document-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:definition """Peppol uses a Document Type code including the code list UNCL1001: +https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ + https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/syntax/Catalogue/cac-CatalogueLine/cac-Item/cac-ItemSpecificationDocumentReference/cbc-DocumentTypeCode/ https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1001/ https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/Image/"""@en ; @@ -825,7 +738,9 @@ https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/Image/"""@en ; at-voc-new:item-classification a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:definition """This reference stands for a context dependent controlled list: -CPV, UNSPC, UNCL7143 (for ordering)"""@en ; +CPV, UNSPC, UNCL7143 (for ordering) + +Needs to be aligned with eCatalogue in order to chose a codelist to be used."""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Item-classification"@en . at-voc-new:orderable-unit a skos:ConceptScheme ; @@ -859,9 +774,6 @@ at-voc-new:transaction-conditions a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:editorialNote "Waiting for code list."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Transaction-conditions"@en . -at-voc-new:vat-category a skos:ConceptScheme ; - skos:prefLabel "Vat-category"@en . - dcterms:description a owl:DatatypeProperty ; skos:definition """An account of the resource. @@ -952,16 +864,14 @@ adms:identifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; skos:definition "Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-cat:Line -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Identifier"@en . -:Catalogue a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; - skos:definition """A Document describing a set of Items offered for purchase that can be processed in an electronic way. -"""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Catalogue"@en . - :Line a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:prefLabel "Line"@en . +:PostAwardDocument a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; + skos:prefLabel "Post award document"@en . + :ItemRelation a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :cat ; skos:definition """Connection between two Items. @@ -973,13 +883,13 @@ WG Approval: 30/06/2022 :cat a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology core specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology eCatalogue specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eCatalogue of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - cat"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eCatalogue"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-cat" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -1004,5 +914,5 @@ WG Approval: 30/06/2022 owl:priorVersion "3.1.0" ; owl:versionIRI :cat-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; - skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eCatalogue_CM.xml on 2023-08-09" . + skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eCatalogue_CM.xml on 2023-09-12" . diff --git a/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-restrictions.rdf b/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-restrictions.rdf index fc7f68bd..c8ec9e06 100644 --- a/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-restrictions.rdf +++ b/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-restrictions.rdf @@ -16,11 +16,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -54,17 +56,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - cat - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification. + eProcurement Ontology - eCatalogue + This module provides the definitions for the eCatalogue of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification. This version is automatically generated from eCatalogue_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -113,15 +115,6 @@ - - - - - - - - - @@ -176,39 +169,6 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - @@ -236,7 +196,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -244,7 +204,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -252,7 +212,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -281,14 +241,6 @@ - - - - - 1 - - - @@ -300,7 +252,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -316,7 +268,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -332,7 +284,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -356,7 +308,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -427,6 +379,20 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -435,25 +401,6 @@ - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - @@ -465,17 +412,6 @@ - - - - - 1 - - - - - - @@ -576,13 +512,13 @@ - + - + @@ -600,30 +536,9 @@ - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -647,6 +562,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -659,12 +580,6 @@ - - - - - - @@ -714,23 +629,23 @@ - - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - + + @@ -738,11 +653,11 @@ - + - - + + @@ -756,11 +671,11 @@ - + - - + + @@ -769,7 +684,7 @@ - + @@ -810,41 +725,6 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -857,15 +737,6 @@ - - - - - - - - - @@ -893,6 +764,16 @@ + + + + + + + + + + @@ -1035,6 +916,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -1164,9 +1051,6 @@ - - - @@ -1179,4 +1063,20 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-restrictions.ttl b/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-restrictions.ttl index f3001d93..cdda8294 100644 --- a/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-restrictions.ttl +++ b/implementation/eCatalogue/owl_ontology/eCatalogue_CM-restrictions.ttl @@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ :cat-restriction a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eCatalogue of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - cat"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eCatalogue"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-cat" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -51,15 +51,20 @@ owl:versionIRI :cat-restriction-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eCatalogue_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . :hasAccessoryItem a owl:AsymmetricProperty ; rdfs:domain :Item ; rdfs:range :Item . -:hasActivityCode rdfs:domain :CatalogueFragment ; +:hasActivityCode rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :Catalogue :CatalogueLine ) ] ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . +:hasAssociatedDocument rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :DespatchAdvice :DespatchLine ) ] ; + rdfs:range :PostAwardDocument . + :hasBaseQuantity rdfs:domain :Price ; rdfs:range :Quantity . @@ -72,8 +77,7 @@ :hasCatalogueLineValidity rdfs:domain :CatalogueLine ; rdfs:range :Period . -:hasCertification rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( foaf:Person :Item org:Organization ) ] ; +:hasCertification rdfs:domain :Item ; rdfs:range :Certificate . :hasChargeInformation rdfs:domain :CatalogueLine ; @@ -95,7 +99,10 @@ :hasDimensionDescription rdfs:domain :Item ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:hasDocumentType rdfs:domain :ProductSpecification ; +:hasDocumentStatus rdfs:domain :PostAwardDocument ; + rdfs:range skos:Concept . + +:hasDocumentType rdfs:domain :PostAwardDocument ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . :hasExpectedDeliveryTime rdfs:domain :Price ; @@ -107,6 +114,9 @@ :hasFreightAllowanceCharge rdfs:domain :Consignment ; rdfs:range :ChargeInformation . +:hasHazardousClass rdfs:domain :Item ; + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . + :hasHazardousItemUNDGCode rdfs:domain :Item ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -119,9 +129,6 @@ :hasKeyword rdfs:domain :Item ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:hasLabelType rdfs:domain :CertificationLabel ; - rdfs:range skos:Concept . - :hasManufacturerID rdfs:domain :Manufacturer ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . @@ -188,12 +195,6 @@ :hasTransactionConditionsCode rdfs:domain :CatalogueLine ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . -:hasVATCategory rdfs:domain :TaxInformation ; - rdfs:range skos:Concept . - -:hasValidityPeriod rdfs:domain :Certificate ; - rdfs:range :Period . - :isSpecificToLine rdfs:domain :InformationHub ; rdfs:range :Line . @@ -240,10 +241,6 @@ dcterms:requires a owl:AsymmetricProperty ; adms:identifier rdfs:domain :Line ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . -:attestedByLabel a owl:FunctionalProperty ; - rdfs:domain :Certificate ; - rdfs:range :CertificationLabel . - :comprisesCatalogueLine rdfs:domain :Catalogue ; rdfs:range :CatalogueLine . @@ -261,10 +258,6 @@ adms:identifier rdfs:domain :Line ; :hasBrand rdfs:domain :Item ; rdfs:range :Brand . -:hasCertificationNumber a owl:FunctionalProperty ; - rdfs:domain :Certificate ; - rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . - :hasClassificationScheme a owl:FunctionalProperty ; rdfs:domain :ItemProperty ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -275,9 +268,6 @@ adms:identifier rdfs:domain :Line ; :hasFactor rdfs:domain :ItemRelation ; rdfs:range xsd:decimal . -:hasHazardousClass rdfs:domain :Item ; - rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . - :hasLiteralValue rdfs:domain :ItemProperty ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -303,18 +293,12 @@ adms:identifier rdfs:domain :Line ; :hasPriceSurchargeInformation rdfs:domain :Price ; rdfs:range :ChargeInformation . -:hasReferenceURI rdfs:domain :CertificationLabel ; - rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . - :hasSpecificPaymentArrangement rdfs:domain :Catalogue ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . :hasTransactionConditions rdfs:domain :CatalogueLine ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:hasURL rdfs:domain :Certificate ; - rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . - :hasWarrantyInformation rdfs:domain :CatalogueLine ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -335,29 +319,16 @@ adms:identifier rdfs:domain :Line ; rdfs:domain :ItemRelation ; rdfs:range :Item . -:issuedByCertifier rdfs:domain :Certificate ; - rdfs:range :Certifier . - :specifiesItem a owl:FunctionalProperty ; rdfs:domain :Line ; rdfs:range :Item . -:updatesCatalogue a owl:FunctionalProperty ; - rdfs:domain :CatalogueFragment ; - rdfs:range :Catalogue . - at-voc-new:activity-code a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:hasValue at-voc-new:activity-code ; owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . -at-voc-new:certification-label-type a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; - owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:hasValue at-voc-new:certification-label-type ; - owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . - at-voc-new:dangerous-goods-list a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -412,12 +383,6 @@ at-voc-new:transaction-conditions a owl:Class ; owl:hasValue at-voc-new:transaction-conditions ; owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . -at-voc-new:vat-category a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; - owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:hasValue at-voc-new:vat-category ; - owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . - dcterms:replaces rdfs:domain :Item ; rdfs:range :Item . @@ -426,10 +391,6 @@ dcterms:replaces rdfs:domain :Item ; owl:cardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty dcterms:title ] . -:CatalogueFragment rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :updatesCatalogue ] . - :ItemModel a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; @@ -439,16 +400,12 @@ dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :Item :Line ) ] ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:CertificationLabel rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReferenceURI ] . - :ItemRelation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isRelatedToItem ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasFactor ] . + owl:onProperty :hasFactor ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isRelatedToItem ] . dcterms:title a owl:FunctionalProperty ; rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; @@ -465,18 +422,21 @@ dcterms:title a owl:FunctionalProperty ; :Batch rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasBestBeforeDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasExpiryDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasManufactureDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasBestBeforeDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isProductionOf ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasExpiryDate ] . + owl:onProperty :hasManufactureDate ] . :ItemProperty rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasAttributeType ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasLiteralValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -484,39 +444,20 @@ dcterms:title a owl:FunctionalProperty ; owl:onProperty :hasClassificationScheme ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :describesItem ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAttributeType ] . + owl:onProperty :describesItem ] . -:Certificate rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasURL ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasCertificationNumber ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; +:Catalogue rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :issuedByCertifier ], + owl:onProperty :hasSpecificPaymentArrangement ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :attestedByLabel ] . - -:Catalogue rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :comprisesCatalogueLine ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasSpecificPaymentArrangement ] . + owl:onProperty :comprisesCatalogueLine ] . :Price rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasPriceSurchargeInformation ] . :CatalogueLine rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasTransactionConditions ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasOrderableUnitFactorRate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -524,16 +465,19 @@ dcterms:title a owl:FunctionalProperty ; owl:onProperty :hasOrderableQuantityIncrement ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasWarrantyInformation ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isContractedItem ], + owl:onProperty :hasTransactionConditions ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isOrderable ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPrice ] . + owl:onProperty :hasPrice ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isContractedItem ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasWarrantyInformation ] . :Item a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -541,22 +485,19 @@ dcterms:title a owl:FunctionalProperty ; owl:onProperty dcterms:description ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasBrand ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty dcterms:title ], + owl:onProperty :isInStock ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasModel ], + owl:onProperty :hasBrand ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasManufacturer ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isInStock ], + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty dcterms:title ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasHazardousClass ] . + owl:onProperty :hasModel ] . [] a ; owl:members ( :ItemComplementaryRelation :ItemAccessoryRelation :ItemComposition :ItemReplacement :ItemRequirement ) . @@ -567,9 +508,15 @@ dcterms:title a owl:FunctionalProperty ; [] a ; owl:members ( :ItemComplementaryRelation :ItemAccessoryRelation :ItemComposition :ItemReplacement :ItemRequirement ) . +[] a ; + owl:members ( :ProductSpecification :Catalogue ) . + [] a ; owl:members ( :ItemComplementaryRelation :ItemAccessoryRelation :ItemComposition :ItemReplacement :ItemRequirement ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :ItemComplementaryRelation :ItemAccessoryRelation :ItemComposition :ItemReplacement :ItemRequirement ) . +[] a ; + owl:members ( :ProductSpecification :Catalogue ) . + diff --git a/implementation/eCatalogue/shacl_shapes/eCatalogue_CM-shacl.rdf b/implementation/eCatalogue/shacl_shapes/eCatalogue_CM-shacl.rdf index ab94913e..da17375e 100644 --- a/implementation/eCatalogue/shacl_shapes/eCatalogue_CM-shacl.rdf +++ b/implementation/eCatalogue/shacl_shapes/eCatalogue_CM-shacl.rdf @@ -17,11 +17,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -57,17 +59,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - cat - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + eProcurement Ontology - eCatalogue + This module provides the definitions for the eCatalogue of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. This artefact provides the datashape specification. This version is automatically generated from eCatalogue_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -99,59 +101,6 @@ WG approval 16/05/2023 - - - - - Certificate - - - Proof of conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. - -Additional Information: -Certificates provide assurance of credibility, trust, and transparency in the procurement process. - -WG approval 16/05/2023 - - - - - - - - - - Certifier - - - The role of an agent who issues a certificate. - -Additional Information: -The certifier is responsible for verifying and confirming the conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. - -WG approval 16/05/2023 - - - - - - - - - Certification label - - - Concept that stands for a set of norms, expectations, standards and policies. - -Additional Information: -Such standards may relate to social, ethical and quality etc. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 - - - - - @@ -213,21 +162,6 @@ WG Approval: 30/06/2022 - - - - - Catalogue fragment - - - A part of the Catalogue. - -Additional Information: -The Catalogue fragment generally represents a difference between two Catalogue versions, but there may be other use cases. - - - - @@ -481,87 +415,15 @@ WG approval 16/05/2023 - - - - - - - - Has certification number - - - The unique identifier of the certificate. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has u r l - - - The identifier of a resource. - -Additional Information - -For example: - -1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; -2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; -3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; -4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) -5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; - -WG Approval 30/09/2019 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has reference u r i - - - A reference to where the label specification (norms, expectations, standards and policies) can be found. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 + + + + + Post award document - + - - - - - 1 - @@ -632,6 +494,28 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023 1 1 + + + + + + + + Has manufacture date + + + The day of production. + + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -679,28 +563,6 @@ WG approval 10/03/2021 1 - - - - - - - - Has manufacture date - - - The day of production. - - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -788,6 +650,30 @@ WG approval 28/07/2022 1 + + + + + + + + Title + + + A name given to the resource. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + + + 1 + 1 + @@ -814,30 +700,6 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 1 - - - - - - - - Title - - - A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - @@ -874,7 +736,25 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023 - + + + + + + + + Is in stock + + + Indicator whether an item is in the supplier's stock. If not in stock the supplier has to order the item. + + + + + + + + 1 @@ -898,46 +778,25 @@ WG Approval 7/04/2022 - - - - - - - - Is in stock - - - Indicator whether an item is in the supplier's stock. If not in stock the supplier has to order the item. - - - - - - - - - 1 - - + - - + + - - Has orderable quantity increment + + Is orderable - - Orderable quantity increment: The increment of Orderable units that can be ordered. + + Indicator, if the item is orderable or not, e.g. because it is temporarily out of stock. - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -962,24 +821,24 @@ WG Approval 7/04/2022 1 - + - - + + - - Has transaction conditions + + Has orderable quantity increment - - Textual description of the specific transaction conditions (purchasing, sales, payment) for an item. + + Orderable quantity increment: The increment of Orderable units that can be ordered. - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -1025,24 +884,24 @@ WG Approval 7/04/2022 1 - + - - + + - - Is orderable + + Has transaction conditions - - Indicator, if the item is orderable or not, e.g. because it is temporarily out of stock. + + Textual description of the specific transaction conditions (purchasing, sales, payment) for an item. - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -1136,82 +995,6 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 Has charge information - - - - - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#issuedByCertifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#issuedByCertifier> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Issued by certifier - - - Relation indicating the Certifier responsible for providing the ItemCertificate. - -Additional Information: -Certifier is a role played by an organisation. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#attestedByLabel> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#attestedByLabel> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Attested by label - - - Relation indicating which label the certificate is about. - -WG approval 28/07/2022 - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasCertification> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasCertification> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Has certification - - - Relation to the proof of conformance. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - @@ -1250,30 +1033,6 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023 Has qualified item relation - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#updatesCatalogue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#updatesCatalogue> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Updates catalogue - - - Relation indicating - @@ -1646,19 +1405,19 @@ WG Approval: 30/06/2022 Is specific to line - + - + 1 - - + + - + - + Has document type @@ -1676,43 +1435,6 @@ WG Approval: 30/06/2022 Has price type - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has label type - - - The label type such environmental, quality, social etc. - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has activity code - - - Code that defines how the line should be applied to an existing eCatalogue. - - @@ -1733,12 +1455,39 @@ Examples of classification schemes are: CPV, UNSPC, eCl@ss, GPC, ... WG acceptance 10/03/2022 - - + + - + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has activity code + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + Has activity code + + + + @@ -1809,10 +1558,6 @@ WG acceptance 10/03/2022 To be proposed to EUVocabularies for publication. - - - To be checked in eInvoicing the relation to VAT code. -Awaiting a new change request on other types of TAX. Waiting for code list. diff --git a/implementation/eCatalogue/shacl_shapes/eCatalogue_CM-shacl.ttl b/implementation/eCatalogue/shacl_shapes/eCatalogue_CM-shacl.ttl index e79949b6..eb9d2250 100644 --- a/implementation/eCatalogue/shacl_shapes/eCatalogue_CM-shacl.ttl +++ b/implementation/eCatalogue/shacl_shapes/eCatalogue_CM-shacl.ttl @@ -57,20 +57,10 @@ cat-shape:epo-cat-Catalogue a sh:NodeShape ; """ ; rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; sh:property cat-shape:epo-cat-Catalogue-epo-cat-comprisesCatalogueLine, + cat-shape:epo-cat-Catalogue-epo-cat-hasActivityCode, cat-shape:epo-cat-Catalogue-epo-cat-hasSpecificPaymentArrangement ; sh:targetClass :Catalogue . -cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueFragment a sh:NodeShape ; - rdfs:label "Catalogue fragment" ; - rdfs:comment """A part of the Catalogue. - -Additional Information: -The Catalogue fragment generally represents a difference between two Catalogue versions, but there may be other use cases.""" ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; - sh:property cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueFragment-epo-cat-hasActivityCode, - cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueFragment-epo-cat-updatesCatalogue ; - sh:targetClass :CatalogueFragment . - cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Catalogue line" ; rdfs:comment """Aggregated information about the Terms and specifications for procuring an Item. @@ -91,7 +81,8 @@ Composition: e.g. information referring to its description, how to order it, wha """ ; rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; - sh:property cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-hasChargeInformation, + sh:property cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-hasActivityCode, + cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-hasChargeInformation, cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-hasOrderableQuantityIncrement, cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-hasOrderableUnit, cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-hasOrderableUnitFactorRate, @@ -104,47 +95,6 @@ Composition: e.g. information referring to its description, how to order it, wha cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-isOrderable ; sh:targetClass :CatalogueLine . -cat-shape:epo-cat-Certificate a sh:NodeShape ; - rdfs:label "Certificate" ; - rdfs:comment """Proof of conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. - -Additional Information: -Certificates provide assurance of credibility, trust, and transparency in the procurement process. - -WG approval 16/05/2023 -""" ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; - sh:property cat-shape:epo-cat-Certificate-epo-cat-attestedByLabel, - cat-shape:epo-cat-Certificate-epo-cat-hasCertificationNumber, - cat-shape:epo-cat-Certificate-epo-cat-issuedByCertifier, - cat-shape:epo-cat-Certificate-epo-hasURL ; - sh:targetClass :Certificate . - -cat-shape:epo-cat-CertificationLabel a sh:NodeShape ; - rdfs:label "Certification label" ; - rdfs:comment """Concept that stands for a set of norms, expectations, standards and policies. - -Additional Information: -Such standards may relate to social, ethical and quality etc. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 -""" ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; - sh:property cat-shape:epo-cat-CertificationLabel-epo-cat-hasLabelType, - cat-shape:epo-cat-CertificationLabel-epo-cat-hasReferenceURI ; - sh:targetClass :CertificationLabel . - -cat-shape:epo-cat-Certifier a sh:NodeShape ; - rdfs:label "Certifier" ; - rdfs:comment """The role of an agent who issues a certificate. - -Additional Information: -The certifier is responsible for verifying and confirming the conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. - -WG approval 16/05/2023""" ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; - sh:targetClass :Certifier . - cat-shape:epo-cat-ChargeInformation a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Charge information" ; rdfs:comment """Information about tax, fee or duty imposed. @@ -200,8 +150,7 @@ WG approval 30/06/2022""" ; cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-cat-hasModel, cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-cat-hasQualifiedItemRelation, cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-cat-hasSpecification, - cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-cat-isInStock, - cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-hasCertification ; + cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-cat-isInStock ; sh:targetClass :Item . cat-shape:epo-cat-ItemAccessoryRelation a sh:NodeShape ; @@ -326,6 +275,12 @@ Examples of supplier roles: seller, despatch party, creditor, economic operator. rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; sh:targetClass :Manufacturer . +cat-shape:epo-cat-PostAwardDocument a sh:NodeShape ; + rdfs:label "Post award document" ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; + sh:property cat-shape:epo-cat-PostAwardDocument-epo-cat-hasDocumentType ; + sh:targetClass :PostAwardDocument . + cat-shape:epo-cat-Price a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Price" ; rdfs:comment """Amount of money required or given in exchange for Items. @@ -347,12 +302,8 @@ WG approval 07/04/2022 """ ; rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; - sh:property cat-shape:epo-cat-ProductSpecification-epo-cat-hasDocumentType ; sh:targetClass :ProductSpecification . -cat-shape:epo-ord-TaxInformation-epo-cat-hasVATCategory sh:description """To be checked in eInvoicing the relation to VAT code. -Awaiting a new change request on other types of TAX. """ . - cat-shape:epo-cat-Batch-epo-cat-hasBestBeforeDate a sh:PropertyShape ; rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; sh:datatype xsd:date ; @@ -410,6 +361,12 @@ cat-shape:epo-cat-Catalogue-epo-cat-comprisesCatalogueLine a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:path :comprisesCatalogueLine ; sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . +cat-shape:epo-cat-Catalogue-epo-cat-hasActivityCode a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class at-voc-new:activity-code ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has activity code" ; + sh:path :hasActivityCode . + cat-shape:epo-cat-Catalogue-epo-cat-hasSpecificPaymentArrangement a sh:PropertyShape ; rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; @@ -425,23 +382,12 @@ WG approval 30/06/2022 sh:name "Has specific payment arrangement" ; sh:path :hasSpecificPaymentArrangement . -cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueFragment-epo-cat-hasActivityCode a sh:PropertyShape ; +cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-hasActivityCode a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:class at-voc-new:activity-code ; - sh:description """Code that defines how the line should be applied to an existing eCatalogue. -""" ; sh:maxCount 1 ; sh:name "Has activity code" ; sh:path :hasActivityCode . -cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueFragment-epo-cat-updatesCatalogue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Catalogue ; - sh:description "Relation indicating" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Updates catalogue" ; - sh:path :updatesCatalogue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-hasChargeInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:class :ChargeInformation ; sh:name "Has charge information" ; @@ -528,79 +474,6 @@ cat-shape:epo-cat-CatalogueLine-epo-cat-isOrderable a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:name "Is orderable" ; sh:path :isOrderable . -cat-shape:epo-cat-Certificate-epo-cat-attestedByLabel a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :CertificationLabel ; - sh:description """Relation indicating which label the certificate is about. - -WG approval 28/07/2022""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Attested by label" ; - sh:path :attestedByLabel ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -cat-shape:epo-cat-Certificate-epo-cat-hasCertificationNumber a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The unique identifier of the certificate. - -WG approval 26/07/2022""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has certification number" ; - sh:path :hasCertificationNumber . - -cat-shape:epo-cat-Certificate-epo-cat-issuedByCertifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Certifier ; - sh:description """Relation indicating the Certifier responsible for providing the ItemCertificate. - -Additional Information: -Certifier is a role played by an organisation. - -WG approval 26/07/2022""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Issued by certifier" ; - sh:path :issuedByCertifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -cat-shape:epo-cat-Certificate-epo-hasURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """The identifier of a resource. - -Additional Information - -For example: - -1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; -2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; -3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; -4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) -5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; - -WG Approval 30/09/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has u r l" ; - sh:path :hasURL . - -cat-shape:epo-cat-CertificationLabel-epo-cat-hasLabelType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc-new:certification-label-type ; - sh:description "The label type such environmental, quality, social etc." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has label type" ; - sh:path :hasLabelType . - -cat-shape:epo-cat-CertificationLabel-epo-cat-hasReferenceURI a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """A reference to where the label specification (norms, expectations, standards and policies) can be found. - -WG approval 26/07/2022""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has reference u r i" ; - sh:path :hasReferenceURI . - cat-shape:epo-cat-InformationHub-epo-cat-isSpecificToLine a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:class :Line ; sh:name "Is specific to line" ; @@ -726,7 +599,6 @@ cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-cat-hasHazardousClass a sh:PropertyShape ; rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; sh:description "Specification of the hazardous nature of an item according to a classification schema. Provides detail of the classification and nature of a hazardous item." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; sh:name "Has hazardous class" ; sh:path :hasHazardousClass . @@ -734,7 +606,6 @@ cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-cat-hasHazardousItemUNDGCode a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:class at-voc-new:dangerous-goods-list ; sh:description """Specification of the hazardous nature of an item according to the UNDG classification schema. Provides detail of the classification and nature of a hazardous item. """ ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; sh:name "Has hazardous item u n d g code" ; sh:path :hasHazardousItemUNDGCode . @@ -794,15 +665,6 @@ cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-cat-isInStock a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:name "Is in stock" ; sh:path :isInStock . -cat-shape:epo-cat-Item-epo-hasCertification a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Certificate ; - sh:description """Relation to the proof of conformance. - -WG approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Has certification" ; - sh:path :hasCertification ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - cat-shape:epo-cat-ItemModel-dct-title a sh:PropertyShape ; rdfs:isDefinedBy cat-shape:cat-shape ; sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; @@ -907,6 +769,12 @@ cat-shape:epo-cat-Line-epo-cat-specifiesItem a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:path :specifiesItem ; sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . +cat-shape:epo-cat-PostAwardDocument-epo-cat-hasDocumentType a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class at-voc-new:document-type ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has document type" ; + sh:path :hasDocumentType . + cat-shape:epo-cat-Price-epo-cat-hasPriceType a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:class at-voc-new:price-type ; sh:maxCount 1 ; @@ -920,22 +788,16 @@ cat-shape:epo-cat-Price-epo-hasPriceSurchargeInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:path :hasPriceSurchargeInformation ; sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . -cat-shape:epo-cat-ProductSpecification-epo-cat-hasDocumentType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc-new:document-type ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has document type" ; - sh:path :hasDocumentType . - cat-shape:cat-shape a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the datashape specification. " ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eCatalogue of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - cat"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eCatalogue"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-cat" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -963,5 +825,5 @@ cat-shape:cat-shape a owl:Ontology ; owl:versionIRI cat-shape:cat-shape-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eCatalogue_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . diff --git a/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-core.rdf b/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-core.rdf index b8d66295..6dbf35c8 100644 --- a/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-core.rdf +++ b/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-core.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -52,16 +54,16 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - con - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology core specification. - This version is automatically generated from eContract_CM.xml on 2023-08-09 + eProcurement Ontology - eContract + This module provides the definitions for the eContract of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology eContract specification. + This version is automatically generated from eContract_CM.xml on 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -98,7 +100,35 @@ - + + + Plain literal + + + + Any u r i + + + + Boolean + + + + Date + + + + Date time + + + + Decimal + + + + Integer + + only to be used in the last section of standard form 20 @@ -122,18 +152,11 @@ - - - Has contract modification information + + + Updates contract value - - - - - - Has restated contract value - - + @@ -143,6 +166,13 @@ + + + Concerns contract amendment + + + + Announces contract amendment @@ -150,11 +180,11 @@ - - - Refers to e form section identifier + + + Relates to e form section identifier - + diff --git a/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-core.ttl b/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-core.ttl index cccbdd6f..9f205798 100644 --- a/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-core.ttl +++ b/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-core.ttl @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ @prefix foaf: . @prefix org: . @prefix owl: . +@prefix rdf: . @prefix rdfs: . @prefix skos: . @prefix vann: . @@ -33,9 +34,9 @@ rdfs:isDefinedBy :con ; skos:prefLabel "Announces contract amendment"@en . -:hasContractModificationInformation a owl:ObjectProperty ; +:concernsContractAmendment a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :con ; - skos:prefLabel "Has contract modification information"@en . + skos:prefLabel "Concerns contract amendment"@en . :hasModificationDescription a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :con ; @@ -85,33 +86,54 @@ WG Approval 5/11/2019 rdfs:isDefinedBy :con ; skos:prefLabel "Has quantity"@en . -:hasRestatedContractValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :con ; - skos:editorialNote "only to be used in the last section of standard form 20"@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has restated contract value"@en . - :hasTotalValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :con ; skos:prefLabel "Has total value"@en . -:refersToEFormSectionIdentifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; +:relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :con ; - skos:prefLabel "Refers to e form section identifier"@en . + skos:prefLabel "Relates to e form section identifier"@en . :specifiesDeliverable a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :con ; skos:prefLabel "Specifies deliverable"@en . +:updatesContractValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :con ; + skos:editorialNote "only to be used in the last section of standard form 20"@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Updates contract value"@en . + +rdf:PlainLiteral a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Plain literal"@en . + +xsd:anyURI a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Any u r i"@en . + +xsd:boolean a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Boolean"@en . + +xsd:date a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Date"@en . + +xsd:dateTime a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Date time"@en . + +xsd:decimal a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Decimal"@en . + +xsd:integer a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Integer"@en . + :con a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology core specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology eContract specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eContract of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - con"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eContract"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-con" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -136,5 +158,5 @@ WG Approval 5/11/2019 owl:priorVersion "3.1.0" ; owl:versionIRI :con-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; - skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eContract_CM.xml on 2023-08-09" . + skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eContract_CM.xml on 2023-09-12" . diff --git a/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-restrictions.rdf b/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-restrictions.rdf index 359d1b6e..8cc3607d 100644 --- a/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-restrictions.rdf +++ b/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-restrictions.rdf @@ -16,11 +16,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -54,17 +56,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - con - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification. + eProcurement Ontology - eContract + This module provides the definitions for the eContract of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification. This version is automatically generated from eContract_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -93,14 +95,17 @@ - + - - 1 + + 1 + + + @@ -134,16 +139,10 @@ - - - - - - - + - + @@ -152,16 +151,22 @@ + + + + + + - + - + diff --git a/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-restrictions.ttl b/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-restrictions.ttl index 5fa87ed3..74e4ce0c 100644 --- a/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-restrictions.ttl +++ b/implementation/eContract/owl_ontology/eContract_CM-restrictions.ttl @@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ :con-restriction a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eContract of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - con"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eContract"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-con" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ owl:versionIRI :con-restriction-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eContract_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . :hasModificationJustification rdfs:domain :ContractModificationInformation ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -64,20 +64,21 @@ :hasQuantity rdfs:domain :Deliverable ; rdfs:range :Quantity . -:hasRestatedContractValue rdfs:domain :ContractAmendment ; - rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . - :hasTotalValue rdfs:domain :Deliverable ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . -:refersToEFormSectionIdentifier rdfs:domain :ContractModificationInformation ; +:relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier rdfs:domain :ContractModificationInformation ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . :specifiesDeliverable rdfs:domain :Contract ; rdfs:range :Deliverable . -:hasContractModificationInformation rdfs:domain :ContractAmendment ; - rdfs:range :ContractModificationInformation . +:updatesContractValue rdfs:domain :ContractAmendment ; + rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . + +:concernsContractAmendment a owl:FunctionalProperty ; + rdfs:domain :ContractModificationInformation ; + rdfs:range :ContractAmendment . :hasModificationDescription rdfs:domain :ContractModificationInformation ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -85,14 +86,13 @@ :hasModificationReasonDescription rdfs:domain :ContractModificationInformation ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:ContractAmendment rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasContractModificationInformation ] . - :ContractModificationInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasModificationDescription ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasModificationReasonDescription ] . + owl:onProperty :hasModificationReasonDescription ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :concernsContractAmendment ] . diff --git a/implementation/eContract/shacl_shapes/eContract_CM-shacl.rdf b/implementation/eContract/shacl_shapes/eContract_CM-shacl.rdf index 88edb244..fc30c396 100644 --- a/implementation/eContract/shacl_shapes/eContract_CM-shacl.rdf +++ b/implementation/eContract/shacl_shapes/eContract_CM-shacl.rdf @@ -17,11 +17,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -57,17 +59,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - con - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + eProcurement Ontology - eContract + This module provides the definitions for the eContract of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. This artefact provides the datashape specification. This version is automatically generated from eContract_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -168,27 +170,28 @@ WG Approval 5/11/2019 1 - - + + - + + 1 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasContractModificationInformation> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasContractModificationInformation> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsContractAmendment> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsContractAmendment> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has contract modification information + + Concerns contract amendment - + only to be used in the last section of standard form 20 diff --git a/implementation/eContract/shacl_shapes/eContract_CM-shacl.ttl b/implementation/eContract/shacl_shapes/eContract_CM-shacl.ttl index 7b765453..9815fc66 100644 --- a/implementation/eContract/shacl_shapes/eContract_CM-shacl.ttl +++ b/implementation/eContract/shacl_shapes/eContract_CM-shacl.ttl @@ -19,15 +19,15 @@ con-shape:epo-con-ContractAmendment a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Contract amendment" ; rdfs:comment "A change to an existing Contract that is agreed by the contracting parties." ; rdfs:isDefinedBy con-shape:con-shape ; - sh:property con-shape:epo-con-ContractAmendment-epo-hasContractModificationInformation ; sh:targetClass :ContractAmendment . -con-shape:epo-con-ContractAmendment-epo-hasRestatedContractValue sh:description "only to be used in the last section of standard form 20" . +con-shape:epo-con-ContractAmendment-epo-updatesContractValue sh:description "only to be used in the last section of standard form 20" . con-shape:epo-con-ContractModificationInformation a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Contract modification information" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy con-shape:con-shape ; - sh:property con-shape:epo-con-ContractModificationInformation-epo-hasModificationDescription, + sh:property con-shape:epo-con-ContractModificationInformation-epo-concernsContractAmendment, + con-shape:epo-con-ContractModificationInformation-epo-hasModificationDescription, con-shape:epo-con-ContractModificationInformation-epo-hasModificationReasonDescription ; sh:targetClass :ContractModificationInformation . @@ -36,12 +36,13 @@ con-shape:epo-con-Deliverable a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:isDefinedBy con-shape:con-shape ; sh:targetClass :Deliverable . -con-shape:epo-con-ContractAmendment-epo-hasContractModificationInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ContractModificationInformation ; +con-shape:epo-con-ContractModificationInformation-epo-concernsContractAmendment a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :ContractAmendment ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has contract modification information" ; - sh:path :hasContractModificationInformation ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + sh:name "Concerns contract amendment" ; + sh:path :concernsContractAmendment ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . con-shape:epo-con-ContractModificationInformation-epo-hasModificationDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; rdfs:isDefinedBy con-shape:con-shape ; @@ -80,11 +81,11 @@ con-shape:con-shape a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionURL ; dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the datashape specification. " ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eContract of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - con"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eContract"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-con" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -112,5 +113,5 @@ con-shape:con-shape a owl:Ontology ; owl:versionIRI con-shape:con-shape-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eContract_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . diff --git a/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-core.rdf b/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-core.rdf index b238937f..2bd9d3fa 100644 --- a/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-core.rdf +++ b/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-core.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -52,16 +54,16 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - ful - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology core specification. - This version is automatically generated from eFulfilment_CM.xml on 2023-08-09 + eProcurement Ontology - eFulfilment + This module provides the definitions for the eFulfilment of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology eFulfilment specification. + This version is automatically generated from eFulfilment_CM.xml on 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -277,51 +279,39 @@ WG approval: 11/10/2022 Allowance-charge-reason - - + + Transport-mode - + https://test-docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNECERec19/ - - - - - + + Size-type - + TRED8155 http://bis.beast.se/codelist/TRED8155/ - - - - - + + Transport-equipment-type - + UNCL8053 http://bis.beast.se/codelist/UNCL8053/ - - - - - + + Packaging-type - + UNECERec21 http://bis.beast.se/codelist/UNECERec21/ - - - Despatch-advice-type @@ -330,6 +320,10 @@ http://bis.beast.se/codelist/UNECERec21/ Document-status + + https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ + + Plain literal @@ -364,9 +358,6 @@ http://bis.beast.se/codelist/UNECERec21/ - - This might not be needed since we now have Person hasCertification. - isReturnable attribute needs to be checked on whether it is useful or not. @@ -487,13 +478,6 @@ https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/codelist/UNCL7161/ (epo-ord:AllowanceCh - - - Has operator licence i d - - - - Played by @@ -912,7 +896,7 @@ This is a logistics information needed for logistics, security measures, customs Has document status - https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ (epo:Document -> at-voc-new:document-status (+epo:hasDocumentStatus)) + https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ (epo-cat:PostAwardDocument -> at-voc-new:document-status (+epo:hasDocumentStatus)) @@ -939,13 +923,6 @@ Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation) - - - Is hazardous risk - - - - Is returnable material @@ -953,6 +930,13 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation) + + + Is hazardous risk + + + + Has packaging type description @@ -960,11 +944,11 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation) - - - Is power indicated + + + Is returnable - + @@ -974,25 +958,18 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation) - - - Is returnable - - - - - - - Has carrier service instruction + + + Is power indicated - + - - - Has delivery instruction + + + Has vehicle description - + @@ -1002,6 +979,13 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation) + + + Has carrier service instruction + + + + Has special instruction @@ -1009,6 +993,13 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation) + + + Has delivery instruction + + + + Has special service instruction @@ -1016,13 +1007,6 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation) - - - Has vehicle description - - - - Has outstanding quantity reason diff --git a/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-core.ttl b/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-core.ttl index f7b9594f..9adfe7c8 100644 --- a/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-core.ttl +++ b/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-core.ttl @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ This is a logistics information needed for logistics, security measures, customs :hasDocumentStatus a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; - skos:definition "https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ (epo:Document -> at-voc-new:document-status (+epo:hasDocumentStatus)) "@en ; + skos:definition "https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ (epo-cat:PostAwardDocument -> at-voc-new:document-status (+epo:hasDocumentStatus)) "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has document status"@en . :hasDriverPerson a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -293,11 +293,6 @@ This is a logistics information needed for logistics, security measures, customs rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; skos:prefLabel "Has on carriage shipment stage"@en . -:hasOperatorLicenceID a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; - skos:editorialNote "This might not be needed since we now have Person hasCertification."@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has operator licence i d"@en . - :hasOutstandingQuantity a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; skos:prefLabel "Has outstanding quantity"@en . @@ -410,12 +405,6 @@ This is a logistics information needed for logistics, security measures, customs rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; skos:prefLabel "Is specific to despatch line"@en . -:packaging-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; - skos:definition """UNECERec21 -http://bis.beast.se/codelist/UNECERec21/"""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Packaging-type"@en . - :playedBy a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; skos:prefLabel "Played by"@en . @@ -444,13 +433,6 @@ http://bis.beast.se/codelist/UNECERec21/"""@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; skos:prefLabel "Refers to shipment agreement"@en . -:size-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; - skos:definition """TRED8155 - -http://bis.beast.se/codelist/TRED8155/"""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Size-type"@en . - :specifiesCarrier a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; skos:prefLabel "Specifies carrier"@en . @@ -487,18 +469,6 @@ http://bis.beast.se/codelist/TRED8155/"""@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; skos:prefLabel "Specifies transport handling units"@en . -:transport-equipment-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; - skos:definition """UNCL8053 - -http://bis.beast.se/codelist/UNCL8053/"""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Transport-equipment-type"@en . - -:transport-mode a skos:ConceptScheme ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; - skos:definition "https://test-docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNECERec19/"@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Transport-mode"@en . - :transportsItemFrom a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ful ; skos:prefLabel "Transports item from"@en . @@ -518,16 +488,39 @@ at-voc-new:despatch-advice-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:prefLabel "Despatch-advice-type"@en . at-voc-new:document-status a skos:ConceptScheme ; + skos:definition """https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ +"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Document-status"@en . at-voc-new:handling-instruction a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:definition "https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/untdid/d17a/tred/tred4079.htm"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Handling-instruction"@en . +at-voc-new:packaging-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; + skos:definition """UNECERec21 +http://bis.beast.se/codelist/UNECERec21/"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Packaging-type"@en . + +at-voc-new:size-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; + skos:definition """TRED8155 + +http://bis.beast.se/codelist/TRED8155/"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Size-type"@en . + +at-voc-new:transport-equipment-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; + skos:definition """UNCL8053 + +http://bis.beast.se/codelist/UNCL8053/"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Transport-equipment-type"@en . + at-voc-new:transport-means-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:definition "https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/UNECERec28/"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Transport-means-type"@en . +at-voc-new:transport-mode a skos:ConceptScheme ; + skos:definition "https://test-docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNECERec19/"@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Transport-mode"@en . + dcterms:description a owl:DatatypeProperty ; skos:definition """An account of the resource. @@ -584,13 +577,13 @@ adms:identifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; :ful a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology core specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology eFulfilment specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eFulfilment of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - ful"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eFulfilment"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-ful" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -615,5 +608,5 @@ adms:identifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; owl:priorVersion "3.1.0" ; owl:versionIRI :ful-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; - skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eFulfilment_CM.xml on 2023-08-09" . + skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eFulfilment_CM.xml on 2023-09-12" . diff --git a/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-restrictions.rdf b/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-restrictions.rdf index 48f84061..56e31abc 100644 --- a/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-restrictions.rdf +++ b/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-restrictions.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:ful-res="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" @@ -54,17 +56,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - ful - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification. + eProcurement Ontology - eFulfilment + This module provides the definitions for the eFulfilment of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification. This version is automatically generated from eFulfilment_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -104,38 +106,38 @@ - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + @@ -169,7 +171,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -177,7 +179,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -201,7 +203,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -217,7 +219,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -438,6 +440,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -452,22 +460,16 @@ - - - - - - - + - + @@ -476,22 +478,16 @@ - + - + - - - - - - - + - + @@ -507,22 +503,28 @@ + + + + + + - + - + - + - + @@ -673,12 +675,6 @@ - - - - - - @@ -921,7 +917,7 @@ - + @@ -1017,6 +1013,6 @@ - + diff --git a/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-restrictions.ttl b/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-restrictions.ttl index b0240ddc..5c852995 100644 --- a/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-restrictions.ttl +++ b/implementation/eFulfilment/owl_ontology/eFulfilment_CM-restrictions.ttl @@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ :ful-restriction a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eFulfilment of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - ful"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eFulfilment"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-ful" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ owl:versionIRI :ful-restriction-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eFulfilment_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . :hasAllowanceChargeReason rdfs:domain :AllowanceChargeInformation ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ :hasAssociatedDocument rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :DespatchLine :DespatchAdvice ) ] ; - rdfs:range :Document . + rdfs:range :PostAwardDocument . :hasCarrierConsignmentID rdfs:domain :Consignment ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ :hasDespatchedQuantity rdfs:domain :DespatchLine ; rdfs:range :Quantity . -:hasDocumentStatus rdfs:domain :Document ; +:hasDocumentStatus rdfs:domain :PostAwardDocument ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . :hasEstimatedDeliveryPeriod rdfs:domain :ShipmentInformation ; @@ -162,9 +162,6 @@ :hasOnCarriageShipmentStage rdfs:domain :Consignment ; rdfs:range :ShipmentStage . -:hasOperatorLicenceID rdfs:domain :TransportMeansOperator ; - rdfs:range adms:Identifier . - :hasOutstandingQuantity rdfs:domain :DespatchLine ; rdfs:range :Quantity . @@ -303,12 +300,6 @@ adms:identifier rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; :isSpecificToDespatchLine rdfs:domain :ShipmentInformation ; rdfs:range :DespatchLine . -:packaging-type a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; - owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:hasValue :packaging-type ; - owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . - :refersToConsignment a owl:FunctionalProperty ; rdfs:domain :DespatchAdvice ; rdfs:range :Consignment . @@ -320,12 +311,6 @@ adms:identifier rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; :refersToShipmentAgreement rdfs:domain :DespatchAdvice ; rdfs:range :ShipmentAgreement . -:size-type a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; - owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:hasValue :size-type ; - owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . - :specifiesCarrier rdfs:domain :ShipmentStage ; rdfs:range :Carrier . @@ -336,18 +321,6 @@ adms:identifier rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; :specifiesShipment rdfs:domain :DespatchAdvice ; rdfs:range :ShipmentInformation . -:transport-equipment-type a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; - owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:hasValue :transport-equipment-type ; - owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . - -:transport-mode a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; - owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:hasValue :transport-mode ; - owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . - :transportsItemFrom rdfs:domain :TransportHandlingUnit ; rdfs:range :DespatchLine . @@ -378,12 +351,36 @@ at-voc-new:handling-instruction a owl:Class ; owl:hasValue at-voc-new:handling-instruction ; owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . +at-voc-new:packaging-type a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; + owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:hasValue at-voc-new:packaging-type ; + owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . + +at-voc-new:size-type a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; + owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:hasValue at-voc-new:size-type ; + owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . + +at-voc-new:transport-equipment-type a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; + owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:hasValue at-voc-new:transport-equipment-type ; + owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . + at-voc-new:transport-means-type a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:hasValue at-voc-new:transport-means-type ; owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . +at-voc-new:transport-mode a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; + owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:hasValue at-voc-new:transport-mode ; + owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . + dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :TemperatureSpecification :TransportEquipment :ShipmentInformation ) ] ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -402,11 +399,11 @@ dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:onProperty dcterms:description ] . :Package rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPackagingTypeDescription ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :containsGoodsItem ] . + owl:onProperty :containsGoodsItem ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasPackagingTypeDescription ] . :TransportMeans rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; @@ -423,11 +420,11 @@ dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; :ShipmentStage a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isHazardousRisk ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :usesTransportMeans ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isHazardousRisk ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :specifiesCarrier ] . @@ -435,37 +432,37 @@ dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; :TransportEquipment a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isPowerIndicated ], + owl:onProperty :isRefrigerated ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isRefrigerated ], + owl:onProperty :isReturnable ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isReturnable ] . + owl:onProperty :isPowerIndicated ] . :DespatchAdvice rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :specifiesDespatcher ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :refersToShipmentAgreement ], + owl:onProperty :specifiesShipment ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :refersToConsignment ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :comprisesDespatchLine ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :specifiesShipment ], + owl:onProperty :refersToShipmentAgreement ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :specifiesDespatcher ] . + owl:onProperty :comprisesDespatchLine ] . :ShipmentInformation a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isSpecificToDespatchLine ], + owl:onProperty :despatchDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :despatchDate ] . + owl:onProperty :isSpecificToDespatchLine ] . :AbstractContainer a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -480,18 +477,18 @@ dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; :Consignment a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasVehicleDescription ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMainCarriageShipmentStage ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasRequestedPickUpInformation ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasVehicleDescription ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isHazardousRisk ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :containsTransportHandlingUnit ] . + owl:onProperty :containsTransportHandlingUnit ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasMainCarriageShipmentStage ] . diff --git a/implementation/eFulfilment/shacl_shapes/eFulfilment_CM-shacl.rdf b/implementation/eFulfilment/shacl_shapes/eFulfilment_CM-shacl.rdf index ebba67cf..bcbe3e23 100644 --- a/implementation/eFulfilment/shacl_shapes/eFulfilment_CM-shacl.rdf +++ b/implementation/eFulfilment/shacl_shapes/eFulfilment_CM-shacl.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:ful-res="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" @@ -57,17 +59,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - ful - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + eProcurement Ontology - eFulfilment + This module provides the definitions for the eFulfilment of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. This artefact provides the datashape specification. This version is automatically generated from eFulfilment_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -330,39 +332,39 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 1 - + - - + + - - Is hazardous risk + + Is returnable material - + - + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Is returnable material + + Is hazardous risk - + - + - + 1 @@ -401,6 +403,42 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 1 + + + + + + + + Is returnable + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Is refrigerated + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -442,85 +480,70 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 1 - - + + - - + + - - Is refrigerated + + Has vehicle description - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Is returnable + + Is hazardous risk - + - + - + 1 - - - - - - - Has carrier service instruction - - - - - - - - - + - - + + - - Has delivery instruction + + Has handling instruction - + - + - + - - + + - - Has handling instruction + + Has carrier service instruction - + - + @@ -539,56 +562,35 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 - + - - + + - - Has special service instruction + + Has delivery instruction - + - + - + - - + + - - Has vehicle description + + Has special service instruction - + - + - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Is hazardous risk - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -607,6 +609,21 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 1 + + + + + + + + Has shipping mark + + + + + + + @@ -622,20 +639,23 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 - - + + - - + + - - Has shipping mark + + Despatch date - + - - + + + + + 1 @@ -660,24 +680,6 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - - - Despatch date - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -1217,7 +1219,7 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 Has handling instruction code - + 1 @@ -1233,7 +1235,7 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 Has transport mode - + @@ -1245,7 +1247,7 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 Has size type - + @@ -1257,7 +1259,7 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 Has transport equipment type - + 1 @@ -1290,9 +1292,6 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DespatchAdviceTypeCode/ - - This might not be needed since we now have Person hasCertification. - isReturnable attribute needs to be checked on whether it is useful or not. diff --git a/implementation/eFulfilment/shacl_shapes/eFulfilment_CM-shacl.ttl b/implementation/eFulfilment/shacl_shapes/eFulfilment_CM-shacl.ttl index d6700926..3eb407f6 100644 --- a/implementation/eFulfilment/shacl_shapes/eFulfilment_CM-shacl.ttl +++ b/implementation/eFulfilment/shacl_shapes/eFulfilment_CM-shacl.ttl @@ -203,8 +203,6 @@ ful-shape:epo-ful-TransportMeansOperator a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:isDefinedBy ful-shape:ful-shape ; sh:targetClass :TransportMeansOperator . -ful-shape:epo-ful-TransportMeansOperator-epo-ful-hasOperatorLicenceID sh:description "This might not be needed since we now have Person hasCertification." . - ful-shape:epo-ful-AbstractContainer-epo-ful-hasTemperatureSpecification a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:class :TemperatureSpecification ; sh:maxCount 1 ; @@ -401,7 +399,7 @@ ful-shape:epo-ful-Package-epo-ful-containsPackage a sh:PropertyShape ; sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . ful-shape:epo-ful-Package-epo-ful-hasPackagingType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :packaging-type ; + sh:class at-voc-new:packaging-type ; sh:maxCount 1 ; sh:name "Has packaging type" ; sh:path :hasPackagingType . @@ -498,7 +496,7 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; sh:path dcterms:description . ful-shape:epo-ful-TransportEquipment-epo-ful-hasSizeType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :size-type ; + sh:class at-voc-new:size-type ; sh:name "Has size type" ; sh:path :hasSizeType . @@ -509,7 +507,7 @@ ful-shape:epo-ful-TransportEquipment-epo-ful-hasTransportEquipmentSeal a sh:Prop sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . ful-shape:epo-ful-TransportEquipment-epo-ful-hasTransportEquipmentType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :transport-equipment-type ; + sh:class at-voc-new:transport-equipment-type ; sh:name "Has transport equipment type" ; sh:path :hasTransportEquipmentType . @@ -572,7 +570,7 @@ ful-shape:epo-ful-TransportMeans-epo-ful-hasTransportMeansType a sh:PropertyShap sh:path :hasTransportMeansType . ful-shape:epo-ful-TransportMeans-epo-ful-hasTransportMode a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :transport-mode ; + sh:class at-voc-new:transport-mode ; sh:maxCount 1 ; sh:minCount 1 ; sh:name "Has transport mode" ; @@ -590,11 +588,11 @@ ful-shape:ful-shape a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionURL ; dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the datashape specification. " ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eFulfilment of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - ful"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eFulfilment"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-ful" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -622,5 +620,5 @@ ful-shape:ful-shape a owl:Ontology ; owl:versionIRI ful-shape:ful-shape-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eFulfilment_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . diff --git a/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-core.rdf b/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-core.rdf index 5498d0f5..9bca108a 100644 --- a/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-core.rdf +++ b/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-core.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -52,16 +54,16 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - not - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology core specification. - This version is automatically generated from eNotice_CM.xml on 2023-08-09 + eProcurement Ontology - eNotice + This module provides the definitions for the eNotice of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology eNotice specification. + This version is automatically generated from eNotice_CM.xml on 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -844,6 +846,34 @@ Social and other specific services – utilities + + + Plain literal + + + + Any u r i + + + + Boolean + + + + Date + + + + Date time + + + + Decimal + + + + Integer + @@ -11026,11 +11056,11 @@ Social and other specific services – utilities - - - Describes result notice + + + Describes direct award prenotification notice - + @@ -11054,6 +11084,13 @@ Social and other specific services – utilities + + + Describes result notice + + + + Has implementing regulation diff --git a/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-core.ttl b/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-core.ttl index 31240117..0f4c5bbd 100644 --- a/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-core.ttl +++ b/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-core.ttl @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ @prefix foaf: . @prefix org: . @prefix owl: . +@prefix rdf: . @prefix rdfs: . @prefix skos: . @prefix vann: . @@ -555,6 +556,10 @@ Social and other specific services – utilities skos:editorialNote "for ReviewBody"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Announces role"@en . +:describesDirectAwardPrenotificationNotice a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :not ; + skos:prefLabel "Describes direct award prenotification notice"@en . + :describesResultNotice a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :not ; skos:prefLabel "Describes result notice"@en . @@ -605,6 +610,27 @@ Social and other specific services – utilities rdfs:isDefinedBy :not ; skos:prefLabel "Refers to role"@en . +rdf:PlainLiteral a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Plain literal"@en . + +xsd:anyURI a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Any u r i"@en . + +xsd:boolean a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Boolean"@en . + +xsd:date a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Date"@en . + +xsd:dateTime a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Date time"@en . + +xsd:decimal a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Decimal"@en . + +xsd:integer a rdfs:Datatype ; + skos:prefLabel "Integer"@en . + :DirectAwardPrenotificationNotice a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :not ; skos:definition "Notice which sets out the Buyer's purchasing intention to award a Contract without prior notification of Competition."@en ; @@ -734,13 +760,13 @@ For European Notices above the threshold :not a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology core specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology eNotice specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eNotice of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - not"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eNotice"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-not" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -765,5 +791,5 @@ For European Notices above the threshold owl:priorVersion "3.1.0" ; owl:versionIRI :not-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; - skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eNotice_CM.xml on 2023-08-09" . + skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eNotice_CM.xml on 2023-09-12" . diff --git a/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-restrictions.rdf b/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-restrictions.rdf index 58e70bb9..b5371d0f 100644 --- a/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-restrictions.rdf +++ b/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-restrictions.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -54,17 +56,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - not - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification. + eProcurement Ontology - eNotice + This module provides the definitions for the eNotice of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification. This version is automatically generated from eNotice_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -4442,18 +4444,11 @@ - - + + - - - - - - - - - + + @@ -4473,4 +4468,10 @@ + + + + + + diff --git a/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-restrictions.ttl b/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-restrictions.ttl index 6103f46e..1ad9ea41 100644 --- a/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-restrictions.ttl +++ b/implementation/eNotice/owl_ontology/eNotice_CM-restrictions.ttl @@ -58,20 +58,22 @@ :ResultNotice ; rdfs:range :AgentInRole . -:describesResultNotice rdf:domain :NoticeAwardInformation ; - rdfs:range [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :DirectAwardPrenotificationNotice :ResultNotice ) ] . +:describesDirectAwardPrenotificationNotice rdfs:domain :NoticeAwardInformation ; + rdfs:range :DirectAwardPrenotificationNotice . + +:describesResultNotice rdfs:domain :NoticeAwardInformation ; + rdfs:range :ResultNotice . :not-restriction a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eNotice of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - not"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eNotice"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-not" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -98,7 +100,7 @@ owl:versionIRI :not-restriction-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eNotice_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . :refersToAwardDecision rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :CompletionNotice :ContractModificationNotice ) ] ; @@ -141,217 +143,229 @@ owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :CANDefence-D81 :CANSocialNotice :CANStandardNotice :DesignContestResultNotice ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :Notice11 :Notice10 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice36 :Notice37 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContestResult-D24 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PINTimeLimitNotice :PINOnlyNotice :PINDefence-D81 :PINProfileNotice ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice33 :CANSocial-D25 :Notice35 :CANSocialNotice-D25 :Notice34 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CNSocialNotice-D25 :Notice20 :CNSocial-D25 :Notice21 ) . + owl:members ( :DesignContest-D24 :DesignContest-D25 :Notice23 :Notice24 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :QS-D25 :QSNotice-D25 :Notice15 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice14 :Notice13 :Notice12 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . + owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANDefence-D81 :CANSocialNotice :CANStandardNotice :DesignContestResultNotice ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice33 :CANSocial-D25 :Notice35 :CANSocialNotice-D25 :Notice34 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :DesignContest-D24 :DesignContest-D25 :Notice23 :Notice24 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . + owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :DesignContest-D24 :DesignContest-D25 :Notice23 :Notice24 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :CNSocialNotice-D25 :Notice20 :CNSocial-D25 :Notice21 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice33 :CANSocial-D25 :Notice35 :CANSocialNotice-D25 :Notice34 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice36 :Notice37 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContestResult-D24 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . + owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANDefence-D81 :CANSocialNotice :CANStandardNotice :DesignContestResultNotice ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . + owl:members ( :CNSocialNotice-D25 :Notice20 :CNSocial-D25 :Notice21 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . + owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice36 :Notice37 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContestResult-D24 ) . + owl:members ( :PINTimeLimitNotice :PINOnlyNotice :PINDefence-D81 :PINProfileNotice ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :DesignContest-D24 :DesignContest-D25 :Notice23 :Notice24 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice33 :CANSocial-D25 :Notice35 :CANSocialNotice-D25 :Notice34 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice14 :Notice13 :Notice12 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :Notice11 :Notice10 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :QS-D25 :QSNotice-D25 :Notice15 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . + owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . + owl:members ( :PINTimeLimitNotice :PINOnlyNotice :PINDefence-D81 :PINProfileNotice ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CNSocialNotice-D25 :Notice20 :CNSocial-D25 :Notice21 ) . + owl:members ( :QS-D25 :QSNotice-D25 :Notice15 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice36 :Notice37 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContestResult-D24 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice14 :Notice13 :Notice12 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice36 :Notice37 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContestResult-D24 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice33 :CANSocial-D25 :Notice35 :CANSocialNotice-D25 :Notice34 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :DesignContest-D24 :DesignContest-D25 :Notice23 :Notice24 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . @@ -360,19 +374,16 @@ owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . - -[] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice14 :Notice13 :Notice12 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 ) . + owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANDefence-D81 :CANSocialNotice :CANStandardNotice :DesignContestResultNotice ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . @@ -381,16 +392,19 @@ owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . + owl:members ( :DesignContest-D24 :DesignContest-D25 :Notice23 :Notice24 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Subcontract-D81 :Notice22 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . @@ -399,40 +413,37 @@ owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :Notice11 :Notice10 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . + owl:members ( :PINTimeLimitNotice :PINOnlyNotice :PINDefence-D81 :PINProfileNotice ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :Notice11 :Notice10 ) . - -[] a ; - owl:members ( :CNSocialNotice-D25 :Notice20 :CNSocial-D25 :Notice21 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice33 :CANSocial-D25 :Notice35 :CANSocialNotice-D25 :Notice34 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Subcontract-D81 :Notice22 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . + owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :QS-D25 :QSNotice-D25 :Notice15 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . @@ -441,37 +452,37 @@ owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CNSocialNotice-D25 :Notice20 :CNSocial-D25 :Notice21 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Subcontract-D81 :Notice22 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :Notice11 :Notice10 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice14 :Notice13 :Notice12 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . @@ -480,43 +491,40 @@ owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :DesignContest-D24 :DesignContest-D25 :Notice23 :Notice24 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice36 :Notice37 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContestResult-D24 ) . + owl:members ( :CNSocialNotice-D25 :Notice20 :CNSocial-D25 :Notice21 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice33 :CANSocial-D25 :Notice35 :CANSocialNotice-D25 :Notice34 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANDefence-D81 :CANSocialNotice :CANStandardNotice :DesignContestResultNotice ) . - -[] a ; - owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice33 :CANSocial-D25 :Notice35 :CANSocialNotice-D25 :Notice34 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . @@ -525,85 +533,79 @@ owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice14 :Notice13 :Notice12 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :Notice11 :Notice10 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :QS-D25 :QSNotice-D25 :Notice15 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice33 :CANSocial-D25 :Notice35 :CANSocialNotice-D25 :Notice34 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . + owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PINTimeLimitNotice :PINOnlyNotice :PINDefence-D81 :PINProfileNotice ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Subcontract-D81 :Notice22 ) . - -[] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice14 :Notice13 :Notice12 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice2 :PINProfile-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :Notice3 :PINProfile-D24 :Notice1 ) . + owl:members ( :DesignContest-D24 :DesignContest-D25 :Notice23 :Notice24 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . - -[] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice14 :Notice13 :Notice12 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 ) . + owl:members ( :CANDefence-D81 :CANSocialNotice :CANStandardNotice :DesignContestResultNotice ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PIN-CFCStandardNotice :PIN-CFCSocialNotice :CNSocialNotice :QSNotice :CNStandardNotice :DesignContestNotice :SubcontractNotice ) . + owl:members ( :Notice31 :CANStandard-D24 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice29 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :CANDefence-D81 :CANSocialNotice :CANStandardNotice :DesignContestResultNotice ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice4 :Notice5 :Notice6 :PINOnly-D24 :PINOnly-D25 ) . + owl:members ( :PIN-RTL-D25 :Notice9 :PIN-RTL-D24 :Notice7 :Notice8 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :VEAT-D81 :VEAT-D23 :VEAT-D24 :Notice25 :Notice27 :Notice26 :VEAT-D25 :Notice28 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice13 :Notice12 :Notice40 :Notice9 :Notice20 :Notice26 :Notice31 :Notice8 :Notice19 :Notice29 :Notice5 :Notice21 :Notice14 :Notice7 :Notice10 :Notice1 :Notice30 :Notice32 :Notice11 :Notice24 :Notice35 :Notice39 :Notice17 :Notice34 :Notice38 :Notice15 :Notice28 :Notice37 :Notice6 :Notice36 :Notice16 :Notice23 :Notice4 :Notice25 :Notice3 :Notice22 :Notice27 :Notice18 :Notice2 :Notice33 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice36 :Notice37 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContestResult-D24 ) . + owl:members ( :Modification-D24 :Notice39 :Modification-D25 :Notice38 :Modification-D23 :Notice40 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice14 :Notice13 :Notice12 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 ) . + owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :PINTimeLimitNotice :PINOnlyNotice :PINDefence-D81 :PINProfileNotice ) . @@ -612,11 +614,11 @@ owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Notice16 :Notice19 :CNStandard-D24 :Notice18 :Notice17 ) . + owl:members ( :Notice36 :Notice37 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContestResult-D24 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :PINTimeLimitNotice :PINOnlyNotice :PINDefence-D81 :PINProfileNotice ) . + owl:members ( :CNSocialNotice-D25 :Notice20 :CNSocial-D25 :Notice21 ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :CANSocialNotice-D25 :VEAT-D25 :CNSocialNotice-D25 :PIN-CFCSocialNotice-D25 :PINOnly-D24 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D23 :PINProfile-D24 :DesignContestResult-D24 :DesignContestResult-D25 :DesignContest-D25 :VEAT-D81 :PIN-RTL-D24 :PINOnly-D25 :CANStandard-D24 :PINProfile-D25 :CNDefence-D81 :PIN-RTL-D25 :SocialAndOtherSpecificServices-D24 :ConcessionNotice-D23 :Modification-D24 :CNStandard-D24 :DesignContest-D24 :QSNotice-D25 :CNSocial-D25 :Modification-D25 :CANSocial-D25 :PIN-CFCSocial-D25 :PINProfile-D81 :VEAT-D24 :QS-D25 :Subcontract-D81 :VEAT-D23 :ConcessionAwardNotice-D23 :PIN-CFCStandard-D24 :CANDefence-D81 :Modification-D23 ) . + owl:members ( :QS-D25 :QSNotice-D25 :Notice15 ) . diff --git a/implementation/eNotice/shacl_shapes/eNotice_CM-shacl.rdf b/implementation/eNotice/shacl_shapes/eNotice_CM-shacl.rdf index a20300e3..d1e7d9d0 100644 --- a/implementation/eNotice/shacl_shapes/eNotice_CM-shacl.rdf +++ b/implementation/eNotice/shacl_shapes/eNotice_CM-shacl.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -57,17 +59,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - not - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + eProcurement Ontology - eNotice + This module provides the definitions for the eNotice of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. This artefact provides the datashape specification. This version is automatically generated from eNotice_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 diff --git a/implementation/eNotice/shacl_shapes/eNotice_CM-shacl.ttl b/implementation/eNotice/shacl_shapes/eNotice_CM-shacl.ttl index 045d81d4..492bee79 100644 --- a/implementation/eNotice/shacl_shapes/eNotice_CM-shacl.ttl +++ b/implementation/eNotice/shacl_shapes/eNotice_CM-shacl.ttl @@ -572,11 +572,11 @@ not-shape:not-shape a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionURL ; dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the datashape specification. " ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eNotice of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - not"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eNotice"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-not" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -604,5 +604,5 @@ not-shape:not-shape a owl:Ontology ; owl:versionIRI not-shape:not-shape-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eNotice_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . diff --git a/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-core.rdf b/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-core.rdf index e179413e..8e4e7663 100644 --- a/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-core.rdf +++ b/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-core.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -52,16 +54,16 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - ord - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology core specification. - This version is automatically generated from eOrdering_CM.xml on 2023-08-09 + eProcurement Ontology - eOrdering + This module provides the definitions for the eOrdering of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology eOrdering specification. + This version is automatically generated from eOrdering_CM.xml on 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -269,6 +271,13 @@ WG approval 20/04/2023 + + + Order response information + + + + Order response @@ -285,17 +294,14 @@ WG approval 20/04/2023 - - - Document-type - - - https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/UNCL1001/ - Response status + + https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/ + + Plain literal @@ -345,43 +351,16 @@ Examples of supplier roles: seller, despatch party, creditor, economic operator. Context: Expressing Needs - - We need codes for: https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ - -220 code is plain Order. - Context: Ordering, Despatch If contractually agreed, the Seller also may respond to the order, changing details that are acceptable by the Buyer. --- If an order is accepted with change, the buyer and seller need to have an agreement between them regarding the processing of the changed order, i.e when is a contract concluded and when can the items be shipped. +-- If an order is accepted with change, the buyer and seller need to have an agreement between them regarding the processing of the changed order, i.e. when is a contract concluded and when can the items be shipped. Proposal: -If the order response is "Change" then the Buyer will create (instanciate) a new order implementing the changes and superseding the previously sent order. - - - Should we conceive that an order line is included in the Order Reponse? - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/ - - - Should we conceive that an order line is included in the Order Reponse? - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/ - - - - Has document type - - - - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ (epo:Document -> at-voc-new:document-type (+epo:hasDocumentType)) - - - +If the order response is "Change" then the Buyer will create (instantiate) a new order implementing the changes and superseding the previously sent order. @@ -425,17 +404,6 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-ord:AllowanceChargeInformation -> epo:MonetaryVal - - - Has v a t category - - - Value-added tax category of the item. - (epo-ord:TaxInformation -> at-voc-new:vat-category (+epo-cat:hasVATCategory)) - - - - Has tax information @@ -777,6 +745,13 @@ Some countries however may allow multiple contracts per order (i.e Italy). (epo + + + Has acceptance status + + + + Comprises order response line @@ -784,6 +759,20 @@ Some countries however may allow multiple contracts per order (i.e Italy). (epo + + + Is specific to order response line + + + + + + + Specifies order response information + + + + Specifies buyer @@ -798,6 +787,21 @@ Some countries however may allow multiple contracts per order (i.e Italy). (epo + + + Has percentage + + + The factor relative to the price charged in addition. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 + (epo-ord:TaxInformation) The factor relative to the price charged in addition. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-ord:AllowanceChargeInformation) + + + + Description @@ -816,19 +820,11 @@ Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo-ord:DeliveryAgreement) - - - Has percentage - - - The factor relative to the price charged in addition. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 - (epo-ord:TaxInformation) The factor relative to the price charged in addition. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-ord:AllowanceChargeInformation) + + + Has shipping mark - + @@ -838,13 +834,6 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-ord:AllowanceChargeInformation) - - - Has shipping mark - - - - Has allowance charge reason description @@ -852,18 +841,6 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-ord:AllowanceChargeInformation) - - - Has accounting cost - - - The accounting reference used by the Buyer to specify the account to which the order and the corresponding invoice are booked. - -WG approval 2023-01-26 (epo-ord:Order) - - - - Has customer reference @@ -880,6 +857,18 @@ WG approval 2023-01-26 (epo-ord:Order) + + + Has accounting cost + + + The accounting reference used by the Buyer to specify the account to which the order and the corresponding invoice are booked. + +WG approval 2023-01-26 (epo-ord:Order) + + + + Has payment term diff --git a/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-core.ttl b/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-core.ttl index 6d3e779a..b9bdaa64 100644 --- a/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-core.ttl +++ b/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-core.ttl @@ -88,15 +88,16 @@ The Order Response is used to inform on the acceptance or rejection of an Order WG approval 20/04/2023 """@en ; skos:editorialNote """If contractually agreed, the Seller also may respond to the order, changing details that are acceptable by the Buyer. --- If an order is accepted with change, the buyer and seller need to have an agreement between them regarding the processing of the changed order, i.e when is a contract concluded and when can the items be shipped. +-- If an order is accepted with change, the buyer and seller need to have an agreement between them regarding the processing of the changed order, i.e. when is a contract concluded and when can the items be shipped. Proposal: -If the order response is "Change" then the Buyer will create (instanciate) a new order implementing the changes and superseding the previously sent order. """@en, - """Should we conceive that an order line is included in the Order Reponse? - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/"""@en ; +If the order response is "Change" then the Buyer will create (instantiate) a new order implementing the changes and superseding the previously sent order. """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Order response"@en . +:OrderResponseInformation a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; + skos:prefLabel "Order response information"@en . + :OrderResponseLine a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; rdfs:subClassOf :OrderLine ; @@ -188,6 +189,10 @@ WG approval 25/04/2023 rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; skos:prefLabel "Concerns originator request"@en . +:hasAcceptanceStatus a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; + skos:prefLabel "Has acceptance status"@en . + :hasAccountingCost a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; skos:definition """The accounting reference used by the Buyer to specify the account to which the order and the corresponding invoice are booked. @@ -240,13 +245,6 @@ WG approval 2023-01-26 (epo-ord:Order) """@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; skos:prefLabel "Has delivery period"@en . -:hasDocumentType a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; - skos:definition """ - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ (epo:Document -> at-voc-new:document-type (+epo:hasDocumentType)) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has document type"@en . - :hasPaymentTerm a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; skos:prefLabel "Has payment term"@en . @@ -326,12 +324,6 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-ord:AllowanceChargeInformation) """@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; skos:prefLabel "Has tracking i d"@en . -:hasVATCategory a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; - skos:definition """Value-added tax category of the item. - (epo-ord:TaxInformation -> at-voc-new:vat-category (+epo-cat:hasVATCategory)) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has v a t category"@en . - :implementsContract a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; skos:prefLabel "Implements contract"@en . @@ -351,6 +343,10 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-ord:AllowanceChargeInformation) """@en ; (epo-cat:ChargeInformation -> epo-ord:OrderLine (+epo-ord:isSpecificToOrderLine)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Is specific to order line"@en . +:isSpecificToOrderResponseLine a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; + skos:prefLabel "Is specific to order response line"@en . + :isSubmittedForOrder a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; skos:prefLabel "Is submitted for order"@en . @@ -428,6 +424,10 @@ The reference to the catalogue line is for information only, to trace the source rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; skos:prefLabel "Specifies general delivery agreement"@en . +:specifiesOrderResponseInformation a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; + skos:prefLabel "Specifies order response information"@en . + :specifiesOriginator a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :ord ; skos:prefLabel "Specifies originator"@en . @@ -449,18 +449,10 @@ The reference to the catalogue line is for information only, to trace the source skos:prefLabel "Specifies specific delivery agreement"@en . at-voc-new:ResponseStatus a skos:ConceptScheme ; - skos:editorialNote """Should we conceive that an order line is included in the Order Reponse? - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/"""@en ; + skos:definition """https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/ +"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Response status"@en . -at-voc-new:document-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; - skos:definition "https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/UNCL1001/"@en ; - skos:editorialNote """We need codes for: https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ - -220 code is plain Order."""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Document-type"@en . - dcterms:description a owl:DatatypeProperty ; skos:definition """An account of the resource. @@ -518,13 +510,13 @@ WG approval 20/04/2023"""@en ; :ord a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology core specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology eOrdering specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eOrdering of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - ord"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eOrdering"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-ord" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -549,5 +541,5 @@ WG approval 20/04/2023"""@en ; owl:priorVersion "3.1.0" ; owl:versionIRI :ord-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; - skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eOrdering_CM.xml on 2023-08-09" . + skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from eOrdering_CM.xml on 2023-09-12" . diff --git a/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-restrictions.rdf b/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-restrictions.rdf index fd339f01..38bf08d1 100644 --- a/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-restrictions.rdf +++ b/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-restrictions.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -54,17 +56,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - ord - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification. + eProcurement Ontology - eOrdering + This module provides the definitions for the eOrdering of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification. This version is automatically generated from eOrdering_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -77,15 +79,6 @@ European Union - - - - - - - - - @@ -98,15 +91,15 @@ - - 1 + + 1 - + 1 @@ -130,7 +123,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -138,7 +131,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -264,52 +257,43 @@ - - - - + - + - + - + - - - + + + - + - - - - - - - - + + @@ -317,24 +301,30 @@ + + + + + + - - - - - - + + + + + + @@ -347,9 +337,6 @@ - - - @@ -382,14 +369,10 @@ - - - - @@ -477,7 +460,14 @@ - + + + + + + + + @@ -678,12 +668,27 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-restrictions.ttl b/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-restrictions.ttl index 5b58912b..c20025cb 100644 --- a/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-restrictions.ttl +++ b/implementation/eOrdering/owl_ontology/eOrdering_CM-restrictions.ttl @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ :concernsOriginatorRequest rdfs:domain :OriginatorInformation ; rdfs:range :OriginatorRequest . +:hasAcceptanceStatus rdfs:domain :OrderResponseInformation ; + rdfs:range skos:Concept . + :hasAllowanceChargeReason rdfs:domain :AllowanceChargeInformation ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -40,12 +43,10 @@ :hasAmountDueForPayment rdfs:domain :Order ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . -:hasDeliveryPeriod rdfs:domain :DeliveryInformation ; +:hasDeliveryPeriod rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :DeliveryInformation :OrderResponseInformation ) ] ; rdfs:range :Period . -:hasDocumentType rdfs:domain :Document ; - rdfs:range skos:Concept . - :hasPrepaidAmount rdfs:domain :Order ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . @@ -88,9 +89,6 @@ :hasTrackingID rdfs:domain :DeliveryInformation ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . -:hasVATCategory rdfs:domain :TaxInformation ; - rdfs:range skos:Concept . - :implementsContract rdfs:domain :OrderResponse ; rdfs:range :Contract . @@ -102,16 +100,19 @@ owl:unionOf ( :OriginatorInformation :ContractInformation :DeliveryInformation :AllowanceInformation :ChargeInformation ) ] ; rdfs:range :OrderLine . +:isSpecificToOrderResponseLine rdfs:domain :OrderResponseInformation ; + rdfs:range :OrderResponseLine . + :ord-restriction a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eOrdering of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - ord"@en ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eOrdering"@en ; bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-ord" ; vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; @@ -138,7 +139,7 @@ owl:versionIRI :ord-restriction-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eOrdering_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . :refersToCatalogue rdfs:domain :Order ; rdfs:range :Catalogue . @@ -180,6 +181,9 @@ :specifiesDespatcher rdfs:domain :Order ; rdfs:range :Despatcher . +:specifiesOrderResponseInformation rdfs:domain :OrderResponse ; + rdfs:range :OrderResponseInformation . + :specifiesOriginator rdfs:domain :DespatchAdvice ; rdfs:range :Originator . @@ -212,7 +216,7 @@ rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . :hasTaxInformation rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :Tender :AllowanceChargeInformation :Item :Contract ) ] ; + owl:unionOf ( :AllowanceChargeInformation :Item :Contract ) ] ; rdfs:range :TaxInformation . :isSubmittedForOrder a owl:FunctionalProperty ; @@ -240,20 +244,10 @@ at-voc-new:ResponseStatus a owl:Class ; owl:hasValue at-voc-new:ResponseStatus ; owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . -at-voc-new:document-type a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; - owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:hasValue at-voc-new:document-type ; - owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . - dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :TaxInformation :DeliveryAgreement ) ] ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:OrderResponseLine rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isSubmittedForOrderLine ] . - :hasPercentage rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :TaxInformation :AllowanceChargeInformation ) ] ; rdfs:range xsd:decimal . @@ -264,6 +258,10 @@ dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; :OrderResponse ; rdfs:range :Seller . +:OrderResponseLine rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isSubmittedForOrderLine ] . + :DeliveryAgreement a owl:Class . :OriginatorInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -279,26 +277,26 @@ dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:onProperty :hasTaxInformation ] . :OrderResponse rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :specifiesSeller ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isSubmittedForOrder ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasResponseDescription ] . + owl:onProperty :hasResponseDescription ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :specifiesSeller ] . :TaxInformation a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty dcterms:description ], + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasPercentage ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPercentage ] . + owl:onProperty dcterms:description ] . :DeliveryInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :specifiesGeneralDeliveryAgreement ], + owl:onProperty :concernsConsignee ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :specifiesSpecificDeliveryAgreement ], @@ -307,27 +305,27 @@ dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:onProperty :hasDeliveryDeadline ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :concernsConsignee ] . + owl:onProperty :specifiesGeneralDeliveryAgreement ] . :Order rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPaymentTerm ], + owl:onProperty :hasAccountingCost ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :specifiesOriginatorInformation ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :comprisesOrderLine ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasCustomerReference ], + owl:onProperty :hasPaymentTerm ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :specifiesSeller ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAccountingCost ], + owl:onProperty :hasCustomerReference ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :specifiesDeliveryInformation ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :specifiesSeller ] . + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :comprisesOrderLine ] . diff --git a/implementation/eOrdering/shacl_shapes/eOrdering_CM-shacl.rdf b/implementation/eOrdering/shacl_shapes/eOrdering_CM-shacl.rdf index 2ef359d6..bfe7c2b0 100644 --- a/implementation/eOrdering/shacl_shapes/eOrdering_CM-shacl.rdf +++ b/implementation/eOrdering/shacl_shapes/eOrdering_CM-shacl.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -57,17 +59,17 @@ - eProcurement Ontology - ord - This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. + eProcurement Ontology - eOrdering + This module provides the definitions for the eOrdering of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. This artefact provides the datashape specification. This version is automatically generated from eOrdering_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -301,6 +303,15 @@ WG approval 20/04/2023 + + + + + Order response information + + + + @@ -319,6 +330,30 @@ WG approval 20/04/2023 + + + + + + + + Has percentage + + + The factor relative to the price charged in addition. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 + + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -344,31 +379,6 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 - 1 - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has percentage - - - The factor relative to the price charged in addition. - -WG approval 26/07/2022 - - - - - - - - - 1 @@ -394,6 +404,21 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + + Has shipping mark + + + + + + + @@ -412,21 +437,6 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 1 - - - - - - - - Has shipping mark - - - - - - - @@ -465,29 +475,6 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 - - - - - - - - Has accounting cost - - - The accounting reference used by the Buyer to specify the account to which the order and the corresponding invoice are booked. - -WG approval 2023-01-26 - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -515,6 +502,29 @@ WG approval 2023-01-26 1 + + + + + + + + Has accounting cost + + + The accounting reference used by the Buyer to specify the account to which the order and the corresponding invoice are booked. + +WG approval 2023-01-26 + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -934,20 +944,55 @@ WG approval 2023-01-26 Comprises order response line - - Primary roles: -Agents that are directly involved with the exchange of information. -Secondary roles: -Agents only mentioned in the documents but not really involved in the information manipulation &amp; exchange. -Note: The context may change the roles primacy. -Note: There is a mixture of pre/post-award roles. Perhaps a distinction shall be done. -Note: Perhaps no role hierarchy is necessary. - - - - - - + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSpecificToOrderResponseLine> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSpecificToOrderResponseLine> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Is specific to order response line + + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesOrderResponseInformation> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesOrderResponseInformation> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Specifies order response information + + + + + + 1 + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has acceptance status Note: Supplier is out of discussion. It is a third party. @@ -964,30 +1009,15 @@ Examples of supplier roles: seller, despatch party, creditor, economic operator. Context: Expressing Needs - - We need codes for: https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ - -220 code is plain Order. - Context: Ordering, Despatch If contractually agreed, the Seller also may respond to the order, changing details that are acceptable by the Buyer. --- If an order is accepted with change, the buyer and seller need to have an agreement between them regarding the processing of the changed order, i.e when is a contract concluded and when can the items be shipped. +-- If an order is accepted with change, the buyer and seller need to have an agreement between them regarding the processing of the changed order, i.e. when is a contract concluded and when can the items be shipped. Proposal: -If the order response is "Change" then the Buyer will create (instanciate) a new order implementing the changes and superseding the previously sent order. - - - Should we conceive that an order line is included in the Order Reponse? - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/ - - - Should we conceive that an order line is included in the Order Reponse? - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/ +If the order response is "Change" then the Buyer will create (instantiate) a new order implementing the changes and superseding the previously sent order. diff --git a/implementation/eOrdering/shacl_shapes/eOrdering_CM-shacl.ttl b/implementation/eOrdering/shacl_shapes/eOrdering_CM-shacl.ttl index f62de458..573518b5 100644 --- a/implementation/eOrdering/shacl_shapes/eOrdering_CM-shacl.ttl +++ b/implementation/eOrdering/shacl_shapes/eOrdering_CM-shacl.ttl @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ @prefix : . @prefix at-voc: . +@prefix at-voc-new: . @prefix bibo: . @prefix cc: . @prefix cccev: . @@ -15,14 +16,6 @@ @prefix vann: . @prefix xsd: . -ord-shape:at-voc-new-ResponseStatus rdfs:comment """Should we conceive that an order line is included in the Order Reponse? - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/""" . - -ord-shape:at-voc-new-document-type rdfs:comment """We need codes for: https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ - -220 code is plain Order.""" . - ord-shape:epo-ord-AllowanceChargeInformation a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Allowance charge information" ; rdfs:comment """Information about discounts, taxes, duties and fees imposed. @@ -143,20 +136,25 @@ The Order Response is used to inform on the acceptance or rejection of an Order WG approval 20/04/2023 """, """If contractually agreed, the Seller also may respond to the order, changing details that are acceptable by the Buyer. --- If an order is accepted with change, the buyer and seller need to have an agreement between them regarding the processing of the changed order, i.e when is a contract concluded and when can the items be shipped. +-- If an order is accepted with change, the buyer and seller need to have an agreement between them regarding the processing of the changed order, i.e. when is a contract concluded and when can the items be shipped. Proposal: -If the order response is "Change" then the Buyer will create (instanciate) a new order implementing the changes and superseding the previously sent order. """, - """Should we conceive that an order line is included in the Order Reponse? - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/codelist/UNCL1229/""" ; +If the order response is "Change" then the Buyer will create (instantiate) a new order implementing the changes and superseding the previously sent order. """ ; rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; sh:property ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-comprisesOrderResponseLine, ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-hasResponseDescription, ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-isSubmittedForOrder, + ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-specifiesOrderResponseInformation, ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-specifiesSeller ; sh:targetClass :OrderResponse . +ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponseInformation a sh:NodeShape ; + rdfs:label "Order response information" ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:property ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponseInformation-epo-ord-hasAcceptanceStatus, + ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponseInformation-epo-ord-isSpecificToOrderResponseLine ; + sh:targetClass :OrderResponseInformation . + ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponseLine a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Order response line" ; rdfs:comment """Details concerning the Seller's ability to fulfil a given Order Line. @@ -229,3 +227,303 @@ WG approval 25/04/2023 ord-shape:epo-ord-TaxInformation-epo-cat-hasPercentage ; sh:targetClass :TaxInformation . +ord-shape:epo-ord-AllowanceChargeInformation-epo-cat-hasPercentage a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; + sh:description """The factor relative to the price charged in addition. + +WG approval 26/07/2022""" ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has percentage" ; + sh:path :hasPercentage . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-AllowanceChargeInformation-epo-ful-hasAllowanceChargeReasonDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; + sh:name "Has allowance charge reason description" ; + sh:path :hasAllowanceChargeReasonDescription . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-AllowanceChargeInformation-epo-ord-hasTaxInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :TaxInformation ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has tax information" ; + sh:path :hasTaxInformation ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-AllowanceInformation-epo-ord-isSpecificToOrderLine a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OrderLine ; + sh:description """Information that is particular to one or multiple Order Lines. +""" ; + sh:name "Is specific to order line" ; + sh:path :isSpecificToOrderLine ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-ContractInformation-epo-ord-isSpecificToOrderLine a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OrderLine ; + sh:description "Information that is particular to one or multiple Order Lines." ; + sh:name "Is specific to order line" ; + sh:path :isSpecificToOrderLine ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-DeliveryAgreement-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; + sh:description """An account of the resource. + +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. + +WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; + sh:name "Description" ; + sh:path dcterms:description . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-DeliveryInformation-epo-ord-concernsConsignee a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :Consignee ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Concerns consignee" ; + sh:path :concernsConsignee ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-DeliveryInformation-epo-ord-hasDeliveryDeadline a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has delivery deadline" ; + sh:path :hasDeliveryDeadline . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-DeliveryInformation-epo-ord-hasShippingMark a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; + sh:name "Has shipping mark" ; + sh:path :hasShippingMark . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-DeliveryInformation-epo-ord-isSpecificToOrderLine a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OrderLine ; + sh:description "Information that is particular to one or multiple Order Lines." ; + sh:name "Is specific to order line" ; + sh:path :isSpecificToOrderLine ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-DeliveryInformation-epo-ord-specifiesGeneralDeliveryAgreement a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :DeliveryAgreement ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Specifies general delivery agreement" ; + sh:path :specifiesGeneralDeliveryAgreement ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-DeliveryInformation-epo-ord-specifiesSpecificDeliveryAgreement a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :DeliveryAgreement ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Specifies specific delivery agreement" ; + sh:path :specifiesSpecificDeliveryAgreement ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-Order-epo-ord-comprisesOrderLine a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OrderLine ; + sh:minCount 1 ; + sh:name "Comprises order line" ; + sh:path :comprisesOrderLine ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-Order-epo-ord-hasAccountingCost a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; + sh:description """The accounting reference used by the Buyer to specify the account to which the order and the corresponding invoice are booked. + +WG approval 2023-01-26""" ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has accounting cost" ; + sh:path :hasAccountingCost . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-Order-epo-ord-hasCustomerReference a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; + sh:description """A supplementary reference for the order. + +Additional information: +This information can be used for the buyer's internal processes. +This reference can also be used in the invoice. + +WG approval 2023-01-26""" ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has customer reference" ; + sh:path :hasCustomerReference . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-Order-epo-ord-hasPaymentTerm a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has payment term" ; + sh:path :hasPaymentTerm . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-Order-epo-ord-specifiesAllowanceInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :AllowanceInformation ; + sh:name "Specifies allowance information" ; + sh:path :specifiesAllowanceInformation ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-Order-epo-ord-specifiesContractInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :ContractInformation ; + sh:description """ +""" ; + sh:name "Specifies contract information" ; + sh:path :specifiesContractInformation ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-Order-epo-ord-specifiesDeliveryInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :DeliveryInformation ; + sh:minCount 1 ; + sh:name "Specifies delivery information" ; + sh:path :specifiesDeliveryInformation ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-Order-epo-ord-specifiesOriginatorInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OriginatorInformation ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Specifies originator information" ; + sh:path :specifiesOriginatorInformation ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-Order-epo-specifiesSeller a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :Seller ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:minCount 1 ; + sh:name "Specifies seller" ; + sh:path :specifiesSeller ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-comprisesOrderResponseLine a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OrderResponseLine ; + sh:name "Comprises order response line" ; + sh:path :comprisesOrderResponseLine ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-hasResponseDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; + sh:description "Response clarification of the Supplier decision. " ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has response description" ; + sh:path :hasResponseDescription . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-isSubmittedForOrder a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :Order ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:minCount 1 ; + sh:name "Is submitted for order" ; + sh:path :isSubmittedForOrder ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-specifiesOrderResponseInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OrderResponseInformation ; + sh:name "Specifies order response information" ; + sh:path :specifiesOrderResponseInformation ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponse-epo-ord-specifiesSeller a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :Seller ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Specifies seller" ; + sh:path :specifiesSeller ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponseInformation-epo-ord-hasAcceptanceStatus a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class at-voc-new:ResponseStatus ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:minCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has acceptance status" ; + sh:path :hasAcceptanceStatus . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponseInformation-epo-ord-isSpecificToOrderResponseLine a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OrderResponseLine ; + sh:name "Is specific to order response line" ; + sh:path :isSpecificToOrderResponseLine ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OrderResponseLine-epo-ord-isSubmittedForOrderLine a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OrderLine ; + sh:minCount 1 ; + sh:name "Is submitted for order line" ; + sh:path :isSubmittedForOrderLine ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OriginatorInformation-epo-ord-concernsOriginator a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :Originator ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:minCount 1 ; + sh:name "Concerns originator" ; + sh:path :concernsOriginator ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-OriginatorInformation-epo-ord-isSpecificToOrderLine a sh:PropertyShape ; + sh:class :OrderLine ; + sh:description """Information that is particular to one or multiple Order Lines. +""" ; + sh:name "Is specific to order line" ; + sh:path :isSpecificToOrderLine ; + sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-TaxInformation-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; + sh:description """An account of the resource. + +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. + +WG Approval 30/05/2023 +""" ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Description" ; + sh:path dcterms:description . + +ord-shape:epo-ord-TaxInformation-epo-cat-hasPercentage a sh:PropertyShape ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy ord-shape:ord-shape ; + sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; + sh:description """The factor relative to the price charged in addition. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 +""" ; + sh:maxCount 1 ; + sh:name "Has percentage" ; + sh:path :hasPercentage . + +ord-shape:ord-shape a owl:Ontology ; + cc:attributionName "European Union" ; + cc:attributionURL ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the datashape specification. " ; + dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eOrdering of eProcurement ontology. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:license ; + dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; + dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - eOrdering"@en ; + bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; + vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo-ord" ; + vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; + rdfs:seeAlso , + , + , + ; + owl:imports :ord, + :ord-restriction, + cccev:, + , + at-voc:, + dcterms:, + , + , + , + , + , + org:, + , + foaf:, + ; + owl:incompatibleWith "3.1.0" ; + owl:priorVersion "3.1.0" ; + owl:versionIRI ord-shape:ord-shape-4.0.0 ; + owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; + skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from eOrdering_CM.xml on + 2023-09-12""" . + diff --git a/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-core.rdf b/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-core.rdf index 4c152b3e..657657c7 100644 --- a/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-core.rdf +++ b/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-core.rdf @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -55,13 +57,13 @@ eProcurement Ontology - core This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. This artefact provides the ontology core specification. - This version is automatically generated from ePO_CM.xml on 2023-08-09 + This version is automatically generated from ePO_CM.xml on 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -74,79 +76,6 @@ European Union - - - Award outcome - - - - - - - Lot award outcome - - - Result concerning the Lot attributed by the Awarder. - - - - - - - Lot group award information - - - Award information related to a given Group of Lots. - - - - - - - Mini competition award outcome - - - Result concerning the process where multiple winners or candidates of previous stages of a procedure bid for a specific procurement attributed by the Awarder. - -Additional Information: -It is typically used in framework agreements where the suppliers have already been pre-selected, and the mini competition is used to determine which supplier is best suited for a particular project or contract. -It is also used in a Dynamic Purchasing System where the suppliers come from a list of Candidates. - - - - - - - Notice award information - - - Information about an Award Notice. - - - - - - - Selected candidate list - - - Record of Candidates admitted to take part in award phases of procurements. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - - Tender award outcome - - - Result concerning the Tender attributed by the Awarder. - - - - Project @@ -854,6 +783,21 @@ WG approval 05/08/2021 (revised 26/10/2021) + + + Certifier + + + The role of an agent who issues a certificate. + +Additional Information: +The certifier is responsible for verifying and confirming the conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. + +WG approval 16/05/2023 + + + + Contact point @@ -986,6 +930,18 @@ This class defines the notion of "Geometry" at the conceptual level, and it shal + + + Review term + + + Conditions and stipulations defining particularities of the review. + +WG approval 23/11/2018 + + + + Access term @@ -1392,6 +1348,38 @@ WG approval 31/10/2018 + + + Certification label + + + Concept that stands for a set of norms, expectations, standards and policies. + +Additional Information: +Such standards may relate to social, ethical and quality etc. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 + + + + + + + + Certificate + + + Proof of conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. + +Additional Information: +Certificates provide assurance of credibility, trust, and transparency in the procurement process. + +WG approval 16/05/2023 + + + + + Green procurement @@ -1400,7 +1388,6 @@ WG approval 31/10/2018 Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure with a reduced Environmental Impact. Additional Information: - The approach may apply to the complete life cycle. The reduced Environmental Impact is in comparison to goods, services and works with the same primary function that would otherwise be procured. Tightly related are article 68 - Life-cycle costing and article 67 - most economically advantageous Tender (see GPP handbook) https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/Buying-Green-Handbook-3rd-Edition.pdf @@ -1414,21 +1401,14 @@ An instance of the class GreenProcurement is represented in eForms with the code Innovative procurement - An instance of the class InnovativeProcurement is represented in eForms with the code "inn-pur" defined in the codelist Strategic-Procurement. - -Research (21/01/2020): - -Purchasing and early adoption of solutions which are not yet available on large scale commercial basis. - -Source: Adapted from the Digital Single Market's Policy on Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/public-procurement-innovative-solutions + Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure an innovative work, supply or service. Additional Information: ‘innovation’ means the implementation of a new or significantly improved product, service or process, including but not limited to production, building or construction processes, a new marketing method, or a new organizational method in business practices, workplace Organisation or external relations inter alia with the purpose of helping to solve societal challenges or to support the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; See: Directive 2014/24 Articles: 2, 26 (3), 31, 67 (2.a) -Question: -Is Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) another type of Strategic Procurement? + @@ -1438,12 +1418,10 @@ Is Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) another type of Strategic Procurement?Social procurement - An instance of the class SocialProcurement is represented in eForms with the code "soc-obj" defined in the codelist Strategic-Procurement. - - -Research (21/01/2020): -Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP): + Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure by fulfilling social objectives. +Additional Information: +Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP) - ‘SRPP’ means Procurement Operations that take into account one or more of the following social considerations: employment opportunities, decent work, compliance with social and labour rights, social inclusion (including persons with disabilities), equal opportunities, accessibility design for all, taking account of sustainability criteria, including ethical trade issues and wider voluntary compliance with corporate social responsibility (CSR), while observing the principles enshrined in the Treaty for the European Union (TFEU) and the Procurement Directives. Source: Buying Social - A Guide to Taking Account of Social Considerations in Public Procurement (Publications Office of the European Union, 2011) https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cb70c481-0e29-4040-9be2-c408cddf081f/language-en See Article 18 and Annex X Directive 2014/24. @@ -1534,11 +1512,91 @@ WG Approval 19/09/2019 - - - Context specific description + + + Award outcome + + + + + + + Lot award outcome + + + Result concerning the Lot attributed by the Awarder. + + + + + + + Lot group award information + + + Award information related to a given Group of Lots. + + + + + + + Mini competition award outcome + + + Result concerning the process where multiple winners or candidates of previous stages of a procedure bid for a specific procurement attributed by the Awarder. + +Additional Information: +It is typically used in framework agreements where the suppliers have already been pre-selected, and the mini competition is used to determine which supplier is best suited for a particular project or contract. +It is also used in a Dynamic Purchasing System where the suppliers come from a list of Candidates. + + + + + + + Notice award information + + + Information about an Award Notice. + + + + + + + Selected candidate list + + + Record of Candidates admitted to take part in award phases of procurements. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + Tender award outcome + + + Result concerning the Tender attributed by the Awarder. + + + + + + + Concession estimate + + + + + + + Context description - + A description concerning a Procurement Object or a Notice in a specific Situation Context. Additional Information: @@ -1547,7 +1605,7 @@ The description has its own identity (+I) but is dependent (+D) on the concerned We say that ContextSpecificDescription *concerns* an Entity. - + @@ -1568,6 +1626,16 @@ http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Context_Slices + + + Contract lot completion information + + + Information related to a given Lot at the end of the procurement. + + + + Estimate @@ -1588,6 +1656,35 @@ http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Context_Slices + + + Review irregularity summary + + + Information about the number and type of requests the Buyer received to review any of its decisions (e.g. the Technical Specifications, Award Decision). + +Additional information: +This class corresponds in eForms to BG-613 Buyer Review Requests. + + + + + + + + + + Review request summary + + + Summary information about the requests the Buyer received to review any of its decisions (e.g. the technical specifications, award decision), as set out in Art. 1(5) of Directive 89/665/EEC and Directive 92/13/EEC, and about the complainants that submitted the requests. + +Additional information: +This class corresponds in eForms to BG-612 Buyer Review Summary. + + + + Statistical information @@ -1609,13 +1706,6 @@ WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - - Concession estimate - - - - Subcontracting estimate @@ -1626,55 +1716,16 @@ WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - - Review irregularity summary + + + Submission statistical information - - Information about the number and type of requests the Buyer received to review any of its decisions (e.g. the Technical Specifications, Award Decision). - -Additional information: -This class corresponds in eForms to BG-613 Buyer Review Requests. - + + Statistical information about submissions on a given competition, either at Lot level or Mini-Competition level. - +WG approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - Review request summary - - - Summary information about the requests the Buyer received to review any of its decisions (e.g. the technical specifications, award decision), as set out in Art. 1(5) of Directive 89/665/EEC and Directive 92/13/EEC, and about the complainants that submitted the requests. - -Additional information: -This class corresponds in eForms to BG-612 Buyer Review Summary. - - - - - - - Submission statistical information - - - Statistical information about submissions on a given competition, either at Lot level or Mini-Competition level. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - - Contract lot completion information - - - Information related to a given Lot at the end of the procurement. - - + @@ -1842,7 +1893,7 @@ WG Approval 24/05/2022 Additional information: This includes Concession Contracts. -(WG approval 01/06/2018) +WG approval 01/06/2018 @@ -1939,24 +1990,14 @@ This class corresponds to the BG-714 Review in eForms. - - - Element change description - - - Information about a specific field to be changed with regard to a previous Notice. - - - - - - - Element description + + + Change information - - Description about a specific resource. + + Alteration to previously provided details. - + @@ -1975,16 +2016,6 @@ Examples of fields that may not be immediately published are Winner, Tender and - - - Notice change information - - - Information about a corrigendum in a Notice. - - - - Identifier @@ -2473,6 +2504,15 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit standard duration, which provides the scale factor for a time extent, or the granularity or precision for a time position. + + + + Certification-label-type + + + * environmental/ecological/green, +* quality, +* social, etc. @@ -2502,48 +2542,6 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit Integer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -3432,6 +3430,21 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -3441,6 +3454,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -3450,6 +3466,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -3789,6 +3808,42 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -3819,6 +3874,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -3849,6 +3907,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -3879,6 +3940,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -3909,6 +3973,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -3939,6 +4006,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -3969,6 +4039,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -3999,6 +4072,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -4029,6 +4105,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -4059,6 +4138,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -4080,6 +4162,9 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + @@ -4092,9 +4177,18 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + + + + + + + @@ -4107,9 +4201,18 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + + + + + + + @@ -4122,9 +4225,18 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + + + + + + + @@ -4137,9 +4249,18 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + + + + + + + @@ -4152,62 +4273,146 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit - + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - - - - - - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -4377,70 +4582,262 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + - + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + - + - + - - + + - - + + + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + - + - + - + - + - + @@ -4866,9 +5263,6 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit - - - @@ -4881,53 +5275,8 @@ The codes associated with contracting entities are derived from sectors explicit - - Lot may be the object of more than one contract if it's a cascading situation. Otherwise, it is exactly one. - -Contract object is defined as follows: -All things which are not outside the commerce of men may be the object of a contract. Similarly, all services which are not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy may be the object of a contract. - - Used in F18 (and other standard forms) which is out of scope. We will need to reuse them for the Contract. - - - Used in F18 (and other standard forms) which is out of scope. We will need to reuse them for the Contract. - - - Proposal to omit this link until we bring tax into ePO core because this does not appear in the data - - - - <b>Procedure/ PlannedProcurementPart / Lot</b> are a conflation of three aspects into one: -- the procedural / process / game rules -- the object/scope/purpose of procurement -- the description of influences or additional information related to the procurement (isSME suitable, isUsingEuFunds, etc.) - -TODO: the definitions NEED to be aligned, for now, to cover all three aspects! Possibly in the future model a separation of concerns for higher clarity/accuracy. - - -Note: -The current procedure class is a conflation of the "process" description and "whole procurement subject matter". - -TODO: revise this definition. -TODO: specify that all procedures have al least one lot. - - - - should this be moved to document? - - - if PlannedProcurementPart has Terms, it should be a subclass of ProcurementObject. - - - In order to align with Core Voc, it means we need to add cv:LegalEntity and org:FormalOrganization between org:Organisation and epo:Business. - - - In order to align with Core Voc, it means we need to add cv:LegalEntity and org:FormalOrganization between org:Organisation and epo:Business. - - - A dependency enumeration will be created and a codelist added for hasLegalFormType. -check WGM 17/01/2023 + Used in F18 and other standard forms. based on eForms (BT-124) a Channel may differ per Lot @@ -4936,842 +5285,582 @@ based on standard forms, a channel may differ per procedure BT-08 can be Awarding CBP; BG-03 is the Buyer. But Awarding CPB is not the same as the Buyer; the organisations may differ for these roles. Having the Awarder Role allows us to specify which Organisation is involved in the Award Decision. + + Here we have roles that belong to other modules (check all). +Discuss whether we need to move them. + + Revise the Term hierarchy. e.g. ReviewTerm is per Procedure in SF (to be investigated how it is in eForms). - - Estimated dates are not really conditions and stipulations, they are not terms. We need to segregate the procedural/process information from the procurement-object information in the future. - - - Estimated dates are not really conditions and stipulations, they are not terms. We need to segregate the procedural/process information from the procurement-object information in the future. - What are the entities that can be reviewed? - + Added hasAdditionalInformation to cover for section VII.2 in F14, since we do not have the Corrigendum notice type anymore in eForms. - - - Has award status + + + Identifier - - Indicates whether the lot is awarded, not awarded or still open. -WG Approval 03/12/2019 + + A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - (epo:AwardOutcome -> at-voc:winner-selection-status (+epo:hasAwardStatus)) - - - - - - - Has awarded value - - - The value of the procurement provided by the Award Decision. +Additional Information -Additional Information: -Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. +For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. -In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum awarded value. +WG Approval 12/11/2019 -WG Approval 10/12/2019 (epo:AwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasAwardedValue)) + (epo:Project -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. + +Additional Information + +For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. + +WG Approval 12/11/2019 (epo:LotGroup -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. + +Additional Information + +For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. + +WG Approval 12/11/2019 + (epo:ProcurementElement -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. + +Additional Information + +For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. + +WG Approval 12/11/2019 + (epo:TenderGroup -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (foaf:Agent -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (dct:Location -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (cccev:InformationConcept -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (cccev:Requirement -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo:Document -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo:Fund -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:Consignment -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-cat:Line -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:AbstractContainer -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) - + + + Refers to project + + - - - Comprises tender award outcome + + + Has purpose - - Incorporates TenderAwardOutcome. (epo:AwardOutcome -> epo:TenderAwardOutcome (+epo:comprisesTenderAwardOutcome)) + + Relation indicating the Purpose of a concept. (epo:ProcurementObject -> epo:Purpose (+epo:hasPurpose)) - + - - - Has non award justification + + + Is funded by - - On hold; Enumeration. + + Funding is provided either completely or partially by a Fund. + +Additional information: +This corresponds in eForms to BG - 61 EU Funds (specified per Lot) and to BG - 611 Contract EU Funds (applied per Contract lot) +Funds may change between the lot and the contract, for example in the case of an emergency crisis, a contract may be financed by a budget that was not foreseen in the call. + (epo:ProcurementObject -> epo:Fund (+epo:isFundedBy)) Funding is provided either completely or partially by a Fund. - (epo:AwardOutcome -> at-voc:non-award-justification (+epo:hasNonAwardJustification)) +Additional information: +This corresponds in eForms to BG - 61 EU Funds (specified per Lot) and to BG - 611 Contract EU Funds (applied per Contract lot) +Funds may change between the lot and the contract, for example in the case of an emergency crisis, a contract may be financed by a budget that was not foreseen in the call. + + (epo:Contract -> epo:Fund (+epo:isFundedBy)) - + - - - Has bargain price + + + Has legal basis - - The value of procured supplies that have used a particularly advantageous opportunity available for a very short time at a value considerably lower than normal market prices. + + The legal basis under which the procurement procedure takes place. -WG approval 23/05/2023 (epo:AwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasBargainPrice)) +Additional Information: +For example European Directives or Regulations, national laws etc. +The recommended code list is the example for the legal basis at the European level. + +WG 04/04/2023 + + (epo:ProcurementObject -> at-voc:legal-basis (+epo:hasLegalBasis)) - + - - - Comprises award outcome - - - Incorporates AwardOutcome. (epo:AwardDecision -> epo:AwardOutcome (+epo:comprisesAwardOutcome)) + + + Has launch framework agreement maximum value - + - - - Summarises information for award outcome - - - Relates to submission for the given competition, either at Lot level or Mini-Competition level. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation -> epo:AwardOutcome (+epo:summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome)) + + + Is subject to term - + - - - Has awarded estimated value - - - The estimated value that can be spent as provided by the Award Decision. - -<u>Additional Information</u>: -This property is used for framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems. -Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasAwardedEstimatedValue)) + + + Fulfills strategic procurement - + - - - Has framework agreement maximum value + + + Foresees concession - + - - - Has framework agreement estimated value - - - This refers to BT-660 in eForms. (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue)) + + + Uses technique - + - - - Has approximate framework agreement value + + + Foresees contract specific term - + - - - Concerns lot - - - Relates to Lot. (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsLot)) Relates to Lot. (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsLot)) - - - + + + Contextualised by - - - Results from lot award outcome + + The place of the AgentInRole in the procurement is expressed by a ProcurementObject. (epo:AgentInRole -> epo:ProcurementObject (+epo:contextualisedBy)) - + - - - Has group framework agreement maximum value + + + Foresees procurement object - - This corresponds to BT-156 in the eForms. (epo:LotGroupAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue)) + + Relation indicating the instance of a Procurement Object that is planned. + +Additional Information: +The properties of the Procurement Object that is foreseen should be read as foreseen properties. +For example, Procedure isSMESuitable should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeSMESuitable. +For example, Procedure isFundedBy should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeFundedBy. (epo:PlannedProcurementPart -> epo:ProcurementObject (+epo:foreseesProcurementObject)) - + - - - Describes lot group + + + Specifies procurement criterion - + - - - Announces lot group award information + + + Is subject to lot specific term - + - - - Refers to lot group award information + + + Has lot reference - + - - - Results from using candidate list + + + Sets grouping context for lot - + - - - Results from mini competition award outcome + + + Refers to lot - + - - - Has maximum framework agreement awarded value + + + Refers to previous procedure lot - - The maximum value which can be spent through all the framework agreements announced in this notice, including options and renewals of contracts. - -Additional information: - -The value provided is a threshold value that implicity means that it cannot be exceeded however it may not be reached during the execution of a contract. + + Reference to one or more Lots in a previous procedure. -The Framework Agreements in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. +Additional Information: +In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. -This corresponds to the BT-118 in eForms. +This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier -WG Approval 03/12/2019 (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue)) +WG Approval 22/11/2019 14:33:55 (epo:DirectAwardTerm -> epo:Lot (+epo:refersToPreviousProcedureLot)) - + - - - Describes result notice + + + Announces lot - + - - - Has procurement highest received tender value - - - The highest received tender value for the procurement. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to section II.1.7.3. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986. (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue)) + + + Is assigned for evaluation of - + - - - Has procurement lowest received tender value - - - The lowest received tender value for the procurement. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to section II.1.7.2. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986. (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue)) + + + Is submitted for lot - + - - - Has total awarded value + + + Concerns review summary for lot - - The awarded value of all lots announced in this notice, including options and renewals. + + Relates to Lot review summary. Additional information: -The values of the individual Lots awarded under a framework agreement and mentioned in this notice are included. - -The values of the individual lots announced in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. - -This corresponds to the BT-161 in eForms. - -WG Approval 03/12/2019 - (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasTotalAwardedValue)) +This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-13722 Buyer Review Lot Identifier. (epo:ReviewRequestSummary -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsReviewSummaryForLot)) - + - - - Announces notice award information + + + Describes lot completion - + - - - Refers to notice award information - - - + + + Concerns lot - - - Contains candidate + + Relates to Lot. (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsLot)) Relates to Lot. (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsLot)) - + - - - Has start date + + + Has procurement scope divided into lot - + - - - Concerns tender + + + Foresees technique - + - - - Indicates award to winner - - - Reveals the winner to whom the tender award outcome is attributed. (epo:TenderAwardOutcome -> epo:Winner (+epo:indicatesAwardToWinner)) + + + Has planned period - + - - - Identifier + + + Has planned duration - - A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - -Additional Information - -For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. - -WG Approval 12/11/2019 - - (epo:Project -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - -Additional Information - -For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. - -WG Approval 12/11/2019 (epo:LotGroup -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - -Additional Information - -For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. - -WG Approval 12/11/2019 - (epo:ProcurementElement -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (foaf:Agent -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (dct:Location -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (cccev:InformationConcept -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo:Document -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo:Fund -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:Consignment -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-cat:Line -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:AbstractContainer -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) + + - - - Refers to project + + + Announces planned procurement part - + - - - Has purpose - - - Relation indicating the Purpose of a concept. (epo:ProcurementObject -> epo:Purpose (+epo:hasPurpose)) + + + Refers to planned part - + - - - Is funded by + + + Has procedure type - - Funding is provided either completely or partially by a Fund. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BG - 61 EU Funds (specified per Lot) and to BG - 611 Contract EU Funds (applied per Contract lot) -Funds may change between the lot and the contract, for example in the case of an emergency crisis, a contract may be financed by a budget that was not foreseen in the call. - - (epo:ProcurementObject -> epo:Fund (+epo:isFundedBy)) Funding is provided either completely or partially by a Fund. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BG - 61 EU Funds (specified per Lot) and to BG - 611 Contract EU Funds (applied per Contract lot) -Funds may change between the lot and the contract, for example in the case of an emergency crisis, a contract may be financed by a budget that was not foreseen in the call. + + Identification of the Procedure used. - (epo:Contract -> epo:Fund (+epo:isFundedBy)) +WG Approval 09/06/2020 + (epo:Procedure -> at-voc:procurement-procedure-type (+epo:hasProcedureType)) - + - - - Has legal basis - - - The legal basis under which the procurement procedure takes place. - -Additional Information: -For example European Directives or Regulations, national laws etc. -The recommended code list is the example for the legal basis at the European level. - -WG 04/04/2023 - - (epo:ProcurementObject -> at-voc:legal-basis (+epo:hasLegalBasis)) + + + Is subject to procedure specific term - + - - - Is subject to term + + + Is executed by procurement service provider - + - - - Fulfills strategic procurement + + + Involves buyer - + - - - Foresees concession + + + Is responsibility of buyer - + + The buyer in charge of the procedure. + +Additional Information: +In case there are multiple buyers, it may be the case that one or more buyers are in charge of the procedure. + (epo:Procedure -> epo:Buyer (+epo:isResponsibilityOfBuyer)) + + - - - Uses technique + + + Specifies procurement criteria summary - + - - - Foresees contract specific term + + + Refers to previous procedure - + + Reference to a previous procedure. + +Additional Information: +In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. + +This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier (epo:DirectAwardTerm -> epo:Procedure (+epo:refersToPreviousProcedure)) + + - - - Contextualised by - - - The place of the AgentInRole in the procurement is expressed by a ProcurementObject. (epo:AgentInRole -> epo:ProcurementObject (+epo:contextualisedBy)) - - - - - - - Foresees procurement object - - - Relation indicating the instance of a Procurement Object that is planned. - -Additional Information: -The properties of the Procurement Object that is foreseen should be read as foreseen properties. -For example, Procedure isSMESuitable should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeSMESuitable. -For example, Procedure isFundedBy should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeFundedBy. (epo:PlannedProcurementPart -> epo:ProcurementObject (+epo:foreseesProcurementObject)) + + + Refers to procedure - + - - - Specifies procurement criterion - - - + + + Concerns procedure - - - Is subject to lot specific term + + Relates to Procedure. (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation -> epo:Procedure (+epo:concernsProcedure)) - + - - - Has lot reference + + + Announces procedure - + - - - Sets grouping context for lot + + + Concerns procedure - + - - - Refers to lot + + + Has internal identifier - + - - - Refers to previous procedure lot + + + Has estimated value - - Reference to one or more Lots in a previous procedure. + + A forecast of the value of the procurement before competition. Additional Information: -In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. +Different cases of estimated values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. +The forecast is calculated by the buyer and covers all revenues whether coming from the buyer or third parties. +See for example recital (19), Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and other articles from the rest of Directives about procurement. -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier +In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum estimated value. -WG Approval 22/11/2019 14:33:55 (epo:DirectAwardTerm -> epo:Lot (+epo:refersToPreviousProcedureLot)) +This property corresponds to BT-27 in eForms (for Lot and Procedure) and can be used for BT-157 (for LotGroup). +<b> +</b>WG Approval 05/12/2019 + (epo:LotGroup -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasEstimatedValue)) A forecast of the value of the procurement before competition. + +Additional Information: +Different cases of estimated values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. +The forecast is calculated by the buyer and covers all revenues whether coming from the buyer or third parties. +See for example recital (19), Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and other articles from the rest of Directives about procurement. + +In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum estimated value. + +This property corresponds to BT-27 in eForms (for Lot and Procedure) and can be used for BT-157 (for LotGroup). +<b> +</b><b>WG Approval 05/12/2019</b> + + (epo:ProcurementElement -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasEstimatedValue)) - + - - - Announces lot + + + Refers to lot group - + - - - Is assigned for evaluation of - - - + + + Defines lot group - - - Is submitted for lot + + Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has a LotGroup. (epo:ProcedureTerm -> epo:LotGroup (+epo:definesLotGroup)) - + - - - Concerns review summary for lot - - - Relates to Lot review summary. - -Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-13722 Buyer Review Lot Identifier. (epo:ReviewRequestSummary -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsReviewSummaryForLot)) + + + Describes lot group - + - - - Describes lot completion + + + Is subject to grouping - + - - - Has procurement scope divided into lot + + + Announces lot group - + - - - Foresees technique + + + Is submitted for lot group - + - - - Has planned period + + + Uses channel - + - - - Has planned duration - - - + + + Has total quantity - - - Announces planned procurement part + + The number of units required. + +Additional Information: +The quantity needs to go along with the unit. + + + + (epo:Purpose -> epo:Quantity (+epo:hasTotalQuantity)) - + - - - Refers to planned part + + + Has main classification - + - - - Has procedure type - - - Identification of the Procedure used. - -WG Approval 09/06/2020 - (epo:Procedure -> at-voc:procurement-procedure-type (+epo:hasProcedureType)) + + + Has additional classification - + - - - Is subject to procedure specific term - - - + + + Comprises tender - - - Is executed by procurement service provider + + Incorporates Tender. (epo:TenderGroup -> epo:Tender (+epo:comprisesTender)) - + - - - Involves buyer + + + Has total value - + - - - Is responsibility of buyer + + + Registered address - - The buyer in charge of the procedure. + + The registered address relationship links a Resource with the legally registered Address. Additional Information: -In case there are multiple buyers, it may be the case that one or more buyers are in charge of the procedure. - (epo:Procedure -> epo:Buyer (+epo:isResponsibilityOfBuyer)) - - - - - - - Specifies procurement criteria summary - - - - - - - Refers to previous procedure - - - Reference to a previous procedure. - -Additional Information: -In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. - -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier (epo:DirectAwardTerm -> epo:Procedure (+epo:refersToPreviousProcedure)) - - - - - - - Refers to procedure - - - - - - - Concerns procedure - - - Relates to Procedure. (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation -> epo:Procedure (+epo:concernsProcedure)) - - - - - - - Announces procedure - - - - - - - Refers to lot group - - - - - - - Defines lot group - - - Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has a LotGroup. (epo:ProcedureTerm -> epo:LotGroup (+epo:definesLotGroup)) - - - - - - - Is subject to grouping - - - - - - - Announces lot group - - - - - - - Is submitted for lot group - - - - - - - Uses channel - - - - - - - Has internal identifier - - - - - - - Has estimated value - - - A forecast of the value of the procurement before competition. - -Additional Information: -Different cases of estimated values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. -The forecast is calculated by the buyer and covers all revenues whether coming from the buyer or third parties. -See for example recital (19), Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and other articles from the rest of Directives about procurement. - -In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum estimated value. - -This property corresponds to BT-27 in eForms (for Lot and Procedure) and can be used for BT-157 (for LotGroup). -<b> -</b><b>WG Approval 05/12/2019</b> - - (epo:ProcurementElement -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasEstimatedValue)) - - - - - - - Has total quantity - - - The number of units required. - -Additional Information: -The quantity needs to go along with the unit. - - - - (epo:Purpose -> epo:Quantity (+epo:hasTotalQuantity)) - - - - - - - Has main classification - - - - - - - Has additional classification - - - - - - - Comprises tender - - - Incorporates Tender. (epo:TenderGroup -> epo:Tender (+epo:comprisesTender)) - - - - - - - Has total value - - - - - - - Registered address - - - The registered address relationship links a Resource with the legally registered Address. - -Additional Information: -It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address. (cpv:Person -> locn:Address (+cv:registeredAddress)) The registered address relationship links a Resource with the legally registered Address. - -Additional Information: -It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address. - (org:Organization -> locn:Address (+cv:registeredAddress)) +It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address. (cpv:Person -> locn:Address (+cv:registeredAddress)) The registered address relationship links a Resource with the legally registered Address. + +Additional Information: +It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address. + (org:Organization -> locn:Address (+cv:registeredAddress)) @@ -5835,6 +5924,13 @@ WG approval 14/09/2021 (epo:Business <-> cpv:Person (+epo:hasBeneficialOwn + + + Played by + + + + Has business size @@ -5881,13 +5977,6 @@ WG Approval 28/05/2020 - - - Played by - - - - Has certification @@ -5895,9 +5984,11 @@ WG Approval 28/05/2020 Relation to the proof of conformance. -WG approval 30/05/2023 (foaf:Person -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. +WG approval 30/05/2023 (foaf:Person -> epo:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. -WG approval 30/05/2023 (org:Organization -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) +WG approval 30/05/2023 (org:Organization -> epo:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Item -> epo:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) @@ -5936,6 +6027,15 @@ WG Approval 05/05/2020 + + + Sub organization of + + + Represents hierarchical containment of Organizations or OrganizationalUnits; indicates an Organization which contains this Organization. + +WG 31/08/2023 (org:Organization -> org:Organization (+org:subOrganizationOf)) + Address @@ -6137,6 +6237,13 @@ Directive 2014/24/EU describes ancillary purchasing activities as activities con + + + Contains candidate + + + + Defines catalogue provider @@ -6280,6 +6387,26 @@ Directive 2014/24/EU describes ancillary purchasing activities as activities con + + + Defines reviewer + + + Relation indicating a ReviewTerm has a Reviewer. (epo:ReviewTerm -> epo:Reviewer (+epo:definesReviewer)) + + + + + + + Defines review procedure information provider + + + Relation indicating a ReviewTerm has a ReviewProcedureInformationProvider. (epo:ReviewTerm -> epo:ReviewProcedureInformationProvider (+epo:definesReviewProcedureInformationProvider)) + + + + Specifies subcontractors @@ -6335,6 +6462,31 @@ WG approval 18/05/2021 (epo:Tender -> epo:Tenderer (+epo:isSubmitedBy)) + + + Indicates award to winner + + + Reveals the winner to whom the tender award outcome is attributed. (epo:TenderAwardOutcome -> epo:Winner (+epo:indicatesAwardToWinner)) + + + + + + + Issued by certifier + + + Relation indicating the Certifier responsible for providing the ItemCertificate. + +Additional Information: +Certifier is a role played by an organisation. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo:Certificate -> epo:Certifier (+epo:issuedByCertifier)) + + + + Has endpoint identifier @@ -6505,6 +6657,13 @@ WG Approval 28/05/2020 + + + Has tender validity duration + + + + Has late submission permission @@ -6553,548 +6712,858 @@ Additional Information: Further conditions for submitting variant tenders are in the procurement documents. (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:permission (+epo:hasVariantPermission)) - - + + + + + + Has e submission permission + + + The requirements as to what extent electronic submission is allowed. + +WG Approval 03/10/2019 + + (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:permission (+epo:hasESubmissionPermission)) + + + + + + + Has tender subcontracting information + + + The information about subcontracting that must be indicated in the tender. + +WG Approval 10/10/2019 + + (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:subcontracting-indication (+epo:hasTenderSubcontractingInformation)) + + + + + + + Has e catalogue permission + + + The extent to which electronic catalogues may be used in tenders. + +WG Approval 03/10/2019 + (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:permission (+epo:hasECataloguePermission)) + + + + + + + Has tender validity period + + + The relation indicating until when a tender instance is applicable. + (epo:SubmissionTerm -> epo:Period (+epo:hasTenderValidityPeriod)) + + + + + + + Has language + + + Language in which the submitted information is to be expressed. + +WG Approval 21/07/2020 + + (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:language (+epo:hasLanguage)) + + + + + + + Has broad place of performance + + + Geopolitical zone where the contract can be executed. + +Additional Information + +Used for setting restrictions that cannot be established with one country code or a geographical zone identifier (like NUTS), because they have a broader scope (geographical, economic, political, other). + (epo:ContractTerm -> at-voc:other-place-service (+epo:hasBroadPlaceOfPerformance)) + + + + + + + Defines contract duration + + + Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Duration. (epo:ContractTerm -> epo:Duration (+epo:definesContractDuration)) + + + + + + + Has e invoicing permission + + + + + + + Has reserved execution + + + + + + + Has contract nature type + + + Subject of the acquisition. + +WG Approval 11/06/2020 + + (epo:ContractTerm -> at-voc:contract-nature (+epo:hasContractNatureType)) + + + + + + + Has additional contract nature + + + Additional type of acquisition taken into consideration in the contract. + +WG Approval 11/06/2020 + + (epo:ContractTerm -> at-voc:contract-nature (+epo:hasAdditionalContractNature)) + + + + + + + Defines subcontracting term + + + Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a SubcontractingTerm. (epo:ContractTerm -> epo:SubcontractTerm (+epo:definesSubcontractingTerm)) + + + + + + + Defines contract period + + + Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Period. (epo:ContractTerm -> epo:Period (+epo:definesContractPeriod)) + + + + + + + Defines prize + + + Relation indicating a DesignContestRegimeTerm has a Prize. (epo:DesignContestRegimeTerm -> epo:Prize (+epo:definesPrize)) + + + + + + + Has framework agreement type + + + The form of framework agreement used in a procurement procedure. + +Addition information: + +A concept to distinguish the different types of framework agreement, which are: +1. Framework agreement without reopening of competition, +2. Framework agreement with reopening of competition, or +3. Framework agreement partly without reopening of competition. + +WG Approval 19/09/2019 + + (epo:FrameworkAgreementTerm -> at-voc:framework-agreement (+epo:hasFrameworkAgreementType)) + + + + + + + Has qualification system duration + + + + + + + Has prize value + + + The monetary value of a prize, if any, for the winner (or runners-up) of the design contest. + +Additional Information: +This corresponds to BT-644 in eForms. + +WG Approval 29/08/2019 + + (epo:Prize -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasPrizeValue)) + + + + + + + Has subcontracting obligation + + + The requirement the tender must meet with regard to subcontracting parts of the contract. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + (epo:SubcontractTerm -> at-voc:subcontracting-obligation (+epo:hasSubcontractingObligation)) + + + + + + + Constrains + + + Information Concept about which a Constraint expresses a limitation. + +Additional Information: +Information Concepts are tools to make Requirements more machine processable: they allow to provide more detail about a Requirement. This way, Constraints can be made very precise, namely the limit that must be achieved, is a limit on the value for the associated Information Concept. For example, the Information Concept would be the age of a person and the Constraint would be the required age in the context of a specific evaluation. (cccev:Constraint -> cccev:InformationConcept (+cccev:constrains)) + + + + Has threshold type + + + The method to interpret the threshold value as minimum or a maximum. + +WG Approval 17/09/2019 + (cccev:Constraint -> at-voc:number-threshold (+epo:hasThresholdType)) + + + + + + + Has constraint + + + + + + + Type + + + Category to which the Requirement belongs. (cccev:Criterion -> at-voc:criterion (+dct:type)) - - - Has e submission permission + + + Has validity period - - The requirements as to what extent electronic submission is allowed. + + The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. -WG Approval 03/10/2019 +WG approval 30/05/2023 (cccev:Evidence -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. - (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:permission (+epo:hasESubmissionPermission)) +WG approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:Technique -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) - + - - - Has tender subcontracting information + + + Supports requirement - - The information about subcontracting that must be indicated in the tender. - -WG Approval 10/10/2019 - - (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:subcontracting-indication (+epo:hasTenderSubcontractingInformation)) + + Requirement for which the Evidence provides proof. (cccev:Evidence -> cccev:Requirement (+cccev:supportsRequirement)) - + + + Reinforces response + + - - - Has e catalogue permission + + + Supports concept - - The extent to which electronic catalogues may be used in tenders. + + Information Concept providing facts found/inferred from the Evidence. -WG Approval 03/10/2019 - (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:permission (+epo:hasECataloguePermission)) +Additional Information: +Examples of Information Concepts are values found explictly in the evidence such as a birth date or information derived from the Evidence such as "I am older that 18 years" or "this is a FairTrade product". (cccev:Evidence -> cccev:InformationConcept (+cccev:supportsConcept)) - - + + + Confidentiality level type - - - Has tender validity period + + Security classification assigned to an Evidence e.g. classified, sensitive, public. + +Additional Information: + +Classifications should be defined by an organisation/country as an outcome of a security assessment. + (cccev:Evidence -> at-voc:confidentiality-level (+cccev:confidentialityLevelType)) - - The relation indicating until when a tender instance is applicable. - (epo:SubmissionTerm -> epo:Period (+epo:hasTenderValidityPeriod)) + + + Has requirement - - + + A more specific Requirement that is part of the Requirement. (cccev:Requirement -> cccev:Requirement (+cccev:hasRequirement)) - - - Has language + + + Has award criterion type - - Language in which the submitted information is to be expressed. - -WG Approval 21/07/2020 + + Category of award criterion. - (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:language (+epo:hasLanguage)) + (epo:AwardCriterion -> at-voc:award-criterion-type (+epo:hasAwardCriterionType)) - + - - - Has broad place of performance + + + Has fixed value type - - Geopolitical zone where the contract can be executed. + + The method to interpret the fixed value as pertaining to a total or unit. -Additional Information +WG Approval 17/09/2019 -Used for setting restrictions that cannot be established with one country code or a geographical zone identifier (like NUTS), because they have a broader scope (geographical, economic, political, other). - (epo:ContractTerm -> at-voc:other-place-service (+epo:hasBroadPlaceOfPerformance)) + (epo:AwardCriterion -> at-voc:number-fixed (+epo:hasFixedValueType)) - + - - - Defines contract duration - - - Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Duration. (epo:ContractTerm -> epo:Duration (+epo:definesContractDuration)) + + + Answers award criteria - + - - - Has e invoicing permission + + + Answers exclusion ground - + - - - Has reserved execution + + + Announces exclusion ground - + - - - Has contract nature type + + + Has reserved procurement - - Subject of the acquisition. + + Explanation as to whether a procurement may be reserved for the participation of certain types of organisation. -WG Approval 11/06/2020 +Additional information: +This property corresponds in eForms to the BT-71 +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + (epo:ParticipationCondition -> at-voc:reserved-procurement (+epo:hasReservedProcurement)) Explanation as to whether a procurement may be reserved for the participation of certain types of organisation. - (epo:ContractTerm -> at-voc:contract-nature (+epo:hasContractNatureType)) +Additional information: +This property corresponds in eForms to the BT-71 +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + (epo:ParticipationConditionsSummary -> at-voc:reserved-procurement (+epo:hasReservedProcurement)) - + - - - Has additional contract nature + + + Implements legislation - - Additional type of acquisition taken into consideration in the contract. + + + + + + Has weight value type + + + No definition. Waiting on CCCEV alignment. -WG Approval 11/06/2020 - (epo:ContractTerm -> at-voc:contract-nature (+epo:hasAdditionalContractNature)) + (epo:ProcurementCriterion -> at-voc:number-weight (+epo:hasWeightValueType)) - + - - - Defines subcontracting term + + + Has performing staff qualification information - - Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a SubcontractingTerm. (epo:ContractTerm -> epo:SubcontractTerm (+epo:definesSubcontractingTerm)) + + +Additional information: + +This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-79. (epo:ProcurementCriterion -> at-voc:requirement-stage (+epo:hasPerformingStaffQualificationInformation)) - + - - - Defines contract period - - - Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Period. (epo:ContractTerm -> epo:Period (+epo:definesContractPeriod)) + + + Comprises question - + - - - Defines prize + + + Implements article - - Relation indicating a DesignContestRegimeTerm has a Prize. (epo:DesignContestRegimeTerm -> epo:Prize (+epo:definesPrize)) + + - + + + Announces procurement criterion + + - - - Has launch framework agreement maximum value + + + Has selection criteria usage - + + +Additional Information: +This corresponds in eForms to BT-748 Selection Criteria Used. (epo:SelectionCriterion -> at-voc:usage (+epo:hasSelectionCriteriaUsage)) + + - - - Has framework agreement type + + + Has selection criterion type - - The form of framework agreement used in a procurement procedure. + + The classification of the selection criteria. -Addition information: -A concept to distinguish the different types of framework agreement, which are: -1. Framework agreement without reopening of competition, -2. Framework agreement with reopening of competition, or -3. Framework agreement partly without reopening of competition. +Additional Information: -WG Approval 19/09/2019 +This corresponds in eForms to BT-747 Selection Criteria Type. - (epo:FrameworkAgreementTerm -> at-voc:framework-agreement (+epo:hasFrameworkAgreementType)) +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + (epo:SelectionCriterion -> at-voc:selection-criterion (+epo:hasSelectionCriterionType)) - + + + + + + Announces selection criteria + + + + + + + Answers selection criteria + + - - - Has launch group framework agreement maximum value + + + Has label type - + + The label type such environmental, quality, social etc. (epo:CertificationLabel -> at-voc-new:certification-label-type (+epo:hasLabelType)) + + - - - Has qualification system duration + + + Attested by label - + + Relation indicating which label the certificate is about. + +WG approval 28/07/2022 (epo:Certificate -> epo:CertificationLabel (+epo:attestedByLabel)) + + - - - Has prize value + + + Fulfills requirement - - The monetary value of a prize, if any, for the winner (or runners-up) of the design contest. + + The requirement to which the concept meets. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + (epo:GreenProcurement -> at-voc:green-public-procurement-criteria (+epo:fulfillsRequirement)) The requirement to which the concept meets. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 -Additional Information: -This corresponds to BT-644 in eForms. + (epo:GreenProcurement -> at-voc:environmental-impact (+epo:fulfillsRequirement)) The requirement to which the concept meets. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 -WG Approval 29/08/2019 + (epo:InnovativeProcurement -> at-voc:innovative-acquisition (+epo:fulfillsRequirement)) The requirement to which the concept meets. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 - (epo:Prize -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasPrizeValue)) + (epo:SocialProcurement -> at-voc:social-objective (+epo:fulfillsRequirement)) - + - - - Has subcontracting obligation - - - The requirement the tender must meet with regard to subcontracting parts of the contract. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - - (epo:SubcontractTerm -> at-voc:subcontracting-obligation (+epo:hasSubcontractingObligation)) + + + Concerns green procurement - + - - - Constrains + + + Includes accessibility criterion - - Information Concept about which a Constraint expresses a limitation. + + Explanation as to whether accessibility Criterion are used or not. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 -Additional Information: -Information Concepts are tools to make Requirements more machine processable: they allow to provide more detail about a Requirement. This way, Constraints can be made very precise, namely the limit that must be achieved, is a limit on the value for the associated Information Concept. For example, the Information Concept would be the age of a person and the Constraint would be the required age in the context of a specific evaluation. (cccev:Constraint -> cccev:InformationConcept (+cccev:constrains)) + (epo:StrategicProcurement -> at-voc:accessibility (+epo:includesAccessibilityCriterion)) - - - Has threshold type + + - - The method to interpret the threshold value as minimum or a maximum. - -WG Approval 17/09/2019 - (cccev:Constraint -> at-voc:number-threshold (+epo:hasThresholdType)) + + + Specifies clean vehicle directive vehicle category - + - - - Has constraint + + + Specifies clean vehicle directive contract type - + - - - Type + + + Has d p s scope - - Category to which the Requirement belongs. (cccev:Criterion -> at-voc:criterion (+dct:type)) + + Explanation as to whether a dps is used and by whom. + +Additional Information: +This corresponds in eForms to BT-766 Dynamic Purchasing System. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + (epo:DynamicPurchaseSystemTechnique -> at-voc:dps-usage (+epo:hasDPSScope)) - - - Supports requirement + + - - Requirement for which the Evidence provides proof. (cccev:Evidence -> cccev:Requirement (+cccev:supportsRequirement)) + + + Has usage - - - Supports concept + + The codelist to be used is at-voc:usage which is available at http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/usage + (epo:Technique -> at-voc:usage (+epo:hasUsage)) - - Information Concept providing facts found/inferred from the Evidence. + + + + + + Has award status + + + Indicates whether the lot is awarded, not awarded or still open. +WG Approval 03/12/2019 -Additional Information: -Examples of Information Concepts are values found explictly in the evidence such as a birth date or information derived from the Evidence such as "I am older that 18 years" or "this is a FairTrade product". (cccev:Evidence -> cccev:InformationConcept (+cccev:supportsConcept)) + (epo:AwardOutcome -> at-voc:winner-selection-status (+epo:hasAwardStatus)) - - - Confidentiality level type + + - - Security classification assigned to an Evidence e.g. classified, sensitive, public. + + + Has awarded value + + + The value of the procurement provided by the Award Decision. Additional Information: +Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. -Classifications should be defined by an organisation/country as an outcome of a security assessment. - (cccev:Evidence -> at-voc:confidentiality-level (+cccev:confidentialityLevelType)) - - - - Has requirement +In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum awarded value. + +WG Approval 10/12/2019 (epo:AwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasAwardedValue)) - - A more specific Requirement that is part of the Requirement. (cccev:Requirement -> cccev:Requirement (+cccev:hasRequirement)) + + - - - Has award criterion type + + + Comprises tender award outcome - - Category of award criterion. - - (epo:AwardCriterion -> at-voc:award-criterion-type (+epo:hasAwardCriterionType)) + + Incorporates TenderAwardOutcome. (epo:AwardOutcome -> epo:TenderAwardOutcome (+epo:comprisesTenderAwardOutcome)) - + - - - Has fixed value type + + + Has non award justification - - The method to interpret the fixed value as pertaining to a total or unit. + + On hold; Enumeration. -WG Approval 17/09/2019 - (epo:AwardCriterion -> at-voc:number-fixed (+epo:hasFixedValueType)) + (epo:AwardOutcome -> at-voc:non-award-justification (+epo:hasNonAwardJustification)) - + - - - Answers award criteria - - - + + + Has bargain price - - - Answers exclusion ground + + The value of procured supplies that have used a particularly advantageous opportunity available for a very short time at a value considerably lower than normal market prices. + +WG approval 23/05/2023 (epo:AwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasBargainPrice)) - + - - - Announces exclusion ground + + + Comprises award outcome - + + Incorporates AwardOutcome. (epo:AwardDecision -> epo:AwardOutcome (+epo:comprisesAwardOutcome)) + + - - - Has reserved procurement + + + Summarises information for award outcome - - Explanation as to whether a procurement may be reserved for the participation of certain types of organisation. - -Additional information: -This property corresponds in eForms to the BT-71 -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - (epo:ParticipationCondition -> at-voc:reserved-procurement (+epo:hasReservedProcurement)) Explanation as to whether a procurement may be reserved for the participation of certain types of organisation. + + Relates to submission for the given competition, either at Lot level or Mini-Competition level. -Additional information: -This property corresponds in eForms to the BT-71 -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - (epo:ParticipationConditionsSummary -> at-voc:reserved-procurement (+epo:hasReservedProcurement)) +WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation -> epo:AwardOutcome (+epo:summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome)) - + - - - Has weight value type + + + Has framework agreement maximum value - - No definition. Waiting on CCCEV alignment. + + + + + + Has approximate framework agreement value + + + The estimated value to be spent within the Framework Agreement(s). +Additional information: +In the case of an Award Decision for a Lot, this relation represents the estimated value for the awarded Framework Agreement. +In the case of a Notice, this relation represents the estimated value for all Framework Agreements covered by the Notice. + (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue)) The estimated value to be spent within the Framework Agreement(s). - (epo:ProcurementCriterion -> at-voc:number-weight (+epo:hasWeightValueType)) +Additional information: +In the case of an Award Decision for a Lot, this relation represents the estimated value for the awarded Framework Agreement. +In the case of a Notice, this relation represents the estimated value for all Framework Agreements covered by the Notice. + (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue)) - + - - - Has performing staff qualification information - - - -Additional information: - -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-79. (epo:ProcurementCriterion -> at-voc:requirement-stage (+epo:hasPerformingStaffQualificationInformation)) + + + Results from lot award outcome - + - - - Has selection criteria usage + + + Has group framework agreement maximum value - - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-748 Selection Criteria Used. (epo:SelectionCriterion -> at-voc:usage (+epo:hasSelectionCriteriaUsage)) + + This corresponds to BT-156 in the eForms. (epo:LotGroupAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue)) - + - - - Has selection criterion type + + + Announces lot group award information - - The classification of the selection criteria. - - -Additional Information: - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-747 Selection Criteria Type. - -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - (epo:SelectionCriterion -> at-voc:selection-criterion (+epo:hasSelectionCriterionType)) + + - + + + Refers to lot group award information + + - - - Announces selection criteria + + + Results from using candidate list - + - - - Answers selection criteria + + + Results from mini competition award outcome - + - - - Fulfills requirement + + + Has maximum framework agreement awarded value - - The requirement to which the concept meets. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - (epo:GreenProcurement -> at-voc:green-public-procurement-criteria (+epo:fulfillsRequirement)) The requirement to which the concept meets. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + The maximum value which can be spent through all the framework agreements announced in this notice, including options and renewals of contracts. - (epo:GreenProcurement -> at-voc:environmental-impact (+epo:fulfillsRequirement)) The requirement to which the concept meets. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 +Additional information: - (epo:InnovativeProcurement -> at-voc:innovative-acquisition (+epo:fulfillsRequirement)) The requirement to which the concept meets. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 +The value provided is a threshold value that implicity means that it cannot be exceeded however it may not be reached during the execution of a contract. - (epo:SocialProcurement -> at-voc:social-objective (+epo:fulfillsRequirement)) +The Framework Agreements in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. + +This corresponds to the BT-118 in eForms. + +WG Approval 03/12/2019 (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue)) - + - - - Concerns green procurement + + + Describes direct award prenotification notice - + - - - Includes accessibility criterion + + + Has procurement highest received tender value - - Explanation as to whether accessibility Criterion are used or not. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + The highest received tender value for the procurement. - (epo:StrategicProcurement -> at-voc:accessibility (+epo:includesAccessibilityCriterion)) +Additional Information: +This corresponds to section II.1.7.3. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986. (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue)) - + - - - Specifies clean vehicle directive vehicle category + + + Describes result notice - + - - - Specifies clean vehicle directive contract type + + + Has procurement lowest received tender value - + + The lowest received tender value for the procurement. + +Additional Information: +This corresponds to section II.1.7.2. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986. (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue)) + + - - - Has d p s scope + + + Has total awarded value - - Explanation as to whether a dps is used and by whom. + + The awarded value of all lots announced in this notice, including options and renewals. -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-766 Dynamic Purchasing System. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - (epo:DynamicPurchaseSystemTechnique -> at-voc:dps-usage (+epo:hasDPSScope)) +Additional information: +The values of the individual Lots awarded under a framework agreement and mentioned in this notice are included. + +The values of the individual lots announced in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. + +This corresponds to the BT-161 in eForms. + +WG Approval 03/12/2019 + (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasTotalAwardedValue)) - + - - - Has usage + + + Announces notice award information - - The codelist to be used is at-voc:usage which is available at http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/usage - (epo:Technique -> at-voc:usage (+epo:hasUsage)) + + - + + + Refers to notice award information + + - - - Has validity period + + + Has start date - - The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - (epo:Technique -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Certificate -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) + + - + + + Concerns tender + + @@ -7137,27 +7606,35 @@ WG Approval 07/01/2020 (epo:ConcessionEstimate -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:has - - - Has subcontracting estimated value + + + Refers to contract - - The estimated value of a single subcontract. - -This relates to BT-553 in eForms. - -WG Approval 01/09/2020 - - (epo:SubcontractingEstimate -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasSubcontractingEstimatedValue)) + + - + + + Provides contract total penalty value + + + +Additional Information: +This corresponds to BT-782 in eForms. + (epo:ContractLotCompletionInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:providesContractTotalPenaltyValue)) + + - - - Foresees subcontracting + + + Provides contract total payment value - + + Additional Information: +This corresponds to BT-779 in eForms. (epo:ContractLotCompletionInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:providesContractTotalPaymentValue)) + + @@ -7179,7 +7656,30 @@ This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-636 Buyer Review Requests I Additional information: This relation corresponds in eForms to BG-613 Buyer Review Requests (epo:ReviewRequestSummary -> epo:ReviewIrregularitySummary (+epo:hasReviewIrregularitySummary)) - + + + + + + Has subcontracting estimated value + + + The estimated value of a single subcontract. + +This relates to BT-553 in eForms. + +WG Approval 01/09/2020 + + (epo:SubcontractingEstimate -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasSubcontractingEstimatedValue)) + + + + + + + Foresees subcontracting + + @@ -7225,37 +7725,6 @@ WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - - Refers to contract - - - - - - - Provides contract total penalty value - - - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to BT-782 in eForms. - (epo:ContractLotCompletionInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:providesContractTotalPenaltyValue)) - - - - - - - Provides contract total payment value - - - Additional Information: -This corresponds to BT-779 in eForms. (epo:ContractLotCompletionInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:providesContractTotalPaymentValue)) - - - - Has u u i d @@ -7268,28 +7737,6 @@ WG Approval 12/05/2020 (epo:Document -> adms:Identifier (+epo:hasUUID)) - - - Has document status - - - https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ (epo:Document -> at-voc-new:document-status (+epo:hasDocumentStatus)) - - - - - - - Has document type - - - - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ (epo:Document -> at-voc-new:document-type (+epo:hasDocumentType)) - - - - Associated with @@ -7351,13 +7798,6 @@ WG Approval 03/10/2019 - - - Has associated document - - - - Has external specification @@ -7395,13 +7835,6 @@ This holds for standard forms. (epo:Notice -> at-voc:legal-basis (+epo:confor - - - Has non published information - - - - Has notice type @@ -7416,20 +7849,6 @@ This holds for standard forms. (epo:Notice -> at-voc:legal-basis (+epo:confor - - - Conforms to specific legal basis - - - - - - - Has notice change information - - - - Has form type @@ -7444,6 +7863,13 @@ WG Approval 12/05/2020 + + + Concerns notice + + + + Refers to previous notice @@ -7451,7 +7877,7 @@ WG Approval 12/05/2020 Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-758 Change Notice Version Identifier. (epo:NoticeChangeInformation -> epo:Notice (+epo:refersToPreviousNotice)) +This corresponds in eForms to BT-758 Change Notice Version Identifier. (epo:ChangeInformation -> epo:Notice (+epo:refersToPreviousNotice)) @@ -7477,13 +7903,6 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-758 Change Notice Version Identifier. (epo:Noti - - - Has tax information - - - - Is supported by @@ -7572,6 +7991,13 @@ When the Lot uses a Technique the contract estimated duration applies to the Tec + + + Has tax information + + + + Announces completion of contract @@ -7737,37 +8163,11 @@ This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-792 Review Remedy Type (epo:Revi - - - Has element change - - - - - - - Has non published information identifier + + + Relates to e form section identifier - - - - - - Has non publication justification - - - The reason why data is not published. -WG Approval 11/06/2020 - (epo:NonPublishedInformation -> at-voc:non-publication-justification (+epo:hasNonPublicationJustification)) - - - - - - - Refers to e form section identifier - - + @@ -7778,16 +8178,21 @@ WG Approval 11/06/2020 Code explaining the change. WG Approval 5/11/2019 - (epo:NoticeChangeInformation -> at-voc:change-corrig-justification (+epo:hasChangeJustification)) + (epo:ChangeInformation -> at-voc:change-corrig-justification (+epo:hasChangeJustification)) - - - Has operator licence i d + + + Has non publication justification + + + The reason why data is not published. +WG Approval 11/06/2020 + (epo:NonPublishedInformation -> at-voc:non-publication-justification (+epo:hasNonPublicationJustification)) - + @@ -7966,11 +8371,11 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo-cat:Price -> epo:Duration (+epo-cat:hasExpectedDe - - - Has restated contract value + + + Updates contract value - + @@ -8113,13 +8518,6 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 - - - Has catalogue line validity - - - - Has delivery period @@ -8127,6 +8525,13 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 + + + Has catalogue line validity + + + + Has unit code @@ -8356,51 +8761,23 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-200. - - - Has non awarded contract number - - - The number the contract would have had if it had been awarded. - -Additional information: - -This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. - -WG agreement: 06/09/2022 - (epo:LotAwardOutcome) - - - - - - - Has non awarded contract title + + + Is s m e suitable - - The title the contract would have had if it had been awarded. + + The Lot is suitable for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). -Additional information: +Additional Information -This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. +This allows the buyer to make emphasis on the fact that the procedure has been designed having SMEs in mind. This indicator is also to be reflected in the selection criteria. -WG agreement: 06/09/2022 (epo:LotAwardOutcome) - - - - - - - Has award rank - - - The position of the tender (i.e. whether the tender ended up first, second, third, etc.) in a design contest, some framework agreements with multiple winners (e.g. cascades) or an innovation partnership. +For example, number of employees and turnover are applicable to the definition of an SME. -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-171 Tender Rank. - (epo:TenderAwardOutcome) +WG Approval 15/10/2019 + (epo:ProcurementObject) - + @@ -8415,34 +8792,26 @@ WG Approval 15/10/2019 (epo:ProcurementObject) Supplementary data about the inst WG Approval 15/10/2019 (epo:Notice) Supplementary data about the instance of the concept. WG Approval 15/10/2019 - (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) + (epo:ChangeInformation) - - - Has legal basis description - - - - - - - Has recurrence description + + + Is using e u funds - - Any additional information about the recurrence of the Procurement. + + The procurement foresees funding by the Union. Additional Information: -For example estimated timing of the Procedure. +The funding may cover the whole procurement or part of the procurement. -This corresponds in eForms to BT-95 Recurrence Description. +For example the European Structural and Investment Funds or grants awarded by the European Union. -(WG approval 2019-01-16) (epo:ProcurementObject) - + @@ -8483,40 +8852,46 @@ WG Approval 12/05/2020 - - - Is s m e suitable + + + Has recurrence description - - The Lot is suitable for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). - -Additional Information + + Any additional information about the recurrence of the Procurement. -This allows the buyer to make emphasis on the fact that the procedure has been designed having SMEs in mind. This indicator is also to be reflected in the selection criteria. +Additional Information: +For example estimated timing of the Procedure. -For example, number of employees and turnover are applicable to the definition of an SME. +This corresponds in eForms to BT-95 Recurrence Description. -WG Approval 15/10/2019 +(WG approval 2019-01-16) (epo:ProcurementObject) - + - - - Is using e u funds + + + Has legal basis description - - The procurement foresees funding by the Union. + + + + + + Is accelerated + + + Statement about the fact that the procedure will be reduced due to a state of urgency. -Additional Information: -The funding may cover the whole procurement or part of the procurement. +Additional Information -For example the European Structural and Investment Funds or grants awarded by the European Union. +This modifies the time limit for the receipt of requests to participate or the receipt of tenders. - (epo:ProcurementObject) +WG Approval 20/08/2019 + (epo:Procedure) - + @@ -8549,21 +8924,17 @@ This information should be given when the procedure is not one of those mentione - - - Is accelerated + + + Is joint procurement - - Statement about the fact that the procedure will be reduced due to a state of urgency. - -Additional Information - -This modifies the time limit for the receipt of requests to participate or the receipt of tenders. + + Multiple buyers procure together within the same procedure. -WG Approval 20/08/2019 - (epo:Procedure) +Addition Information: +In case the joint procurement involves buyers from different countries, the national law is specified by the epo:hasCrossBorderLaw in the ProcedureTerm . (epo:Procedure) - + @@ -8583,18 +8954,32 @@ WG approval 04-02-2021 (epo:Procedure) - - - Is joint procurement + + + Title - - Multiple buyers procure together within the same procedure. + + A name given to the resource. -Addition Information: -In case the joint procurement involves buyers from different countries, the national law is specified by the epo:hasCrossBorderLaw in the ProcedureTerm . (epo:Procedure) - - - +WG approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:LotGroup) A name given to the resource. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo:ProcurementElement) A name given to the resource. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:TenderGroup) A name given to the resource. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 (foaf:Agent) A name given to the resource. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:AgentInRole) A name given to the resource. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + + (epo:Document) A name given to the resource. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:Fund) @@ -8606,11 +8991,23 @@ In case the joint procurement involves buyers from different countries, the nati Additional Information: Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. +WG Approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:LotGroup) An account of the resource. + +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. + WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo:ProcurementElement) An account of the resource. Additional Information: Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. +WG Approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:TenderGroup) An account of the resource. + +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. + WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo:System) An account of the resource. Additional Information: @@ -8680,41 +9077,12 @@ Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo:Fund) - - - Title - - - A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo:ProcurementElement) A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 (foaf:Agent) A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - (epo:AgentInRole) A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - - (epo:Document) A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - (epo:Fund) - - - - Birth date - - - The point in time on which the Person was born. (cpv:Person) - - - - Alternative + + + Name - - Any name by which an individual is known other than their full name. -WG 09/11/2021 (cpv:Person) + + The complete name of the Person as one string. (cpv:Person) @@ -8732,12 +9100,21 @@ WG 09/11/2021 (cpv:Person) The name(s) that identify the Person within a family with a common surname. (cpv:Person) - - - Name + + + Patronymic name - - The complete name of the Person as one string. (cpv:Person) + + Name based on the given name of the Person's father. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (cpv:Person) + + + + Alternative + + + Any name by which an individual is known other than their full name. +WG 09/11/2021 (cpv:Person) @@ -8747,13 +9124,12 @@ WG 09/11/2021 (cpv:Person) Family name of the Person given upon their birth. WG Approval 09/11/2021 (cpv:Person) - - - Patronymic name + + + Birth date - - Name based on the given name of the Person's father. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 (cpv:Person) + + The point in time on which the Person was born. (cpv:Person) @@ -8799,6 +9175,18 @@ WG Approval 25/03/2021 (foaf:Agent) + + + Has legal name + + + The officially registered name of an organisation. + +WG Approval 10/01/2023 (org:Organization) + + + + Has buyer legal type description @@ -8814,23 +9202,6 @@ WG Approval 06/09/2022 (org:Organization) - - - Has internet address - - - The main web page used by the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 01/06/2023 - (org:Organization) The main web page used by the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 01/06/2023 - - (cpov:ContactPoint) - - - - Has legal form type @@ -8846,18 +9217,6 @@ Note that the codelist provided at national level should be used. - - - Has legal name - - - The officially registered name of an organisation. - -WG Approval 10/01/2023 (org:Organization) - - - - Has main activity description @@ -8874,19 +9233,43 @@ WG Approval 06/09/2022 - - - Has organisation unit name + + + Has internet address + + + The main web page used by the instance of the concept. + +WG Approval 01/06/2023 + (org:Organization) The main web page used by the instance of the concept. + +WG Approval 01/06/2023 + + (cpov:ContactPoint) + + + + + + + Is contracting entity - - The name of a subpart of an organisation. + + Role of entities, which: -Additional Information: -E.g. the relevant department of a large organisation. +(a) are contracting authorities or public undertakings and which pursue one of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14 of the Directive 2014/25/EU. + +(b) when they are not contracting authorities or public undertakings, have as one of their activities any of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14, or any combination thereof and operate on the basis of special or exclusive rights granted by a competent authority of a Member State. + +Additional Information -We added this attribute in case of eProcurement notices where the Buyer is actually a part of an Organization and the rest of the properties apply to the rest of the Organisation as well. (org:Organization) +The indicator is needed in order to discriminate between those contracts where the Contracting Entity acts as a Contracting Authority undergoing the limits and the rules of Directive 24 and those where it acts as a Contracting Entity, with certain relaxed constraints. +For example, the Contracting Entities have different thresholds for the application of Directive 24 if compared with Contracting Authorities. + +WG Approval 28/04/2020 + (epo:Buyer) - + @@ -8918,28 +9301,24 @@ WG approval 04/05/2018 - - - Is contracting entity + + + Has fax - - Role of entities, which: - -(a) are contracting authorities or public undertakings and which pursue one of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14 of the Directive 2014/25/EU. - -(b) when they are not contracting authorities or public undertakings, have as one of their activities any of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14, or any combination thereof and operate on the basis of special or exclusive rights granted by a competent authority of a Member State. - -Additional Information - -The indicator is needed in order to discriminate between those contracts where the Contracting Entity acts as a Contracting Authority undergoing the limits and the rules of Directive 24 and those where it acts as a Contracting Entity, with certain relaxed constraints. -For example, the Contracting Entities have different thresholds for the application of Directive 24 if compared with Contracting Authorities. - -WG Approval 28/04/2020 - (epo:Buyer) + + The fax number used to reach a person or an organisation. (cpov:ContactPoint) - + + + + Telephone + + + A telephone number through which the Contact Point can be contacted. + (cpov:ContactPoint) + Email @@ -8947,14 +9326,6 @@ WG Approval 28/04/2020 The email of the Organisation. - (cpov:ContactPoint) - - - - Telephone - - - A telephone number through which the Contact Point can be contacted. (cpov:ContactPoint) @@ -8969,16 +9340,6 @@ WG Approval: 27/01/2022 (cpov:ContactPoint) - - - Has fax - - - The fax number used to reach a person or an organisation. (cpov:ContactPoint) - - - - Has address u r l @@ -9010,6 +9371,13 @@ The country codes defined in ISO 3166 may be used as geographic names and these Where a country has changed its name or no longer exists (such as Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia etc.) use the ISO 3166-3 code. (dct:Location) + + + Post name + + + The key postal division of the address, usually the city. (INSPIRE's definition is "One or more names created and maintained for postal purposes to identify a subdivision of addresses and postal delivery points.) For example, "Paris". (locn:Address) + Address area @@ -9020,15 +9388,17 @@ Where a country has changed its name or no longer exists (such as Czechoslovakia Additional Information: This would typically be part of a city, a neighbourhood or village, e.g. Montmartre. (locn:Address) - - - Admin unit l1 + + + Locator name - - The name or names of a unit of administration related to the exercise of jurisdictional rights, for local, regional and national governance. Level 1 refers to the uppermost administrative unit for the address, almost always a country. + + Proper noun(s) applied to the real world entity identified by the locator. Additional Information: -Best practice is to use the ISO 3166-1 code but if this is inappropriate for the context, country names should be provided in a consistent manner to reduce ambiguity. For example, either write 'France' or 'FRA' consistently throughout the dataset and avoid mixing the two. The Country controlled vocabulary from the Publications Office can be reused for this. (locn:Address) +The locator name could be the name of the property or complex, of the building or part of the building, or it could be the name of a room inside a building. + +The key difference between a locator and a locator name is that the latter is a proper name and is unlikely to include digits. For example, "Shumann, Berlaymont" is a meeting room within the European Commission headquarters for which locator name is more appropriate than locator. (locn:Address) @@ -9061,17 +9431,15 @@ Use of this property is recommended as it will not suffer any misunderstandings Additional Information: In simpler terms, this is the building number, apartment number, etc. For an address such as "Flat 3, 17 Bridge Street", the locator is "flat 3, 17". (locn:Address) - - - Locator name + + + Admin unit l1 - - Proper noun(s) applied to the real world entity identified by the locator. + + The name or names of a unit of administration related to the exercise of jurisdictional rights, for local, regional and national governance. Level 1 refers to the uppermost administrative unit for the address, almost always a country. Additional Information: -The locator name could be the name of the property or complex, of the building or part of the building, or it could be the name of a room inside a building. - -The key difference between a locator and a locator name is that the latter is a proper name and is unlikely to include digits. For example, "Shumann, Berlaymont" is a meeting room within the European Commission headquarters for which locator name is more appropriate than locator. (locn:Address) +Best practice is to use the ISO 3166-1 code but if this is inappropriate for the context, country names should be provided in a consistent manner to reduce ambiguity. For example, either write 'France' or 'FRA' consistently throughout the dataset and avoid mixing the two. The Country controlled vocabulary from the Publications Office can be reused for this. (locn:Address) @@ -9083,13 +9451,6 @@ The key difference between a locator and a locator name is that the latter is a Additional Information: Post codes are common elements in many countries' postal address systems. One of the many post codes of Paris is for example "75000". (locn:Address) - - - Post name - - - The key postal division of the address, usually the city. (INSPIRE's definition is "One or more names created and maintained for postal purposes to identify a subdivision of addresses and postal delivery points.) For example, "Paris". (locn:Address) - Thoroughfare @@ -9107,13 +9468,6 @@ For example, "Avenue des Champs-&#201;lys&#233;es". (locn:Address) The coordinate list. (locn:Geometry) - - - Latitude - - - The latitude. (locn:Geometry) - Longitude @@ -9121,16 +9475,12 @@ For example, "Avenue des Champs-&#201;lys&#233;es". (locn:Address) The longitude. (locn:Geometry) - - - Has award date scheduled - - - Planned date for the award decision. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ProcessPlanningTerm) + + + Latitude - - + + The latitude. (locn:Geometry) @@ -9158,39 +9508,66 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ProcessPlanningTerm) - - - Has additional information deadline + + + Has award date scheduled - - The time limit for requesting further information. - -Additional information: + + Planned date for the award decision. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ProcessPlanningTerm) + + + + + + + Has review procedure + + + The description of the method used to request the verification that the procedure has been carried out correctly. -This is generally used to indicate the deadline for Economic Operators to request further information of the procedure before the submission deadline. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ReviewTerm) + + + + + + + Has review deadline + + + The time limit for review procedures. -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13 Additional Information Deadline. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ReviewTerm) + + + + + + + Has review deadline information + + + The description of the time limits for review procedures. -WG Approval 09/06/2020 - (epo:AccessTerm) +WG Approval 01/10/2019 (epo:ReviewTerm) - + - - - Has public access u r l + + + Is procurement document restricted - - Web page where the procurement documents can be downloaded. + + The access to certain procurement documents is restricted. Additional Information: -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-15 Documents URL. +This corresponds in eForms to BT-14 Documents Restricted. -WG Approval 09/03/2021 - (epo:AccessTerm) +WG Approval 10/10/2019 (epo:AccessTerm) - + @@ -9207,19 +9584,39 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-615 Documents Restricted URL. - - - Is procurement document restricted + + + Has additional information deadline - - The access to certain procurement documents is restricted. + + The time limit for requesting further information. + +Additional information: + +This is generally used to indicate the deadline for Economic Operators to request further information of the procedure before the submission deadline. + +This corresponds in eForms to BT-13 Additional Information Deadline. + +WG Approval 09/06/2020 + (epo:AccessTerm) + + + + + + + Has public access u r l + + + Web page where the procurement documents can be downloaded. Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-14 Documents Restricted. +This corresponds in the eForms to BT-15 Documents URL. -WG Approval 10/10/2019 (epo:AccessTerm) +WG Approval 09/03/2021 + (epo:AccessTerm) - + @@ -9302,6 +9699,17 @@ WG Approval 5/11/2019 + + + Is submission for all lots required + + + Indicates whether tenders must be submitted for all Lots. + (epo:ProcedureTerm) + + + + Has cross border law @@ -9315,74 +9723,35 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-09 Cross Border Law. (epo:ProcedureTerm) - - - Has group lot evaluation method - - - Description of how lots and groups of lots are evaluated against one another in the procedure. - - - - (epo:ProcedureTerm) - - - - - - - Has lot award combination - - - The contracting authority reserves the right to award contracts combining lots or groups of lots. - -Additional Information: -This property contains information about the Lots concerned. -This property is required by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). - -WG approval 23/08/2022 - (epo:ProcedureTerm) - - - - - - - Has maximum lot submission allowed + + + Is one lot only allowed - - The total number of lots for which one Tenderer can submit Tenders. + + Indicates whether tenders may be submitted for only one Lot. Additional information: This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). -WG approval 12/12/2018 +WG approval 23/08/2022 (epo:ProcedureTerm) - + - - - Has maximum number of lots to be awarded + + + Has group lot evaluation method - - The maximum number of lots for which contract(s) can be awarded to one tenderer. + + Description of how lots and groups of lots are evaluated against one another in the procedure. -Additional information: -This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). -WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:ProcedureTerm) - - - - - - - Has national procedure rules + + (epo:ProcedureTerm) - + @@ -9397,97 +9766,74 @@ WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:ProcedureTerm) - - - Is one lot only allowed + + + Has maximum lot submission allowed - - Indicates whether tenders may be submitted for only one Lot. + + The total number of lots for which one Tenderer can submit Tenders. Additional information: This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). -WG approval 23/08/2022 +WG approval 12/12/2018 (epo:ProcedureTerm) - + - - - Is submission for all lots allowed + + + Has lot award combination - - Indicates whether tenders may be submitted for all Lots. + + The contracting authority reserves the right to award contracts combining lots or groups of lots. -Additional information: -This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms) +Additional Information: +This property contains information about the Lots concerned. +This property is required by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). WG approval 23/08/2022 (epo:ProcedureTerm) - - - - - - Has e auction u r l - - - The internet address of the electronic auction. - -Additional Information: - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-123 Electronic Auction URL. (epo:SubmissionTerm) - - + - - - Has guarantee description + + + Has maximum number of lots to be awarded - - Information on the financial commitment required from the economic operator. - -Additional Information: -1. This information may include the amount and the way of delivering of the guarantee -2. The financial commitment may be retained by the buyer in the case the tenderer withdraws the submitted information (i.e. tender, expression of interest and request for participation, but not request for clarifications) before the award of the contract or does not sign the contract. -3. Usual modalities are bonds, cheques, loans, other. + + The maximum number of lots for which contract(s) can be awarded to one tenderer. -WG Approval 21/07/20 - (epo:SubmissionTerm) +Additional information: +This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). + +WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:ProcedureTerm) - + - - - Has late submission information description - - - A narrative text explaining the content of the economic operator information that can be submitted late. - -Additional Information -This does not apply to requests for clarifications. - (epo:SubmissionTerm) + + + Has national procedure rules - + - - - Has non electronic submission description + + + Has e auction u r l - - Textual explanation of how non-electronic information is to be presented. + + The internet address of the electronic auction. -WG Approval 21/07/2020 +Additional Information: - (epo:SubmissionTerm) +This corresponds in eForms to BT-123 Electronic Auction URL. (epo:SubmissionTerm) - + @@ -9521,25 +9867,39 @@ Pending of review by the WG - - - Has receipt participation request deadline - - - + + + Is guarantee required - - - Has receipt preliminary market consultation deadline + + The submitted information must include a financial commitment to be used in case of default. + +Additional Information: +See the additional information provided in the definition of the 'Guarantee Description' element. + +WG Approval 21/07/20 + + (epo:SubmissionTerm) - + - - - Has receipt tender deadline + + + Has guarantee description - + + Information on the financial commitment required from the economic operator. + +Additional Information: +1. This information may include the amount and the way of delivering of the guarantee +2. The financial commitment may be retained by the buyer in the case the tenderer withdraws the submitted information (i.e. tender, expression of interest and request for participation, but not request for clarifications) before the award of the contract or does not sign the contract. +3. Usual modalities are bonds, cheques, loans, other. + +WG Approval 21/07/20 + (epo:SubmissionTerm) + + @@ -9556,6 +9916,27 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-509 Organisation eDelivery Gateway. (epo:Submis + + + Has non electronic submission description + + + Textual explanation of how non-electronic information is to be presented. + +WG Approval 21/07/2020 + + (epo:SubmissionTerm) + + + + + + + Has receipt preliminary market consultation deadline + + + + Is advanced electronic signature required @@ -9578,21 +9959,11 @@ WG Approval 21/07/2020 - - - Is guarantee required - - - The submitted information must include a financial commitment to be used in case of default. - -Additional Information: -See the additional information provided in the definition of the 'Guarantee Description' element. - -WG Approval 21/07/20 - - (epo:SubmissionTerm) + + + Has receipt participation request deadline - + @@ -9609,20 +9980,25 @@ WG Approval 10/10/2019 - - - Has e invoicing + + + Has receipt tender deadline - - Electronic means will be used for invoicing in the post-award process. - -Additional Information: -This attribute is used for standard form mappings. + + + + + + Has late submission information description + + + A narrative text explaining the content of the economic operator information that can be submitted late. -WG Approval 12/09/2019 - (epo:ContractTerm) +Additional Information +This does not apply to requests for clarifications. + (epo:SubmissionTerm) - + @@ -9651,18 +10027,41 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 - - - Has legal form requirement + + + Has options - - The legal form to be taken by a Contractor. + + The buyer reserves the right (not an obligation) for additional purchases from the contractor (while the contract is valid). (epo:ContractTerm) + + + + + + + Has e invoicing + + + Electronic means will be used for invoicing in the post-award process. Additional Information: -Generally, this is defined to cover the case where an Organisation Group is involved. -Note that the codelist provided at national level should be used. (epo:ContractTerm) +This attribute is used for standard form mappings. + +WG Approval 12/09/2019 + (epo:ContractTerm) - + + + + + + Is renewal indicator + + + Indicates whether the contract is subject to a renewal clause. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ContractTerm) + + @@ -9683,16 +10082,6 @@ PLEASE REVIEW THIS DEFINITION AGAIN WITH THE WORKING GROUP. It was originally ta - - - Has options - - - The buyer reserves the right (not an obligation) for additional purchases from the contractor (while the contract is valid). (epo:ContractTerm) - - - - Has options description @@ -9705,6 +10094,18 @@ WG Approval 09/04/2019 (epo:ContractTerm) + + + Has renewal description + + + Any other information about the renewal(s). + +WG approval 16/04/2019 (epo:ContractTerm) + + + + Has payment arrangement @@ -9721,20 +10122,18 @@ WG Pending of discussion with eForms (epo:ContractTerm) - - - Has performance conditions + + + Has legal form requirement - - The particular conditions and additional information related to the execution of the contract. - -Additional Information: - -For example, specific information about the place of performance, intermediary deliverables, compensation for damages, intellectual property rights. + + The legal form to be taken by a Contractor. -WG approval 15-01-2019 (epo:ContractTerm) +Additional Information: +Generally, this is defined to cover the case where an Organisation Group is involved. +Note that the codelist provided at national level should be used. (epo:ContractTerm) - + @@ -9749,27 +10148,41 @@ WG Approval 30/07/2019 (epo:ContractTerm) - - - Has renewal description + + + Has performance conditions - - Any other information about the renewal(s). + + The particular conditions and additional information related to the execution of the contract. -WG approval 16/04/2019 (epo:ContractTerm) +Additional Information: + +For example, specific information about the place of performance, intermediary deliverables, compensation for damages, intellectual property rights. + +WG approval 15-01-2019 (epo:ContractTerm) + + + + + + + Is jury decision binding + + + Indicates whether the procuring entity is bound to apply the decision of the jury. (epo:DesignContestRegimeTerm) - + - - - Is renewal indicator + + + Has participation payment - - Indicates whether the contract is subject to a renewal clause. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ContractTerm) + + Details on payments to participants +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:DesignContestRegimeTerm) - + @@ -9796,25 +10209,30 @@ WG Approval 03/09/2019 (epo:DesignContestRegimeTerm) - - - Has participation payment - - - Details on payments to participants -WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:DesignContestRegimeTerm) + + + Has description of prizes - + - - - Is jury decision binding + + + Has maximum participants number - - Indicates whether the procuring entity is bound to apply the decision of the jury. (epo:DesignContestRegimeTerm) + + The maximum number of participants in the framework agreement. + +Additional Information: +Maximum number of tenderers who may be awarded a contract within the framework agreement. + +The number is a positive integer. + +This corresponds in eForms to BT-113 Framework Maximum Participants Number. + +WG Approval 2019-02-05 (epo:FrameworkAgreementTerm) - + @@ -9854,36 +10272,42 @@ WG Approval 26/09/2019 (epo:FrameworkAgreementTerm) - - - Has maximum participants number + + + Has maximum number of candidates - - The maximum number of participants in the framework agreement. - -Additional Information: -Maximum number of tenderers who may be awarded a contract within the framework agreement. - -The number is a positive integer. + + Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. -This corresponds in eForms to BT-113 Framework Maximum Participants Number. +WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) + + + + + + + Has successive reduction + + + The number of solutions or tenders will be reduced in iterative evaluations for multiple staged procedures. -WG Approval 2019-02-05 (epo:FrameworkAgreementTerm) +Additional information: +This refers to multiple-stage procedures (included two-stage procedures, at least). Open Procedures can be seen as one-stage procedures. +WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) - + - - - Has estimated invitation to express interest date + + + Has minimum number of candidates - - The estimated date of dispatch of the invitations to confirm interest. + + Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-631 Dispatch Invitation Interest. (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) +WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) - + @@ -9901,30 +10325,6 @@ WG Approval 01/10/2019 (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) - - - Has maximum number of candidates - - - Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. - -WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) - - - - - - - Has minimum number of candidates - - - Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. - -WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) - - - - Has no negotiation necessary @@ -9939,6 +10339,19 @@ See Article 29(4) of Directive 2014/24/EU. + + + Has estimated invitation to express interest date + + + The estimated date of dispatch of the invitations to confirm interest. + +Additional Information: +This corresponds in eForms to BT-631 Dispatch Invitation Interest. (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) + + + + Has qualification system renewal description @@ -9946,20 +10359,6 @@ See Article 29(4) of Directive 2014/24/EU. - - - Has successive reduction - - - The number of solutions or tenders will be reduced in iterative evaluations for multiple staged procedures. - -Additional information: -This refers to multiple-stage procedures (included two-stage procedures, at least). Open Procedures can be seen as one-stage procedures. -WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) - - - - Has prize rank @@ -10005,21 +10404,6 @@ WG Approval 17/09/2019 (epo:SubcontractTerm) - - - Has minimum subcontractors proposed obligation - - - The minimum percentage of the contract value that the contractor must subcontract. - -Additional information: -This is used for the competitive procedure described in Title III of Directive 2009/81/EC. - -WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:SubcontractTerm) - - - - Has subcontracting involved @@ -10035,6 +10419,21 @@ WG Approval 28/02/2019 (epo:SubcontractTerm) + + + Has minimum subcontractors proposed obligation + + + The minimum percentage of the contract value that the contractor must subcontract. + +Additional information: +This is used for the competitive procedure described in Title III of Directive 2009/81/EC. + +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:SubcontractTerm) + + + + Has subcontractors proposed above obligation @@ -10063,6 +10462,32 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-543 Award Criteria Complicated. (epo:AwardEvalu + + + Has overall quality award criteria ponderation + + + The weighting given to quality. + +Additional Information: +This weighting covers usually all quality criteria against price or cost criteria. (epo:AwardEvaluationTerm) + + + + + + + Has overall price award criteria ponderation + + + The weighting given to price. + +Additional Information: +This weighting covers usually all price criteria against cost or quality criteria. (epo:AwardEvaluationTerm) + + + + Has award criteria order justification @@ -10089,32 +10514,6 @@ This weighting covers usually all cost criteria against price or quality criteri - - - Has overall price award criteria ponderation - - - The weighting given to price. - -Additional Information: -This weighting covers usually all price criteria against cost or quality criteria. (epo:AwardEvaluationTerm) - - - - - - - Has overall quality award criteria ponderation - - - The weighting given to quality. - -Additional Information: -This weighting covers usually all quality criteria against price or cost criteria. (epo:AwardEvaluationTerm) - - - - Has threshold value @@ -10222,13 +10621,6 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-543. (epo:ProcurementCriterion) - - - Describes profession - - - - Describes profession relevant law @@ -10243,11 +10635,11 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-543. (epo:ProcurementCriterion) - - - Has condition verification method + + + Describes profession - + @@ -10257,18 +10649,25 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-543. (epo:ProcurementCriterion) - - - Describes minimum level of standards + + + Has condition verification method - + Has selection criteria stated in procurement documents - + + + + + + Describes minimum level of standards + + @@ -10285,6 +10684,65 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-40 Selection Criteria Second Stage Invite (epo: + + + Has reference u r i + + + A reference to where the label specification (norms, expectations, standards and policies) can be found. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo:CertificationLabel) + + + + + + + Has certification number + + + The unique identifier of the certificate. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo:Certificate) + + + + + + + Has u r l + + + The identifier of a resource. + +Additional Information + +For example: + +1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; +2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; +3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; +4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) +5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; + +WG Approval 30/09/2019 + (epo:Certificate) The identifier of a resource. + +Additional Information + +For example: + +1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; +2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; +3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; +4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) +5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; + +WG Approval 30/09/2019 (epo:Fund) + + + + Uses clean vehicle directive @@ -10321,22 +10779,6 @@ WG Approval 05/03/2019 (epo:StrategicProcurement) - - - Has clean vehicles - - - The number of all clean vehicles that have either been purchased, leased, rented, hired-purchased or their use has been contractually committed to for the provision of a purchased service. - -Additional Information -In the European Union, the legal requirements and scope for the provision of these vehicles or services are covered by Directive 2009/33/EC. - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 - (epo:VehicleInformation) - - - - Has total vehicles @@ -10371,54 +10813,67 @@ WG Approval 28/07/2020 - - - Is competition terminated + + + Has clean vehicles - - No further contracts will be awarded in this procedure. - -Additional Information: -This can be instantiated in the post award phase. + + The number of all clean vehicles that have either been purchased, leased, rented, hired-purchased or their use has been contractually committed to for the provision of a purchased service. -PIN for Competition needs to be signaled. This field can be used even if no contracts are awarded in the contract award notice. +Additional Information +In the European Union, the legal requirements and scope for the provision of these vehicles or services are covered by Directive 2009/33/EC. -This corresponds in eForms to BT-756 PIN Competition Termination. (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation) +WG Approval 28/07/2020 + (epo:VehicleInformation) - + - - - Is d p s terminated + + + Has non awarded contract title - - End of the Dynamic Purchase System (DPS). + + The title the contract would have had if it had been awarded. -Additional Information: This property can be used in the contract award notice even if no contracts are awarded. +Additional information: -WG Approval 22/11/2019 - (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation) +This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. + +WG agreement: 06/09/2022 (epo:LotAwardOutcome) - + - - - Is to be relaunched + + + Has non awarded contract number - - Indicator of whether the procurement object is to be relaunched. + + The number the contract would have had if it had been awarded. -Additional information: -This can be instantiated in the post award phase. +Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-634 Procurement Relaunch. +This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. -WG Approval: 18/01/2022 - (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation) +WG agreement: 06/09/2022 + (epo:LotAwardOutcome) - + + + + + + Has award rank + + + The position of the tender (i.e. whether the tender ended up first, second, third, etc.) in a design contest, some framework agreements with multiple winners (e.g. cascades) or an innovation partnership. + +Additional Information: +This corresponds in eForms to BT-171 Tender Rank. + (epo:TenderAwardOutcome) + + @@ -10436,31 +10891,61 @@ WG Approval 25/05/2018 (epo:ConcessionEstimate) - - - Has estimated percentage + + + Has payment value discrepancy justification - - The estimated proportion foreseen to be subcontracted. + + + + + + Is to be relaunched + + + Indicator of whether the procurement object is to be relaunched. -WG Approval 07/01/2020 (epo:SubcontractingEstimate) +Additional information: +This can be instantiated in the post award phase. + +This corresponds in eForms to BT-634 Procurement Relaunch. + +WG Approval: 18/01/2022 + (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation) - + - - - Has subject matter + + + Is competition terminated - - Description of the share of the contract that is to be subcontracted. + + No further contracts will be awarded in this procedure. -Additional infromation: -This can be an aggregate of several subcontracts. +Additional Information: +This can be instantiated in the post award phase. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:SubcontractingEstimate) +PIN for Competition needs to be signaled. This field can be used even if no contracts are awarded in the contract award notice. + +This corresponds in eForms to BT-756 PIN Competition Termination. (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation) - + + + + + + Is d p s terminated + + + End of the Dynamic Purchase System (DPS). + +Additional Information: This property can be used in the contract award notice even if no contracts are awarded. + +WG Approval 22/11/2019 + (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation) + + @@ -10491,97 +10976,55 @@ WG Approval 11/04/2019 (epo:ReviewRequestSummary) - - - Has abnormally low tenders - - - Tenders received that were found irregular and non-acceptable due to an abnormally low price or cost. - -Additional Information -The definition implies that abnormally Low Tender Lots are Inadmissible Tender Lots. - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 - - (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - - - - - - - Has e e a received tenders - - - The amount of tenders received from economic operators in other EEA countries other than the country of the buyer. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - - - - - - - Has electronic tenders + + + Has estimated percentage - - Electronic Tender Lots received. + + The estimated proportion foreseen to be subcontracted. -WG Approval 28/07/2020 - (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - - - - - - - Has estimated total subcontracts - - - The estimated amount of work to be subcontracted in the contract resulting from the lot. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) +WG Approval 07/01/2020 (epo:SubcontractingEstimate) - + - - - Has e u received tenders + + + Has subject matter - - The amount of tenders received from economic operators in other EU countries other than the country of the buyer. (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) + + Description of the share of the contract that is to be subcontracted. + +Additional infromation: +This can be an aggregate of several subcontracts. + +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:SubcontractingEstimate) - + - - - Has inadmissible tenders + + + Has e e a received tenders - - Tenders received that cannot be awarded due to non-compliance to procurement document requirements or having an abnormally low price or cost. - -<u>Additional Information: </u> -Non-compliance with a Procurement Document requirements include exclusion grounds, selection criteria and submission deadline, etc. + + The amount of tenders received from economic operators in other EEA countries other than the country of the buyer. WG Approval 12/12/2019 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - + - - - Has medium tender per lots + + + Has received participation requests - - Tenders from medium-sized enterprise. - -<u>Additional Information:</u> + + The amount of applications to participate from economic operators. -See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. - (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) +WG Approval 12/12/2019 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - + @@ -10596,39 +11039,22 @@ WG Approval 12/12/2019 15:20:36 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - - - Has non e u received tenders - - - The amount of tenders received from economic operators in non-EU countries. - (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - - - - - - - Has number of tenderers invited + + + Has s m e received tenders - - Number of economic operators invited to tender. + + The amount of tenders received from micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. -Additional Information -This may be used for single-stage procedures or to indicate the number of candidates invited to tender in multi-stage procedures. +<u>Additional Information:</u> -WG Approval 01/12/2020 +See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. +The ReceivedSMETenderLots is used when the size of the company is not exactly knokn. +WG Approval 05/03/2020 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - - - - - - Has other countries received tenders - - + @@ -10645,18 +11071,6 @@ See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation - - - Has received participation requests - - - The amount of applications to participate from economic operators. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - - - - Has received small tenders @@ -10673,6 +11087,21 @@ See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. + + + Has medium tender per lots + + + Tenders from medium-sized enterprise. + +<u>Additional Information:</u> + +See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. + (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) + + + + Has received tenders @@ -10685,22 +11114,47 @@ WG Approval 12/12/2019 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - - - Has s m e received tenders + + + Has inadmissible tenders - - The amount of tenders received from micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. + + Tenders received that cannot be awarded due to non-compliance to procurement document requirements or having an abnormally low price or cost. -<u>Additional Information:</u> +<u>Additional Information: </u> +Non-compliance with a Procurement Document requirements include exclusion grounds, selection criteria and submission deadline, etc. -See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. -The ReceivedSMETenderLots is used when the size of the company is not exactly knokn. +WG Approval 12/12/2019 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) + + + + + + + Has abnormally low tenders + + + Tenders received that were found irregular and non-acceptable due to an abnormally low price or cost. + +Additional Information +The definition implies that abnormally Low Tender Lots are Inadmissible Tender Lots. + +WG Approval 28/07/2020 -WG Approval 05/03/2020 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - + + + + + + Has non e u received tenders + + + The amount of tenders received from economic operators in non-EU countries. + (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) + + @@ -10716,49 +11170,62 @@ WG Approval 28/07/2020 - - - Has payment value discrepancy justification + + + Has electronic tenders - + + Electronic Tender Lots received. + +WG Approval 28/07/2020 + (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) + + - - - Issued + + + Has e u received tenders - - Date of formal issuance of the resource. - -Additional information: -This is generally used for modules other than eNotice. -The xsd:dateTime here means that we can provide either xsd:date, xsd:dateTime, or xsd:timeStamp or any other variant of time expression. This extension needs to be encoded/automated in the ontology and in the application profile. -Why is it like this? Because UML cannot handle such expressions of disjunctive property ranges. - -WG approval 26/01/2023 (epo:Document) + + The amount of tenders received from economic operators in other EU countries other than the country of the buyer. (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - - - Has access u r l + + - - Location where the resource can be accessed. - -WG approval 07/04/2022 (epo:Document) + + + Has other countries received tenders - + - - - Has dispatch date + + + Has estimated total subcontracts - - Date of transmission of a record to an organisation. + + The estimated amount of work to be subcontracted in the contract resulting from the lot. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) + + + + + + + Has number of tenderers invited + + + Number of economic operators invited to tender. -WG Approval 12/05/2020 (epo:Document) +Additional Information +This may be used for single-stage procedures or to indicate the number of candidates invited to tender in multi-stage procedures. + +WG Approval 01/12/2020 + + (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) - + @@ -10770,19 +11237,57 @@ WG Approval 12/05/2020 (epo:Document) WG approval 20/06/2023 (epo:Document) - - + + + + + + Has reception date + + + Notes: Date when a record is acknowledged by an organisation. + +WG Approval 12/05/2020 (epo:Document) + + + + + + + Has dispatch date + + + Date and time of transmission of a record to an Organization. + +WG Approval 31/08/2023 (epo:Document) + + + + + + + Issued + + + Date of formal issuance of the resource. + +Additional information: +This is generally used for modules other than eNotice. +The xsd:dateTime here means that we can provide either xsd:date, xsd:dateTime, or xsd:timeStamp or any other variant of time expression. This extension needs to be encoded/automated in the ontology and in the application profile. +Why is it like this? Because UML cannot handle such expressions of disjunctive property ranges. + +WG approval 26/01/2023 (epo:Document) - - - Has reception date + + + Has access u r l - - Notes: Date when a record is acknowledged by an organisation. + + Location where the resource can be accessed. -WG Approval 12/05/2020 (epo:Document) +WG approval 07/04/2022 (epo:Document) - + @@ -10798,40 +11303,18 @@ WG approval: 18/11/2021 - - - Has e forms subtype - - - - - - - Has e sender dispatch date - - - The date and time the notice was transmitted electronically by the eSender to the Publications Office of the European Union. - -Additional Information: -Typically, eSenders include national Official Journals, Buyers sending a large number of electronic Notices, public or private bodies acting on behalf of Buyers and eProcurement software developers. - -WG approval 20/06/2023 (epo:Notice) - - - - - - - Has form number + + + Has o j s issue number - + - - - Has long title + + + Has o j s type - + @@ -10841,33 +11324,33 @@ WG approval 20/06/2023 (epo:Notice) - - - Has o j s issue number + + + Has form number - + - - - Has o j s type + + + Has e forms subtype - + - - - Has additional non award justification + + + Has e sender dispatch date - - Further justification for the non award . + + The date and time the notice was transmitted electronically by the eSender to the Publications Office of the European Union. -Additional information: -This is generally used when the non award reason code is set to "Other". +Additional Information: +Typically, eSenders include national Official Journals, Buyers sending a large number of electronic Notices, public or private bodies acting on behalf of Buyers and eProcurement software developers. -WG: 18/01/2022 (epo:AwardDecision) +WG approval 20/06/2023 (epo:Notice) - + @@ -10886,6 +11369,21 @@ WG Approval 09/01/2020 + + + Has additional non award justification + + + Further justification for the non award . + +Additional information: +This is generally used when the non award reason code is set to "Other". + +WG: 18/01/2022 (epo:AwardDecision) + + + + Has electronic submission @@ -10951,28 +11449,6 @@ WG approval 05/11/2019 (epo:Contract) - - - Has u r l - - - The identifier of a resource. - -Additional Information - -For example: - -1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; -2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; -3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; -4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) -5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; - -WG Approval 30/09/2019 (epo:Fund) - - - - Has decision date @@ -10995,10 +11471,7 @@ This attribute corresponds to the BT-787 Review Date in eForms. Reference to the class instance in the current notice. Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier, BT-786 Review Notice Section Identifier and BT-1501 Modification Previous Notice Section Identifier. (epo:ReviewObject) Reference to the class instance in the current notice. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier, BT-786 Review Notice Section Identifier and BT-1501 Modification Previous Notice Section Identifier. (epo:ElementChangeDescription) +This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier, BT-786 Review Notice Section Identifier and BT-1501 Modification Previous Notice Section Identifier. (epo:ReviewObject) @@ -11027,18 +11500,17 @@ This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-794 Review URL. - - - Has request date + + + Is withdrawn - - The date when the review request was submitted. + + The review request was withdrawn. Additional information: -This attribute corresponds to the BT-787 Review Date in eForms. - (epo:ReviewRequest) +This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-796 Review Request Withdrawn. (epo:ReviewRequest) - + @@ -11067,59 +11539,18 @@ This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-798 Review Request Withdrawn Reasons - - - Is withdrawn + + + Has request date - - The review request was withdrawn. + + The date when the review request was submitted. Additional information: -This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-796 Review Request Withdrawn. (epo:ReviewRequest) - - - - - - - Has previous version of element reference - - - Reference to the class instance in the previous version of the notice, which was changed. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier. - (epo:ElementChangeDescription) - - - - - - - Has accessibility date - - - The date at which unpublished data shall be published. - -WG Approval 11/06/2020 (epo:NonPublishedInformation) - - - - - - - Has confidentiality justification - - - A narrative explanation of why data is not published. - -Additional Information: -This element is generally used when the non-publication-justification code chosen is "other". - -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - (epo:NonPublishedInformation) +This attribute corresponds to the BT-787 Review Date in eForms. + (epo:ReviewRequest) - + @@ -11129,7 +11560,7 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 Explanatory text about the instance of the concept. -WG Approval 30/09/2019 (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) +WG Approval 30/09/2019 (epo:ChangeInformation) @@ -11142,11 +11573,26 @@ WG Approval 30/09/2019 (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) Explanatory text about why the element is altered. Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-762 Change Reason Description. (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) +This corresponds in eForms to BT-762 Change Reason Description. (epo:ChangeInformation) + + + Is procurement document changed + + + One or more procurement documents have been changed. + +Additional information: +This corresponds in eForms to BT-718 Change Procurement Documents + +WG Approval 05/11/2019 (epo:ChangeInformation) + + + + Has procurement document change date @@ -11158,26 +11604,46 @@ Additional information: This corresponds in eForms to BT-719 Change Procurement Documents Date WG Approval 5/11/2019 - (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) + (epo:ChangeInformation) - - - Is procurement document changed + + + Has accessibility date - - One or more procurement documents have been changed. + + The date at which unpublished data shall be published. -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-718 Change Procurement Documents +WG Approval 11/06/2020 (epo:NonPublishedInformation) + + + + + + + Has confidentiality justification + + + A narrative explanation of why data is not published. + +Additional Information: +This element is generally used when the non-publication-justification code chosen is "other". -WG Approval 05/11/2019 (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + (epo:NonPublishedInformation) - + + + + Notation + + + The literal identifying an entity, like a person or an object. (adms:Identifier) + Schema agency @@ -11205,13 +11671,6 @@ WG Approval 05/11/2019 (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) - - - Notation - - - The literal identifying an entity, like a person or an object. (adms:Identifier) - Has amount value diff --git a/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-core.ttl b/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-core.ttl index d6056f26..01e8008b 100644 --- a/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-core.ttl +++ b/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-core.ttl @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ @prefix : . @prefix adms: . @prefix at-voc: . +@prefix at-voc-new: . @prefix bibo: . @prefix cc: . @prefix cccev: . @@ -112,7 +113,6 @@ WG approval 05/08/2021 WG Approval 28/04/2020 """@en ; - skos:editorialNote "In order to align with Core Voc, it means we need to add cv:LegalEntity and org:FormalOrganization between org:Organisation and epo:Business."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Business"@en . :Candidate a owl:Class ; @@ -149,6 +149,48 @@ The Catalogue Receiver role is usually played by the agent that acts as a Buyer, WG Approval 28/01/2021"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Catalogue receiver"@en . +:Certificate a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf cccev:Evidence ; + skos:definition """Proof of conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. + +Additional Information: +Certificates provide assurance of credibility, trust, and transparency in the procurement process. + +WG approval 16/05/2023 +"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Certificate"@en . + +:CertificationLabel a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf cccev:InformationConcept ; + skos:definition """Concept that stands for a set of norms, expectations, standards and policies. + +Additional Information: +Such standards may relate to social, ethical and quality etc. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 +"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Certification label"@en . + +:Certifier a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf :AuxiliaryParty ; + skos:definition """The role of an agent who issues a certificate. + +Additional Information: +The certifier is responsible for verifying and confirming the conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. + +WG approval 16/05/2023"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Certifier"@en . + +:ChangeInformation a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf :ContextDescription ; + skos:definition "Alteration to previously provided details."@en ; + skos:editorialNote "Added hasAdditionalInformation to cover for section VII.2 in F14, since we do not have the Corrigendum notice type anymore in eForms."@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Change information"@en . + :ConcessionContract a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; rdfs:subClassOf :Contract ; @@ -164,7 +206,7 @@ WG Approval 24/05/2022"""@en ; :ContractLotCompletionInformation a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :ContextualProjection ; + rdfs:subClassOf :ContextDescription ; skos:definition "Information related to a given Lot at the end of the procurement."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Contract lot completion information"@en . @@ -187,7 +229,8 @@ WG approval 08/11/2022"""@en ; :DesignContestRegimeTerm a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :LotSpecificTerm ; + rdfs:subClassOf :LotSpecificTerm, + :ProcedureSpecificTerm ; skos:definition """Conditions and stipulations defining particularities of a Design Contest. WG approval: 04-02-2021"""@en ; @@ -245,12 +288,6 @@ WG approval 20/07/2018"""@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Electronic signature"@en . -:ElementChangeDescription a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :ElementDescription ; - skos:definition "Information about a specific field to be changed with regard to a previous Notice."@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Element change description"@en . - :EmploymentInformationProvider a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; rdfs:subClassOf :AuxiliaryParty ; @@ -339,7 +376,6 @@ WG Approved 14/05/2019 skos:definition """Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure with a reduced Environmental Impact. Additional Information: - The approach may apply to the complete life cycle. The reduced Environmental Impact is in comparison to goods, services and works with the same primary function that would otherwise be procured. Tightly related are article 68 - Life-cycle costing and article 67 - most economically advantageous Tender (see GPP handbook) https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/Buying-Green-Handbook-3rd-Edition.pdf @@ -354,21 +390,14 @@ An instance of the class GreenProcurement is represented in eForms with the code :InnovativeProcurement a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; rdfs:subClassOf :StrategicProcurement ; - skos:definition """An instance of the class InnovativeProcurement is represented in eForms with the code "inn-pur" defined in the codelist Strategic-Procurement. - -Research (21/01/2020): - -Purchasing and early adoption of solutions which are not yet available on large scale commercial basis. - -Source: Adapted from the Digital Single Market's Policy on Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/public-procurement-innovative-solutions + skos:definition """Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure an innovative work, supply or service. Additional Information: ‘innovation’ means the implementation of a new or significantly improved product, service or process, including but not limited to production, building or construction processes, a new marketing method, or a new organizational method in business practices, workplace Organisation or external relations inter alia with the purpose of helping to solve societal challenges or to support the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; See: Directive 2014/24 Articles: 2, 26 (3), 31, 67 (2.a) -Question: -Is Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) another type of Strategic Procurement?"""@en ; +"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Innovative procurement"@en . :JuryMember a owl:Class ; @@ -415,7 +444,7 @@ Member States may provide that, where more than one lot may be awarded to the sa :LotGroupAwardInformation a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :ContextualProjection ; + rdfs:subClassOf :ContextDescription ; skos:definition "Award information related to a given Group of Lots."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Lot group award information"@en . @@ -464,6 +493,7 @@ WG Approval 15/04/2021"""@en ; :NonPublishedInformation a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf :ContextDescription ; skos:definition """Information about fields not published in this Notice. Additional Information: @@ -484,16 +514,10 @@ WG Approval 23/05/2019 :NoticeAwardInformation a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :ContextSpecificDescription ; + rdfs:subClassOf :ContextDescription ; skos:definition "Information about an Award Notice."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Notice award information"@en . -:NoticeChangeInformation a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition "Information about a corrigendum in a Notice."@en ; - skos:editorialNote "Added hasAdditionalInformation to cover for section VII.2 in F14, since we do not have the Corrigendum notice type anymore in eForms."@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Notice change information"@en . - :Offer a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; rdfs:subClassOf :Document ; @@ -521,7 +545,8 @@ WG approval 09/02/2023"""@en ; :OpeningTerm a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :LotSpecificTerm ; + rdfs:subClassOf :LotSpecificTerm, + :ProcedureSpecificTerm ; skos:definition """Conditions and stipulations defining particularities of the opening of Tenders. Additional Information: The opening of Tenders is the event when Tenders are made accessible for evaluation, it is generally the same date and time for all Tenders. @@ -602,7 +627,6 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023"""@en ; skos:definition """A subdivision of a Planned Procurement that may later become one or more Lots or a self-standing Procedure. A Lot or a Procedure can also cover one or more parts of the Planned Procurement. WG Approval 20/06/2019"""@en ; - skos:editorialNote "if PlannedProcurementPart has Terms, it should be a subclass of ProcurementObject."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Planned procurement part"@en . :Prize a owl:Class ; @@ -664,7 +688,7 @@ WG Approval 23/05/2019 17:08:30"""@en ; :ProcurementProcessInformation a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :ContextSpecificDescription ; + rdfs:subClassOf :ContextDescription ; skos:definition "Information about the temporal unfolding or succession of Procurement Objects."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Procurement process information"@en . @@ -796,6 +820,15 @@ This class corresponds in eForms to BG-612 Buyer Review Summary."""@en ; WG Approval 23/10/2021"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Review requester"@en . +:ReviewTerm a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf :LotSpecificTerm, + :ProcedureSpecificTerm ; + skos:definition """Conditions and stipulations defining particularities of the review. + +WG approval 23/11/2018"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Review term"@en . + :Reviewer a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; rdfs:subClassOf :AcquiringParty ; @@ -847,12 +880,10 @@ WG approval 31/10/2018"""@en ; :SocialProcurement a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; rdfs:subClassOf :StrategicProcurement ; - skos:definition """An instance of the class SocialProcurement is represented in eForms with the code "soc-obj" defined in the codelist Strategic-Procurement. - - -Research (21/01/2020): -Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP): + skos:definition """Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure by fulfilling social objectives. +Additional Information: +Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP) - ‘SRPP’ means Procurement Operations that take into account one or more of the following social considerations: employment opportunities, decent work, compliance with social and labour rights, social inclusion (including persons with disabilities), equal opportunities, accessibility design for all, taking account of sustainability criteria, including ethical trade issues and wider voluntary compliance with corporate social responsibility (CSR), while observing the principles enshrined in the Treaty for the European Union (TFEU) and the Procurement Directives. Source: Buying Social - A Guide to Taking Account of Social Considerations in Public Procurement (Publications Office of the European Union, 2011) https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cb70c481-0e29-4040-9be2-c408cddf081f/language-en See Article 18 and Annex X Directive 2014/24."""@en ; @@ -955,7 +986,6 @@ WG Approval 28/04/2020 Additional Information: This class is generally used to provide the Monetary Value in response to a Lot Group. """@en ; - skos:editorialNote "should this be moved to document?"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Tender group"@en . :TenderProcessor a owl:Class ; @@ -1044,6 +1074,10 @@ WG approval 05/08/2021 (revised 26/10/2021)"""@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Announces procedure"@en . +:announcesProcurementCriterion a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Announces procurement criterion"@en . + :announcesReviewObject a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Announces review object"@en . @@ -1076,6 +1110,13 @@ WGM 01/03/2022 (epo:Document -> epo:Document (+epo:associatedWith)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Associated with"@en . +:attestedByLabel a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition """Relation indicating which label the certificate is about. + +WG approval 28/07/2022 (epo:Certificate -> epo:CertificationLabel (+epo:attestedByLabel)) """@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Attested by label"@en . + :bindsBuyer a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition "Provides legal constraint on the Buyer. (epo:Contract -> epo:Buyer (+epo:bindsBuyer)) "@en ; @@ -1091,6 +1132,10 @@ WGM 01/03/2022 skos:definition "Incorporates AwardOutcome. (epo:AwardDecision -> epo:AwardOutcome (+epo:comprisesAwardOutcome)) "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Comprises award outcome"@en . +:comprisesQuestion a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Comprises question"@en . + :comprisesTender a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition "Incorporates Tender. (epo:TenderGroup -> epo:Tender (+epo:comprisesTender)) "@en ; @@ -1111,9 +1156,13 @@ WGM 01/03/2022 :concernsLot a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition "Relates to Lot. (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsLot)) Relates to Lot. (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsLot)) "@en ; + skos:definition "Relates to Lot. (epo:ProcurementProcessInformation -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsLot)) Relates to Lot. (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:Lot (+epo:concernsLot)) "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Concerns lot"@en . +:concernsNotice a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Concerns notice"@en . + :concernsOriginatorRequest a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Concerns originator request"@en . @@ -1144,10 +1193,6 @@ This Notice can be used for Procedures which do not have the same legal basis. This holds for standard forms. (epo:Notice -> at-voc:legal-basis (+epo:conformsToLegalBasis)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Conforms to legal basis"@en . -:conformsToSpecificLegalBasis a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Conforms to specific legal basis"@en . - :containsCandidate a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Contains candidate"@en . @@ -1234,6 +1279,16 @@ WG Approval 10-10-2019 (epo:OpeningTerm -> locn:Address (+epo:definesOpeningPlac skos:definition "Relation indicating an AccessTerm has a ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider. (epo:AccessTerm -> epo:ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider (+epo:definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider)) "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Defines procurement procedure information provider"@en . +:definesReviewProcedureInformationProvider a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition "Relation indicating a ReviewTerm has a ReviewProcedureInformationProvider. (epo:ReviewTerm -> epo:ReviewProcedureInformationProvider (+epo:definesReviewProcedureInformationProvider)) "@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Defines review procedure information provider"@en . + +:definesReviewer a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition "Relation indicating a ReviewTerm has a Reviewer. (epo:ReviewTerm -> epo:Reviewer (+epo:definesReviewer)) "@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Defines reviewer"@en . + :definesSpecificPlaceOfPerformance a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition "Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a specific place of performance. (epo:ContractTerm -> dct:Location (+epo:definesSpecificPlaceOfPerformance)) "@en ; @@ -1268,6 +1323,10 @@ Directive 2014/24/EU describes ancillary purchasing activities as activities con (c) preparation and management of procurement procedures on behalf and for the account of the contracting authority concerned; (epo:Buyer -> epo:ProcurementServiceProvider (+epo:delegatesAncillaryActivitiesTo)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Delegates ancillary activities to"@en . +:describesDirectAwardPrenotificationNotice a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Describes direct award prenotification notice"@en . + :describesLotCompletion a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Describes lot completion"@en . @@ -1430,7 +1489,7 @@ WG Approval 15/10/2019 (epo:ProcurementObject) Supplementary data about the inst WG Approval 15/10/2019 (epo:Notice) Supplementary data about the instance of the concept. WG Approval 15/10/2019 - (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) """@en ; + (epo:ChangeInformation) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has additional information"@en . :hasAdditionalInformationDeadline a owl:DatatypeProperty ; @@ -1496,11 +1555,18 @@ WG approval 26/07/2022 :hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has approximate framework agreement value"@en . + skos:definition """The estimated value to be spent within the Framework Agreement(s). -:hasAssociatedDocument a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has associated document"@en . +Additional information: +In the case of an Award Decision for a Lot, this relation represents the estimated value for the awarded Framework Agreement. +In the case of a Notice, this relation represents the estimated value for all Framework Agreements covered by the Notice. + (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue)) The estimated value to be spent within the Framework Agreement(s). + +Additional information: +In the case of an Award Decision for a Lot, this relation represents the estimated value for the awarded Framework Agreement. +In the case of a Notice, this relation represents the estimated value for all Framework Agreements covered by the Notice. + (epo:NoticeAwardInformation -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue)) """@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Has approximate framework agreement value"@en . :hasAwardCriteriaEvaluationFormula a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; @@ -1563,20 +1629,6 @@ WG Approval 03/12/2019 (epo:AwardOutcome -> at-voc:winner-selection-status (+epo:hasAwardStatus)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has award status"@en . -:hasAwardedEstimatedValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition """The estimated value that can be spent as provided by the Award Decision. - -Additional Information: -This property is used for framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems. -Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasAwardedEstimatedValue)) """@en ; - skos:editorialNote "Used in F18 (and other standard forms) which is out of scope. We will need to reuse them for the Contract."@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has awarded estimated value"@en . - :hasAwardedValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """The value of the procurement provided by the Award Decision. @@ -1587,7 +1639,7 @@ Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the pr In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum awarded value. WG Approval 10/12/2019 (epo:AwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasAwardedValue)) """@en ; - skos:editorialNote "Used in F18 (and other standard forms) which is out of scope. We will need to reuse them for the Contract."@en ; + skos:editorialNote "Used in F18 and other standard forms."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has awarded value"@en . :hasBargainPrice a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -1720,16 +1772,25 @@ WG Approval 25/05/2018 (epo:ConcessionEstimate) """@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """Relation to the proof of conformance. -WG approval 30/05/2023 (foaf:Person -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. +WG approval 30/05/2023 (foaf:Person -> epo:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 (org:Organization -> epo:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) Relation to the proof of conformance. -WG approval 30/05/2023 (org:Organization -> epo-cat:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) """@en ; +WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Item -> epo:Certificate (+epo:hasCertification)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has certification"@en . +:hasCertificationNumber a owl:DatatypeProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition """The unique identifier of the certificate. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo:Certificate) """@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Has certification number"@en . + :hasChangeDescription a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """Explanatory text about the instance of the concept. -WG Approval 30/09/2019 (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) """@en ; +WG Approval 30/09/2019 (epo:ChangeInformation) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has change description"@en . :hasChangeJustification a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -1737,7 +1798,7 @@ WG Approval 30/09/2019 (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) """@en ; skos:definition """Code explaining the change. WG Approval 5/11/2019 - (epo:NoticeChangeInformation -> at-voc:change-corrig-justification (+epo:hasChangeJustification)) """@en ; + (epo:ChangeInformation -> at-voc:change-corrig-justification (+epo:hasChangeJustification)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has change justification"@en . :hasChangeReasonDescription a owl:DatatypeProperty ; @@ -1745,7 +1806,7 @@ WG Approval 5/11/2019 skos:definition """Explanatory text about why the element is altered. Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-762 Change Reason Description. (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) """@en ; +This corresponds in eForms to BT-762 Change Reason Description. (epo:ChangeInformation) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has change reason description"@en . :hasChargeableWeight a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -1942,6 +2003,10 @@ This attribute corresponds to the BT-787 Review Date in eForms. rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has delivery period"@en . +:hasDescriptionOfPrizes a owl:DatatypeProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Has description of prizes"@en . + :hasDespatchedQuantity a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition "Quantity despatched for delivered. (epo-ful:DespatchLine -> epo:Quantity (+epo-ful:hasDespatchedQuantity)) "@en ; @@ -1957,9 +2022,9 @@ WG Approval 28/05/2020 :hasDispatchDate a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition """Date of transmission of a record to an organisation. + skos:definition """Date and time of transmission of a record to an Organization. -WG Approval 12/05/2020 (epo:Document) """@en ; +WG Approval 31/08/2023 (epo:Document) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has dispatch date"@en . :hasDocumentRestrictionJustification a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -1973,18 +2038,6 @@ WG Approval 09/03/2021 (epo:AccessTerm -> at-voc:communication-justification (+epo:hasDocumentRestrictionJustification)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has document restriction justification"@en . -:hasDocumentStatus a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition "https://test-docs.peppol.eu/logistics/transport-execution/codelist/DocumentStatusCode/ (epo:Document -> at-voc-new:document-status (+epo:hasDocumentStatus)) "@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has document status"@en . - -:hasDocumentType a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition """ - -https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/upgrade-3/2022-Q4/codelist/UNCL1001_T01/ (epo:Document -> at-voc-new:document-type (+epo:hasDocumentType)) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has document type"@en . - :hasDurationExtensionJustification a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """The explanation of the reason why the framework agreement has an extended duration. @@ -2102,19 +2155,12 @@ WG Approval 28/07/2020 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has electronic tenders"@en . -:hasElementChange a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has element change"@en . - :hasElementReference a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """Reference to the class instance in the current notice. Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier, BT-786 Review Notice Section Identifier and BT-1501 Modification Previous Notice Section Identifier. (epo:ReviewObject) Reference to the class instance in the current notice. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier, BT-786 Review Notice Section Identifier and BT-1501 Modification Previous Notice Section Identifier. (epo:ElementChangeDescription) """@en ; +This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier, BT-786 Review Notice Section Identifier and BT-1501 Modification Previous Notice Section Identifier. (epo:ReviewObject) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has element reference"@en . :hasEnd a owl:DatatypeProperty ; @@ -2234,6 +2280,18 @@ See for example recital (19), Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and other articl In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum estimated value. +This property corresponds to BT-27 in eForms (for Lot and Procedure) and can be used for BT-157 (for LotGroup). + +WG Approval 05/12/2019 + (epo:LotGroup -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasEstimatedValue)) A forecast of the value of the procurement before competition. + +Additional Information: +Different cases of estimated values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. +The forecast is calculated by the buyer and covers all revenues whether coming from the buyer or third parties. +See for example recital (19), Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and other articles from the rest of Directives about procurement. + +In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum estimated value. + This property corresponds to BT-27 in eForms (for Lot and Procedure) and can be used for BT-157 (for LotGroup). WG Approval 05/12/2019 @@ -2322,11 +2380,6 @@ Additional Information: This corresponds in eForms to BT-543. (epo:ProcurementCriterion) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has formula"@en . -:hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition "This refers to BT-660 in eForms. (epo:LotAwardOutcome -> epo:MonetaryValue (+epo:hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue)) "@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has framework agreement estimated value"@en . - :hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has framework agreement maximum value"@en . @@ -2481,6 +2534,11 @@ WG Approval 5/11/2019 (epo:DirectAwardTerm) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has justification"@en . +:hasLabelType a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition "The label type such environmental, quality, social etc. (epo:CertificationLabel -> at-voc-new:certification-label-type (+epo:hasLabelType)) "@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Has label type"@en . + :hasLanguage a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """Language in which the submitted information is to be expressed. @@ -2514,10 +2572,6 @@ WG Approval 21/07/2020 rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has launch framework agreement maximum value"@en . -:hasLaunchGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has launch group framework agreement maximum value"@en . - :hasLegalBasis a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """The legal basis under which the procurement procedure takes place. @@ -2573,10 +2627,6 @@ WG Approval 10/01/2023 (org:Organization) """@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has loading length"@en . -:hasLongTitle a owl:DatatypeProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has long title"@en . - :hasLotAwardCombination a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """The contracting authority reserves the right to award contracts combining lots or groups of lots. @@ -2938,18 +2988,6 @@ WG Approval 11/06/2020 (epo:NonPublishedInformation -> at-voc:non-publication-justification (+epo:hasNonPublicationJustification)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has non publication justification"@en . -:hasNonPublishedInformation a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has non published information"@en . - -:hasNonPublishedInformationIdentifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has non published information identifier"@en . - -:hasNoticeChangeInformation a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has notice change information"@en . - :hasNoticePublicationNumber a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has notice publication number"@en . @@ -3021,10 +3059,6 @@ WG Approval 12/03/2019 (epo:OpeningTerm) """@en ; WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:OpeningTerm) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has opening u r l"@en . -:hasOperatorLicenceID a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has operator licence i d"@en . - :hasOptions a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition "The buyer reserves the right (not an obligation) for additional purchases from the contractor (while the contract is valid). (epo:ContractTerm) "@en ; @@ -3041,16 +3075,6 @@ WG Approval 09/04/2019 (epo:ContractTerm) """@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has orderabable unit factor rate"@en . -:hasOrganisationUnitName a owl:DatatypeProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition """The name of a subpart of an organisation. - -Additional Information: -E.g. the relevant department of a large organisation. - -We added this attribute in case of eProcurement notices where the Buyer is actually a part of an Organization and the rest of the properties apply to the rest of the Organisation as well. (org:Organization) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has organisation unit name"@en . - :hasOtherCountriesReceivedTenders a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has other countries received tenders"@en . @@ -3142,15 +3166,6 @@ WG Approval 30/07/2019 (epo:ContractTerm) """@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has prepaid amount"@en . -:hasPreviousVersionOfElementReference a owl:DatatypeProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition """Reference to the class instance in the previous version of the notice, which was changed. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier. - (epo:ElementChangeDescription) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Has previous version of element reference"@en . - :hasPriceValidity a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has price validity"@en . @@ -3195,7 +3210,7 @@ Additional information: This corresponds in eForms to BT-719 Change Procurement Documents Date WG Approval 5/11/2019 - (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) """@en ; + (epo:ChangeInformation) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has procurement document change date"@en . :hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -3367,6 +3382,13 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-95 Recurrence Description. (epo:ProcurementObject) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has recurrence description"@en . +:hasReferenceURI a owl:DatatypeProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition """A reference to where the label specification (norms, expectations, standards and policies) can be found. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo:CertificationLabel) """@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Has reference u r i"@en . + :hasRegistrationCountry a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has registration country"@en . @@ -3412,10 +3434,6 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ParticipationConditionsSummary -> at-voc:reserved-procurement (+epo:hasReservedProcurement)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has reserved procurement"@en . -:hasRestatedContractValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Has restated contract value"@en . - :hasRestrictedAccessURL a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """The internet address with information on accessing the restricted (part of the) procurement document. @@ -3429,6 +3447,20 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-615 Documents Restricted URL. rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Has review body type"@en . +:hasReviewDeadline a owl:DatatypeProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition """The time limit for review procedures. + +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ReviewTerm) """@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Has review deadline"@en . + +:hasReviewDeadlineInformation a owl:DatatypeProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition """The description of the time limits for review procedures. + +WG Approval 01/10/2019 (epo:ReviewTerm) """@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Has review deadline information"@en . + :hasReviewDecisionType a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """Additional information: @@ -3449,6 +3481,13 @@ This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-635 Buyer Review Requests Count. (epo This relation corresponds in eForms to BG-613 Buyer Review Requests (epo:ReviewRequestSummary -> epo:ReviewIrregularitySummary (+epo:hasReviewIrregularitySummary)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has review irregularity summary"@en . +:hasReviewProcedure a owl:DatatypeProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition """The description of the method used to request the verification that the procedure has been carried out correctly. + +WG Approval 09/11/2021 (epo:ReviewTerm) """@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Has review procedure"@en . + :hasReviewRequestFee a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """Additional information: @@ -3621,8 +3660,6 @@ WG Approval 22/08/2019 (epo:MultipleStageProcedureTerm) """@en ; :hasTaxInformation a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:editorialNote """Proposal to omit this link until we bring tax into ePO core because this does not appear in the data -"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has tax information"@en . :hasTenderSubcontractingInformation a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -3634,6 +3671,10 @@ WG Approval 10/10/2019 (epo:SubmissionTerm -> at-voc:subcontracting-indication (+epo:hasTenderSubcontractingInformation)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has tender subcontracting information"@en . +:hasTenderValidityDuration a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Has tender validity duration"@en . + :hasTenderValidityPeriod a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """The relation indicating until when a tender instance is applicable. @@ -3766,6 +3807,19 @@ For example: 4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) 5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; +WG Approval 30/09/2019 + (epo:Certificate) The identifier of a resource. + +Additional Information + +For example: + +1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; +2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; +3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; +4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) +5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; + WG Approval 30/09/2019 (epo:Fund) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has u r l"@en . @@ -3815,10 +3869,10 @@ WG Approval 28/07/2020 rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. -WG approval 30/05/2023 - (epo:Technique -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. +WG approval 30/05/2023 (cccev:Evidence -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. -WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo-cat:Certificate -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) """@en ; +WG approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:Technique -> epo:Period (+epo:hasValidityPeriod)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has validity period"@en . :hasVariantPermission a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -3893,10 +3947,18 @@ WG Approval 28/07/2020 (epo:VehicleInformation) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has zero emission vehicles"@en . +:implementsArticle a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Implements article"@en . + :implementsContract a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Implements contract"@en . +:implementsLegislation a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Implements legislation"@en . + :includesAccessibilityCriterion a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """Explanation as to whether accessibility Criterion are used or not. @@ -4155,7 +4217,7 @@ WG approval 23/08/2022 Additional information: This corresponds in eForms to BT-718 Change Procurement Documents -WG Approval 05/11/2019 (epo:NoticeChangeInformation) """@en ; +WG Approval 05/11/2019 (epo:ChangeInformation) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Is procurement document changed"@en . :isProcurementDocumentRestricted a owl:DatatypeProperty ; @@ -4234,16 +4296,11 @@ WG Approval 15/10/2019 rdfs:subPropertyOf :isSubjectToTerm ; skos:prefLabel "Is subject to procedure specific term"@en . -:isSubmissionForAllLotsAllowed a owl:DatatypeProperty ; +:isSubmissionForAllLotsRequired a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition """Indicates whether tenders may be submitted for all Lots. - -Additional information: -This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms) - -WG approval 23/08/2022 + skos:definition """Indicates whether tenders must be submitted for all Lots. (epo:ProcedureTerm) """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Is submission for all lots allowed"@en . + skos:prefLabel "Is submission for all lots required"@en . :isSubmitedBy a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; @@ -4323,6 +4380,16 @@ Additional information: This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-796 Review Request Withdrawn. (epo:ReviewRequest) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Is withdrawn"@en . +:issuedByCertifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition """Relation indicating the Certifier responsible for providing the ItemCertificate. + +Additional Information: +Certifier is a role played by an organisation. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 (epo:Certificate -> epo:Certifier (+epo:issuedByCertifier)) """@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Issued by certifier"@en . + :leadBy a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Lead by"@en . @@ -4377,10 +4444,6 @@ This corresponds to BT-782 in eForms. rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Refers to contract to be modified"@en . -:refersToEFormSectionIdentifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:prefLabel "Refers to e form section identifier"@en . - :refersToLot a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Refers to lot"@en . @@ -4413,7 +4476,7 @@ This corresponds to BT-782 in eForms. rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """ Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-758 Change Notice Version Identifier. (epo:NoticeChangeInformation -> epo:Notice (+epo:refersToPreviousNotice)) """@en ; +This corresponds in eForms to BT-758 Change Notice Version Identifier. (epo:ChangeInformation -> epo:Notice (+epo:refersToPreviousNotice)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Refers to previous notice"@en . :refersToPreviousProcedure a owl:ObjectProperty ; @@ -4456,6 +4519,14 @@ This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-785 "Review Previous Identifier". (epo rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Refers to role"@en . +:reinforcesResponse a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Reinforces response"@en . + +:relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Relates to e form section identifier"@en . + :requestsRemedyType a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """Additional information: @@ -4553,6 +4624,10 @@ This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-792 Review Remedy Type (epo:Revi WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo:SubmissionStatisticalInformation -> epo:AwardOutcome (+epo:summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Summarises information for award outcome"@en . +:updatesContractValue a owl:ObjectProperty ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:prefLabel "Updates contract value"@en . + :usesChannel a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Uses channel"@en . @@ -4584,16 +4659,6 @@ The Contact Point could be a role, email address, telephone number, etc. WG approval 5/11/2019"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Contact point"@en . -cccev:Evidence a owl:Class ; - skos:definition """Proof that a Requirement is met. - -"""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Evidence"@en . - -cccev:InformationConcept a owl:Class ; - skos:definition "Piece of information that the Evidence provides or the Requirement needs."@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Information concept"@en . - cccev:Person a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf foaf:Person ; skos:definition """A individual human being who may be dead or alive, but not imaginary. @@ -4868,6 +4933,12 @@ at-voc:modification-justification a skos:ConceptScheme ; """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Modification-justification"@en . +at-voc-new:certification-label-type a skos:ConceptScheme ; + skos:definition """* environmental/ecological/green, +* quality, +* social, etc."""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Certification-label-type"@en . + at-voc:non-award-justification a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:definition "This table provides the list of reasons of the Buyer for not choosing a Winner in the Procurement Procedure."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Non-award-justification"@en . @@ -4985,11 +5056,23 @@ dcterms:description a owl:DatatypeProperty ; Additional Information: Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. +WG Approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:LotGroup) An account of the resource. + +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. + WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo:ProcurementElement) An account of the resource. Additional Information: Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. +WG Approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:TenderGroup) An account of the resource. + +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. + WG Approval 30/05/2023 (epo:System) An account of the resource. Additional Information: @@ -5074,8 +5157,14 @@ WG approval 26/01/2023 (epo:Document) """@en ; dcterms:title a owl:DatatypeProperty ; skos:definition """A name given to the resource. +WG approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:LotGroup) A name given to the resource. + WG approval 30/05/2023 (epo:ProcurementElement) A name given to the resource. +WG approval 30/05/2023 + (epo:TenderGroup) A name given to the resource. + WG approval 30/05/2023 (foaf:Agent) A name given to the resource. WG approval 30/05/2023 @@ -5166,7 +5255,14 @@ Additional Information For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. WG Approval 12/11/2019 - (epo:ProcurementElement -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (foaf:Agent -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (dct:Location -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (cccev:InformationConcept -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo:Document -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo:Fund -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:Consignment -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-cat:Line -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:AbstractContainer -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) """@en ; + (epo:ProcurementElement -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. + +Additional Information + +For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. + +WG Approval 12/11/2019 + (epo:TenderGroup -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (foaf:Agent -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (dct:Location -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (cccev:InformationConcept -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (cccev:Requirement -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo:Document -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo:Fund -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:Consignment -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:ShipmentInformation -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-cat:Line -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. (epo-ful:AbstractContainer -> adms:Identifier (+adms:identifier)) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Identifier"@en . adms:schemaAgency a owl:DatatypeProperty ; @@ -5325,6 +5421,12 @@ Additional Information: For example, "Avenue des Champs-Élysées". (locn:Address) """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Thoroughfare"@en . +org:subOrganizationOf a owl:ObjectProperty ; + skos:definition """Represents hierarchical containment of Organizations or OrganizationalUnits; indicates an Organization which contains this Organization. + +WG 31/08/2023 (org:Organization -> org:Organization (+org:subOrganizationOf)) """@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Sub organization of"@en . + person:birthName a owl:DatatypeProperty ; skos:definition """Family name of the Person given upon their birth. WG Approval 09/11/2021 (cpv:Person) """@en ; @@ -5357,11 +5459,6 @@ foaf:name a owl:DatatypeProperty ; skos:definition "The complete name of the Person as one string. (cpv:Person) "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Name"@en . -:ElementDescription a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition "Description about a specific resource."@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Element description"@en . - :involvesBuyer a owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:prefLabel "Involves buyer"@en . @@ -5390,6 +5487,16 @@ Additional Information: In general, Criteria are used for comparison, filtering or Selection purposes. Criteria usually set minimum conditions (e.g. limits, intervals, thresholds, etc.) that need to be met in order to pass the Requirements or to fulfil them to a certain degree or quality. The concept of Criteria is broader than the concept of Constraint since it covers more usages. The evaluation of the fulfilment is usually supported by the provision of Evidence. For example in the eProcurement domain, the eProcurement Ontology defines different subclasses of Criterion such as Exclusion Grounds, Selection Criteria or Award Criteria. A concrete example of a Criterion is 'participation in a criminal organisation' which could also be considered as an Exclusion Ground Criterion in the procurement domain or for requiring a public service."""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Criterion"@en . +cccev:Evidence a owl:Class ; + skos:definition """Proof that a Requirement is met. + +"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Evidence"@en . + +cccev:InformationConcept a owl:Class ; + skos:definition "Piece of information that the Evidence provides or the Requirement needs."@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Information concept"@en . + cccev:hasRequirement a owl:ObjectProperty ; skos:definition "A more specific Requirement that is part of the Requirement. (cccev:Requirement -> cccev:Requirement (+cccev:hasRequirement)) "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Has requirement"@en . @@ -5401,6 +5508,7 @@ foaf:Person a owl:Class ; :AwardOutcome a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf :ContextualProjection ; skos:prefLabel "Award outcome"@en . :Buyer a owl:Class ; @@ -5426,6 +5534,19 @@ Contracting Authority procuring activities conducted on a permanent basis, in on WG approval 05/08/2021"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Central purchasing body"@en . +:ContextualProjection a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition """Projection of an Entity and all of its properties that hold in a given Situation Context. + +Additional Information: +The contextual projection does not have its own identity (-I), is dependent (+D) on the described Entity, and is anti-rigid (~R) + +We say that ContextualProjection *describes* an Entity. + +Adaptation of ContextSlices pattern encoding a 4D view. +http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Context_Slices"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Contextual projection"@en . + :Duration a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition "The length of time in which a concept occurs."@en ; @@ -5433,6 +5554,7 @@ WG approval 05/08/2021"""@en ; :Estimate a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf :ContextDescription ; skos:definition "An approximate calculation or a judgement of the value, number, Quantity or extent of something."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Estimate"@en . @@ -5468,21 +5590,6 @@ To test whether something is a Procedure Object check if it can have a Purpose a Note: Procedure, seems to be an exception from this rule. Because it is a conflated term: it carries process properties and "purpose" properties. """@en ; - skos:editorialNote """Procedure/ PlannedProcurementPart / Lot are a conflation of three aspects into one: -- the procedural / process / game rules -- the object/scope/purpose of procurement -- the description of influences or additional information related to the procurement (isSME suitable, isUsingEuFunds, etc.) - -TODO: the definitions NEED to be aligned, for now, to cover all three aspects! Possibly in the future model a separation of concerns for higher clarity/accuracy. - - -Note: -The current procedure class is a conflation of the "process" description and "whole procurement subject matter". - -TODO: revise this definition. -TODO: specify that all procedures have al least one lot. -"""@en, - "Estimated dates are not really conditions and stipulations, they are not terms. We need to segregate the procedural/process information from the procurement-object information in the future. "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Procurement object"@en . :QualificationCriteriaSummary a owl:Class ; @@ -5523,37 +5630,10 @@ The classification of roles is based is based on the degree of involvement into - Primary (Procurement) Pole is directly involved in the Procurement Process; - Secondary (Procurement sub-) Role is secondary to the Procurement Process - Tertiary (Related) Role is not involved in the Procurement Process."""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Agent in role"@en . - -:AuxiliaryParty a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :AgentInRole ; - skos:definition "Role of an Agent who may be mentioned in the information exchanged during the Procurement Process but who does not play an active part in it."@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Auxiliary party"@en . - -:ContextSpecificDescription a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition """A description concerning a Procurement Object or a Notice in a specific Situation Context. - -Additional Information: -The description has its own identity (+I) but is dependent (+D) on the concerned Entity. - -We say that ContextSpecificDescription *concerns* an Entity. + skos:editorialNote """Here we have roles that belong to other modules (check all). +Discuss whether we need to move them. """@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Context specific description"@en . - -:ContextualProjection a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - skos:definition """Projection of an Entity and all of its properties that hold in a given Situation Context. - -Additional Information: -The contextual projection does not have its own identity (-I), is dependent (+D) on the described Entity, and is anti-rigid (~R) - -We say that ContextualProjection *describes* an Entity. - -Adaptation of ContextSlices pattern encoding a 4D view. -http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Context_Slices"""@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Contextual projection"@en . + skos:prefLabel "Agent in role"@en . :ContractSpecificTerm a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; @@ -5586,7 +5666,7 @@ WG Approval 23/04/2020"""@en ; :StatisticalInformation a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :ContextSpecificDescription ; + rdfs:subClassOf :ContextDescription ; skos:definition """Statistical data on the Procedure and the Lot. Additional Information @@ -5643,9 +5723,6 @@ org:Organization a owl:Class ; (WG approval 23/11/2018). """@en ; - skos:editorialNote """A dependency enumeration will be created and a codelist added for hasLegalFormType. -check WGM 17/01/2023"""@en, - "In order to align with Core Voc, it means we need to add cv:LegalEntity and org:FormalOrganization between org:Organisation and epo:Business."@en ; skos:prefLabel "Organization"@en . foaf:Agent a owl:Class ; @@ -5654,6 +5731,12 @@ foaf:Agent a owl:Class ; WG Approval 28/04/2020"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Agent"@en . +:AuxiliaryParty a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf :AgentInRole ; + skos:definition "Role of an Agent who may be mentioned in the information exchanged during the Procurement Process but who does not play an active part in it."@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Auxiliary party"@en . + :Contract a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; rdfs:subClassOf :Document ; @@ -5662,19 +5745,25 @@ WG Approval 28/04/2020"""@en ; Additional information: This includes Concession Contracts. -(WG approval 01/06/2018)"""@en ; - skos:editorialNote """Lot may be the object of more than one contract if it's a cascading situation. Otherwise, it is exactly one. - -Contract object is defined as follows: -All things which are not outside the commerce of men may be the object of a contract. Similarly, all services which are not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy may be the object of a contract."""@en ; +WG approval 01/06/2018"""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Contract"@en . :Term a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition "A governing condition or stipulation."@en ; - skos:editorialNote "Estimated dates are not really conditions and stipulations, they are not terms. We need to segregate the procedural/process information from the procurement-object information in the future. "@en ; skos:prefLabel "Term"@en . +:ContextDescription a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + skos:definition """A description concerning a Procurement Object or a Notice in a specific Situation Context. + +Additional Information: +The description has its own identity (+I) but is dependent (+D) on the concerned Entity. + +We say that ContextSpecificDescription *concerns* an Entity. +"""@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Context description"@en . + :ProcedureSpecificTerm a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; rdfs:subClassOf :Term ; @@ -5693,12 +5782,6 @@ Additional information: As per the European Procurement Directives the notion of ‘Economic Operators’ should be interpreted in a broad manner so as to include any Persons and/or Entities which offer the execution of works, the supply of products or the provision of services on the market, irrespective of the legal form under which they have chosen to operate. Thus, firms, branches, subsidiaries, partnerships, cooperative societies, limited companies, universities, public or private, and other forms of entities than natural Persons should all fall within the notion of Economic Operator, whether or not they are ‘Legal Persons’ in all circumstances."""@en ; skos:prefLabel "Offering party"@en . -:LotSpecificTerm a owl:Class ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; - rdfs:subClassOf :Term ; - skos:definition "Gathering class for conditions and stipulations related to a Lot."@en ; - skos:prefLabel "Lot specific term"@en . - :Document a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; skos:definition """A set of interrelated Business Information representing the Business facts and associated metadata. @@ -5708,6 +5791,12 @@ WG Approval 23/05/2019 """@en ; skos:prefLabel "Document"@en . +:LotSpecificTerm a owl:Class ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; + rdfs:subClassOf :Term ; + skos:definition "Gathering class for conditions and stipulations related to a Lot."@en ; + skos:prefLabel "Lot specific term"@en . + :AcquiringParty a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy :core ; rdfs:subClassOf :AgentInRole ; @@ -5721,7 +5810,7 @@ WG Approval 23/05/2019 dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology core specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - core"@en ; @@ -5749,5 +5838,5 @@ WG Approval 23/05/2019 owl:priorVersion "3.1.0" ; owl:versionIRI :core-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; - skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from ePO_CM.xml on 2023-08-09" . + skos:changeNote "This version is automatically generated from ePO_CM.xml on 2023-09-12" . diff --git a/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-restrictions.rdf b/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-restrictions.rdf index 813ad4f2..68c2b02b 100644 --- a/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-restrictions.rdf +++ b/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-restrictions.rdf @@ -16,11 +16,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -56,15 +58,15 @@ eProcurement Ontology - core This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. - This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification. + This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification. This version is automatically generated from ePO_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -563,26 +565,19 @@ - - - - - 1 - - - - - + + - - 1 + + - - - + + + + - + 1 @@ -590,7 +585,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -614,15 +609,7 @@ - - 1 - - - - - - - + 1 @@ -638,7 +625,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -646,7 +633,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -691,18 +678,10 @@ - - - - - 1 - - - - + 1 @@ -710,7 +689,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -742,7 +721,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -750,7 +729,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -774,7 +753,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -806,7 +785,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -814,7 +793,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -822,7 +801,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -830,15 +809,15 @@ - + 1 - + - + 1 @@ -846,7 +825,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -862,7 +841,15 @@ - + + 1 + + + + + + + 1 @@ -918,7 +905,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -926,7 +913,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -934,7 +921,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -942,7 +929,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -950,7 +937,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -958,7 +945,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -990,7 +977,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1006,7 +993,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1014,7 +1001,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1022,7 +1009,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1030,7 +1017,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1038,7 +1025,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1046,7 +1033,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1054,7 +1041,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1062,7 +1049,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1070,7 +1057,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1078,7 +1065,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1086,7 +1073,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1094,7 +1081,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1110,15 +1097,15 @@ - + 1 - + - + 1 @@ -1131,10 +1118,10 @@ - + - + 1 @@ -1142,7 +1129,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1150,7 +1137,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1163,6 +1150,14 @@ + + + + + 1 + + + @@ -1174,7 +1169,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1182,7 +1177,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1214,7 +1209,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1222,7 +1217,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1238,7 +1233,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1246,7 +1241,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1254,7 +1249,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1262,7 +1257,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1366,7 +1361,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1374,7 +1369,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1382,7 +1377,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1390,7 +1385,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1398,7 +1393,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1411,18 +1406,34 @@ - + - + 1 - + - + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + 1 @@ -1443,98 +1454,98 @@ - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - - 1 + + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - - 1 + + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 @@ -1542,7 +1553,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1550,7 +1561,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1566,7 +1577,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1574,7 +1585,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1582,7 +1593,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1590,7 +1601,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1598,7 +1609,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1606,7 +1617,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1614,7 +1625,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1622,7 +1633,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1635,34 +1646,42 @@ - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + + 1 + + + + + + + 1 @@ -1670,7 +1689,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1694,31 +1713,47 @@ - + 1 - + + + + + 1 + + + + - 1 + 1 - + - + 1 + + + + + 1 + + + - + 1 @@ -1726,7 +1761,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1734,7 +1769,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1742,7 +1777,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1750,7 +1785,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1758,7 +1793,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1766,7 +1801,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1774,7 +1809,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1782,7 +1817,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1854,7 +1889,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -1878,44 +1913,28 @@ - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + @@ -1923,18 +1942,18 @@ - + - + 1 - + - + 1 @@ -1987,44 +2006,6 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -2472,6 +2453,16 @@ + + + + + + + + + + @@ -2480,6 +2471,7 @@ + @@ -2488,6 +2480,7 @@ + @@ -2691,6 +2684,23 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -2706,6 +2716,7 @@ + @@ -2721,6 +2732,7 @@ + @@ -2736,6 +2748,7 @@ + @@ -2751,6 +2764,7 @@ + @@ -2766,6 +2780,7 @@ + @@ -2781,6 +2796,7 @@ + @@ -2796,6 +2812,7 @@ + @@ -2811,6 +2828,7 @@ + @@ -2826,6 +2844,7 @@ + @@ -2843,51 +2862,105 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -3088,71 +3161,179 @@ - - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + - - + + - + - - - + + + + + + + + - - - + + + + + + + + - - - + + + + + + + + - - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -3387,182 +3568,18 @@ - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - + - + 1 - + - + 1 @@ -3570,7 +3587,7 @@ - + 1 @@ -3656,6 +3673,17 @@ + + + + + 1 + + + + + + @@ -3731,20 +3759,47 @@ - + - + 1 - + - - 1 - + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -3785,6 +3840,14 @@ + + + + + 1 + + + @@ -3797,13 +3860,10 @@ - 1 + 1 - - - @@ -3828,6 +3888,14 @@ + + + + + 1 + + + @@ -3863,13 +3931,8 @@ - - - - - 1 - - + + @@ -3951,6 +4014,14 @@ + + + + + 1 + + + @@ -3991,6 +4062,22 @@ + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + @@ -4051,12 +4138,17 @@ - 1 + 1 - - + + + + + 1 + + @@ -4090,39 +4182,39 @@ - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + @@ -4133,6 +4225,17 @@ + + + + + 1 + + + + + + @@ -4152,235 +4255,369 @@ - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - - 1 + + 1 - + + + + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - - 1 + + 1 - - - - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - - - - - - - - - - + - + 1 - - - - + - - 1 + + 1 - - - - + - + 1 - + - + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - + - + - + 1 - + - + 1 - - - - + - + 1 - + - - 1 + + 1 - + - - 1 + + 1 - + - - 1 + + 1 - - + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + 1 + + @@ -4508,6 +4745,9 @@ + + + @@ -4535,16 +4775,16 @@ - + - + - + - + @@ -4562,9 +4802,6 @@ - - - @@ -4592,10 +4829,10 @@ - + - + @@ -4613,26 +4850,17 @@ - + - - - - - - - - - - - + + - - + + - - + + @@ -4640,7 +4868,7 @@ - + @@ -4648,17 +4876,11 @@ - - - - - - - + - - + + @@ -4672,16 +4894,22 @@ - + - - + + - + - + + + + + + + @@ -4696,10 +4924,10 @@ - + - + @@ -4708,17 +4936,31 @@ - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + @@ -4740,63 +4982,47 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - + + - + - + - + - - + + + + + + + + - + - + - - + + @@ -4816,12 +5042,30 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -4835,29 +5079,11 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + - - + + @@ -4871,16 +5097,10 @@ - - - - - - - + - + @@ -4889,16 +5109,16 @@ - + - + - + - + @@ -4913,29 +5133,35 @@ + + + + + + - + - + - - + + - + - + @@ -4943,11 +5169,11 @@ - + - - + + @@ -4955,17 +5181,11 @@ - - - - - - - + @@ -4973,23 +5193,17 @@ - - - - - - - - + + - - + + @@ -5003,17 +5217,35 @@ - - + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + - - + + @@ -5021,11 +5253,17 @@ - + - - + + + + + + + + @@ -5072,23 +5310,35 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + - + - - + + @@ -5096,6 +5346,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -5108,29 +5364,29 @@ - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -5138,11 +5394,11 @@ - + - - + + @@ -5150,17 +5406,17 @@ - + - + - + - - + + @@ -5168,11 +5424,11 @@ - + - - + + @@ -5180,28 +5436,28 @@ - + - - + + - - + + - + - - + + - + - - + + - + @@ -5210,40 +5466,28 @@ - + - + - + - - + + - + - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - + @@ -5252,10 +5496,10 @@ - + - + @@ -5264,18 +5508,24 @@ - + - + - - + + - + + + + + + + @@ -5288,17 +5538,17 @@ - + - + - - + + - - + + @@ -5312,35 +5562,29 @@ - - - - - - - + - - + + - + - - + + - + - + - + - - + + @@ -5348,17 +5592,17 @@ - + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -5378,18 +5622,18 @@ - - - - - - + + + + + + @@ -5402,16 +5646,10 @@ - - - - - - - + - + @@ -5420,10 +5658,16 @@ - + - + + + + + + + @@ -5505,12 +5749,6 @@ - - - - - - @@ -5523,10 +5761,10 @@ - - + + - + @@ -5535,10 +5773,10 @@ - - + + - + @@ -5547,12 +5785,46 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -5571,12 +5843,6 @@ - - - - - - @@ -5589,23 +5855,29 @@ - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + + + + + + + @@ -5613,17 +5885,29 @@ - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -5640,11 +5924,17 @@ - - + + - - + + + + + + + + @@ -5652,131 +5942,131 @@ - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - - + + - - + + - + - - + + - + - - + + - + - + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -5784,28 +6074,16 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - + - + - + @@ -5814,23 +6092,23 @@ - + - - + + - + - - + + - - + + - - + + @@ -5838,6 +6116,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -5862,12 +6146,6 @@ - - - - - - @@ -5875,14 +6153,7 @@ - - - - - - - - + @@ -5902,11 +6173,11 @@ - + - - + + @@ -5920,373 +6191,137 @@ - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - + - + - - - - - - - + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - - - - - - - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - - - - - - - - + + - - + + - - - - - - - - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + + + + @@ -6295,9 +6330,11 @@ + + @@ -6349,6 +6386,19 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -6487,6 +6537,19 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -6596,6 +6659,38 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -6616,6 +6711,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -6647,18 +6748,6 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -6736,6 +6825,28 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -6761,31 +6872,10 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - + + @@ -6793,6 +6883,7 @@ + @@ -6812,6 +6903,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -6971,6 +7068,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -7064,6 +7167,18 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -7100,6 +7215,18 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -7204,6 +7331,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -7270,21 +7403,9 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -7318,12 +7439,31 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -7349,106 +7489,312 @@ - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - - - - - - - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - + + + + + + + + + + - - - + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + - + - - + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -7467,17 +7813,23 @@ - - + + - + + + + + + + - - + + - - + + @@ -7488,6 +7840,18 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + @@ -7503,36 +7867,12 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -7540,7 +7880,14 @@ - + + + + + + + + @@ -7563,19 +7910,6 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -7588,12 +7922,6 @@ - - - - - - @@ -7603,20 +7931,24 @@ - - - - + - - + + + + + + + + + - - + + - + @@ -7653,19 +7985,6 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - @@ -7716,6 +8035,12 @@ + + + + + + @@ -7819,42 +8144,25 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - + + - + - - - - + - - + + @@ -7962,10 +8270,10 @@ - + - + @@ -8074,16 +8382,23 @@ - - + + + + + + + + + - + - - + + - + diff --git a/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-restrictions.ttl b/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-restrictions.ttl index b8237671..5a001e35 100644 --- a/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-restrictions.ttl +++ b/implementation/ePO/owl_ontology/ePO_CM-restrictions.ttl @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ @prefix : . @prefix adms: . @prefix at-voc: . +@prefix at-voc-new: . @prefix bibo: . @prefix cc: . @prefix cccev: . @@ -60,6 +61,9 @@ owl:unionOf ( :DirectAwardPrenotificationNotice :CompetitionNotice ) ] ; rdfs:range :Procedure . +:announcesProcurementCriterion rdfs:domain :ESPDRequest ; + rdfs:range :ProcurementCriterion . + :announcesReviewObject rdfs:domain :CompletionNotice ; rdfs:range :ReviewObject . @@ -94,6 +98,9 @@ :comprisesAwardOutcome rdfs:domain :AwardDecision ; rdfs:range :AwardOutcome . +:comprisesQuestion rdfs:domain :ProcurementCriterion ; + rdfs:range :Question . + :comprisesTenderAwardOutcome rdfs:domain :AwardOutcome ; rdfs:range :TenderAwardOutcome . @@ -106,9 +113,6 @@ :conformsToLegalBasis rdfs:domain :Notice ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . -:conformsToSpecificLegalBasis rdfs:domain :Notice ; - rdfs:range skos:Concept . - :containsCandidate rdfs:domain :SelectedCandidateList ; rdfs:range :Candidate . @@ -118,10 +122,10 @@ :core-restriction a owl:Ontology ; cc:attributionName "European Union" ; cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extention with restrictions and inference-relaated specification." ; + dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the ontology extension with restrictions and inference-related specification." ; dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; + dcterms:issued "2023-09-12"^^xsd:date ; dcterms:license ; dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - core"@en ; @@ -151,7 +155,7 @@ owl:versionIRI :core-restriction-4.0.0 ; owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from ePO_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . + 2023-09-12""" . :definesCatalogueProvider rdfs:domain :AccessTerm ; rdfs:range :CatalogueProvider . @@ -168,15 +172,20 @@ :definesPrize rdfs:domain :DesignContestRegimeTerm ; rdfs:range :Prize . +:definesReviewer rdfs:domain :ReviewTerm ; + rdfs:range :Reviewer . + :definesSpecificPlaceOfPerformance rdfs:domain :ContractTerm ; rdfs:range dcterms:Location . :delegatesAncillaryActivitiesTo rdfs:domain :Buyer ; rdfs:range :ProcurementServiceProvider . -:describesResultNotice rdf:domain :NoticeAwardInformation ; - rdfs:range [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :DirectAwardPrenotificationNotice :ResultNotice ) ] . +:describesDirectAwardPrenotificationNotice rdfs:domain :NoticeAwardInformation ; + rdfs:range :DirectAwardPrenotificationNotice . + +:describesResultNotice rdfs:domain :NoticeAwardInformation ; + rdfs:range :ResultNotice . :distributesOffer rdfs:domain :OfferIssuer ; rdfs:range :Offer . @@ -231,10 +240,6 @@ :hasAmountDueForPayment rdfs:domain :Order ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . -:hasAssociatedDocument rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :DespatchAdvice :DespatchLine ) ] ; - rdfs:range :Document . - :hasAwardCriteriaEvaluationFormula rdfs:domain :AwardEvaluationTerm ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -276,16 +281,16 @@ rdfs:range :Period . :hasCertification rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( foaf:Person org:Organization ) ] ; + owl:unionOf ( foaf:Person org:Organization :Item ) ] ; rdfs:range :Certificate . -:hasChangeDescription rdfs:domain :NoticeChangeInformation ; +:hasChangeDescription rdfs:domain :ChangeInformation ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:hasChangeJustification rdfs:domain :NoticeChangeInformation ; +:hasChangeJustification rdfs:domain :ChangeInformation ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . -:hasChangeReasonDescription rdfs:domain :NoticeChangeInformation ; +:hasChangeReasonDescription rdfs:domain :ChangeInformation ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . :hasChargeableWeight rdfs:domain :Consignment ; @@ -352,7 +357,8 @@ :hasDeliveryLocation rdfs:domain :Price ; rdfs:range dcterms:Location . -:hasDeliveryPeriod rdfs:domain :DeliveryInformation ; +:hasDeliveryPeriod rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :OrderResponseInformation :DeliveryInformation ) ] ; rdfs:range :Period . :hasDespatchedQuantity rdfs:domain :DespatchLine ; @@ -364,12 +370,6 @@ :hasDocumentRestrictionJustification rdfs:domain :AccessTerm ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . -:hasDocumentStatus rdfs:domain :Document ; - rdfs:range skos:Concept . - -:hasDocumentType rdfs:domain :Document ; - rdfs:range skos:Concept . - :hasECataloguePermission rdfs:domain :SubmissionTerm ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -386,6 +386,9 @@ :hasElectronicSignature rdfs:domain :Document ; rdfs:range :ElectronicSignature . +:hasElementReference rdfs:domain :ReviewObject ; + rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . + :hasEndpointIdentifier rdfs:domain cccev:Channel ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . @@ -442,7 +445,8 @@ :hasHeight rdfs:domain :AbstractContainer ; rdfs:range :Quantity . -:hasInternalIdentifier rdfs:domain :ProcurementElement ; +:hasInternalIdentifier rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :LotGroup :ProcurementElement ) ] ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . :hasIrregularityType rdfs:domain :ReviewIrregularitySummary ; @@ -457,6 +461,9 @@ :hasJustification rdfs:domain :DirectAwardTerm ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . +:hasLabelType rdfs:domain :CertificationLabel ; + rdfs:range skos:Concept . + :hasLanguage rdfs:domain :SubmissionTerm ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -548,12 +555,6 @@ :hasNonPublicationJustification rdfs:domain :NonPublishedInformation ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . -:hasNonPublishedInformation rdfs:domain :Notice ; - rdfs:range :NonPublishedInformation . - -:hasNoticeChangeInformation rdfs:domain :Notice ; - rdfs:range :NoticeChangeInformation . - :hasNoticeType rdfs:domain :Notice ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -561,15 +562,13 @@ owl:unionOf ( dcterms:Location locn:Address ) ] ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . -:hasOfficialLanguage rdfs:domain :Document ; +:hasOfficialLanguage rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :Document :Legislation ) ] ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . :hasOpeningDescription rdfs:domain :OpeningTerm ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:hasOperatorLicenceID rdfs:domain :TransportMeansOperator ; - rdfs:range adms:Identifier . - :hasOptionsDescription rdfs:domain :ContractTerm ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -632,18 +631,21 @@ owl:unionOf ( :ParticipationCondition :ParticipationConditionsSummary ) ] ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . -:hasRestatedContractValue rdfs:domain :ContractAmendment ; - rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . - :hasReviewBodyType rdfs:domain :Reviewer ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . +:hasReviewDeadlineInformation rdfs:domain :ReviewTerm ; + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . + :hasReviewDecisionType rdfs:domain :ReviewDecision ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . :hasReviewIrregularitySummary rdfs:domain :ReviewRequestSummary ; rdfs:range :ReviewIrregularitySummary . +:hasReviewProcedure rdfs:domain :ReviewTerm ; + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . + :hasRoundingAmount rdfs:domain :Order ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . @@ -683,8 +685,7 @@ :hasTaxIdentifier rdfs:domain org:Organization ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . -:hasTaxInformation rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :Tender :Contract ) ] ; +:hasTaxInformation rdfs:domain :Contract ; rdfs:range :TaxInformation . :hasTenderSubcontractingInformation rdfs:domain :SubmissionTerm ; @@ -751,9 +752,15 @@ :hasWidth rdfs:domain :AbstractContainer ; rdfs:range :Quantity . +:implementsArticle rdfs:domain :ProcurementCriterion ; + rdfs:range :Article . + :implementsContract rdfs:domain :OrderResponse ; rdfs:range :Contract . +:implementsLegislation rdfs:domain :ProcurementCriterion ; + rdfs:range :Legislation . + :includesAccessibilityCriterion rdfs:domain :StrategicProcurement ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -841,6 +848,9 @@ :ResultNotice ; rdfs:range :AgentInRole . +:reinforcesResponse rdfs:domain cccev:Evidence ; + rdfs:range :Response . + :requestsRemedyType rdfs:domain :ReviewRequest ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -896,6 +906,9 @@ :specifiesSubcontractors rdfs:domain :Tender ; rdfs:range :Subcontractor . +:updatesContractValue rdfs:domain :ContractAmendment ; + rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . + :usesChannel rdfs:domain :ProcurementElement ; rdfs:range cccev:Channel . @@ -931,7 +944,7 @@ cccev:telephone rdfs:domain cccev:ContactPoint ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . dcterms:alternative rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . dcterms:type rdfs:domain cccev:Criterion ; rdfs:range skos:Concept . @@ -946,29 +959,37 @@ locn:postCode rdfs:domain locn:Address ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . locn:postName rdfs:domain locn:Address ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . locn:thoroughfare rdfs:domain locn:Address ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . + +org:subOrganizationOf a owl:AsymmetricProperty ; + rdfs:domain org:Organization ; + rdfs:range org:Organization . person:birthName rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . person:patronymicName rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . foaf:familyName rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . foaf:givenName rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . :actsOnBehalfOf rdfs:domain :ProcurementServiceProvider ; rdfs:range :Buyer . +:attestedByLabel a owl:FunctionalProperty ; + rdfs:domain :Certificate ; + rdfs:range :CertificationLabel . + :comprisesTender rdfs:domain :TenderGroup ; rdfs:range :Tender . @@ -976,7 +997,8 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; rdfs:domain :VehicleInformation ; rdfs:range :GreenProcurement . -:concernsProcedure rdfs:domain :ProcurementProcessInformation ; +:concernsProcedure rdfs:domain :ESPDRequest, + :ProcurementProcessInformation ; rdfs:range :Procedure . :concernsReviewSummaryForLot a owl:FunctionalProperty ; @@ -1017,6 +1039,9 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider rdfs:domain :AccessTerm ; rdfs:range :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider . +:definesReviewProcedureInformationProvider rdfs:domain :ReviewTerm ; + rdfs:range :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider . + :definesSubcontractingTerm rdfs:domain :ContractTerm ; rdfs:range :SubcontractTerm . @@ -1090,9 +1115,6 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasAwardRank rdfs:domain :TenderAwardOutcome ; rdfs:range xsd:integer . -:hasAwardedEstimatedValue rdfs:domain :LotAwardOutcome ; - rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . - :hasAwardedValue rdfs:domain :AwardOutcome ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . @@ -1111,6 +1133,10 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasCalculationMethod rdfs:domain :ConcessionEstimate ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . +:hasCertificationNumber a owl:FunctionalProperty ; + rdfs:domain :Certificate ; + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . + :hasCleanVehicles rdfs:domain :VehicleInformation ; rdfs:range xsd:integer . @@ -1135,8 +1161,11 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasDecisionDate rdfs:domain :ReviewDecision ; rdfs:range xsd:date . +:hasDescriptionOfPrizes rdfs:domain :DesignContestRegimeTerm ; + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . + :hasDispatchDate rdfs:domain :Document ; - rdfs:range xsd:date . + rdfs:range xsd:dateTime . :hasDurationExtensionJustification rdfs:domain :FrameworkAgreementTerm ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -1171,13 +1200,6 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasElectronicTenders rdfs:domain :SubmissionStatisticalInformation ; rdfs:range xsd:integer . -:hasElementChange rdfs:domain :NoticeChangeInformation ; - rdfs:range :ElementChangeDescription . - -:hasElementReference rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :ReviewObject :ElementChangeDescription ) ] ; - rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . - :hasEnd rdfs:domain :Period ; rdfs:range xsd:dateTime . @@ -1211,9 +1233,6 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasEstimatedUserConcessionRevenue rdfs:domain :ConcessionEstimate ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . -:hasEstimatedValue rdfs:domain :ProcurementElement ; - rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . - :hasFinancialOfferValue rdfs:domain :Tender ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . @@ -1224,14 +1243,11 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; rdfs:range xsd:boolean . :hasFormNumber rdfs:domain :Notice ; - rdfs:range xsd:integer . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . :hasFormula rdfs:domain :ProcurementCriterion ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue rdfs:domain :LotAwardOutcome ; - rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . - :hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue rdfs:domain :LotAwardOutcome ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . @@ -1248,21 +1264,12 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; owl:unionOf ( org:Organization cccev:ContactPoint ) ] ; rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . -:hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue rdfs:domain :FrameworkAgreementTerm ; - rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . - -:hasLaunchGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue rdfs:domain :FrameworkAgreementTerm ; - rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . - :hasLegalFormRequirement rdfs:domain :ContractTerm ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . :hasLegalFormType rdfs:domain org:Organization ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . -:hasLongTitle rdfs:domain :Notice ; - rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . - :hasLotAwardCombination rdfs:domain :ProcedureTerm ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -1326,9 +1333,6 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasNonEUReceivedTenders rdfs:domain :SubmissionStatisticalInformation ; rdfs:range xsd:integer . -:hasNonPublishedInformationIdentifier rdfs:domain :NonPublishedInformation ; - rdfs:range adms:Identifier . - :hasNoticePublicationNumber rdfs:domain :Notice ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -1355,9 +1359,6 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasOptions rdfs:domain :ContractTerm ; rdfs:range xsd:boolean . -:hasOrganisationUnitName rdfs:domain org:Organization ; - rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . - :hasOtherCountriesReceivedTenders rdfs:domain :SubmissionStatisticalInformation ; rdfs:range xsd:integer . @@ -1382,16 +1383,13 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasPlannedPeriod rdfs:domain :PlannedProcurementPart ; rdfs:range :Period . -:hasPreviousVersionOfElementReference rdfs:domain :ElementChangeDescription ; - rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . - :hasPrizeRank rdfs:domain :Prize ; rdfs:range xsd:integer . :hasPrizeValue rdfs:domain :Prize ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . -:hasProcurementDocumentChangeDate rdfs:domain :NoticeChangeInformation ; +:hasProcurementDocumentChangeDate rdfs:domain :ChangeInformation ; rdfs:range xsd:dateTime . :hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue rdfs:domain :NoticeAwardInformation ; @@ -1452,6 +1450,9 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasRecurrenceDescription rdfs:domain :ProcurementObject ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . +:hasReferenceURI rdfs:domain :CertificationLabel ; + rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . + :hasRemedyValue rdfs:domain :ReviewDecision ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . @@ -1461,6 +1462,9 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasRestrictedAccessURL rdfs:domain :AccessTerm ; rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . +:hasReviewDeadline rdfs:domain :ReviewTerm ; + rdfs:range xsd:dateTime . + :hasReviewIrregularityCount a owl:FunctionalProperty ; rdfs:domain :ReviewIrregularitySummary ; rdfs:range xsd:integer . @@ -1495,6 +1499,9 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasSuccessiveReduction rdfs:domain :MultipleStageProcedureTerm ; rdfs:range xsd:boolean . +:hasTenderValidityDuration rdfs:domain :SubmissionTerm ; + rdfs:range :Duration . + :hasTenderValidityPeriod rdfs:domain :SubmissionTerm ; rdfs:range :Period . @@ -1511,27 +1518,19 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :hasTotalQuantity rdfs:domain :Purpose ; rdfs:range :Quantity . -:hasTotalValue a owl:FunctionalProperty ; - rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; +:hasTotalValue rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :TenderGroup :Deliverable ) ] ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . :hasTotalVehicles rdfs:domain :VehicleInformation ; rdfs:range xsd:integer . -:hasURL rdfs:domain :Fund ; - rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . - :hasUUID rdfs:domain :Document ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . :hasUnverifiedTenders rdfs:domain :SubmissionStatisticalInformation ; rdfs:range xsd:integer . -:hasValidityPeriod rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :Technique :Certificate ) ] ; - rdfs:range :Period . - :hasVersion rdfs:domain :Document ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . @@ -1550,8 +1549,7 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :indicatesPerformingStaffInformationRequirement rdfs:domain :ProcurementCriteriaSummary ; rdfs:range xsd:boolean . -:involvesProcurementDocument a owl:FunctionalProperty ; - rdfs:domain :AccessTerm ; +:involvesProcurementDocument rdfs:domain :AccessTerm ; rdfs:range :ProcurementDocument . :isAccelerated rdfs:domain :Procedure ; @@ -1609,7 +1607,7 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; rdfs:range foaf:Agent ; owl:inverseOf :ownsSystem . -:isProcurementDocumentChanged rdfs:domain :NoticeChangeInformation ; +:isProcurementDocumentChanged rdfs:domain :ChangeInformation ; rdfs:range xsd:boolean . :isProcurementDocumentRestricted rdfs:domain :AccessTerm ; @@ -1633,7 +1631,7 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :isSubjectToProcedureSpecificTerm rdfs:domain :Procedure ; rdfs:range :ProcedureSpecificTerm . -:isSubmissionForAllLotsAllowed rdfs:domain :ProcedureTerm ; +:isSubmissionForAllLotsRequired rdfs:domain :ProcedureTerm ; rdfs:range xsd:boolean . :isSubmitedBy rdfs:domain :Tender ; @@ -1662,6 +1660,9 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :isWithdrawn rdfs:domain :ReviewRequest ; rdfs:range xsd:boolean . +:issuedByCertifier rdfs:domain :Certificate ; + rdfs:range :Certifier . + :leadBy rdfs:domain :OrganisationGroup ; rdfs:range org:Organization . @@ -1684,10 +1685,6 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; rdfs:domain :ContractLotCompletionInformation ; rdfs:range :Contract . -:refersToEFormSectionIdentifier rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :NoticeChangeInformation :ContractModificationInformation ) ] ; - rdfs:range adms:Identifier . - :refersToLot rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :Notice :CompletionNotice :ContractModificationNotice :ResultNotice ) ] ; rdfs:range :Lot . @@ -1697,7 +1694,7 @@ foaf:name rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; rdfs:range :Notice . :refersToPreviousNotice a owl:FunctionalProperty ; - rdfs:domain :NoticeChangeInformation ; + rdfs:domain :ChangeInformation ; rdfs:range :Notice . :refersToPreviousProcedure rdfs:domain :DirectAwardTerm ; @@ -1928,6 +1925,12 @@ at-voc:modification-justification a owl:Class ; owl:hasValue at-voc:modification-justification ; owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . +at-voc-new:certification-label-type a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; + owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:hasValue at-voc-new:certification-label-type ; + owl:onProperty skos:inScheme ] . + at-voc:non-award-justification a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -2076,7 +2079,7 @@ dcterms:issued rdfs:domain :Document ; rdfs:range xsd:dateTime . dcterms:title rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :ProcurementElement foaf:Agent :AgentInRole :Document :Fund ) ] ; + owl:unionOf ( :LotGroup :ProcurementElement :TenderGroup foaf:Agent :AgentInRole :Document :Fund ) ] ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . skos:notation a owl:FunctionalProperty ; @@ -2101,19 +2104,19 @@ locn:address rdfs:domain dcterms:Location ; rdfs:range locn:Address . locn:addressArea rdfs:domain locn:Address ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . locn:addressID rdfs:domain locn:Address ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . locn:adminUnitL1 rdfs:domain locn:Address ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . locn:adminUnitL2 rdfs:domain locn:Address ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . locn:fullAddress rdfs:domain locn:Address ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . locn:geographicIdentifier rdfs:domain dcterms:Location ; rdfs:range adms:Identifier . @@ -2128,7 +2131,7 @@ locn:locatorDesignator rdfs:domain locn:Address ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . locn:locatorName rdfs:domain locn:Address ; - rdfs:range rdf:langString . + rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . person:placeOfBirth rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; rdfs:range dcterms:Location . @@ -2147,42 +2150,63 @@ person:placeOfDeath rdfs:domain cccev:Person ; :concernsLot a owl:FunctionalProperty ; rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :LotAwardOutcome :ProcurementProcessInformation ) ] ; + owl:unionOf ( :ProcurementProcessInformation :LotAwardOutcome ) ] ; rdfs:range :Lot . +:concernsNotice a owl:FunctionalProperty ; + rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :NonPublishedInformation :ChangeInformation ) ] ; + rdfs:range :Notice . + :foreseesConcession rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :ProcurementObject :Tender ) ] ; rdfs:range :ConcessionEstimate . :hasAdditionalInformation rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :ProcurementObject :Notice :NoticeChangeInformation ) ] ; + owl:unionOf ( :ProcurementObject :Notice :ChangeInformation ) ] ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . :hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :LotAwardOutcome :NoticeAwardInformation ) ] ; rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . +:hasEstimatedValue rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :LotGroup :ProcurementElement ) ] ; + rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . + +:hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :ProcurementObject :LotGroup ) ] ; + rdfs:range :MonetaryValue . + :hasPurpose rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( :ProcurementObject :Contract ) ] ; rdfs:range :Purpose . +:hasURL rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :Certificate :Fund ) ] ; + rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . + +:hasValidityPeriod rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( cccev:Evidence :Technique ) ] ; + rdfs:range :Period . + :playedBy a owl:FunctionalProperty ; rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :AgentInRole :TransportMeansOperator :JuryMember ) ] ; + owl:unionOf ( :JuryMember :AgentInRole :TransportMeansOperator ) ] ; rdfs:range [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( foaf:Agent foaf:Person ) ] . + owl:unionOf ( cccev:Person foaf:Agent foaf:Person ) ] . + +:relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :ChangeInformation :NonPublishedInformation :ContractModificationInformation ) ] ; + rdfs:range adms:Identifier . cccev:registeredAddress rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:unionOf ( cccev:Person org:Organization ) ] ; rdfs:range locn:Address . -:ElementChangeDescription a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:CertificationLabel rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPreviousVersionOfElementReference ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasElementReference ] . + owl:onProperty :hasReferenceURI ] . :Prize rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; @@ -2195,16 +2219,6 @@ cccev:registeredAddress rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasStartDate ] . -:TenderGroup rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasTotalValue ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :comprisesTender ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isSubmittedForLotGroup ] . - :MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :resultsFromUsingCandidateList ] . @@ -2215,105 +2229,101 @@ cccev:registeredAddress rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; :SelectionCriteriaSummary rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :describesMinimumLevelOfStandards ], + owl:onProperty :hasSelectionCriteriaStatedInProcurementDocuments ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasSelectionCriteriaStatedInProcurementDocuments ] . + owl:onProperty :describesMinimumLevelOfStandards ] . :SpecificDuration rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty time:numericDuration ] . -:NonPublishedInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasNonPublishedInformationIdentifier ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; +:Certificate a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasConfidentialityJustification ], + owl:onProperty :hasURL ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasCertificationNumber ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAccessibilityDate ] . + owl:onProperty :issuedByCertifier ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :attestedByLabel ] . :ProcurementCriteriaSummary rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :indicatesPerformingStaffInformationRequirement ] . -:ProcurementCriterion rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasFormula ] . - :Technique a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasValidityPeriod ] . -cccev:InformationConcept a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +cccev:Evidence rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty adms:identifier ] . + owl:onProperty :hasValidityPeriod ] . -cccev:Requirement a owl:Class ; +cccev:InformationConcept a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty dcterms:description ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty skos:prefLabel ] . + owl:onProperty adms:identifier ] . dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :ProcurementElement :System :AgentInRole cccev:ContactPoint cccev:Channel :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :SecurityClearanceTerm :SubcontractTerm cccev:InformationConcept cccev:Requirement :Technique :SubcontractingEstimate :Document :ElectronicSignature :Fund ) ] ; + owl:unionOf ( :LotGroup :ProcurementElement :TenderGroup :System :AgentInRole cccev:ContactPoint cccev:Channel :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :SecurityClearanceTerm :SubcontractTerm cccev:InformationConcept cccev:Requirement :Technique :SubcontractingEstimate :Document :ElectronicSignature :Fund ) ] ; rdfs:range rdf:PlainLiteral . :Fund a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasURL ], + owl:onProperty adms:identifier ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty adms:identifier ] . + owl:onProperty :hasURL ] . :GreenProcurement rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :usesCleanVehicleDirective ] . :OrganisationGroup rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :leadBy ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMember ] . + owl:onProperty :hasMember ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :leadBy ] . :ParticipationConditionsSummary rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :describesObjectiveParticipationRules ], + owl:onProperty :describesVerificationMethod ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :describesVerificationMethod ] . + owl:onProperty :describesObjectiveParticipationRules ] . :ProcurementElement a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty adms:identifier ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedValue ] . + owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedValue ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty adms:identifier ] . :ProfessionalSuitabilitySummary rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :describesProfession ], + owl:onProperty :hasServiceReservedToParticularProfession ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :describesProfessionRelevantLaw ], + owl:onProperty :describesProfession ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasServiceReservedToParticularProfession ] . + owl:onProperty :describesProfessionRelevantLaw ] . :PurchaseContract rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :followsRulesSetBy ], + owl:onProperty :resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome ] . + owl:onProperty :followsRulesSetBy ] . :ReviewIrregularitySummary rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; @@ -2331,18 +2341,42 @@ dcterms:description rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isOwnedByAgent ] . -:VehicleInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:TenderAwardOutcome rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasCleanVehicles ], + owl:onProperty :indicatesAwardToWinner ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :concernsTender ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasTotalVehicles ], + owl:onProperty :hasAwardRank ] . + +:TenderGroup a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :comprisesTender ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty adms:identifier ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :concernsGreenProcurement ], + owl:onProperty :isSubmittedForLotGroup ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasTotalValue ] . + +:VehicleInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasTotalVehicles ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasZeroEmissionVehicles ] . + owl:onProperty :hasCleanVehicles ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasZeroEmissionVehicles ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :concernsGreenProcurement ] . cccev:Channel a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -2352,10 +2386,16 @@ cccev:Channel a owl:Class ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty dcterms:description ] . -adms:identifier a owl:FunctionalProperty ; - rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; - owl:unionOf ( :Project :LotGroup :ProcurementElement foaf:Agent dcterms:Location cccev:InformationConcept :Document :Fund :Consignment :TransportEquipment :ShipmentStage :TransportEquipmentSeal :ShipmentInformation :Line :AbstractContainer ) ] ; - rdfs:range adms:Identifier . +cccev:Requirement a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty adms:identifier ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty skos:prefLabel ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty dcterms:description ] . foaf:Agent a owl:Class . @@ -2372,36 +2412,22 @@ foaf:Agent a owl:Class . owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasOverallCostAwardCriteriaPonderation ] . -:AwardOutcome rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasBargainPrice ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAwardedValue ] . - :Business rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isListedCompany ] . :ConcessionEstimate rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasConcessionEstimatedValue ], + owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedUserConcessionRevenue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedBuyerConcessionRevenue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedUserConcessionRevenue ], + owl:onProperty :hasCalculationMethod ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasCalculationMethod ] . - -:LotGroupAwardInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :describesLotGroup ] . + owl:onProperty :hasConcessionEstimatedValue ] . :ProcessPlanningTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; @@ -2425,16 +2451,6 @@ foaf:Agent a owl:Class . owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedPercentage ] . -:TenderAwardOutcome rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :indicatesAwardToWinner ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :concernsTender ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAwardRank ] . - cccev:Constraint rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasThresholdValue ] . @@ -2444,10 +2460,10 @@ cccev:Criterion rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty cccev:bias ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty cccev:weight ], + owl:onProperty cccev:weightingConsiderationDescription ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty cccev:weightingConsiderationDescription ] . + owl:onProperty cccev:weight ] . :AgentInRole a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -2455,186 +2471,159 @@ cccev:Criterion rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :playedBy ] . :AwardCriterion rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAwardCriteriaStatedInProcurementDocuments ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasFixedValue ] . + owl:onProperty :hasFixedValue ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasAwardCriteriaStatedInProcurementDocuments ] . -:ContractLotCompletionInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:LotAwardOutcome rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPaymentValueDiscrepancyJustification ], + owl:onProperty :hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :describesLotCompletion ], + owl:onProperty :concernsLot ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :providesContractTotalPaymentValue ], + owl:onProperty :hasNonAwardedContractNumber ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :refersToContract ], + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :providesContractTotalPenaltyValue ] . + owl:onProperty :hasNonAwardedContractTitle ] . :PlannedProcurementPart rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPlannedPeriod ], + owl:onProperty :hasPlannedDuration ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPlannedDuration ], + owl:onProperty :foreseesProcurementObject ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :foreseesProcurementObject ] . + owl:onProperty :hasPlannedPeriod ] . -:ProcurementProcessInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isToBeRelaunched ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; +:ReviewDecision rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isCompetitionTerminated ], + owl:onProperty :hasDecisionDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :concernsProcedure ], + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :resolvesReviewRequest ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isDPSTerminated ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :concernsLot ] . + owl:onProperty :hasRemedyValue ] . -:ReviewDecision rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +adms:identifier a owl:FunctionalProperty ; + rdfs:domain [ a owl:Class ; + owl:unionOf ( :Project :LotGroup :ProcurementElement :TenderGroup foaf:Agent dcterms:Location cccev:InformationConcept cccev:Requirement :Document :Fund :Consignment :TransportEquipment :ShipmentStage :TransportEquipmentSeal :ShipmentInformation :Line :AbstractContainer ) ] ; + rdfs:range adms:Identifier . + +:AwardOutcome rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasRemedyValue ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :resolvesReviewRequest ], + owl:onProperty :hasBargainPrice ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasDecisionDate ] . - -:DirectAwardTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :refersToPreviousProcedure ] . + owl:onProperty :hasAwardedValue ] . -:LotGroup rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :setsGroupingContextForLot ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; +:ProcurementCriterion rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty adms:identifier ] . + owl:onProperty :hasFormula ] . -:LotAwardOutcome rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +cccev:ContactPoint a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasNonAwardedContractTitle ], + owl:onProperty :hasContactName ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAwardedEstimatedValue ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :concernsLot ], + owl:onProperty cccev:address ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ], + owl:onProperty cccev:email ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :hasInternetAddress ] . + +:ReviewRequest rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasNonAwardedContractNumber ], + owl:onProperty :isWithdrawn ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue ] . - -:NoticeChangeInformation a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :hasWithdrawalReason ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :refersToPreviousNotice ], + owl:onProperty :hasNumberOfReviewRequests ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasProcurementDocumentChangeDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasReviewRequestFee ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isProcurementDocumentChanged ], + owl:onProperty :hasRequestDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAdditionalInformation ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasElementChange ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :refersToEFormSectionIdentifier ] . + owl:onProperty :hasWithdrawalDate ] . -cccev:ContactPoint a owl:Class ; +:SubcontractTerm a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty cccev:email ], + owl:onProperty :hasMinimumShare ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasContactName ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasInternetAddress ], + owl:onProperty :hasMinimumSubcontractorsProposedObligation ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty cccev:address ] . - -:NoticeAwardInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue ], + owl:onProperty :hasSubcontractingInvolved ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue ], + owl:onProperty :hasMaximumShare ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :hasSubcontractorsProposedAboveObligation ] . + +:Contractor rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :needsToBeAWinner ] . + +:DirectAwardTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasTotalAwardedValue ] . + owl:onProperty :refersToPreviousProcedure ] . -:ReviewRequest rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:LotGroupAwardInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReviewRequestFee ], + owl:onProperty :hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :describesLotGroup ] . + +:Period rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasRequestDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasEnd ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isWithdrawn ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :hasBeginning ] . + +:Tenderer rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasWithdrawalDate ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :substantiatesExclusionGround ] . + +:Winner rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasWithdrawalReason ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasNumberOfReviewRequests ] . + owl:onProperty :needsToBeATenderer ] . -:SubcontractTerm a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:ContractLotCompletionInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMaximumShare ], + owl:onProperty :providesContractTotalPenaltyValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasSubcontractorsProposedAboveObligation ], + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :refersToContract ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasSubcontractingInvolved ], + owl:onProperty :hasPaymentValueDiscrepancyJustification ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMinimumSubcontractorsProposedObligation ], + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :describesLotCompletion ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMinimumShare ] . - -:Contractor rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :needsToBeAWinner ] . + owl:onProperty :providesContractTotalPaymentValue ] . :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -2644,63 +2633,65 @@ cccev:ContactPoint a owl:Class ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isNonDisclosureAgreementRequired ] . -:ParticipationRequestTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :definesParticipationRequestReceiver ], +:NonPublishedInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :concernsNotice ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :definesParticipationRequestProcessor ] . - -:Period rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasBeginning ], + owl:onProperty :hasConfidentialityJustification ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEnd ] . + owl:onProperty :hasAccessibilityDate ] . -:Tenderer rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:ParticipationRequestTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :substantiatesExclusionGround ] . - -:Winner rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :definesParticipationRequestProcessor ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :needsToBeATenderer ] . + owl:onProperty :definesParticipationRequestReceiver ] . -:SecurityClearanceTerm a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:ProcurementProcessInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isSecurityClearanceRequired ], + owl:onProperty :isCompetitionTerminated ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasDeadline ] . - -:OpeningTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :isDPSTerminated ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasOpeningURL ], + owl:onProperty :isToBeRelaunched ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :definesOpeningPlace ], + owl:onProperty :concernsProcedure ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasOpeningDateTime ] . + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :concernsLot ] . -cccev:Person rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:LotGroup a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty cccev:registeredAddress ], + owl:onProperty :hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty person:placeOfBirth ], + owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty person:placeOfDeath ], + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :setsGroupingContextForLot ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty cccev:birthDate ] . + owl:onProperty adms:identifier ] . -dcterms:Location rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:SecurityClearanceTerm a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty locn:address ], + owl:onProperty :hasDeadline ], [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isSecurityClearanceRequired ] . + +dcterms:Location rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty locn:geometry ], [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -2708,23 +2699,28 @@ dcterms:Location rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty locn:geographicIdentifier ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty locn:geographicName ], + owl:onProperty adms:identifier ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty adms:identifier ] . + owl:onProperty locn:address ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty locn:geographicName ] . -:DesignContestRegimeTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +cccev:Person rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isJuryDecisionBinding ], + owl:onProperty cccev:birthDate ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty person:placeOfDeath ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasParticipationPayment ], + owl:onProperty person:placeOfBirth ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasFollowupContract ] . + owl:onProperty cccev:registeredAddress ] . -:ReviewObject a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:ReviewObject rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :refersToPreviousReview ], [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -2733,13 +2729,13 @@ dcterms:Location rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; locn:Address rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty locn:locatorName ], + owl:onProperty locn:adminUnitL2 ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty locn:addressID ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty locn:addressArea ], + owl:onProperty locn:locatorName ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty locn:adminUnitL1 ], @@ -2748,59 +2744,70 @@ locn:Address rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty locn:fullAddress ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty locn:adminUnitL2 ], + owl:onProperty locn:addressArea ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty locn:locatorDesignator ] . :AwardDecision rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAwardDecisionDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasAdditionalNonAwardJustification ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAdditionalNonAwardJustification ] . - -:JuryMember rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :playedBy ] . + owl:onProperty :hasAwardDecisionDate ] . -:MultipleStageProcedureTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMinimumNumberOfCandidates ], +:ChangeInformation a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :refersToPreviousNotice ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :concernsNotice ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasQualificationSystemDuration ], + owl:onProperty :hasAdditionalInformation ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasQualificationSystemRenewalDescription ], + owl:onProperty :isProcurementDocumentChanged ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedInvitationToExpressInterestDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasProcurementDocumentChangeDate ] . + +:NoticeAwardInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMaximumNumberOfCandidates ], + owl:onProperty :hasTotalAwardedValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasSuccessiveReduction ], + owl:onProperty :hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasNoNegotiationNecessary ], + owl:onProperty :hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedInvitationToTenderDate ] . + owl:onProperty :hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue ] . + +:JuryMember rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :playedBy ] . :Procedure rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasProcurementScopeDividedIntoLot ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isSubjectToProcedureSpecificTerm ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isJointProcurement ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isAccelerated ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isSubjectToProcedureSpecificTerm ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasProcurementScopeDividedIntoLot ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isExecutedByProcurementServiceProvider ], @@ -2808,132 +2815,152 @@ locn:Address rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isDesignContest ] . -:ProcedureTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:MultipleStageProcedureTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMaximumNumberOfLotsToBeAwarded ], + owl:onProperty :hasMinimumNumberOfCandidates ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :definesMediator ], + owl:onProperty :hasSuccessiveReduction ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isOneLotOnlyAllowed ], + owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedInvitationToExpressInterestDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isAwardedByCPB ], + owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedInvitationToTenderDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isSubmissionForAllLotsAllowed ], + owl:onProperty :hasQualificationSystemRenewalDescription ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMaximumLotSubmissionAllowed ], + owl:onProperty :hasQualificationSystemDuration ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasLotAwardCombination ], + owl:onProperty :hasNoNegotiationNecessary ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :definesBudgetProvider ] . + owl:onProperty :hasMaximumNumberOfCandidates ] . -:ProcurementObject a owl:Class ; +:ProcurementServiceProvider rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :actsOnBehalfOf ] . + +:Document a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPurpose ], + owl:onProperty :hasReceptionDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isCoveredByGPA ], + owl:onProperty :hasDispatchDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isSMESuitable ], + owl:onProperty :hasVersion ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isRecurrent ], + owl:onProperty :hasPublicationDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isUsingEUFunds ], + owl:onProperty dcterms:title ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasRecurrenceDescription ], + owl:onProperty dcterms:issued ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :foreseesConcession ] . - -:ProcurementServiceProvider rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :actsOnBehalfOf ] . + owl:onProperty dcterms:description ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasUUID ] . -org:Organization a owl:Class ; +:ProcurementObject a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMainActivityDescription ], + owl:onProperty :hasPurpose ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasLegalFormType ], + owl:onProperty :hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasOrganisationUnitName ], + owl:onProperty :isRecurrent ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasBuyerLegalTypeDescription ], + owl:onProperty :isCoveredByGPA ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty cccev:registeredAddress ] . + owl:onProperty :isUsingEUFunds ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :foreseesConcession ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isSMESuitable ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasRecurrenceDescription ] . -:Document a owl:Class ; - rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:ProcedureTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty dcterms:title ], + owl:onProperty :isSubmissionForAllLotsRequired ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPublicationDate ], + owl:onProperty :isOneLotOnlyAllowed ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty dcterms:description ], + owl:onProperty :hasLotAwardCombination ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasUUID ], + owl:onProperty :definesMediator ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasVersion ], + owl:onProperty :isAwardedByCPB ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReceptionDate ], + owl:onProperty :definesBudgetProvider ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasDispatchDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasMaximumNumberOfLotsToBeAwarded ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty dcterms:issued ] . + owl:onProperty :hasMaximumLotSubmissionAllowed ] . -:FrameworkAgreementTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +org:Organization a owl:Class ; + rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasDurationExtensionJustification ], + owl:onProperty :hasMainActivityDescription ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMaximumParticipantsNumber ], + owl:onProperty :hasBuyerLegalTypeDescription ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ], + owl:onProperty :hasLegalFormType ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasLaunchGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ] . + owl:onProperty cccev:registeredAddress ] . -:SubmissionStatisticalInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:OpeningTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMediumTenderPerLots ], + owl:onProperty :hasOpeningURL ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasNonEEAReceivedTenders ], + owl:onProperty :definesOpeningPlace ], [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasOpeningDateTime ] . + +:ReviewTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasSMEReceivedTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasReviewDeadline ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasUnverifiedTenders ], + owl:onProperty :definesReviewProcedureInformationProvider ] . + +:SubmissionStatisticalInformation rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasOtherCountriesReceivedTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReceivedMicroTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasNonEUReceivedTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEUReceivedTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasNumberOfTenderersInvited ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasHighestReceivedTenderValue ], @@ -2945,42 +2972,48 @@ org:Organization a owl:Class ; owl:onProperty :hasLowestReceivedTenderValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasNonEUReceivedTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasSMEReceivedTenders ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasNonEEAReceivedTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasInadmissibleTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasReceivedParticipationRequests ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedTotalSubcontracts ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasOtherCountriesReceivedTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasMediumTenderPerLots ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReceivedSmallTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasElectronicTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAbnormallyLowTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasReceivedMicroTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasNumberOfTenderersInvited ], + owl:onProperty :hasEEAReceivedTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReceivedParticipationRequests ], + owl:onProperty :hasEUReceivedTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasElectronicTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasUnverifiedTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEEAReceivedTenders ], + owl:onProperty :hasAbnormallyLowTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome ] . - -:ContractTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEPayment ], + owl:onProperty :hasReceivedSmallTenders ], [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasInadmissibleTenders ] . + +:ContractTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :definesContractPeriod ], [ a owl:Restriction ; @@ -2991,107 +3024,101 @@ org:Organization a owl:Class ; owl:onProperty :definesPaymentExecutor ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEInvoicing ], + owl:onProperty :hasMaximumNumberOfRenewals ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :definesSubcontractingTerm ], + owl:onProperty :hasEPayment ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasOptions ], + owl:onProperty :hasLegalFormRequirement ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasLegalFormRequirement ], + owl:onProperty :isRenewalIndicator ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasEOrdering ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isRenewalIndicator ], + owl:onProperty :definesSubcontractingTerm ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasMaximumNumberOfRenewals ] . - -:AccessTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasRestrictedAccessURL ], + owl:onProperty :hasOptions ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPublicAccessURL ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :hasEInvoicing ] . + +:DesignContestRegimeTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isProcurementDocumentRestricted ], + owl:onProperty :isJuryDecisionBinding ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAdditionalInformationDeadline ], + owl:onProperty :hasFollowupContract ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider ], + owl:onProperty :hasDescriptionOfPrizes ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :definesOfflineAccessProvider ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :involvesProcurementDocument ] . - -:Quantity rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:cardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasQuantityValue ] . + owl:onProperty :hasParticipationPayment ] . -:Tender rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:FrameworkAgreementTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasFinancialOfferValue ], + owl:onProperty :hasMaximumParticipantsNumber ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isSubjectToGrouping ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:onProperty :hasDurationExtensionJustification ] . + +:Tender rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isSubmitedBy ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isVariant ], + owl:onProperty :foreseesConcession ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :foreseesConcession ], + owl:onProperty :isVariant ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :isSubmittedForLot ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasElectronicSubmission ] . + owl:onProperty :hasFinancialOfferValue ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasElectronicSubmission ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isSubjectToGrouping ] . + +:Quantity rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:cardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasQuantityValue ] . adms:Identifier rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:cardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty skos:notation ] . -:Buyer rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isContractingEntity ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasBuyerProfile ] . - :Notice a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasFormNumber ], + owl:onProperty :hasAdditionalInformation ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasOJSType ], + owl:onProperty :hasEFormsSubtype ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEFormsSubtype ], + owl:onProperty :hasNoticePublicationNumber ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :refersToNotice ], + owl:onProperty :hasOJSType ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasESenderDispatchDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasOJSIssueNumber ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasAdditionalInformation ], + owl:onProperty :hasESenderDispatchDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasOJSIssueNumber ], + owl:onProperty :refersToNotice ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:minCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :refersToLot ], @@ -3100,39 +3127,62 @@ adms:Identifier rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :refersToProcedure ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasNoticePublicationNumber ], + owl:onProperty :hasFormNumber ] . + +:AccessTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasRestrictedAccessURL ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :definesOfflineAccessProvider ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasPublicAccessURL ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isProcurementDocumentRestricted ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :involvesProcurementDocument ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasLongTitle ] . + owl:onProperty :hasAdditionalInformationDeadline ] . -:Contract rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; +:Buyer rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasEntryIntoForceDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasBuyerProfile ], [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :isContractingEntity ] . + +:Contract rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasEstimatedDuration ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasPurpose ], + owl:onProperty :hasContractConclusionDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:minCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasLotReference ], + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasEntryIntoForceDate ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasContractConclusionDate ], + owl:onProperty :hasContractValue ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasContractValue ] . + owl:onProperty :hasPurpose ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:minCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasLotReference ] . :SubmissionTerm rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isAdvancedElectronicSignatureRequired ], - [ a owl:Restriction ; - owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :isGuaranteeRequired ], + owl:onProperty :hasReceiptTenderDeadline ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReceiptExpressionDeadline ], + owl:onProperty :hasReceiptPreliminaryMarketConsultationDeadline ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :definesTenderProcessor ], @@ -3147,16 +3197,22 @@ adms:Identifier rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isMultipleTenderSubmissionAllowed ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasTenderValidityPeriod ], + owl:onProperty :isAdvancedElectronicSignatureRequired ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReceiptDeadline ], + owl:onProperty :hasTenderValidityDuration ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReceiptTenderDeadline ], + owl:onProperty :hasReceiptExpressionDeadline ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; - owl:onProperty :hasReceiptPreliminaryMarketConsultationDeadline ], + owl:onProperty :isGuaranteeRequired ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasTenderValidityPeriod ], + [ a owl:Restriction ; + owl:maxCardinality 1 ; + owl:onProperty :hasReceiptDeadline ], [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:maxCardinality 1 ; owl:onProperty :hasReceiptParticipationRequestDeadline ] . @@ -3166,371 +3222,398 @@ adms:Identifier rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :hasAmountValue ] . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( :EconomicStandingSummary :ProfessionalSuitabilitySummary :TechnicalAbilitySummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Procedure :Lot ) . + owl:members ( :ReviewIrregularitySummary :ReviewRequestSummary :SubmissionStatisticalInformation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :TenderAwardOutcome :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . + owl:members ( :ConcessionContract :PurchaseContract :DirectContract :FrameworkAgreement ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AwardCriterion :ParticipationCondition :QualificationCriterion ) . + owl:members ( :ConcessionContract :PurchaseContract :DirectContract :FrameworkAgreement ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SubmissionStatisticalInformation :ReviewRequestSummary :ReviewIrregularitySummary ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SubmissionStatisticalInformation :ReviewRequestSummary :ReviewIrregularitySummary ) . + owl:members ( cccev:PublicOrganisation :Business :OrganisationGroup ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AwardCriteriaSummary :ParticipationConditionsSummary :QualificationCriteriaSummary ) . + owl:members ( :TaxInformationProvider :Certifier :EnvironmentalProtectionInformationProvider :EmploymentInformationProvider ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( cccev:PublicOrganisation :Business :OrganisationGroup ) . + owl:members ( :System org:Organization foaf:Person ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ContractSpecificTerm :LotSpecificTerm :ProcedureSpecificTerm :ProcessPlanningTerm ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . + owl:members ( :OpeningTerm :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :DirectAwardTerm :ReviewTerm ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DirectAwardTerm ) . + owl:members ( :ReviewDecision :ReviewRequest ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :TaxInformationProvider :EnvironmentalProtectionInformationProvider :EmploymentInformationProvider ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :DynamicPurchaseSystemTechnique :EAuctionTechnique :FrameworkAgreementTechnique ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :NoticeAwardInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ContractSpecificTerm :LotSpecificTerm :ProcedureSpecificTerm :ProcessPlanningTerm ) . + owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :NoticeAwardInformation :ChangeInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation :NonPublishedInformation :Estimate :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :TenderAwardOutcome :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . + owl:members ( :SubcontractTerm :ContractTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :DynamicPurchaseSystemTechnique :EAuctionTechnique :FrameworkAgreementTechnique ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AwardCriterion :ParticipationCondition :QualificationCriterion ) . + owl:members ( :DynamicPurchaseSystemTechnique :EAuctionTechnique :FrameworkAgreementTechnique ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . + owl:members ( :AwardOutcome :TenderAwardOutcome ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SubcontractingEstimate :ConcessionEstimate ) . + owl:members ( :Procedure :Lot ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ConcessionContract :PurchaseContract :DirectContract :FrameworkAgreement ) . + owl:members ( :System org:Organization foaf:Person ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . + owl:members ( cccev:Constraint cccev:Criterion :ProcurementCriteriaSummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :IndefiniteDuration :SpecificDuration ) . + owl:members ( :ExclusionGroundsSummary :SelectionCriteriaSummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( cccev:Constraint cccev:Criterion :ProcurementCriteriaSummary ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ConcessionContract :PurchaseContract :DirectContract :FrameworkAgreement ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :NoticeAwardInformation :ChangeInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation :NonPublishedInformation :Estimate :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :TaxInformationProvider :Certifier :EnvironmentalProtectionInformationProvider :EmploymentInformationProvider ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . +[] a ; + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :AcquiringParty :OfferingParty :AuxiliaryParty ) . + [] a ; owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( cccev:Constraint cccev:Criterion :ProcurementCriteriaSummary ) . + owl:members ( :ReviewDecision :ReviewRequest ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome :LotAwardOutcome ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :IndefiniteDuration :SpecificDuration ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DirectAwardTerm ) . + owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :NoticeAwardInformation :ChangeInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation :NonPublishedInformation :Estimate :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :EconomicStandingSummary :ProfessionalSuitabilitySummary :TechnicalAbilitySummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . + owl:members ( :OpeningTerm :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :DirectAwardTerm :ReviewTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Procedure :Lot ) . + owl:members ( :ContractSpecificTerm :LotSpecificTerm :ProcedureSpecificTerm :ProcessPlanningTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ExclusionGroundsSummary :SelectionCriteriaSummary ) . + owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :NoticeAwardInformation :ChangeInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation :NonPublishedInformation :Estimate :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :NoticeAwardInformation :ChangeInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation :NonPublishedInformation :Estimate :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :AwardOutcome :TenderAwardOutcome ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :ConcessionEstimate :SubcontractingEstimate ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AwardCriteriaSummary :ParticipationConditionsSummary :QualificationCriteriaSummary ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AcquiringParty :OfferingParty :AuxiliaryParty ) . + owl:members ( :AwardCriterion :ParticipationCondition :QualificationCriterion ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( cccev:PublicOrganisation :Business :OrganisationGroup ) . + owl:members ( :ExclusionGround :SelectionCriterion ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AwardCriteriaSummary :ParticipationConditionsSummary :QualificationCriteriaSummary ) . + owl:members ( :OpeningTerm :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :DirectAwardTerm :ReviewTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . + owl:members ( :SubcontractTerm :ContractTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :NoticeAwardInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation ) . + owl:members ( cccev:PublicOrganisation :Business :OrganisationGroup ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( :AcquiringCentralPurchasingBody :AwardingCentralPurchasingBody ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DirectAwardTerm ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AcquiringCentralPurchasingBody :AwardingCentralPurchasingBody ) . + owl:members ( :ExclusionGround :SelectionCriterion ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( :TaxInformationProvider :Certifier :EnvironmentalProtectionInformationProvider :EmploymentInformationProvider ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :System org:Organization foaf:Person ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SubmissionStatisticalInformation :ReviewRequestSummary :ReviewIrregularitySummary ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :NoticeAwardInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation ) . + owl:members ( :AwardCriteriaSummary :ParticipationConditionsSummary :QualificationCriteriaSummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ContractSpecificTerm :LotSpecificTerm :ProcedureSpecificTerm :ProcessPlanningTerm ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( cccev:Constraint cccev:Criterion :ProcurementCriteriaSummary ) . + owl:members ( :GreenProcurement :InnovativeProcurement :SocialProcurement ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DirectAwardTerm ) . + owl:members ( :System org:Organization foaf:Person ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . + owl:members ( :OpeningTerm :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :DirectAwardTerm :ReviewTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SubcontractTerm :ContractTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :DynamicPurchaseSystemTechnique :EAuctionTechnique :FrameworkAgreementTechnique ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SubcontractTerm :ContractTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :OpeningTerm :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :DirectAwardTerm :ReviewTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AcquiringCentralPurchasingBody :AwardingCentralPurchasingBody ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AwardEvaluationTerm :SelectionEvaluationTerm ) . + owl:members ( :ContractSpecificTerm :LotSpecificTerm :ProcedureSpecificTerm :ProcessPlanningTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :DynamicPurchaseSystemTechnique :EAuctionTechnique :FrameworkAgreementTechnique ) . + owl:members ( :ConcessionContract :PurchaseContract :DirectContract :FrameworkAgreement ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :LeadBuyer :CentralPurchasingBody ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :System org:Organization foaf:Person ) . + owl:members ( :OpeningTerm :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :DirectAwardTerm :ReviewTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AcquiringParty :OfferingParty :AuxiliaryParty ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :EconomicStandingSummary :ProfessionalSuitabilitySummary :TechnicalAbilitySummary ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . + owl:members ( :MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome :LotAwardOutcome ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DirectAwardTerm ) . + owl:members ( :ReviewIrregularitySummary :ReviewRequestSummary :SubmissionStatisticalInformation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( :AwardCriteriaSummary :ParticipationConditionsSummary :QualificationCriteriaSummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ReviewDecision :ReviewRequest ) . + owl:members ( cccev:PublicOrganisation :Business :OrganisationGroup ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :TaxInformationProvider :EnvironmentalProtectionInformationProvider :EmploymentInformationProvider ) . + owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( :AwardCriteriaSummary :ParticipationConditionsSummary :QualificationCriteriaSummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementObject :PlannedProcurementPart ) . + owl:members ( :LeadBuyer :CentralPurchasingBody ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :ReviewIrregularitySummary :ReviewRequestSummary :SubmissionStatisticalInformation ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SubcontractingEstimate :ConcessionEstimate ) . + owl:members ( :AwardEvaluationTerm :SelectionEvaluationTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ConcessionContract :PurchaseContract :DirectContract :FrameworkAgreement ) . + owl:members ( :OpeningTerm :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :DirectAwardTerm :ReviewTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ContractSpecificTerm :LotSpecificTerm :ProcedureSpecificTerm :ProcessPlanningTerm ) . + owl:members ( :GreenProcurement :InnovativeProcurement :SocialProcurement ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :EconomicStandingSummary :ProfessionalSuitabilitySummary :TechnicalAbilitySummary ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AwardCriterion :ParticipationCondition :QualificationCriterion ) . + owl:members ( :DynamicPurchaseSystemTechnique :EAuctionTechnique :FrameworkAgreementTechnique ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :LeadBuyer :CentralPurchasingBody ) . + owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + +[] a ; + owl:members ( :MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome :LotAwardOutcome ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AcquiringParty :OfferingParty :AuxiliaryParty ) . + owl:members ( :LeadBuyer :CentralPurchasingBody ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :GreenProcurement :InnovativeProcurement :SocialProcurement ) . + owl:members ( :ConcessionContract :PurchaseContract :DirectContract :FrameworkAgreement ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . + owl:members ( :ContractSpecificTerm :LotSpecificTerm :ProcedureSpecificTerm :ProcessPlanningTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ExclusionGroundsSummary :SelectionCriteriaSummary ) . + owl:members ( cccev:Constraint cccev:Criterion :ProcurementCriteriaSummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementObject :PlannedProcurementPart ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :AwardEvaluationTerm :SelectionEvaluationTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :IndefiniteDuration :SpecificDuration ) . + owl:members ( :OpeningTerm :AccessTerm :ProcedureTerm :SubmissionTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :DirectAwardTerm :ReviewTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( cccev:PublicOrganisation :Business :OrganisationGroup ) . + owl:members ( :AcquiringParty :OfferingParty :AuxiliaryParty ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SubcontractTerm :ContractTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :ConcessionEstimate :SubcontractingEstimate ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :GreenProcurement :InnovativeProcurement :SocialProcurement ) . + owl:members ( :ContractSpecificTerm :LotSpecificTerm :ProcedureSpecificTerm :ProcessPlanningTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . + owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :NoticeAwardInformation :ChangeInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation :NonPublishedInformation :Estimate :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( :AwardCriterion :ParticipationCondition :QualificationCriterion ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( :Procedure :Lot ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ExclusionGround :SelectionCriterion ) . + owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementObject :PlannedProcurementPart ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :AwardEvaluationTerm :SelectionEvaluationTerm ) . + owl:members ( :AcquiringCentralPurchasingBody :AwardingCentralPurchasingBody ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( cccev:Constraint cccev:Criterion :ProcurementCriteriaSummary ) . [] a ; owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :System org:Organization foaf:Person ) . + owl:members ( :AcquiringParty :OfferingParty :AuxiliaryParty ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ReviewDecision :ReviewRequest ) . + owl:members ( :EconomicStandingSummary :ProfessionalSuitabilitySummary :TechnicalAbilitySummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :GreenProcurement :InnovativeProcurement :SocialProcurement ) . + owl:members ( :TaxInformationProvider :Certifier :EnvironmentalProtectionInformationProvider :EmploymentInformationProvider ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Mediator :JuryMember :ParticipationRequestProcessor :ProcurementServiceProvider :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider :Reviewer :TenderReceiver :PaymentExecutor :Awarder :BudgetProvider :Buyer :OfflineAccessProvider :TenderProcessor :ReviewProcedureInformationProvider :CatalogueReceiver :ParticipationRequestReceiver ) . + owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . + owl:members ( :IndefiniteDuration :SpecificDuration ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :TenderAwardOutcome :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . + owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :NoticeAwardInformation :ChangeInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation :NonPublishedInformation :Estimate :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome :LotAwardOutcome ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :TaxInformationProvider :EnvironmentalProtectionInformationProvider :EmploymentInformationProvider ) . + owl:members ( :SubcontractTerm :ContractTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :ExclusionGroundsSummary :SelectionCriteriaSummary ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ProcurementDocument :Offer :RequestForClarification :OriginatorRequest :Contract :ReviewObject :AwardDecision :Notice :Tender :ExpressionOfInterest :RequestForParticipation ) . + owl:members ( :LotGroupAwardInformation :NoticeAwardInformation :ChangeInformation :StatisticalInformation :ProcurementProcessInformation :NonPublishedInformation :Estimate :ContractLotCompletionInformation ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :Candidate :CatalogueProvider :Contractor :Tenderer :OtherEntity :ReviewRequester :Subcontractor :OfferIssuer :Winner ) . + owl:members ( :AwardCriterion :ParticipationCondition :QualificationCriterion ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . + owl:members ( :GreenProcurement :InnovativeProcurement :SocialProcurement ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ConcessionContract :PurchaseContract :DirectContract :FrameworkAgreement ) . + owl:members ( :ProcurementObject :PlannedProcurementPart ) . [] a ; - owl:members ( :ExclusionGround :SelectionCriterion ) . + owl:members ( :SecurityClearanceTerm :ParticipationRequestTerm :DesignContestRegimeTerm :OpeningTerm :SubmissionTerm :EvaluationTerm :NonDisclosureAgreementTerm :ReviewTerm :AccessTerm :MultipleStageProcedureTerm :FrameworkAgreementTerm ) . diff --git a/implementation/ePO/shacl_shapes/ePO_CM-shacl.rdf b/implementation/ePO/shacl_shapes/ePO_CM-shacl.rdf index 934db72f..e9b7ddaf 100644 --- a/implementation/ePO/shacl_shapes/ePO_CM-shacl.rdf +++ b/implementation/ePO/shacl_shapes/ePO_CM-shacl.rdf @@ -17,11 +17,13 @@ xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dul="http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#" xmlns:epo="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-acc="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-cat="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-con="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ful="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-not="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:epo-ord="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" + xmlns:epo-sub="http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" xmlns:espd="https://github.com/ESPD/ESPD-EDM/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:geosparql="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" @@ -61,13 +63,13 @@ This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused. This artefact provides the datashape specification. This version is automatically generated from ePO_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 - 2023-08-09 + 2023-09-12 4.0.0 3.1.0 @@ -80,93 +82,6 @@ European Union - - - - - Award outcome - - - - - - - - - Lot award outcome - - - Result concerning the Lot attributed by the Awarder. - - - - - - - - - Lot group award information - - - Award information related to a given Group of Lots. - - - - - - - - - Mini competition award outcome - - - Result concerning the process where multiple winners or candidates of previous stages of a procedure bid for a specific procurement attributed by the Awarder. - -Additional Information: -It is typically used in framework agreements where the suppliers have already been pre-selected, and the mini competition is used to determine which supplier is best suited for a particular project or contract. -It is also used in a Dynamic Purchasing System where the suppliers come from a list of Candidates. - - - - - - - - - Notice award information - - - Information about an Award Notice. - - - - - - - - - Selected candidate list - - - Record of Candidates admitted to take part in award phases of procurements. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - - - - Tender award outcome - - - Result concerning the Tender attributed by the Awarder. - - - - @@ -988,6 +903,23 @@ WG approval 05/08/2021 (revised 26/10/2021) + + + + + Certifier + + + The role of an agent who issues a certificate. + +Additional Information: +The certifier is responsible for verifying and confirming the conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. + +WG approval 16/05/2023 + + + + @@ -1157,6 +1089,20 @@ This class defines the notion of "Geometry" at the conceptual level, and it shal + + + + + Review term + + + Conditions and stipulations defining particularities of the review. + +WG approval 23/11/2018 + + + + @@ -1650,6 +1596,42 @@ WG approval 31/10/2018 + + + + + Certification label + + + Concept that stands for a set of norms, expectations, standards and policies. + +Additional Information: +Such standards may relate to social, ethical and quality etc. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 + + + + + + + + + + Certificate + + + Proof of conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. + +Additional Information: +Certificates provide assurance of credibility, trust, and transparency in the procurement process. + +WG approval 16/05/2023 + + + + + @@ -1660,7 +1642,6 @@ WG approval 31/10/2018 Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure with a reduced Environmental Impact. Additional Information: - The approach may apply to the complete life cycle. The reduced Environmental Impact is in comparison to goods, services and works with the same primary function that would otherwise be procured. Tightly related are article 68 - Life-cycle costing and article 67 - most economically advantageous Tender (see GPP handbook) https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/Buying-Green-Handbook-3rd-Edition.pdf @@ -1676,21 +1657,14 @@ An instance of the class GreenProcurement is represented in eForms with the code Innovative procurement - An instance of the class InnovativeProcurement is represented in eForms with the code "inn-pur" defined in the codelist Strategic-Procurement. - -Research (21/01/2020): - -Purchasing and early adoption of solutions which are not yet available on large scale commercial basis. - -Source: Adapted from the Digital Single Market's Policy on Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/public-procurement-innovative-solutions + Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure an innovative work, supply or service. Additional Information: ‘innovation’ means the implementation of a new or significantly improved product, service or process, including but not limited to production, building or construction processes, a new marketing method, or a new organizational method in business practices, workplace Organisation or external relations inter alia with the purpose of helping to solve societal challenges or to support the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; See: Directive 2014/24 Articles: 2, 26 (3), 31, 67 (2.a) -Question: -Is Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) another type of Strategic Procurement? + @@ -1702,12 +1676,10 @@ Is Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) another type of Strategic Procurement?Social procurement - An instance of the class SocialProcurement is represented in eForms with the code "soc-obj" defined in the codelist Strategic-Procurement. - - -Research (21/01/2020): -Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP): + Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure by fulfilling social objectives. +Additional Information: +Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP) - ‘SRPP’ means Procurement Operations that take into account one or more of the following social considerations: employment opportunities, decent work, compliance with social and labour rights, social inclusion (including persons with disabilities), equal opportunities, accessibility design for all, taking account of sustainability criteria, including ethical trade issues and wider voluntary compliance with corporate social responsibility (CSR), while observing the principles enshrined in the Treaty for the European Union (TFEU) and the Procurement Directives. Source: Buying Social - A Guide to Taking Account of Social Considerations in Public Procurement (Publications Office of the European Union, 2011) https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cb70c481-0e29-4040-9be2-c408cddf081f/language-en See Article 18 and Annex X Directive 2014/24. @@ -1810,13 +1782,109 @@ WG Approval 19/09/2019 - - + + + + + Award outcome + + + + + + + + + Lot award outcome + + + Result concerning the Lot attributed by the Awarder. + + + + + + + + + Lot group award information + + + Award information related to a given Group of Lots. + + + + + + + + + Mini competition award outcome + + + Result concerning the process where multiple winners or candidates of previous stages of a procedure bid for a specific procurement attributed by the Awarder. + +Additional Information: +It is typically used in framework agreements where the suppliers have already been pre-selected, and the mini competition is used to determine which supplier is best suited for a particular project or contract. +It is also used in a Dynamic Purchasing System where the suppliers come from a list of Candidates. + + + + + + + + + Notice award information + + + Information about an Award Notice. + + + + + + + + + Selected candidate list + + + Record of Candidates admitted to take part in award phases of procurements. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + + + Tender award outcome + + + Result concerning the Tender attributed by the Awarder. + + + + + + + + + Concession estimate + + + + + + - - Context specific description + + Context description - + A description concerning a Procurement Object or a Notice in a specific Situation Context. Additional Information: @@ -1825,7 +1893,7 @@ The description has its own identity (+I) but is dependent (+D) on the concerned We say that ContextSpecificDescription *concerns* an Entity. - + @@ -1848,6 +1916,18 @@ http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Context_Slices + + + + + Contract lot completion information + + + Information related to a given Lot at the end of the procurement. + + + + @@ -1872,81 +1952,72 @@ http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Context_Slices - - + + - - Statistical information + + Review irregularity summary - - Statistical data on the Procedure and the Lot. - -Additional Information + + Information about the number and type of requests the Buyer received to review any of its decisions (e.g. the Technical Specifications, Award Decision). -At the present time Procurement Procedures are not fully electronic. At a later date, information on the Tenders received could be inferred by the data in the eProcurement System. -Therefore this class is temporal and should cease to exist in fully electronic Procurement. -The need for its presence responds also to the alignment with the Regulation (EU) 2019/1780 (eForms). +Additional information: +This class corresponds in eForms to BG-613 Buyer Review Requests. -Attention will have to be paid in the future to possible inconsistencies derived from data placed in other classes and data held in the Statistical Information class; e.g. the TenderEvaluation class (see eEvaluation diagram) has the attribute admissibileTender indicator, which in case of being false, may enter in contradiction with the highest or lowest Tender value for that very same inadmissible Tender. -WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - - - - - - - Concession estimate - - + - - + + - - Subcontracting estimate + + Review request summary - - Information on the approximation of the foreseen Subcontracting. + + Summary information about the requests the Buyer received to review any of its decisions (e.g. the technical specifications, award decision), as set out in Art. 1(5) of Directive 89/665/EEC and Directive 92/13/EEC, and about the complainants that submitted the requests. + +Additional information: +This class corresponds in eForms to BG-612 Buyer Review Summary. - + - - + + - - Review irregularity summary + + Statistical information - - Information about the number and type of requests the Buyer received to review any of its decisions (e.g. the Technical Specifications, Award Decision). + + Statistical data on the Procedure and the Lot. -Additional information: -This class corresponds in eForms to BG-613 Buyer Review Requests. +Additional Information + +At the present time Procurement Procedures are not fully electronic. At a later date, information on the Tenders received could be inferred by the data in the eProcurement System. +Therefore this class is temporal and should cease to exist in fully electronic Procurement. +The need for its presence responds also to the alignment with the Regulation (EU) 2019/1780 (eForms). +Attention will have to be paid in the future to possible inconsistencies derived from data placed in other classes and data held in the Statistical Information class; e.g. the TenderEvaluation class (see eEvaluation diagram) has the attribute admissibileTender indicator, which in case of being false, may enter in contradiction with the highest or lowest Tender value for that very same inadmissible Tender. +WG Approval 12/12/2019 - + - - + + - - Review request summary + + Subcontracting estimate - - Summary information about the requests the Buyer received to review any of its decisions (e.g. the technical specifications, award decision), as set out in Art. 1(5) of Directive 89/665/EEC and Directive 92/13/EEC, and about the complainants that submitted the requests. - -Additional information: -This class corresponds in eForms to BG-612 Buyer Review Summary. + + Information on the approximation of the foreseen Subcontracting. - + @@ -1963,18 +2034,6 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - Contract lot completion information - - - Information related to a given Lot at the end of the procurement. - - - - @@ -2166,7 +2225,7 @@ WG Approval 24/05/2022 Additional information: This includes Concession Contracts. -(WG approval 01/06/2018) +WG approval 01/06/2018 @@ -2277,28 +2336,16 @@ This class corresponds to the BG-714 Review in eForms. - - + + - - Element change description + + Change information - - Information about a specific field to be changed with regard to a previous Notice. + + Alteration to previously provided details. - - - - - - - - Element description - - - Description about a specific resource. - - + @@ -2319,18 +2366,6 @@ Examples of fields that may not be immediately published are Winner, Tender and - - - - - Notice change information - - - Information about a corrigendum in a Notice. - - - - @@ -2419,84 +2454,34 @@ WG approval 13/04/2021 - - - - - - - - Has non awarded contract number - - - The number the contract would have had if it had been awarded. - -Additional information: - -This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. - -WG agreement: 06/09/2022 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - + + - - + + - - Has non awarded contract title + + Is s m e suitable - - The title the contract would have had if it had been awarded. + + The Lot is suitable for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). -Additional information: +Additional Information -This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. +This allows the buyer to make emphasis on the fact that the procedure has been designed having SMEs in mind. This indicator is also to be reflected in the selection criteria. -WG agreement: 06/09/2022 - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has award rank - - - The position of the tender (i.e. whether the tender ended up first, second, third, etc.) in a design contest, some framework agreements with multiple winners (e.g. cascades) or an innovation partnership. +For example, number of employees and turnover are applicable to the definition of an SME. -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-171 Tender Rank. +WG Approval 15/10/2019 - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -2520,47 +2505,31 @@ WG Approval 15/10/2019 - - - - - - - Has legal basis description - - - - - - - - - + - - + + - - Has recurrence description + + Is using e u funds - - Any additional information about the recurrence of the Procurement. + + The procurement foresees funding by the Union. Additional Information: -For example estimated timing of the Procedure. +The funding may cover the whole procurement or part of the procurement. -This corresponds in eForms to BT-95 Recurrence Description. +For example the European Structural and Investment Funds or grants awarded by the European Union. -(WG approval 2019-01-16) - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -2624,61 +2593,75 @@ WG Approval 12/05/2020 1 - + - - + + - - Is s m e suitable + + Has recurrence description - - The Lot is suitable for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). - -Additional Information + + Any additional information about the recurrence of the Procurement. -This allows the buyer to make emphasis on the fact that the procedure has been designed having SMEs in mind. This indicator is also to be reflected in the selection criteria. +Additional Information: +For example estimated timing of the Procedure. -For example, number of employees and turnover are applicable to the definition of an SME. +This corresponds in eForms to BT-95 Recurrence Description. -WG Approval 15/10/2019 +(WG approval 2019-01-16) - + - - + + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Is using e u funds + + Has legal basis description - - The procurement foresees funding by the Union. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Is accelerated + + + Statement about the fact that the procedure will be reduced due to a state of urgency. -Additional Information: -The funding may cover the whole procurement or part of the procurement. +Additional Information -For example the European Structural and Investment Funds or grants awarded by the European Union. +This modifies the time limit for the receipt of requests to participate or the receipt of tenders. +WG Approval 20/08/2019 - + - + - + 1 @@ -2728,31 +2711,27 @@ This information should be given when the procedure is not one of those mentione - + - - + + - - Is accelerated + + Is joint procurement - - Statement about the fact that the procedure will be reduced due to a state of urgency. - -Additional Information - -This modifies the time limit for the receipt of requests to participate or the receipt of tenders. + + Multiple buyers procure together within the same procedure. -WG Approval 20/08/2019 - +Addition Information: +In case the joint procurement involves buyers from different countries, the national law is specified by the epo:hasCrossBorderLaw in the ProcedureTerm . - + - + - + 1 @@ -2783,51 +2762,49 @@ WG approval 04-02-2021 1 - - + + - - + + - - Is joint procurement + + Title - - Multiple buyers procure together within the same procedure. + + A name given to the resource. -Addition Information: -In case the joint procurement involves buyers from different countries, the national law is specified by the epo:hasCrossBorderLaw in the ProcedureTerm . +WG approval 30/05/2023 + - + - - - - - 1 + + - - + + - + - + Description - + An account of the resource. Additional Information: Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. -WG Approval 30/05/2023 +WG Approval 30/05/2023 + - + - + @@ -2850,45 +2827,91 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023 - - + + - - + + - - Birth date + + Description - - The point in time on which the Person was born. + + An account of the resource. + +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. + +WG Approval 30/05/2023 - + - - + + - - 1 + + + + + + + + Title + + + A name given to the resource. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Description + + + An account of the resource. + +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. + +WG Approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + - + - - + + - - Alternative + + Name - - Any name by which an individual is known other than their full name. -WG 09/11/2021 + + The complete name of the Person as one string. - + - - + + @@ -2907,7 +2930,7 @@ WG 09/11/2021 - + @@ -2926,25 +2949,45 @@ WG 09/11/2021 - + - + - - + + - - Name + + Patronymic name - - The complete name of the Person as one string. + + Name based on the given name of the Person's father. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 - + - - + + + + + + + + + + + Alternative + + + Any name by which an individual is known other than their full name. +WG 09/11/2021 + + + + + + @@ -2963,26 +3006,28 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 - + - + - - + + - - Patronymic name + + Birth date - - Name based on the given name of the Person's father. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + The point in time on which the Person was born. - + - - + + + + + 1 @@ -3099,51 +3144,50 @@ WG Approval 25/03/2021 - + - - + + - - Has buyer legal type description + + Has legal name - - Self-explanatory text about the Buyer Legal Type. - -Additional information: -This field is used when the Buyer Legal Type is not available in the controlled list at-voc:buyer-legal-type . This is necessary in to cover data provided in the TED Standard Forms. It shall be deprecated in the future. + + The officially registered name of an organisation. -WG Approval 06/09/2022 +WG Approval 10/01/2023 - + - + - - 1 - - + - - + + - - Has internet address + + Has buyer legal type description - - The main web page used by the instance of the concept. + + Self-explanatory text about the Buyer Legal Type. -WG Approval 01/06/2023 - +Additional information: +This field is used when the Buyer Legal Type is not available in the controlled list at-voc:buyer-legal-type . This is necessary in to cover data provided in the TED Standard Forms. It shall be deprecated in the future. + +WG Approval 06/09/2022 - + - - + + + + + 1 @@ -3171,26 +3215,6 @@ Note that the codelist provided at national level should be used. 1 - - - - - - - - Has legal name - - - The officially registered name of an organisation. - -WG Approval 10/01/2023 - - - - - - - @@ -3219,30 +3243,25 @@ WG Approval 06/09/2022 1 - + - - + + - - Has organisation unit name + + Has internet address - - The name of a subpart of an organisation. - -Additional Information: -E.g. the relevant department of a large organisation. + + The main web page used by the instance of the concept. -We added this attribute in case of eProcurement notices where the Buyer is actually a part of an Organization and the rest of the properties apply to the rest of the Organisation as well. +WG Approval 01/06/2023 + - + - - - - - 1 + + @@ -3288,6 +3307,39 @@ WG approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + + Is contracting entity + + + Role of entities, which: + +(a) are contracting authorities or public undertakings and which pursue one of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14 of the Directive 2014/25/EU. + +(b) when they are not contracting authorities or public undertakings, have as one of their activities any of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14, or any combination thereof and operate on the basis of special or exclusive rights granted by a competent authority of a Member State. + +Additional Information + +The indicator is needed in order to discriminate between those contracts where the Contracting Entity acts as a Contracting Authority undergoing the limits and the rules of Directive 24 and those where it acts as a Contracting Entity, with certain relaxed constraints. +For example, the Contracting Entities have different thresholds for the application of Directive 24 if compared with Contracting Authorities. + +WG Approval 28/04/2020 + + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -3336,38 +3388,42 @@ WG approval 04/05/2018 1 - - + + - - + + - - Is contracting entity + + Has fax - - Role of entities, which: - -(a) are contracting authorities or public undertakings and which pursue one of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14 of the Directive 2014/25/EU. - -(b) when they are not contracting authorities or public undertakings, have as one of their activities any of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14, or any combination thereof and operate on the basis of special or exclusive rights granted by a competent authority of a Member State. - -Additional Information - -The indicator is needed in order to discriminate between those contracts where the Contracting Entity acts as a Contracting Authority undergoing the limits and the rules of Directive 24 and those where it acts as a Contracting Entity, with certain relaxed constraints. -For example, the Contracting Entities have different thresholds for the application of Directive 24 if compared with Contracting Authorities. - -WG Approval 28/04/2020 - + + The fax number used to reach a person or an organisation. - + - - + + - - 1 + + + + + + + + Telephone + + + A telephone number through which the Contact Point can be contacted. + + + + + + + @@ -3392,25 +3448,6 @@ WG Approval 28/04/2020 1 - - - - - - - - Telephone - - - A telephone number through which the Contact Point can be contacted. - - - - - - - - @@ -3457,24 +3494,6 @@ WG Approval: 27/01/2022 1 - - - - - - - - Has fax - - - The fax number used to reach a person or an organisation. - - - - - - - @@ -3500,6 +3519,24 @@ WG Approval 01/06/2023 1 + + + + + + + + Has address u r l + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -3526,24 +3563,6 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 1 - - - - - - - - Has address u r l - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -3582,6 +3601,24 @@ Where a country has changed its name or no longer exists (such as Czechoslovakia 1 + + + + + + + + Post name + + + The key postal division of the address, usually the city. (INSPIRE's definition is "One or more names created and maintained for postal purposes to identify a subdivision of addresses and postal delivery points.) For example, "Paris". + + + + + + + @@ -3601,33 +3638,35 @@ This would typically be part of a city, a neighbourhood or village, e.g. Montmar - + 1 - + - - + + - - Admin unit l1 + + Locator name - - The name or names of a unit of administration related to the exercise of jurisdictional rights, for local, regional and national governance. Level 1 refers to the uppermost administrative unit for the address, almost always a country. + + Proper noun(s) applied to the real world entity identified by the locator. Additional Information: -Best practice is to use the ISO 3166-1 code but if this is inappropriate for the context, country names should be provided in a consistent manner to reduce ambiguity. For example, either write 'France' or 'FRA' consistently throughout the dataset and avoid mixing the two. The Country controlled vocabulary from the Publications Office can be reused for this. +The locator name could be the name of the property or complex, of the building or part of the building, or it could be the name of a room inside a building. + +The key difference between a locator and a locator name is that the latter is a proper name and is unlikely to include digits. For example, "Shumann, Berlaymont" is a meeting room within the European Commission headquarters for which locator name is more appropriate than locator. - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -3650,7 +3689,7 @@ Some recommended codelists from the EU Publications Office include: Administrati - + 1 @@ -3674,7 +3713,7 @@ Use of this property is recommended as it will not suffer any misunderstandings - + 1 @@ -3704,29 +3743,27 @@ In simpler terms, this is the building number, apartment number, etc. For an add 1 - + - - + + - - Locator name + + Admin unit l1 - - Proper noun(s) applied to the real world entity identified by the locator. + + The name or names of a unit of administration related to the exercise of jurisdictional rights, for local, regional and national governance. Level 1 refers to the uppermost administrative unit for the address, almost always a country. Additional Information: -The locator name could be the name of the property or complex, of the building or part of the building, or it could be the name of a room inside a building. - -The key difference between a locator and a locator name is that the latter is a proper name and is unlikely to include digits. For example, "Shumann, Berlaymont" is a meeting room within the European Commission headquarters for which locator name is more appropriate than locator. +Best practice is to use the ISO 3166-1 code but if this is inappropriate for the context, country names should be provided in a consistent manner to reduce ambiguity. For example, either write 'France' or 'FRA' consistently throughout the dataset and avoid mixing the two. The Country controlled vocabulary from the Publications Office can be reused for this. - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -3750,24 +3787,6 @@ Post codes are common elements in many countries' postal address systems. One of - - - - - - - - Post name - - - The key postal division of the address, usually the city. (INSPIRE's definition is "One or more names created and maintained for postal purposes to identify a subdivision of addresses and postal delivery points.) For example, "Paris". - - - - - - - @@ -3787,7 +3806,7 @@ For example, "Avenue des Champs-&#201;lys&#233;es". - + @@ -3807,24 +3826,6 @@ For example, "Avenue des Champs-&#201;lys&#233;es". - - - - - - - - Latitude - - - The latitude. - - - - - - - @@ -3843,27 +3844,23 @@ For example, "Avenue des Champs-&#201;lys&#233;es". - - + + - - + + - - Has award date scheduled + + Latitude - - Planned date for the award decision. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + The latitude. - + - - - - - 1 + + @@ -3913,61 +3910,115 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has additional information deadline + + Has award date scheduled - - The time limit for requesting further information. - -Additional information: - -This is generally used to indicate the deadline for Economic Operators to request further information of the procedure before the submission deadline. + + Planned date for the award decision. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has review procedure + + + The description of the method used to request the verification that the procedure has been carried out correctly. -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13 Additional Information Deadline. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Has review deadline + + + The time limit for review procedures. -WG Approval 09/06/2020 - +WG Approval 09/11/2021 - + - + - + 1 + + + + + + + + Has review deadline information + + + The description of the time limits for review procedures. + +WG Approval 01/10/2019 + + + + + + + - + - - + + - - Has public access u r l + + Is procurement document restricted - - Web page where the procurement documents can be downloaded. + + The access to certain procurement documents is restricted. Additional Information: -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-15 Documents URL. +This corresponds in eForms to BT-14 Documents Restricted. -WG Approval 09/03/2021 - +WG Approval 10/10/2019 - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -3996,29 +4047,60 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-615 Documents Restricted URL. 1 - + - - + + - - Is procurement document restricted + + Has additional information deadline - - The access to certain procurement documents is restricted. + + The time limit for requesting further information. + +Additional information: + +This is generally used to indicate the deadline for Economic Operators to request further information of the procedure before the submission deadline. + +This corresponds in eForms to BT-13 Additional Information Deadline. + +WG Approval 09/06/2020 + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has public access u r l + + + Web page where the procurement documents can be downloaded. Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-14 Documents Restricted. +This corresponds in the eForms to BT-15 Documents URL. -WG Approval 10/10/2019 +WG Approval 09/03/2021 + - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -4137,29 +4219,6 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 1 - - - - - - - - Description - - - An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - - @@ -4185,6 +4244,29 @@ WG Approval 12/09/2019 1 + + + + + + + + Description + + + An account of the resource. + +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. + +WG Approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + @@ -4223,6 +4305,28 @@ WG Approval 5/11/2019 + + + + + + + + Is submission for all lots required + + + Indicates whether tenders must be submitted for all Lots. + + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -4244,6 +4348,34 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-09 Cross Border Law. + + + + + + + + Is one lot only allowed + + + Indicates whether tenders may be submitted for only one Lot. + +Additional information: +This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). + +WG approval 23/08/2022 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -4267,31 +4399,26 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-09 Cross Border Law. - + - - + + - - Has lot award combination + + Is awarded by c p b - - The contracting authority reserves the right to award contracts combining lots or groups of lots. - -Additional Information: -This property contains information about the Lots concerned. -This property is required by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). + + Procedure is awarded by a Central Purchasing Body. -WG approval 23/08/2022 - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -4322,6 +4449,34 @@ WG approval 12/12/2018 1 + + + + + + + + Has lot award combination + + + The contracting authority reserves the right to award contracts combining lots or groups of lots. + +Additional Information: +This property contains information about the Lots concerned. +This property is required by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). + +WG approval 23/08/2022 + + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -4363,107 +4518,110 @@ WG Approval 22/08/2019 - - + + - - + + - - Is awarded by c p b + + Has e auction u r l - - Procedure is awarded by a Central Purchasing Body. + + The internet address of the electronic auction. - +Additional Information: + +This corresponds in eForms to BT-123 Electronic Auction URL. - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Is one lot only allowed + + Has receipt deadline - - Indicates whether tenders may be submitted for only one Lot. - -Additional information: -This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). + + The time limit for receiving submissions. -WG approval 23/08/2022 +Additional Information +This is the deadline by which the buyer must receive submissions (e.g. tenders, requests to participate, clarifications, etc.) and is not the time at which the information is submitted by the economic operator. +This attribute should be used for standard forms mappings. +WG Approval 21/07/2020 - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Is submission for all lots allowed + + Has receipt expression deadline - - Indicates whether tenders may be submitted for all Lots. + + Time limit for receipt of expressions of interest. -Additional information: -This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms) +Pending of review by the WG -WG approval 23/08/2022 - + - - + + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Has e auction u r l + + Is guarantee required - - The internet address of the electronic auction. + + The submitted information must include a financial commitment to be used in case of default. Additional Information: +See the additional information provided in the definition of the 'Guarantee Description' element. -This corresponds in eForms to BT-123 Electronic Auction URL. +WG Approval 21/07/20 + + - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -4493,26 +4651,26 @@ WG Approval 21/07/20 - + - - + + - - Has late submission information description + + Has submission u r l - - A narrative text explaining the content of the economic operator information that can be submitted late. + + +Additional Information: +This corresponds to the eForms BT-18 Submission URL. -Additional Information -This does not apply to requests for clarifications. - +This corresponds in eForms to BT-509 Organisation eDelivery Gateway. - + - - + + @@ -4536,77 +4694,6 @@ WG Approval 21/07/2020 - - - - - - - - Has receipt deadline - - - The time limit for receiving submissions. - -Additional Information -This is the deadline by which the buyer must receive submissions (e.g. tenders, requests to participate, clarifications, etc.) and is not the time at which the information is submitted by the economic operator. -This attribute should be used for standard forms mappings. - -WG Approval 21/07/2020 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has receipt expression deadline - - - Time limit for receipt of expressions of interest. - -Pending of review by the WG - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has receipt participation request deadline - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -4625,46 +4712,6 @@ Pending of review by the WG 1 - - - - - - - - Has receipt tender deadline - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has submission u r l - - - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to the eForms BT-18 Submission URL. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-509 Organisation eDelivery Gateway. - - - - - - - @@ -4699,31 +4746,21 @@ WG Approval 21/07/2020 1 - + - - + + - - Is guarantee required - - - The submitted information must include a financial commitment to be used in case of default. - -Additional Information: -See the additional information provided in the definition of the 'Guarantee Description' element. - -WG Approval 21/07/20 - - + + Has receipt participation request deadline - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -4751,32 +4788,45 @@ WG Approval 10/10/2019 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has e invoicing + + Has receipt tender deadline - - Electronic means will be used for invoicing in the post-award process. - -Additional Information: -This attribute is used for standard form mappings. + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has late submission information description + + + A narrative text explaining the content of the economic operator information that can be submitted late. -WG Approval 12/09/2019 +Additional Information +This does not apply to requests for clarifications. - + - - - - - 1 + + @@ -4826,60 +4876,6 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 1 - - - - - - - - Has legal form requirement - - - The legal form to be taken by a Contractor. - -Additional Information: -Generally, this is defined to cover the case where an Organisation Group is involved. -Note that the codelist provided at national level should be used. - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has maximum number of renewals - - - The maximum number of times the contract can be renewed. - -Additional Information - -By renewing, the buyer reserves the right (i.e. not an obligation) to renew the contract (i.e. extend its duration) without a new procurement procedure. -For example, a contract may be valid for one year and the buyer may keep a possibility to renew it (e.g. once, twice) for another three months, if he is content with the services he received. - -PLEASE REVIEW THIS DEFINITION AGAIN WITH THE WORKING GROUP. It was originally taken from eForms. - - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -4901,6 +4897,84 @@ PLEASE REVIEW THIS DEFINITION AGAIN WITH THE WORKING GROUP. It was originally ta 1 + + + + + + + + Has e invoicing + + + Electronic means will be used for invoicing in the post-award process. + +Additional Information: +This attribute is used for standard form mappings. + +WG Approval 12/09/2019 + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Is renewal indicator + + + Indicates whether the contract is subject to a renewal clause. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has maximum number of renewals + + + The maximum number of times the contract can be renewed. + +Additional Information + +By renewing, the buyer reserves the right (i.e. not an obligation) to renew the contract (i.e. extend its duration) without a new procurement procedure. +For example, a contract may be valid for one year and the buyer may keep a possibility to renew it (e.g. once, twice) for another three months, if he is content with the services he received. + +PLEASE REVIEW THIS DEFINITION AGAIN WITH THE WORKING GROUP. It was originally taken from eForms. + + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -4921,6 +4995,26 @@ WG Approval 09/04/2019 + + + + + + + + Has renewal description + + + Any other information about the renewal(s). + +WG approval 16/04/2019 + + + + + + + @@ -4946,29 +5040,30 @@ WG Pending of discussion with eForms - + - - + + - - Has performance conditions + + Has legal form requirement - - The particular conditions and additional information related to the execution of the contract. - -Additional Information: - -For example, specific information about the place of performance, intermediary deliverables, compensation for damages, intellectual property rights. + + The legal form to be taken by a Contractor. -WG approval 15-01-2019 +Additional Information: +Generally, this is defined to cover the case where an Organisation Group is involved. +Note that the codelist provided at national level should be used. - + - + + + 1 + @@ -4990,45 +5085,70 @@ WG Approval 30/07/2019 - + - - + + - - Has renewal description + + Has performance conditions - - Any other information about the renewal(s). + + The particular conditions and additional information related to the execution of the contract. -WG approval 16/04/2019 +Additional Information: + +For example, specific information about the place of performance, intermediary deliverables, compensation for damages, intellectual property rights. + +WG approval 15-01-2019 - + - + - - + + - - + + - - Is renewal indicator + + Is jury decision binding - - Indicates whether the contract is subject to a renewal clause. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + Indicates whether the procuring entity is bound to apply the decision of the jury. - + - + - + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has participation payment + + + Details on payments to participants +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + + + + + + + 1 @@ -5075,46 +5195,51 @@ WG Approval 03/09/2019 - + - - + + - - Has participation payment - - - Details on payments to participants -WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + Has description of prizes - + - + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Is jury decision binding + + Has maximum participants number - - Indicates whether the procuring entity is bound to apply the decision of the jury. + + The maximum number of participants in the framework agreement. + +Additional Information: +Maximum number of tenderers who may be awarded a contract within the framework agreement. + +The number is a positive integer. + +This corresponds in eForms to BT-113 Framework Maximum Participants Number. + +WG Approval 2019-02-05 - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -5173,58 +5298,75 @@ WG Approval 26/09/2019 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has maximum participants number + + Has maximum number of candidates - - The maximum number of participants in the framework agreement. - -Additional Information: -Maximum number of tenderers who may be awarded a contract within the framework agreement. - -The number is a positive integer. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-113 Framework Maximum Participants Number. + + Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. -WG Approval 2019-02-05 +WG Approval 22/08/2019 - + - + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Has estimated invitation to express interest date + + Has successive reduction - - The estimated date of dispatch of the invitations to confirm interest. + + The number of solutions or tenders will be reduced in iterative evaluations for multiple staged procedures. -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-631 Dispatch Invitation Interest. +Additional information: +This refers to multiple-stage procedures (included two-stage procedures, at least). Open Procedures can be seen as one-stage procedures. +WG Approval 22/08/2019 - + - - + + - + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has minimum number of candidates + + + Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. + +WG Approval 22/08/2019 + + + + + + + + 1 @@ -5253,52 +5395,6 @@ WG Approval 01/10/2019 1 - - - - - - - - Has maximum number of candidates - - - Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. - -WG Approval 22/08/2019 - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has minimum number of candidates - - - Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. - -WG Approval 22/08/2019 - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -5325,46 +5421,45 @@ See Article 29(4) of Directive 2014/24/EU. 1 - + - - + + - - Has qualification system renewal description + + Has estimated invitation to express interest date - + + The estimated date of dispatch of the invitations to confirm interest. + +Additional Information: +This corresponds in eForms to BT-631 Dispatch Invitation Interest. + + - - + + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Has successive reduction - - - The number of solutions or tenders will be reduced in iterative evaluations for multiple staged procedures. - -Additional information: -This refers to multiple-stage procedures (included two-stage procedures, at least). Open Procedures can be seen as one-stage procedures. -WG Approval 22/08/2019 + + Has qualification system renewal description - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -5468,32 +5563,6 @@ WG Approval 17/09/2019 1 - - - - - - - - Has minimum subcontractors proposed obligation - - - The minimum percentage of the contract value that the contractor must subcontract. - -Additional information: -This is used for the competitive procedure described in Title III of Directive 2009/81/EC. - -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -5520,6 +5589,32 @@ WG Approval 28/02/2019 1 + + + + + + + + Has minimum subcontractors proposed obligation + + + The minimum percentage of the contract value that the contractor must subcontract. + +Additional information: +This is used for the competitive procedure described in Title III of Directive 2009/81/EC. + +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -5568,99 +5663,99 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-543 Award Criteria Complicated. - + - - + + - - Has award criteria order justification + + Has overall quality award criteria ponderation - - The justification for only indicating the award criteria's order of importance, not their weighing. + + The weighting given to quality. Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-733 Award Criteria Order Justification. +This weighting covers usually all quality criteria against price or cost criteria. - + - - + + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Has overall cost award criteria ponderation + + Has overall price award criteria ponderation - - The weighting given to cost. + + The weighting given to price. Additional Information: -This weighting covers usually all cost criteria against price or quality criteria. +This weighting covers usually all price criteria against cost or quality criteria. - + - + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Has overall price award criteria ponderation + + Has award criteria order justification - - The weighting given to price. + + The justification for only indicating the award criteria's order of importance, not their weighing. Additional Information: -This weighting covers usually all price criteria against cost or quality criteria. +This corresponds in eForms to BT-733 Award Criteria Order Justification. - + - - + + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Has overall quality award criteria ponderation + + Has overall cost award criteria ponderation - - The weighting given to quality. + + The weighting given to cost. Additional Information: -This weighting covers usually all quality criteria against price or cost criteria. +This weighting covers usually all cost criteria against price or quality criteria. - + - + - + 1 @@ -5972,24 +6067,6 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-543. 1 - - - - - - - - Describes profession - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -6026,21 +6103,24 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-543. 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has condition verification method + + Describes profession - + - + + + 1 + @@ -6056,24 +6136,21 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-543. - - + + - - + + - - Describes minimum level of standards + + Has condition verification method - + - + - - 1 - @@ -6092,6 +6169,24 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-543. 1 + + + + + + + + Describes minimum level of standards + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -6117,6 +6212,87 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-40 Selection Criteria Second Stage Invite 1 + + + + + + + + Has reference u r i + + + A reference to where the label specification (norms, expectations, standards and policies) can be found. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has certification number + + + The unique identifier of the certificate. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 + + + + + + + + + 1 + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has u r l + + + The identifier of a resource. + +Additional Information + +For example: + +1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; +2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; +3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; +4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) +5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; + +WG Approval 30/09/2019 + + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -6180,33 +6356,6 @@ WG Approval 05/03/2019 - - - - - - - - Has clean vehicles - - - The number of all clean vehicles that have either been purchased, leased, rented, hired-purchased or their use has been contractually committed to for the provision of a purchased service. - -Additional Information -In the European Union, the legal requirements and scope for the provision of these vehicles or services are covered by Directive 2009/33/EC. - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - @@ -6263,6 +6412,33 @@ WG Approval 28/07/2020 1 + + + + + + + + Has clean vehicles + + + The number of all clean vehicles that have either been purchased, leased, rented, hired-purchased or their use has been contractually committed to for the provision of a purchased service. + +Additional Information +In the European Union, the legal requirements and scope for the provision of these vehicles or services are covered by Directive 2009/33/EC. + +WG Approval 28/07/2020 + + + + + + + + + + 1 + @@ -6286,87 +6462,84 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 - - + + - - + + - - Is competition terminated + + Has non awarded contract title - - No further contracts will be awarded in this procedure. + + The title the contract would have had if it had been awarded. -Additional Information: -This can be instantiated in the post award phase. +Additional information: -PIN for Competition needs to be signaled. This field can be used even if no contracts are awarded in the contract award notice. +This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. -This corresponds in eForms to BT-756 PIN Competition Termination. +WG agreement: 06/09/2022 - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Is d p s terminated + + Has non awarded contract number - - End of the Dynamic Purchase System (DPS). + + The number the contract would have had if it had been awarded. -Additional Information: This property can be used in the contract award notice even if no contracts are awarded. +Additional information: -WG Approval 22/11/2019 +This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. + +WG agreement: 06/09/2022 - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Is to be relaunched + + Has award rank - - Indicator of whether the procurement object is to be relaunched. - -Additional information: -This can be instantiated in the post award phase. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-634 Procurement Relaunch. + + The position of the tender (i.e. whether the tender ended up first, second, third, etc.) in a design contest, some framework agreements with multiple winners (e.g. cascades) or an innovation partnership. -WG Approval: 18/01/2022 +Additional Information: +This corresponds in eForms to BT-171 Tender Rank. - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -6395,74 +6568,106 @@ WG Approval 25/05/2018 1 - - + + - - + + - - Description + + Has payment value discrepancy justification - - An account of the resource. + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Is to be relaunched + + + Indicator of whether the procurement object is to be relaunched. -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. +Additional information: +This can be instantiated in the post award phase. -WG Approval 30/05/2023 +This corresponds in eForms to BT-634 Procurement Relaunch. + +WG Approval: 18/01/2022 + - + - - + + - - + + 1 - - + + + + + - - Has estimated percentage + + Is competition terminated - - The estimated proportion foreseen to be subcontracted. + + No further contracts will be awarded in this procedure. -WG Approval 07/01/2020 +Additional Information: +This can be instantiated in the post award phase. + +PIN for Competition needs to be signaled. This field can be used even if no contracts are awarded in the contract award notice. + +This corresponds in eForms to BT-756 PIN Competition Termination. - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has subject matter + + Is d p s terminated - - Description of the share of the contract that is to be subcontracted. + + End of the Dynamic Purchase System (DPS). -Additional infromation: -This can be an aggregate of several subcontracts. +Additional Information: This property can be used in the contract award notice even if no contracts are awarded. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 +WG Approval 22/11/2019 + - + - - + + + + + 1 @@ -6515,34 +6720,75 @@ WG Approval 11/04/2019 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has abnormally low tenders + + Description - - Tenders received that were found irregular and non-acceptable due to an abnormally low price or cost. + + An account of the resource. -Additional Information -The definition implies that abnormally Low Tender Lots are Inadmissible Tender Lots. +Additional Information: +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. -WG Approval 28/07/2020 +WG Approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Has estimated percentage + + + The estimated proportion foreseen to be subcontracted. - +WG Approval 07/01/2020 - + - - + + - + 1 + + + + + + + + Has subject matter + + + Description of the share of the contract that is to be subcontracted. + +Additional infromation: +This can be an aggregate of several subcontracts. + +WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + + + + + + @@ -6567,122 +6813,26 @@ WG Approval 12/12/2019 1 - + - - + + - - Has electronic tenders - - - Electronic Tender Lots received. - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has estimated total subcontracts - - - The estimated amount of work to be subcontracted in the contract resulting from the lot. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has e u received tenders - - - The amount of tenders received from economic operators in other EU countries other than the country of the buyer. - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has inadmissible tenders + + Has received participation requests - - Tenders received that cannot be awarded due to non-compliance to procurement document requirements or having an abnormally low price or cost. - -<u>Additional Information: </u> -Non-compliance with a Procurement Document requirements include exclusion grounds, selection criteria and submission deadline, etc. + + The amount of applications to participate from economic operators. WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has medium tender per lots - - - Tenders from medium-sized enterprise. - -<u>Additional Information:</u> - -See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. - - - + - + - + 1 @@ -6709,71 +6859,32 @@ WG Approval 12/12/2019 15:20:36 1 - - - - - - - Has non e u received tenders - - - The amount of tenders received from economic operators in non-EU countries. - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - + - - + + - - Has number of tenderers invited + + Has s m e received tenders - - Number of economic operators invited to tender. + + The amount of tenders received from micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. -Additional Information -This may be used for single-stage procedures or to indicate the number of candidates invited to tender in multi-stage procedures. +<u>Additional Information:</u> -WG Approval 01/12/2020 +See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. +The ReceivedSMETenderLots is used when the size of the company is not exactly knokn. +WG Approval 05/03/2020 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has other countries received tenders - - + - + - + 1 @@ -6802,53 +6913,56 @@ See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. 1 - + - - + + - - Has received participation requests + + Has received small tenders - - The amount of applications to participate from economic operators. + + Tenders from small enterprise. -WG Approval 12/12/2019 +<u>Additional Information:</u> + +See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. + + - + - + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Has received small tenders + + Has medium tender per lots - - Tenders from small enterprise. + + Tenders from medium-sized enterprise. <u>Additional Information:</u> See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. - - + - + - + 1 @@ -6875,39 +6989,86 @@ WG Approval 12/12/2019 1 - + - - + + - - Has s m e received tenders + + Has inadmissible tenders - - The amount of tenders received from micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. - -<u>Additional Information:</u> + + Tenders received that cannot be awarded due to non-compliance to procurement document requirements or having an abnormally low price or cost. -See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. -The ReceivedSMETenderLots is used when the size of the company is not exactly knokn. +<u>Additional Information: </u> +Non-compliance with a Procurement Document requirements include exclusion grounds, selection criteria and submission deadline, etc. -WG Approval 05/03/2020 - +WG Approval 12/12/2019 - + - + - + 1 - + - - + + + + + Has abnormally low tenders + + + Tenders received that were found irregular and non-acceptable due to an abnormally low price or cost. + +Additional Information +The definition implies that abnormally Low Tender Lots are Inadmissible Tender Lots. + +WG Approval 28/07/2020 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has non e u received tenders + + + The amount of tenders received from economic operators in non-EU countries. + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + Has unverified tenders @@ -6927,145 +7088,142 @@ WG Approval 28/07/2020 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has payment value discrepancy justification + + Has electronic tenders - + + Electronic Tender Lots received. + +WG Approval 28/07/2020 + + + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Description + + Has e u received tenders - - An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023 - + + The amount of tenders received from economic operators in other EU countries other than the country of the buyer. - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Issued - - - Date of formal issuance of the resource. - -Additional information: -This is generally used for modules other than eNotice. -The xsd:dateTime here means that we can provide either xsd:date, xsd:dateTime, or xsd:timeStamp or any other variant of time expression. This extension needs to be encoded/automated in the ontology and in the application profile. -Why is it like this? Because UML cannot handle such expressions of disjunctive property ranges. - -WG approval 26/01/2023 + + Has other countries received tenders - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Title + + Has estimated total subcontracts - - A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - - + + The estimated amount of work to be subcontracted in the contract resulting from the lot. +WG Approval 09/11/2021 - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has access u r l + + Has number of tenderers invited - - Location where the resource can be accessed. + + Number of economic operators invited to tender. -WG approval 07/04/2022 +Additional Information +This may be used for single-stage procedures or to indicate the number of candidates invited to tender in multi-stage procedures. + +WG Approval 01/12/2020 + + - + - - + + + + + 1 - + - - + + - - Has dispatch date + + Title - - Date of transmission of a record to an organisation. + + A name given to the resource. -WG Approval 12/05/2020 +WG approval 30/05/2023 + + - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -7115,157 +7273,188 @@ WG Approval 12/05/2020 1 - + - - + + - - Has version + + Has dispatch date - - A number that identifies a specific state of a document. + + Date and time of transmission of a record to an Organization. -WG approval: 18/11/2021 - +WG Approval 31/08/2023 - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - + + Issued + + + Date of formal issuance of the resource. + +Additional information: +This is generally used for modules other than eNotice. +The xsd:dateTime here means that we can provide either xsd:date, xsd:dateTime, or xsd:timeStamp or any other variant of time expression. This extension needs to be encoded/automated in the ontology and in the application profile. +Why is it like this? Because UML cannot handle such expressions of disjunctive property ranges. + +WG approval 26/01/2023 + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + Description - + An account of the resource. Additional Information: Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. -WG Approval 30/05/2023 +WG Approval 30/05/2023 + - + - + - - 1 + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has additional information + + Has access u r l - - Supplementary data about the instance of the concept. + + Location where the resource can be accessed. -WG Approval 15/10/2019 +WG approval 07/04/2022 - + - - - - - 1 + + - - + + - - + + - - Has e forms subtype + + Has version - + + A number that identifies a specific state of a document. + +WG approval: 18/11/2021 + + + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has e sender dispatch date + + Description - - The date and time the notice was transmitted electronically by the eSender to the Publications Office of the European Union. + + An account of the resource. Additional Information: -Typically, eSenders include national Official Journals, Buyers sending a large number of electronic Notices, public or private bodies acting on behalf of Buyers and eProcurement software developers. +Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. -WG approval 20/06/2023 +WG Approval 30/05/2023 - + - - + + - + + 1 1 - + - - + + - - Has form number + + Has o j s issue number - + - + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Has long title + + Has o j s type - + - + - + 1 @@ -7287,65 +7476,88 @@ WG approval 20/06/2023 1 - + - - + + - - Has o j s issue number + + Has form number - + - + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has e forms subtype + + + + + - + 1 - + - - + + - - Has o j s type + + Has additional information - + + Supplementary data about the instance of the concept. + +WG Approval 15/10/2019 + + - + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has additional non award justification + + Has e sender dispatch date - - Further justification for the non award . + + The date and time the notice was transmitted electronically by the eSender to the Publications Office of the European Union. -Additional information: -This is generally used when the non award reason code is set to "Other". +Additional Information: +Typically, eSenders include national Official Journals, Buyers sending a large number of electronic Notices, public or private bodies acting on behalf of Buyers and eProcurement software developers. -WG: 18/01/2022 +WG approval 20/06/2023 - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -7375,22 +7587,48 @@ WG Approval 09/01/2020 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has electronic submission + + Has additional non award justification - - Transmission of tenders is possible by electronic means of communication. + + Further justification for the non award . + +Additional information: +This is generally used when the non award reason code is set to "Other". + +WG: 18/01/2022 - + - + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has electronic submission + + + Transmission of tenders is possible by electronic means of communication. + + + + + @@ -7484,6 +7722,27 @@ WG approval 05/11/2019 1 + + + + + + + + Title + + + A name given to the resource. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + + + + + + + + @@ -7507,27 +7766,6 @@ WG Approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - - - Title - - - A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - - - @@ -7655,28 +7893,27 @@ This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-794 Review URL. 1 - + - - + + - - Has request date + + Is withdrawn - - The date when the review request was submitted. + + The review request was withdrawn. Additional information: -This attribute corresponds to the BT-787 Review Date in eForms. - +This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-796 Review Request Withdrawn. - + - - + + - + 1 @@ -7728,77 +7965,146 @@ This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-798 Review Request Withdrawn Reasons< 1 - + - - + + - - Is withdrawn + + Has request date - - The review request was withdrawn. + + The date when the review request was submitted. Additional information: -This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-796 Review Request Withdrawn. +This attribute corresponds to the BT-787 Review Date in eForms. + - + - - + + - + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has element reference + + Has change description - - Reference to the class instance in the current notice. + + Explanatory text about the instance of the concept. + +WG Approval 30/09/2019 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Has change reason description + + + Explanatory text about why the element is altered. + +Additional information: +This corresponds in eForms to BT-762 Change Reason Description. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Is procurement document changed + + + One or more procurement documents have been changed. Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier, BT-786 Review Notice Section Identifier and BT-1501 Modification Previous Notice Section Identifier. +This corresponds in eForms to BT-718 Change Procurement Documents + +WG Approval 05/11/2019 - + - - + + - - 1 + 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has previous version of element reference + + Has procurement document change date - - Reference to the class instance in the previous version of the notice, which was changed. + + The date and time of the change. Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier. +This corresponds in eForms to BT-719 Change Procurement Documents Date + +WG Approval 5/11/2019 - + - - + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has additional information + + + Supplementary data about the instance of the concept. + +WG Approval 15/10/2019 + + + + - + + + + 1 @@ -7851,205 +8157,87 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has additional information + + Notation - - Supplementary data about the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 15/10/2019 - + + The literal identifying an entity, like a person or an object. - + - + - + + 1 1 - - + + - - + + - - Has change description + + Schema agency - - Explanatory text about the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 30/09/2019 + + The name of the agency that issued the identifier. - + - + - - + + - - + + - - Has change reason description + + Has scheme - - Explanatory text about why the element is altered. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-762 Change Reason Description. + + The name of the identification scheme. - + - + - - + + - - + + - - Has procurement document change date + + Has scheme version - - The date and time of the change. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-719 Change Procurement Documents Date - -WG Approval 5/11/2019 - + + The version of the identification scheme. - + - - - - - 1 + + - - + + - - - - - Is procurement document changed - - - One or more procurement documents have been changed. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-718 Change Procurement Documents - -WG Approval 05/11/2019 - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Schema agency - - - The name of the agency that issued the identifier. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Has scheme - - - The name of the identification scheme. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Has scheme version - - - The version of the identification scheme. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Notation - - - The literal identifying an entity, like a person or an object. - - - - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - + + Has amount value @@ -8232,1916 +8420,1572 @@ WG Approval 09/11/2021 1 1 - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasAwardedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasAwardedValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has awarded value + + Identifier - - The value of the procurement provided by the Award Decision. + + A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. -Additional Information: -Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. +Additional Information -In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum awarded value. +For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. -WG Approval 10/12/2019 +WG Approval 12/11/2019 + + - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesTenderAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesTenderAwardOutcome> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPurpose> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPurpose> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Comprises tender award outcome - - - Incorporates TenderAwardOutcome. + + Has purpose - - + + Relation indicating the Purpose of a concept. - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasBargainPrice> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasBargainPrice> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isFundedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isFundedBy> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has bargain price + + Is funded by - - The value of procured supplies that have used a particularly advantageous opportunity available for a very short time at a value considerably lower than normal market prices. + + Funding is provided either completely or partially by a Fund. -WG approval 23/05/2023 +Additional information: +This corresponds in eForms to BG - 61 EU Funds (specified per Lot) and to BG - 611 Contract EU Funds (applied per Contract lot) +Funds may change between the lot and the contract, for example in the case of an emergency crisis, a contract may be financed by a budget that was not foreseen in the call. + + - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesAwardOutcome> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Comprises award outcome - - - Incorporates AwardOutcome. - - - + + Has launch framework agreement maximum value - - 1 - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToTerm> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Summarises information for award outcome - - - Relates to submission for the given competition, either at Lot level or Mini-Competition level. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - - - + + Is subject to term - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasAwardedEstimatedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasAwardedEstimatedValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#fulfillsStrategicProcurement> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#fulfillsStrategicProcurement> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has awarded estimated value + + Fulfills strategic procurement - - The estimated value that can be spent as provided by the Award Decision. - -<u>Additional Information</u>: -This property is used for framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems. -Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - - - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesConcession> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesConcession> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has framework agreement maximum value - - - + + Foresees concession - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#usesTechnique> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#usesTechnique> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has framework agreement estimated value - - - This refers to BT-660 in eForms. - - - + + Uses technique - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesContractSpecificTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesContractSpecificTerm> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has approximate framework agreement value - - - + + Foresees contract specific term - - 1 - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsLot> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#contextualisedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#contextualisedBy> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Concerns lot + + Contextualised by - - Relates to Lot. + + The place of the AgentInRole in the procurement is expressed by a ProcurementObject. - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromLotAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromLotAwardOutcome> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesProcurementObject> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesProcurementObject> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Results from lot award outcome + + Foresees procurement object - - + + Relation indicating the instance of a Procurement Object that is planned. + +Additional Information: +The properties of the Procurement Object that is foreseen should be read as foreseen properties. +For example, Procedure isSMESuitable should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeSMESuitable. +For example, Procedure isFundedBy should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeFundedBy. - + + + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromLotAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromLotAwardOutcome> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriterion> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriterion> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Results from lot award outcome - - - + + Specifies procurement criterion - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToLotSpecificTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToLotSpecificTerm> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has group framework agreement maximum value - - - This corresponds to BT-156 in the eForms. + + Is subject to lot specific term - - + + - - 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#describesLotGroup> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#describesLotGroup> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLotReference> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLotReference> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Describes lot group + + Has lot reference - - + + - - 1 + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromUsingCandidateList> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromUsingCandidateList> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#setsGroupingContextForLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#setsGroupingContextForLot> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Results from using candidate list + + Sets grouping context for lot - - + + - - 1 + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToLot> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Results from mini competition award outcome - - - + + Refers to lot - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousProcedureLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousProcedureLot> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has maximum framework agreement awarded value + + Refers to previous procedure lot - - The maximum value which can be spent through all the framework agreements announced in this notice, including options and renewals of contracts. - -Additional information: - -The value provided is a threshold value that implicity means that it cannot be exceeded however it may not be reached during the execution of a contract. + + Reference to one or more Lots in a previous procedure. -The Framework Agreements in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. +Additional Information: +In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. -This corresponds to the BT-118 in eForms. +This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier -WG Approval 03/12/2019 +WG Approval 22/11/2019 14:33:55 - - + + - + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmittedForLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmittedForLot> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has procurement highest received tender value - - - The highest received tender value for the procurement. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to section II.1.7.3. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986. + + Is submitted for lot - - + + - + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsReviewSummaryForLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsReviewSummaryForLot> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has approximate framework agreement value + + Concerns review summary for lot - - + + Relates to Lot review summary. + +Additional information: +This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-13722 Buyer Review Lot Identifier. - + + + + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#describesLotCompletion> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#describesLotCompletion> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has procurement lowest received tender value - - - The lowest received tender value for the procurement. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to section II.1.7.2. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986. + + Describes lot completion - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalAwardedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalAwardedValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsLot> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has total awarded value + + Concerns lot - - The awarded value of all lots announced in this notice, including options and renewals. - -Additional information: -The values of the individual Lots awarded under a framework agreement and mentioned in this notice are included. - -The values of the individual lots announced in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. - -This corresponds to the BT-161 in eForms. - -WG Approval 03/12/2019 - + + Relates to Lot. - - + + - + + 1 + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#containsCandidate> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#containsCandidate> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsLot> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Contains candidate + + Concerns lot - - + + Relates to Lot. - - 1 + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasStartDate> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasStartDate> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementScopeDividedIntoLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementScopeDividedIntoLot> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has start date - - - + + Has procurement scope divided into lot - - 1 - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsTender> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsTender> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesTechnique> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesTechnique> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Concerns tender + + Foresees technique - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#indicatesAwardToWinner> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#indicatesAwardToWinner> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPlannedPeriod> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPlannedPeriod> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Indicates award to winner - - - Reveals the winner to whom the tender award outcome is attributed. + + Has planned period - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPlannedDuration> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPlannedDuration> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Identifier - - - A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - -Additional Information - -For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. - -WG Approval 12/11/2019 - - - - - + + Has planned duration - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPurpose> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPurpose> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPlannedPart> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPlannedPart> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has purpose + + Refers to planned part - - Relation indicating the Purpose of a concept. + + - - + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isFundedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isFundedBy> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToProcedureSpecificTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToProcedureSpecificTerm> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is funded by + + Is subject to procedure specific term - - Funding is provided either completely or partially by a Fund. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BG - 61 EU Funds (specified per Lot) and to BG - 611 Contract EU Funds (applied per Contract lot) -Funds may change between the lot and the contract, for example in the case of an emergency crisis, a contract may be financed by a budget that was not foreseen in the call. - - + + - - + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToTerm> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isExecutedByProcurementServiceProvider> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isExecutedByProcurementServiceProvider> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is subject to term + + Is executed by procurement service provider - - + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#fulfillsStrategicProcurement> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#fulfillsStrategicProcurement> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#involvesBuyer> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#involvesBuyer> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Fulfills strategic procurement - - - + + Involves buyer - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesConcession> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesConcession> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isResponsibilityOfBuyer> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isResponsibilityOfBuyer> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Foresees concession + + Is responsibility of buyer - - + + + - + + + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#usesTechnique> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#usesTechnique> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriteriaSummary> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriteriaSummary> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Uses technique + + Specifies procurement criteria summary - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesContractSpecificTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesContractSpecificTerm> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousProcedure> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousProcedure> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Foresees contract specific term + + Refers to previous procedure - - + + Reference to a previous procedure. + +Additional Information: +In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. + +This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier - + + + + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#contextualisedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#contextualisedBy> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsProcedure> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsProcedure> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Contextualised by + + Concerns procedure - - The place of the AgentInRole in the procurement is expressed by a ProcurementObject. + + Relates to Procedure. - - + + - + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesProcurementObject> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesProcurementObject> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToProcedure> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToProcedure> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Foresees procurement object + + Refers to procedure - - Relation indicating the instance of a Procurement Object that is planned. - -Additional Information: -The properties of the Procurement Object that is foreseen should be read as foreseen properties. -For example, Procedure isSMESuitable should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeSMESuitable. -For example, Procedure isFundedBy should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeFundedBy. + + - - - - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriterion> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriterion> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasInternalIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasInternalIdentifier> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Specifies procurement criterion + + Has internal identifier - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToLotSpecificTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToLotSpecificTerm> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is subject to lot specific term + + Identifier - - + + A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. + +Additional Information + +For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. + +WG Approval 12/11/2019 - - 1 + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLotReference> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLotReference> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEstimatedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEstimatedValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has lot reference + + Has estimated value - - + + A forecast of the value of the procurement before competition. + +Additional Information: +Different cases of estimated values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. +The forecast is calculated by the buyer and covers all revenues whether coming from the buyer or third parties. +See for example recital (19), Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and other articles from the rest of Directives about procurement. + +In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum estimated value. + +This property corresponds to BT-27 in eForms (for Lot and Procedure) and can be used for BT-157 (for LotGroup). +<b> +</b>WG Approval 05/12/2019 + - - 1 + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#setsGroupingContextForLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#setsGroupingContextForLot> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?this .} - + - - + + - - Sets grouping context for lot - - - + + Has launch framework agreement maximum value - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToLot> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriterion> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriterion> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Refers to lot + + Specifies procurement criterion - - + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousProcedureLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousProcedureLot> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesLotGroup> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesLotGroup> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Refers to previous procedure lot + + Defines lot group - - Reference to one or more Lots in a previous procedure. - -Additional Information: -In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. - -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier - -WG Approval 22/11/2019 14:33:55 + + Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has a LotGroup. - - + + - + 1 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmittedForLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmittedForLot> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#describesLotGroup> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#describesLotGroup> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is submitted for lot + + Describes lot group - - + + - + 1 - 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsReviewSummaryForLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsReviewSummaryForLot> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToGrouping> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToGrouping> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Concerns review summary for lot - - - Relates to Lot review summary. - -Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-13722 Buyer Review Lot Identifier. + + Is subject to grouping - - + + - + 1 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#describesLotCompletion> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#describesLotCompletion> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmittedForLotGroup> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmittedForLotGroup> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Describes lot completion - - - + + Is submitted for lot group - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsLot> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#usesChannel> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#usesChannel> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Concerns lot - - - Relates to Lot. - - - + + Uses channel - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementScopeDividedIntoLot> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementScopeDividedIntoLot> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasInternalIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasInternalIdentifier> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has procurement scope divided into lot + + Has internal identifier - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesTechnique> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesTechnique> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEstimatedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEstimatedValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Foresees technique + + Has estimated value - - + + A forecast of the value of the procurement before competition. + +Additional Information: +Different cases of estimated values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. +The forecast is calculated by the buyer and covers all revenues whether coming from the buyer or third parties. +See for example recital (19), Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and other articles from the rest of Directives about procurement. + +In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum estimated value. + +This property corresponds to BT-27 in eForms (for Lot and Procedure) and can be used for BT-157 (for LotGroup). +<b> +</b><b>WG Approval 05/12/2019</b> + + - + + + + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPlannedPeriod> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPlannedPeriod> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has planned period + + Identifier - - + + A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. + +Additional Information + +For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. + +WG Approval 12/11/2019 + - + + + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPlannedDuration> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPlannedDuration> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalQuantity> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalQuantity> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has planned duration - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPlannedPart> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPlannedPart> ?this .} - - - - + + Has total quantity - - - - - Refers to planned part + + The number of units required. + +Additional Information: +The quantity needs to go along with the unit. + + + + - - + + - - 1 + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToProcedureSpecificTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToProcedureSpecificTerm> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPurpose> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPurpose> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is subject to procedure specific term + + Has purpose - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isExecutedByProcurementServiceProvider> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isExecutedByProcurementServiceProvider> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is executed by procurement service provider - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#involvesBuyer> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#involvesBuyer> ?this .} - + + Identifier - - + + A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. + +Additional Information + +For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. + +WG Approval 12/11/2019 + - - - - - Involves buyer + + - - + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isResponsibilityOfBuyer> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isResponsibilityOfBuyer> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesTender> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesTender> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is responsibility of buyer + + Comprises tender - - - + + Incorporates Tender. - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriteriaSummary> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriteriaSummary> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Specifies procurement criteria summary + + Has total value - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousProcedure> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousProcedure> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/registeredAddress> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/registeredAddress> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Refers to previous procedure + + Registered address - - Reference to a previous procedure. + + The registered address relationship links a Resource with the legally registered Address. Additional Information: -In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. - -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier +It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address. - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsProcedure> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsProcedure> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/person#placeOfBirth> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/person#placeOfBirth> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Concerns procedure + + Place of birth - - Relates to Procedure. + + The Location where the Person was born. - - + + - + 1 - 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToProcedure> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToProcedure> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/person#placeOfDeath> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/person#placeOfDeath> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Refers to procedure + + Place of death - - + + The Location where the Person died. - - 1 + + - + + + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasBeneficialOwner> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasBeneficialOwner> ?this .} - - - - - - - - Identifier - - - A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - -Additional Information - -For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. - -WG Approval 12/11/2019 - - - - - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriterion> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesProcurementCriterion> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isBeneficialOwnerOf> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isBeneficialOwnerOf> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Specifies procurement criterion - - - + + Has beneficial owner - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesLotGroup> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesLotGroup> ?this .} - + + A role of any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the organisation or on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted. +Additional Information: +This role is defined in the directive EU 2015/849 and it's beyond the scope for public eProcurement domain. +WG approval 14/09/2021 - - + + - - + + - - Defines lot group + + Is beneficial owner of - - Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has a LotGroup. + + A role of any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the organisation or on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted. +Additional Information: +This role is defined in the directive EU 2015/849 and it's beyond the scope for public eProcurement domain. +WG approval 14/09/2021 - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToGrouping> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToGrouping> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#playedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#playedBy> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is subject to grouping + + Played by - - + + - - 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmittedForLotGroup> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmittedForLotGroup> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasMember> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasMember> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is submitted for lot group - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#usesChannel> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#usesChannel> ?this .} - - - - + + Has member - - - - - Uses channel + + - - + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasInternalIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasInternalIdentifier> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#leadBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#leadBy> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has internal identifier + + Lead by - - + + - + + + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEstimatedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEstimatedValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isOwnedByAgent> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isOwnedByAgent> ?this .} - - + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#ownsSystem> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#ownsSystem> ?this .} + - - + + + + + - - Has estimated value + + Is owned by agent - - A forecast of the value of the procurement before competition. - -Additional Information: -Different cases of estimated values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. -The forecast is calculated by the buyer and covers all revenues whether coming from the buyer or third parties. -See for example recital (19), Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and other articles from the rest of Directives about procurement. - -In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum estimated value. - -This property corresponds to BT-27 in eForms (for Lot and Procedure) and can be used for BT-157 (for LotGroup). -<b> -</b><b>WG Approval 05/12/2019</b> - - + + - - + + + + + Owns system - - 1 - 1 + + - + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} - - + + - + - + Identifier - - A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - -Additional Information - -For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. - -WG Approval 12/11/2019 - + + Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. - - + + - + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalQuantity> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalQuantity> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#playedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#playedBy> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has total quantity - - - The number of units required. - -Additional Information: -The quantity needs to go along with the unit. - - - - - - - + + Played by - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPurpose> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPurpose> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasCertification> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasCertification> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has purpose + + Has certification - - + + Relation to the proof of conformance. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesTender> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesTender> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLegalIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLegalIdentifier> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Comprises tender - - - Incorporates Tender. - - - + + Has legal identifier - - 1 - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/org#subOrganizationOf> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/org#subOrganizationOf> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has total value + + Sub organization of - + + Represents hierarchical containment of Organizations or OrganizationalUnits; indicates an Organization which contains this Organization. + +WG 31/08/2023 + + - + 1 - + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/registeredAddress> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/registeredAddress> ?this .} - - + + - + - + Registered address - + The registered address relationship links a Resource with the legally registered Address. Additional Information: -It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address. - - - +It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address. + - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/person#placeOfBirth> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/person#placeOfBirth> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/address> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/address> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Place of birth - - - The Location where the Person was born. + + Address - - + + Associates any Resource with the corresponding Address. + +Additional Information: +Asserting the address relationship implies that the Resource has an Address. - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/person#placeOfDeath> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/person#placeOfDeath> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPrimaryContactPoint> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPrimaryContactPoint> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Place of death - - - The Location where the Person died. - - - - - - + + Has primary contact point - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasBeneficialOwner> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasBeneficialOwner> ?this .} - + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isBeneficialOwnerOf> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isBeneficialOwnerOf> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasCertification> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasCertification> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has beneficial owner + + Has certification - - A role of any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the organisation or on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted. -Additional Information: -This role is defined in the directive EU 2015/849 and it's beyond the scope for public eProcurement domain. -WG approval 14/09/2021 + + Relation to the proof of conformance. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 - - - - - - - - Is beneficial owner of - - - A role of any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the organisation or on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted. -Additional Information: -This role is defined in the directive EU 2015/849 and it's beyond the scope for public eProcurement domain. -WG approval 14/09/2021 - - - - - - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasMember> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasMember> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Has member - - - - - - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#leadBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#leadBy> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Lead by - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isOwnedByAgent> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isOwnedByAgent> ?this .} - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#ownsSystem> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#ownsSystem> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Is owned by agent - - - - - - - - - Owns system - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Identifier - - - Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#playedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#playedBy> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Played by - - - - - - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#playedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#playedBy> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Played by - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLegalIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLegalIdentifier> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Has legal identifier - - - - - - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/registeredAddress> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/registeredAddress> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Registered address - - - The registered address relationship links a Resource with the legally registered Address. - -Additional Information: -It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address. - - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/address> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/address> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Address - - - Associates any Resource with the corresponding Address. - -Additional Information: -Asserting the address relationship implies that the Resource has an Address. - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPrimaryContactPoint> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPrimaryContactPoint> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Has primary contact point - - - + + @@ -10374,6 +10218,23 @@ Directive 2014/24/EU describes ancillary purchasing activities as activities con Signed by buyer + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#containsCandidate> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#containsCandidate> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Contains candidate + @@ -10417,986 +10278,1586 @@ Directive 2014/24/EU describes ancillary purchasing activities as activities con - + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#needsToBeAWinner> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#needsToBeAWinner> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Needs to be a winner + + + The Contractor must be a Winner. + + + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#signedByContractor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#signedByContractor> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Signed by contractor + + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#bindsContractor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#bindsContractor> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Binds contractor + + + Provides legal constraint on the Contractor. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesMediator> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesMediator> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines mediator + + + Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has a Mediator. + + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#distributesOffer> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#distributesOffer> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Distributes offer + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesOfflineAccessProvider> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesOfflineAccessProvider> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines offline access provider + + + Relation indicating an AccessTerm has an OfflineAccessProvider. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesParticipationRequestProcessor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesParticipationRequestProcessor> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines participation request processor + + + Relation indicating a ParticipationRequestTerm has a ParticipationRequestProcessor. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesParticipationRequestReceiver> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesParticipationRequestReceiver> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines participation request receiver + + + Relation indicating a ParticipationRequestTerm has a ParticipationRequestReceiver. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesPaymentExecutor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesPaymentExecutor> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines payment executor + + + Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a PaymentExecutor. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines procurement procedure information provider + + + Relation indicating an AccessTerm has a ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider. + + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesReviewer> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesReviewer> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines reviewer + + + Relation indicating a ReviewTerm has a Reviewer. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesReviewProcedureInformationProvider> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesReviewProcedureInformationProvider> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines review procedure information provider + + + Relation indicating a ReviewTerm has a ReviewProcedureInformationProvider. + + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesSubcontractors> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesSubcontractors> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Specifies subcontractors + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#substantiatesExclusionGround> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#substantiatesExclusionGround> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Substantiates exclusion ground + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#needsToBeATenderer> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#needsToBeATenderer> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Needs to be a tenderer + + + The Winner must be a Tenderer. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmitedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmitedBy> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Is submited by + + + Relation indicating the submission of a tender by an economic operator. +WG approval 18/05/2021 + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesTenderProcessor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesTenderProcessor> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines tender processor + + + Relation indicating a SubmissionTerm has a TenderProcessor. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesTenderReceiver> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesTenderReceiver> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines tender receiver + + + Relation indicating a SubmissionTerm has a TenderReceiver. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#indicatesAwardToWinner> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#indicatesAwardToWinner> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Indicates award to winner + + + Reveals the winner to whom the tender award outcome is attributed. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#issuedByCertifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#issuedByCertifier> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Issued by certifier + + + Relation indicating the Certifier responsible for providing the ItemCertificate. + +Additional Information: +Certifier is a role played by an organisation. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/address> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/address> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Address + + + Associates any Resource with the corresponding Address. + +Additional Information: +Asserting the address relationship implies that the Resource has an Address. + + + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEndpointIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEndpointIdentifier> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Has endpoint identifier + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Identifier + + + Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#address> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#address> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Address + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#geographicIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#geographicIdentifier> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Geographic identifier + + + A URI that identifies the Location. + +Additional Information: +GeoNames.org provides stable, widely recognised identifiers for more than 10 million geographical names that can be used as links to further information. For example, http://sws.geonames.org/593116/ identifies the Lithuanian capital Vilnius. Unfortunately these URIs cannot easily be automatically deduced since the URI scheme uses simple numeric codes. Finding a GeoNames identifier for a Location is almost always a manual process. Where such identifiers are known or can be found, however, it is recommended that they be used. + +Where the Location Class is used to identify a country, if the geonames URI is not known, the recommendation is to use DBpedia URIs of the form http://dbpedia.org/resource/ISO_3166-1:XX where XX is the ISO 3166 two character code for the country. + +The EU's Publication Office diverges from ISO 3166-1 and uses EL and UK for Greece and the United Kingdom respectively. DBpedia sticks to the ISO codes and so the correct URIs for these countries are: + +- http://dbpedia.org/resource/ISO_3166-1:GR +- http://dbpedia.org/resource/ISO_3166-1:GB +even when the geographic name is given as EL or UK. + +The use of a URIs has added advantages: + +- it can be used by automated systems to look up additional data (linked data); +- a triple store may store only one copy of the URI, whereas if a string is used, a copy of that string is always stored for each and every person in the database. Thus, in large data sets, the saving on memory capacity and the improvement in transmission efficiency can be substantial. + + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#geometry> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#geometry> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Geometry + + + + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesSpecificPlaceOfPerformance> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesSpecificPlaceOfPerformance> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Defines specific place of performance + + + Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a specific place of performance. + + + + + + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#addressID> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#addressID> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Address i d + + + A globally unique identifier for each instance of an Address. + +Additional Information: +The concept of adding a globally unique identifier for each instance of an address is a crucial part of the INSPIRE data spec. A number of EU countries have already implemented an ID (a UUID) in their Address Register/gazetteer, among them Denmark. OASIS xAL also includes an address identifier. It is the address Identifier that allows an address to be represented in a format other than INSPIRE whilst remaining conformant to the Core Vocabulary. + +The INSPIRE method of representing addresses is very detailed, designed primarily for use in databases of addresses. Whilst data that is published in full conformance with the INSPIRE data structure can be made available using the Location Core Vocabulary the reverse is not true since the Core Vocabulary allows much greater flexibility. + +Many datasets that include address data as one piece of information about something else are likely to have that data in simpler formats. These might be tailored to the specific need of the dataset, follow a national norm, or make use of a standard like vCard. + +To provide maximum flexibility in the Core Vocabulary, whilst remaining interoperable with INSPIRE Address Guidelines (which EU Member States are obliged to use), the Location Core Vocabulary provides the extra property of full address and makes use of INSPIRE's addressID. + + + + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#needsToBeAWinner> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#needsToBeAWinner> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesOpeningPlace> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesOpeningPlace> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Needs to be a winner - - - The Contractor must be a Winner. - - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#signedByContractor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#signedByContractor> ?this .} - - - - + + Defines opening place - - - - - Signed by contractor + + The place where the tenders will be publicly opened. + +WG Approval 10-10-2019 - - + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#bindsContractor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#bindsContractor> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToContractSpecificTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToContractSpecificTerm> ?this .} - + - - + + - - Binds contractor - - - Provides legal constraint on the Contractor. + + Is subject to contract specific term - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesMediator> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesMediator> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#involvesProcurementDocument> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#involvesProcurementDocument> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines mediator + + Involves procurement document - - Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has a Mediator. + + - - + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#distributesOffer> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#distributesOffer> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTenderValidityDuration> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTenderValidityDuration> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Distributes offer + + Has tender validity duration - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesOfflineAccessProvider> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesOfflineAccessProvider> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTenderValidityPeriod> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTenderValidityPeriod> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines offline access provider + + Has tender validity period - - Relation indicating an AccessTerm has an OfflineAccessProvider. + + The relation indicating until when a tender instance is applicable. + - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesParticipationRequestProcessor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesParticipationRequestProcessor> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesContractDuration> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesContractDuration> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines participation request processor + + Defines contract duration - - Relation indicating a ParticipationRequestTerm has a ParticipationRequestProcessor. + + Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Duration. - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesParticipationRequestReceiver> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesParticipationRequestReceiver> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesSubcontractingTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesSubcontractingTerm> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines participation request receiver + + Defines subcontracting term - - Relation indicating a ParticipationRequestTerm has a ParticipationRequestReceiver. + + Relation indicating a term has a subterm. - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesPaymentExecutor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesPaymentExecutor> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesContractPeriod> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesContractPeriod> ?this .} - + - - + + - - Defines payment executor - - - Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a PaymentExecutor. + + Defines contract period - - + + Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Period. - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesPrize> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesPrize> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines procurement procedure information provider + + Defines prize - - Relation indicating an AccessTerm has a ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider. + + Relation indicating a DesignContestRegimeTerm has a Prize. - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesSubcontractors> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#specifiesSubcontractors> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasQualificationSystemDuration> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasQualificationSystemDuration> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Specifies subcontractors + + Has qualification system duration - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#substantiatesExclusionGround> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#substantiatesExclusionGround> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPrizeValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPrizeValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Substantiates exclusion ground + + Has prize value - - + + The monetary value of a prize, if any, for the winner (or runners-up) of the design contest. + +Additional Information: +This corresponds to BT-644 in eForms. + +WG Approval 29/08/2019 + + - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#needsToBeATenderer> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#needsToBeATenderer> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/constrains> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/constrains> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Needs to be a tenderer - - - The Winner must be a Tenderer. + + Constrains - - + + Information Concept about which a Constraint expresses a limitation. + +Additional Information: +Information Concepts are tools to make Requirements more machine processable: they allow to provide more detail about a Requirement. This way, Constraints can be made very precise, namely the limit that must be achieved, is a limit on the value for the associated Information Concept. For example, the Information Concept would be the age of a person and the Constraint would be the required age in the context of a specific evaluation. - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmitedBy> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubmitedBy> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasConstraint> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasConstraint> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is submited by - - - Relation indicating the submission of a tender by an economic operator. -WG approval 18/05/2021 + + Has constraint - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesTenderProcessor> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesTenderProcessor> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasValidityPeriod> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasValidityPeriod> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines tender processor - - - Relation indicating a SubmissionTerm has a TenderProcessor. + + Has validity period - - + + The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesTenderReceiver> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesTenderReceiver> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/supportsRequirement> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/supportsRequirement> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines tender receiver - - - Relation indicating a SubmissionTerm has a TenderReceiver. + + Supports requirement - - + + Requirement for which the Evidence provides proof. - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/address> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/address> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/supportsConcept> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/supportsConcept> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Address + + Supports concept - - Associates any Resource with the corresponding Address. + + Information Concept providing facts found/inferred from the Evidence. Additional Information: -Asserting the address relationship implies that the Resource has an Address. - +Examples of Information Concepts are values found explictly in the evidence such as a birth date or information derived from the Evidence such as "I am older that 18 years" or "this is a FairTrade product". - + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEndpointIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasEndpointIdentifier> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has endpoint identifier + + Identifier - + + Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. + + - + 1 - + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} - - + + - + - + Identifier - + Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. - - - - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#address> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#address> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/hasRequirement> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/hasRequirement> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Address + + Has requirement - - + + A more specific Requirement that is part of the Requirement. - + + + + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#geographicIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#geographicIdentifier> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#attestedByLabel> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#attestedByLabel> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Geographic identifier + + Attested by label - - A URI that identifies the Location. - -Additional Information: -GeoNames.org provides stable, widely recognised identifiers for more than 10 million geographical names that can be used as links to further information. For example, http://sws.geonames.org/593116/ identifies the Lithuanian capital Vilnius. Unfortunately these URIs cannot easily be automatically deduced since the URI scheme uses simple numeric codes. Finding a GeoNames identifier for a Location is almost always a manual process. Where such identifiers are known or can be found, however, it is recommended that they be used. - -Where the Location Class is used to identify a country, if the geonames URI is not known, the recommendation is to use DBpedia URIs of the form http://dbpedia.org/resource/ISO_3166-1:XX where XX is the ISO 3166 two character code for the country. - -The EU's Publication Office diverges from ISO 3166-1 and uses EL and UK for Greece and the United Kingdom respectively. DBpedia sticks to the ISO codes and so the correct URIs for these countries are: - -- http://dbpedia.org/resource/ISO_3166-1:GR -- http://dbpedia.org/resource/ISO_3166-1:GB -even when the geographic name is given as EL or UK. - -The use of a URIs has added advantages: + + Relation indicating which label the certificate is about. -- it can be used by automated systems to look up additional data (linked data); -- a triple store may store only one copy of the URI, whereas if a string is used, a copy of that string is always stored for each and every person in the database. Thus, in large data sets, the saving on memory capacity and the improvement in transmission efficiency can be substantial. - +WG approval 28/07/2022 - - + + - + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#geometry> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#geometry> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsGreenProcurement> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsGreenProcurement> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Geometry + + Concerns green procurement - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesSpecificPlaceOfPerformance> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesSpecificPlaceOfPerformance> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasValidityPeriod> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasValidityPeriod> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines specific place of performance + + Has validity period - - Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a specific place of performance. + + The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 + - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#addressID> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#addressID> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasAwardedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasAwardedValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Address i d + + Has awarded value - - A globally unique identifier for each instance of an Address. + + The value of the procurement provided by the Award Decision. Additional Information: -The concept of adding a globally unique identifier for each instance of an address is a crucial part of the INSPIRE data spec. A number of EU countries have already implemented an ID (a UUID) in their Address Register/gazetteer, among them Denmark. OASIS xAL also includes an address identifier. It is the address Identifier that allows an address to be represented in a format other than INSPIRE whilst remaining conformant to the Core Vocabulary. - -The INSPIRE method of representing addresses is very detailed, designed primarily for use in databases of addresses. Whilst data that is published in full conformance with the INSPIRE data structure can be made available using the Location Core Vocabulary the reverse is not true since the Core Vocabulary allows much greater flexibility. +Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. -Many datasets that include address data as one piece of information about something else are likely to have that data in simpler formats. These might be tailored to the specific need of the dataset, follow a national norm, or make use of a standard like vCard. +In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum awarded value. -To provide maximum flexibility in the Core Vocabulary, whilst remaining interoperable with INSPIRE Address Guidelines (which EU Member States are obliged to use), the Location Core Vocabulary provides the extra property of full address and makes use of INSPIRE's addressID. - - - +WG Approval 10/12/2019 - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesOpeningPlace> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesOpeningPlace> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesTenderAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesTenderAwardOutcome> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines opening place + + Comprises tender award outcome - - The place where the tenders will be publicly opened. - -WG Approval 10-10-2019 + + Incorporates TenderAwardOutcome. - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToContractSpecificTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#isSubjectToContractSpecificTerm> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasBargainPrice> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasBargainPrice> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Is subject to contract specific term + + Has bargain price - - + + The value of procured supplies that have used a particularly advantageous opportunity available for a very short time at a value considerably lower than normal market prices. + +WG approval 23/05/2023 - - 1 - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#involvesProcurementDocument> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#involvesProcurementDocument> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#comprisesAwardOutcome> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Involves procurement document + + Comprises award outcome - - + + Incorporates AwardOutcome. - + + + + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTenderValidityPeriod> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTenderValidityPeriod> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has tender validity period + + Summarises information for award outcome - - The relation indicating until when a tender instance is applicable. - + + Relates to submission for the given competition, either at Lot level or Mini-Competition level. + +WG approval 30/05/2023 - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesContractDuration> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesContractDuration> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines contract duration - - - Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Duration. + + Has framework agreement maximum value - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesSubcontractingTerm> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesSubcontractingTerm> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines subcontracting term - - - Relation indicating a term has a subterm. + + Has approximate framework agreement value - - + + The estimated value to be spent within the Framework Agreement(s). + +Additional information: +In the case of an Award Decision for a Lot, this relation represents the estimated value for the awarded Framework Agreement. +In the case of a Notice, this relation represents the estimated value for all Framework Agreements covered by the Notice. + - - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesContractPeriod> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesContractPeriod> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromLotAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromLotAwardOutcome> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines contract period - - - Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Period. + + Results from lot award outcome - - + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesPrize> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#definesPrize> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromLotAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromLotAwardOutcome> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Defines prize - - - Relation indicating a DesignContestRegimeTerm has a Prize. + + Results from lot award outcome - + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has launch framework agreement maximum value + + Has group framework agreement maximum value - - + + This corresponds to BT-156 in the eForms. + + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLaunchGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLaunchGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromUsingCandidateList> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromUsingCandidateList> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has launch group framework agreement maximum value + + Results from using candidate list - - + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasQualificationSystemDuration> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasQualificationSystemDuration> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has qualification system duration + + Results from mini competition award outcome - + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPrizeValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasPrizeValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has prize value + + Has maximum framework agreement awarded value - - The monetary value of a prize, if any, for the winner (or runners-up) of the design contest. + + The maximum value which can be spent through all the framework agreements announced in this notice, including options and renewals of contracts. -Additional Information: -This corresponds to BT-644 in eForms. +Additional information: -WG Approval 29/08/2019 +The value provided is a threshold value that implicity means that it cannot be exceeded however it may not be reached during the execution of a contract. - +The Framework Agreements in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. + +This corresponds to the BT-118 in eForms. + +WG Approval 03/12/2019 - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/constrains> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/constrains> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Constrains + + Has procurement highest received tender value - - Information Concept about which a Constraint expresses a limitation. + + The highest received tender value for the procurement. Additional Information: -Information Concepts are tools to make Requirements more machine processable: they allow to provide more detail about a Requirement. This way, Constraints can be made very precise, namely the limit that must be achieved, is a limit on the value for the associated Information Concept. For example, the Information Concept would be the age of a person and the Constraint would be the required age in the context of a specific evaluation. - - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasConstraint> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasConstraint> ?this .} - - - - +This corresponds to section II.1.7.3. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986. - - - - - Has constraint + + - - + + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/supportsRequirement> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/supportsRequirement> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Supports requirement + + Has approximate framework agreement value - - Requirement for which the Evidence provides proof. + + The estimated value to be spent within the Framework Agreement(s). + +Additional information: +In the case of an Award Decision for a Lot, this relation represents the estimated value for the awarded Framework Agreement. +In the case of a Notice, this relation represents the estimated value for all Framework Agreements covered by the Notice. + - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/supportsConcept> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/supportsConcept> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Supports concept + + Has procurement lowest received tender value - - Information Concept providing facts found/inferred from the Evidence. + + The lowest received tender value for the procurement. Additional Information: -Examples of Information Concepts are values found explictly in the evidence such as a birth date or information derived from the Evidence such as "I am older that 18 years" or "this is a FairTrade product". +This corresponds to section II.1.7.2. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986. - - + + - + 1 - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?that . ?that <http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#identifier> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Identifier - - - Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class. - - - - - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/hasRequirement> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/m8g/hasRequirement> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalAwardedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasTotalAwardedValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has requirement + + Has total awarded value - - A more specific Requirement that is part of the Requirement. + + The awarded value of all lots announced in this notice, including options and renewals. + +Additional information: +The values of the individual Lots awarded under a framework agreement and mentioned in this notice are included. + +The values of the individual lots announced in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. + +This corresponds to the BT-161 in eForms. + +WG Approval 03/12/2019 + - - + + - + 1 - 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsGreenProcurement> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsGreenProcurement> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasStartDate> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasStartDate> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Concerns green procurement + + Has start date - - + + - + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasValidityPeriod> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasValidityPeriod> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsTender> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsTender> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has validity period - - - The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - + + Concerns tender @@ -11497,51 +11958,76 @@ WG Approval 07/01/2020 Foresees concession - + + + + + 1 + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToContract> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToContract> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Refers to contract + + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasSubcontractingEstimatedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasSubcontractingEstimatedValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#providesContractTotalPenaltyValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#providesContractTotalPenaltyValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has subcontracting estimated value + + Provides contract total penalty value - - The estimated value of a single subcontract. - -This relates to BT-553 in eForms. - -WG Approval 01/09/2020 - + + +Additional Information: +This corresponds to BT-782 in eForms. - - + + - + + 1 + + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesSubcontracting> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesSubcontracting> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#providesContractTotalPaymentValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#providesContractTotalPaymentValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Foresees subcontracting + + Provides contract total payment value + + + Additional Information: +This corresponds to BT-779 in eForms. @@ -11564,138 +12050,113 @@ WG Approval 01/09/2020 Additional information: This relation corresponds in eForms to BG-613 Buyer Review Requests - - - - - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasHighestReceivedTenderValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasHighestReceivedTenderValue> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Has highest received tender value - - - Amount of the Tender with the highest value. - -Additional Information -The value must correspond to an admissible tender. For example, tenders compliant with the procurement document requirements, not having an abnormally low price or cost, etc. - - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - - - - + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLowestReceivedTenderValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLowestReceivedTenderValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasSubcontractingEstimatedValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasSubcontractingEstimatedValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has lowest received tender value + + Has subcontracting estimated value - - Amount of the Tender with the lowest value. + + The estimated value of a single subcontract. -Additional Information -The value must correspond to an admissible tender. For example, tenders compliant with the procurement document requirements, not having an abnormally low price or cost, etc. +This relates to BT-553 in eForms. -WG Approval 12/12/2019 +WG Approval 01/09/2020 - - - - - 1 - 1 + + - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToContract> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToContract> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesSubcontracting> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#foreseesSubcontracting> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Refers to contract + + Foresees subcontracting - + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#providesContractTotalPenaltyValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#providesContractTotalPenaltyValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasHighestReceivedTenderValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasHighestReceivedTenderValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Provides contract total penalty value + + Has highest received tender value - - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to BT-782 in eForms. + + Amount of the Tender with the highest value. + +Additional Information +The value must correspond to an admissible tender. For example, tenders compliant with the procurement document requirements, not having an abnormally low price or cost, etc. + + +WG Approval 12/12/2019 + + - + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#providesContractTotalPaymentValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#providesContractTotalPaymentValue> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLowestReceivedTenderValue> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasLowestReceivedTenderValue> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Provides contract total payment value + + Has lowest received tender value - - Additional Information: -This corresponds to BT-779 in eForms. + + Amount of the Tender with the lowest value. + +Additional Information +The value must correspond to an admissible tender. For example, tenders compliant with the procurement document requirements, not having an abnormally low price or cost, etc. + +WG Approval 12/12/2019 + + @@ -11816,23 +12277,6 @@ WGM 01/03/2022 Refers to previous - - - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasNonPublishedInformation> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasNonPublishedInformation> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Has non published information - @@ -11853,49 +12297,74 @@ WGM 01/03/2022 Refers to notice - - + + + + + 1 + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasNoticeChangeInformation> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasNoticeChangeInformation> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsNotice> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsNotice> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has notice change information + + Concerns notice - + - + 1 1 - + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousNotice> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToPreviousNotice> ?this .} - - + + - + - + Refers to previous notice - + Additional information: This corresponds in eForms to BT-758 Change Notice Version Identifier. + + + + + 1 + 1 + + + + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsNotice> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#concernsNotice> ?this .} + + + + + + + + + + Concerns notice + @@ -12156,107 +12625,45 @@ This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-785 "Review Previous Identifier".Additional information: This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-795 Review Request Fee. - - - - - 1 - - - - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasElementChange> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasElementChange> ?this .} - - - - - - - - - - Has element change - - + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasNonPublishedInformationIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#hasNonPublishedInformationIdentifier> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier> ?this .} - - + + - - + + - - Has non published information identifier + + Relates to e form section identifier - + - + 1 - + - SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToEFormSectionIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#refersToEFormSectionIdentifier> ?this .} + SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier> ?that . ?that <http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier> ?this .} - - - - - - - - Refers to e form section identifier - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has award status - - - Indicates whether the lot is awarded, not awarded or still open. -WG Approval 03/12/2019 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - + + - - + + - - Has non award justification - - - On hold; Enumeration. - - - + + Relates to e form section identifier @@ -13101,6 +13508,24 @@ This corresponds in eForms to BT-747 Selection Criteria Type. WG Approval 09/11/2021 + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has label type + + + The label type such environmental, quality, social etc. + @@ -13258,6 +13683,48 @@ The codelist to be used is at-voc:dps-usage which is available at http://publica The codelist to be used is at-voc:usage which is available at http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/usage + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has award status + + + Indicates whether the lot is awarded, not awarded or still open. +WG Approval 03/12/2019 + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has non award justification + + + On hold; Enumeration. + + @@ -13358,9 +13825,6 @@ WG Acceptance 06/09/2022 - - 1 - @@ -13393,21 +13857,6 @@ This holds for standard forms. Has notice type - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - Conforms to specific legal basis - @@ -13565,6 +14014,30 @@ This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-791 Review Irregularity Type Additional information: This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-792 Review Remedy Type + + + + + + 1 + 1 + + + + + + + + + Has change justification + + + The motives for the change. + +WG 5/11/2019 + +The codelist to be used is at-voc:change-corrig-justification which is available at +http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/change-corrig-justification @@ -13586,30 +14059,6 @@ This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-792 Review Remedy TypeThe reason why data is not published. WG Approval 11/06/2020 - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - - - - Has change justification - - - The motives for the change. - -WG 5/11/2019 - -The codelist to be used is at-voc:change-corrig-justification which is available at -http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/change-corrig-justification @@ -13683,53 +14132,12 @@ http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/change-corrig-justification Unit type - - Lot may be the object of more than one contract if it's a cascading situation. Otherwise, it is exactly one. - -Contract object is defined as follows: -All things which are not outside the commerce of men may be the object of a contract. Similarly, all services which are not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy may be the object of a contract. - - Used in F18 (and other standard forms) which is out of scope. We will need to reuse them for the Contract. - - - Used in F18 (and other standard forms) which is out of scope. We will need to reuse them for the Contract. + Used in F18 and other standard forms. - - Proposal to omit this link until we bring tax into ePO core because this does not appear in the data - - - - <b>Procedure/ PlannedProcurementPart / Lot</b> are a conflation of three aspects into one: -- the procedural / process / game rules -- the object/scope/purpose of procurement -- the description of influences or additional information related to the procurement (isSME suitable, isUsingEuFunds, etc.) - -TODO: the definitions NEED to be aligned, for now, to cover all three aspects! Possibly in the future model a separation of concerns for higher clarity/accuracy. - - -Note: -The current procedure class is a conflation of the "process" description and "whole procurement subject matter". - -TODO: revise this definition. -TODO: specify that all procedures have al least one lot. + + should this be review? - - - should this be moved to document? - - - if PlannedProcurementPart has Terms, it should be a subclass of ProcurementObject. - - - In order to align with Core Voc, it means we need to add cv:LegalEntity and org:FormalOrganization between org:Organisation and epo:Business. - - - In order to align with Core Voc, it means we need to add cv:LegalEntity and org:FormalOrganization between org:Organisation and epo:Business. - - - A dependency enumeration will be created and a codelist added for hasLegalFormType. -check WGM 17/01/2023 based on eForms (BT-124) a Channel may differ per Lot @@ -13738,25 +14146,20 @@ based on standard forms, a channel may differ per procedure BT-08 can be Awarding CBP; BG-03 is the Buyer. But Awarding CPB is not the same as the Buyer; the organisations may differ for these roles. Having the Awarder Role allows us to specify which Organisation is involved in the Award Decision. - - Context: -Consumption or end use of the procurement (goods and service). + + Here we have roles that belong to other modules (check all). +Discuss whether we need to move them. + Revise the Term hierarchy. e.g. ReviewTerm is per Procedure in SF (to be investigated how it is in eForms). - - Estimated dates are not really conditions and stipulations, they are not terms. We need to segregate the procedural/process information from the procurement-object information in the future. - - - Estimated dates are not really conditions and stipulations, they are not terms. We need to segregate the procedural/process information from the procurement-object information in the future. - What are the entities that can be reviewed? - + Added hasAdditionalInformation to cover for section VII.2 in F14, since we do not have the Corrigendum notice type anymore in eForms. diff --git a/implementation/ePO/shacl_shapes/ePO_CM-shacl.ttl b/implementation/ePO/shacl_shapes/ePO_CM-shacl.ttl index 2e131227..ae4f627e 100644 --- a/implementation/ePO/shacl_shapes/ePO_CM-shacl.ttl +++ b/implementation/ePO/shacl_shapes/ePO_CM-shacl.ttl @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ @prefix : . @prefix adms: . @prefix at-voc: . +@prefix at-voc-new: . @prefix bibo: . @prefix cc: . @prefix cccev: . @@ -62,7 +63,8 @@ core-shape:cccev-Evidence a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:cccev-Evidence-cccev-confidentialityLevelType, core-shape:cccev-Evidence-cccev-supportsConcept, - core-shape:cccev-Evidence-cccev-supportsRequirement ; + core-shape:cccev-Evidence-cccev-supportsRequirement, + core-shape:cccev-Evidence-epo-hasValidityPeriod ; sh:targetClass cccev:Evidence . core-shape:cccev-InformationConcept a sh:NodeShape ; @@ -83,7 +85,8 @@ Requirement is a generic class representing any type of prerequisite that may be To illustrate the notion: the European Directive on services in the internal market defines requirement as any obligation, prohibition, condition or limit provided for in the laws, regulations or administrative provisions of the Member States or in consequence of case-law, administrative practice, the rules of professional bodies, or the collective rules of professional associations or other professional Organisations, adopted in the exercise of their legal autonomy. To stay consistent to how identification is realised in the eProcurement ontology, we switch to using `adms:identifier` instead of `dct:identifier` as per CCCEV specification.""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:property core-shape:cccev-Requirement-cccev-hasRequirement, + sh:property core-shape:cccev-Requirement-adms-identifier, + core-shape:cccev-Requirement-cccev-hasRequirement, core-shape:cccev-Requirement-dct-description, core-shape:cccev-Requirement-skos-prefLabel ; sh:targetClass cccev:Requirement . @@ -233,7 +236,10 @@ WG Acceptance 10/01/2023 core-shape:epo-AgentInRole a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Agent in role" ; - rdfs:comment """Relative concept that ties an Agent to a part they play in a given Situational Context. + rdfs:comment """Here we have roles that belong to other modules (check all). +Discuss whether we need to move them. +""", + """Relative concept that ties an Agent to a part they play in a given Situational Context. Additional information: The classification of roles is based is based on the degree of involvement into the Procurement Process: @@ -334,8 +340,7 @@ core-shape:epo-Business a sh:NodeShape ; WG Approval 28/04/2020 -""", - "In order to align with Core Voc, it means we need to add cv:LegalEntity and org:FormalOrganization between org:Organisation and epo:Business." ; +""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-Business-epo-hasBeneficialOwner, core-shape:epo-Business-epo-hasBusinessSize, @@ -406,6 +411,63 @@ WG approval 05/08/2021""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:targetClass :CentralPurchasingBody . +core-shape:epo-Certificate a sh:NodeShape ; + rdfs:label "Certificate" ; + rdfs:comment """Proof of conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. + +Additional Information: +Certificates provide assurance of credibility, trust, and transparency in the procurement process. + +WG approval 16/05/2023 +""" ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; + sh:property core-shape:epo-Certificate-epo-attestedByLabel, + core-shape:epo-Certificate-epo-hasCertificationNumber, + core-shape:epo-Certificate-epo-hasURL, + core-shape:epo-Certificate-epo-issuedByCertifier ; + sh:targetClass :Certificate . + +core-shape:epo-CertificationLabel a sh:NodeShape ; + rdfs:label "Certification label" ; + rdfs:comment """Concept that stands for a set of norms, expectations, standards and policies. + +Additional Information: +Such standards may relate to social, ethical and quality etc. + +WG approval 26/07/2022 +""" ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; + sh:property core-shape:epo-CertificationLabel-epo-hasLabelType, + core-shape:epo-CertificationLabel-epo-hasReferenceURI ; + sh:targetClass :CertificationLabel . + +core-shape:epo-Certifier a sh:NodeShape ; + rdfs:label "Certifier" ; + rdfs:comment """The role of an agent who issues a certificate. + +Additional Information: +The certifier is responsible for verifying and confirming the conformance of the instance of the concept to a defined set of criteria. + +WG approval 16/05/2023""" ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; + sh:targetClass :Certifier . + +core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation a sh:NodeShape ; + rdfs:label "Change information" ; + rdfs:comment "Added hasAdditionalInformation to cover for section VII.2 in F14, since we do not have the Corrigendum notice type anymore in eForms.", + "Alteration to previously provided details." ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; + sh:property core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation-epo-concernsNotice, + core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation-epo-hasAdditionalInformation, + core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation-epo-hasChangeDescription, + core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation-epo-hasChangeJustification, + core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation-epo-hasChangeReasonDescription, + core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation-epo-hasProcurementDocumentChangeDate, + core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation-epo-isProcurementDocumentChanged, + core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation-epo-refersToPreviousNotice, + core-shape:epo-ChangeInformation-epo-relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier ; + sh:targetClass :ChangeInformation . + core-shape:epo-ConcessionContract a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Concession contract" ; rdfs:comment """A Contract between one or more Buyers and one or more Economic Operators giving the right to the Economic Operators to exploit the rights foreseen in the Contract which may include the receipt of Payments. @@ -423,8 +485,8 @@ core-shape:epo-ConcessionEstimate a sh:NodeShape ; core-shape:epo-ConcessionEstimate-epo-hasEstimatedUserConcessionRevenue ; sh:targetClass :ConcessionEstimate . -core-shape:epo-ContextSpecificDescription a sh:NodeShape ; - rdfs:label "Context specific description" ; +core-shape:epo-ContextDescription a sh:NodeShape ; + rdfs:label "Context description" ; rdfs:comment """A description concerning a Procurement Object or a Notice in a specific Situation Context. Additional Information: @@ -433,7 +495,7 @@ The description has its own identity (+I) but is dependent (+D) on the concerned We say that ContextSpecificDescription *concerns* an Entity. """ ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:targetClass :ContextSpecificDescription . + sh:targetClass :ContextDescription . core-shape:epo-ContextualProjection a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Contextual projection" ; @@ -456,11 +518,7 @@ core-shape:epo-Contract a sh:NodeShape ; Additional information: This includes Concession Contracts. -(WG approval 01/06/2018)""", - """Lot may be the object of more than one contract if it's a cascading situation. Otherwise, it is exactly one. - -Contract object is defined as follows: -All things which are not outside the commerce of men may be the object of a contract. Similarly, all services which are not contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy may be the object of a contract.""" ; +WG approval 01/06/2018""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-bindsBuyer, core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-bindsContractor, @@ -541,6 +599,7 @@ core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm a sh:NodeShape ; WG approval: 04-02-2021""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-definesPrize, + core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-hasDescriptionOfPrizes, core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-hasFollowupContract, core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-hasFollowupContractInformation, core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-hasParticipationPayment, @@ -639,20 +698,6 @@ core-shape:epo-ElectronicSignature a sh:NodeShape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-ElectronicSignature-dct-description ; sh:targetClass :ElectronicSignature . -core-shape:epo-ElementChangeDescription a sh:NodeShape ; - rdfs:label "Element change description" ; - rdfs:comment "Information about a specific field to be changed with regard to a previous Notice." ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:property core-shape:epo-ElementChangeDescription-epo-hasElementReference, - core-shape:epo-ElementChangeDescription-epo-hasPreviousVersionOfElementReference ; - sh:targetClass :ElementChangeDescription . - -core-shape:epo-ElementDescription a sh:NodeShape ; - rdfs:label "Element description" ; - rdfs:comment "Description about a specific resource." ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:targetClass :ElementDescription . - core-shape:epo-EmploymentInformationProvider a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Employment information provider" ; rdfs:comment "A Role of an Agent responsible for providing information concerning the general regulatory framework for employment protection and working conditions." ; @@ -732,8 +777,6 @@ core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm a sh:NodeShape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasBuyerCategoryDescription, core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasDurationExtensionJustification, core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasFrameworkAgreementType, - core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue, - core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasLaunchGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue, core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasMaximumParticipantsNumber ; sh:targetClass :FrameworkAgreementTerm . @@ -768,7 +811,6 @@ core-shape:epo-GreenProcurement a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:comment """Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure with a reduced Environmental Impact. Additional Information: - The approach may apply to the complete life cycle. The reduced Environmental Impact is in comparison to goods, services and works with the same primary function that would otherwise be procured. Tightly related are article 68 - Life-cycle costing and article 67 - most economically advantageous Tender (see GPP handbook) https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/Buying-Green-Handbook-3rd-Edition.pdf @@ -785,21 +827,14 @@ core-shape:epo-IndefiniteDuration a sh:NodeShape ; core-shape:epo-InnovativeProcurement a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Innovative procurement" ; - rdfs:comment """An instance of the class InnovativeProcurement is represented in eForms with the code "inn-pur" defined in the codelist Strategic-Procurement. - -Research (21/01/2020): - -Purchasing and early adoption of solutions which are not yet available on large scale commercial basis. - -Source: Adapted from the Digital Single Market's Policy on Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/public-procurement-innovative-solutions + rdfs:comment """Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure an innovative work, supply or service. Additional Information: ‘innovation’ means the implementation of a new or significantly improved product, service or process, including but not limited to production, building or construction processes, a new marketing method, or a new organizational method in business practices, workplace Organisation or external relations inter alia with the purpose of helping to solve societal challenges or to support the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; See: Directive 2014/24 Articles: 2, 26 (3), 31, 67 (2.a) -Question: -Is Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) another type of Strategic Procurement?""" ; +""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-InnovativeProcurement-epo-fulfillsRequirement ; sh:targetClass :InnovativeProcurement . @@ -834,8 +869,6 @@ core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-concernsLot, core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue, - core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasAwardedEstimatedValue, - core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue, core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue, core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasNonAwardedContractNumber, core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasNonAwardedContractTitle ; @@ -856,6 +889,11 @@ Pending of discussion with eForms Member States may provide that, where more than one lot may be awarded to the same tenderer, contracting authorities may award contracts combining several or all lots where they have specified in the contract notice or in the invitation to confirm interest that they reserve the possibility of doing so and indicate the lots or groups of lots that may be combined.""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-LotGroup-adms-identifier, + core-shape:epo-LotGroup-dct-description, + core-shape:epo-LotGroup-dct-title, + core-shape:epo-LotGroup-epo-hasEstimatedValue, + core-shape:epo-LotGroup-epo-hasInternalIdentifier, + core-shape:epo-LotGroup-epo-hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue, core-shape:epo-LotGroup-epo-setsGroupingContextForLot, core-shape:epo-LotGroup-epo-specifiesProcurementCriterion ; sh:targetClass :LotGroup . @@ -944,10 +982,11 @@ The non-published information may become available at a later date and may diffe Examples of fields that may not be immediately published are Winner, Tender and Procedure Lot Result, etc., e.g. for security reasons. """ ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:property core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-hasAccessibilityDate, + sh:property core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-concernsNotice, + core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-hasAccessibilityDate, core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-hasConfidentialityJustification, core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-hasNonPublicationJustification, - core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-hasNonPublishedInformationIdentifier ; + core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-relatesToEFormSectionIdentifier ; sh:targetClass :NonPublishedInformation . core-shape:epo-Notice a sh:NodeShape ; @@ -958,15 +997,11 @@ WG Approval 23/05/2019 """ ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-conformsToLegalBasis, - core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-conformsToSpecificLegalBasis, core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasAdditionalInformation, core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasEFormsSubtype, core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasESenderDispatchDate, core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasFormNumber, core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasFormType, - core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasLongTitle, - core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasNonPublishedInformation, - core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasNoticeChangeInformation, core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasNoticePublicationNumber, core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasNoticeType, core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasOJSIssueNumber, @@ -988,22 +1023,6 @@ core-shape:epo-NoticeAwardInformation a sh:NodeShape ; core-shape:epo-NoticeAwardInformation-epo-hasTotalAwardedValue ; sh:targetClass :NoticeAwardInformation . -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation a sh:NodeShape ; - rdfs:label "Notice change information" ; - rdfs:comment "Added hasAdditionalInformation to cover for section VII.2 in F14, since we do not have the Corrigendum notice type anymore in eForms.", - "Information about a corrigendum in a Notice." ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:property core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasAdditionalInformation, - core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasChangeDescription, - core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasChangeJustification, - core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasChangeReasonDescription, - core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasElementChange, - core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasProcurementDocumentChangeDate, - core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-isProcurementDocumentChanged, - core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-refersToEFormSectionIdentifier, - core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-refersToPreviousNotice ; - sh:targetClass :NoticeChangeInformation . - core-shape:epo-Offer a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Offer" ; rdfs:comment """Document providing the Monetary Value and the details to fulfill the Requirements set out in the Procurement Documents or Request for Offer. @@ -1137,8 +1156,7 @@ core-shape:epo-PlannedProcurementPart a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Planned procurement part" ; rdfs:comment """A subdivision of a Planned Procurement that may later become one or more Lots or a self-standing Procedure. A Lot or a Procedure can also cover one or more parts of the Planned Procurement. -WG Approval 20/06/2019""", - "if PlannedProcurementPart has Terms, it should be a subclass of ProcurementObject." ; +WG Approval 20/06/2019""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:epo-PlannedProcurementPart-epo-foreseesProcurementObject, core-shape:epo-PlannedProcurementPart-epo-foreseesTechnique, @@ -1206,7 +1224,7 @@ core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm a sh:NodeShape ; core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-hasNationalProcedureRules, core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-isAwardedByCPB, core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-isOneLotOnlyAllowed, - core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-isSubmissionForAllLotsAllowed ; + core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-isSubmissionForAllLotsRequired ; sh:targetClass :ProcedureTerm . core-shape:epo-ProcessPlanningTerm a sh:NodeShape ; @@ -1275,22 +1293,7 @@ Alias: ProcurementComponent""" ; core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Procurement object" ; - rdfs:comment """Procedure/ PlannedProcurementPart / Lot are a conflation of three aspects into one: -- the procedural / process / game rules -- the object/scope/purpose of procurement -- the description of influences or additional information related to the procurement (isSME suitable, isUsingEuFunds, etc.) - -TODO: the definitions NEED to be aligned, for now, to cover all three aspects! Possibly in the future model a separation of concerns for higher clarity/accuracy. - - -Note: -The current procedure class is a conflation of the "process" description and "whole procurement subject matter". - -TODO: revise this definition. -TODO: specify that all procedures have al least one lot. -""", - "Estimated dates are not really conditions and stipulations, they are not terms. We need to segregate the procedural/process information from the procurement-object information in the future. ", - """The whole or a division of goods, services or works to be procured. + rdfs:comment """The whole or a division of goods, services or works to be procured. Additional Information: Anything that can specify the procurement content (i.e. goods, services, work) is a Procurement Object. @@ -1304,6 +1307,7 @@ Procedure, seems to be an exception from this rule. Because it is a conflated te core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-foreseesContractSpecificTerm, core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-fulfillsStrategicProcurement, core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasAdditionalInformation, + core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue, core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasLegalBasis, core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasLegalBasisDescription, core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasPurpose, @@ -1527,6 +1531,19 @@ WG Approval 23/10/2021""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:targetClass :ReviewRequester . +core-shape:epo-ReviewTerm a sh:NodeShape ; + rdfs:label "Review term" ; + rdfs:comment """Conditions and stipulations defining particularities of the review. + +WG approval 23/11/2018""" ; + rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; + sh:property core-shape:epo-ReviewTerm-epo-definesReviewProcedureInformationProvider, + core-shape:epo-ReviewTerm-epo-definesReviewer, + core-shape:epo-ReviewTerm-epo-hasReviewDeadline, + core-shape:epo-ReviewTerm-epo-hasReviewDeadlineInformation, + core-shape:epo-ReviewTerm-epo-hasReviewProcedure ; + sh:targetClass :ReviewTerm . + core-shape:epo-Reviewer a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Reviewer" ; rdfs:comment """Role of an Agent who investigates the overall correctness of a Procurement Procedure, producing a related report. @@ -1594,12 +1611,10 @@ core-shape:epo-SelectionEvaluationTerm a sh:NodeShape ; core-shape:epo-SocialProcurement a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Social procurement" ; - rdfs:comment """An instance of the class SocialProcurement is represented in eForms with the code "soc-obj" defined in the codelist Strategic-Procurement. - - -Research (21/01/2020): -Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP): + rdfs:comment """Approach whereby Buyers seek to procure by fulfilling social objectives. +Additional Information: +Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP) - ‘SRPP’ means Procurement Operations that take into account one or more of the following social considerations: employment opportunities, decent work, compliance with social and labour rights, social inclusion (including persons with disabilities), equal opportunities, accessibility design for all, taking account of sustainability criteria, including ethical trade issues and wider voluntary compliance with corporate social responsibility (CSR), while observing the principles enshrined in the Treaty for the European Union (TFEU) and the Procurement Directives. Source: Buying Social - A Guide to Taking Account of Social Considerations in Public Procurement (Publications Office of the European Union, 2011) https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cb70c481-0e29-4040-9be2-c408cddf081f/language-en See Article 18 and Annex X Directive 2014/24.""" ; @@ -1743,6 +1758,7 @@ WG Approval 14/07/2020""" ; core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasReceiptTenderDeadline, core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasSubmissionURL, core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasTenderSubcontractingInformation, + core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasTenderValidityDuration, core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasTenderValidityPeriod, core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasVariantPermission, core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-isAdvancedElectronicSignatureRequired, @@ -1812,9 +1828,6 @@ core-shape:epo-Tender a sh:NodeShape ; core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-specifiesSubcontractors ; sh:targetClass :Tender . -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-ord-hasTaxInformation sh:description """Proposal to omit this link until we bring tax into ePO core because this does not appear in the data -""" . - core-shape:epo-TenderAwardOutcome a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Tender award outcome" ; rdfs:comment "Result concerning the Tender attributed by the Awarder." ; @@ -1830,10 +1843,12 @@ core-shape:epo-TenderGroup a sh:NodeShape ; Additional Information: This class is generally used to provide the Monetary Value in response to a Lot Group. -""", - "should this be moved to document?" ; +""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:property core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-epo-comprisesTender, + sh:property core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-adms-identifier, + core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-dct-description, + core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-dct-title, + core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-epo-comprisesTender, core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-epo-hasTotalValue, core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-epo-isSubmittedForLotGroup ; sh:targetClass :TenderGroup . @@ -1863,8 +1878,7 @@ WG approval 05/08/2021""" ; core-shape:epo-Term a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Term" ; - rdfs:comment "A governing condition or stipulation.", - "Estimated dates are not really conditions and stipulations, they are not terms. We need to segregate the procedural/process information from the procurement-object information in the future. " ; + rdfs:comment "A governing condition or stipulation." ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:targetClass :Term . @@ -1903,6 +1917,7 @@ core-shape:foaf-Person a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Person" ; rdfs:comment "The Person class represents people. Something is a Person if it is a Person. We don't nitpick about whether they're alive, dead, real, or imaginary. The Person class is a sub-class of the Agent class, since all people are considered 'Agents' in FOAF." ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; + sh:property core-shape:foaf-Person-epo-hasCertification ; sh:targetClass foaf:Person . core-shape:locn-Address a sh:NodeShape ; @@ -1957,5124 +1972,22 @@ core-shape:org-Organization a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:comment """A collection of people organized together into a community or other social, commercial or political structure. The group has some common purpose or reason for existence which goes beyond the set of people belonging to it and can act as an Agent. Organisations are often decomposable into hierarchical structures. (WG approval 23/11/2018). -""", - """A dependency enumeration will be created and a codelist added for hasLegalFormType. -check WGM 17/01/2023""", - "In order to align with Core Voc, it means we need to add cv:LegalEntity and org:FormalOrganization between org:Organisation and epo:Business." ; +""" ; rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; sh:property core-shape:org-Organization-cv-address, core-shape:org-Organization-cv-registeredAddress, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasBuyerLegalType, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasBuyerLegalTypeDescription, + core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasCertification, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasInternetAddress, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasLegalFormType, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasLegalIdentifier, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasLegalName, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasMainActivity, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasMainActivityDescription, - core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasOrganisationUnitName, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasPrimaryContactPoint, core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasRegistrationCountry, - core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasTaxIdentifier ; + core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasTaxIdentifier, + core-shape:org-Organization-org-subOrganizationOf ; sh:targetClass org:Organization . -core-shape:role rdfs:comment """Context: -Consumption or end use of the procurement (goods and service).""" . - -core-shape:adms-Identifier-adms-schemaAgency a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description "The name of the agency that issued the identifier." ; - sh:name "Schema agency" ; - sh:path adms:schemaAgency . - -core-shape:adms-Identifier-epo-hasScheme a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description "The name of the identification scheme." ; - sh:name "Has scheme" ; - sh:path :hasScheme . - -core-shape:adms-Identifier-epo-hasSchemeVersion a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description "The version of the identification scheme." ; - sh:name "Has scheme version" ; - sh:path :hasSchemeVersion . - -core-shape:adms-Identifier-skos-notation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description "The literal identifying an entity, like a person or an object." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Notation" ; - sh:path skos:notation . - -core-shape:cccev-Constraint-cccev-constrains a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:InformationConcept ; - sh:description """Information Concept about which a Constraint expresses a limitation. - -Additional Information: -Information Concepts are tools to make Requirements more machine processable: they allow to provide more detail about a Requirement. This way, Constraints can be made very precise, namely the limit that must be achieved, is a limit on the value for the associated Information Concept. For example, the Information Concept would be the age of a person and the Constraint would be the required age in the context of a specific evaluation.""" ; - sh:name "Constrains" ; - sh:path cccev:constrains ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cccev-Constraint-epo-hasThresholdType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:number-threshold ; - sh:description """The method to interpret the threshold value as minimum or a maximum. - -WG Approval 17/09/2019 -""" ; - sh:name "Has threshold type" ; - sh:path :hasThresholdType . - -core-shape:cccev-Constraint-epo-hasThresholdValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """The cut-off level for a given concept. - -Additional Information: -This value is given as e.g. a minimum score, a maximum number of tenders with the highest score passing (see codelist at-voc:number-threshold).""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has threshold value" ; - sh:path :hasThresholdValue . - -core-shape:cccev-Criterion-cccev-bias a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """Parameter used to adjust the evaluation of the Criterion. - -Additional Information: -The bias parameter tries to correct a systematic error. For example in procurement, a home bias corresponds to the "presence of local preferences distorting international specialisation and resource allocation". When quantified, this systematic error can be removed.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Bias" ; - sh:path cccev:bias . - -core-shape:cccev-Criterion-cccev-weight a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """Relative importance of the Criterion. - -Additional Information: -The weight must be between 0 and 1. Usually, all Criteria can be integrated within a weighted sum equal to 1.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Weight" ; - sh:path cccev:weight . - -core-shape:cccev-Criterion-cccev-weightingConsiderationDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Explanation of how the weighting of a Criterion is to be used. - -Additional Information: -This description gives the view of the creator of the Criterion weights on how to interpret and use them during the evaluation process.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Weighting consideration description" ; - sh:path cccev:weightingConsiderationDescription . - -core-shape:cccev-Criterion-dct-type a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:criterion ; - sh:description "Category to which the Requirement belongs." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Type" ; - sh:path dcterms:type . - -core-shape:cccev-Evidence-cccev-confidentialityLevelType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:confidentiality-level ; - sh:description """Security classification assigned to an Evidence e.g. classified, sensitive, public. - -Additional Information: - -Classifications should be defined by an organisation/country as an outcome of a security assessment. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Confidentiality level type" ; - sh:path cccev:confidentialityLevelType . - -core-shape:cccev-Evidence-cccev-supportsConcept a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:InformationConcept ; - sh:description """Information Concept providing facts found/inferred from the Evidence. - -Additional Information: -Examples of Information Concepts are values found explictly in the evidence such as a birth date or information derived from the Evidence such as "I am older that 18 years" or "this is a FairTrade product".""" ; - sh:name "Supports concept" ; - sh:path cccev:supportsConcept ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cccev-Evidence-cccev-supportsRequirement a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:Requirement ; - sh:description "Requirement for which the Evidence provides proof." ; - sh:name "Supports requirement" ; - sh:path cccev:supportsRequirement ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cccev-InformationConcept-adms-identifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description "Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Identifier" ; - sh:path adms:identifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cccev-InformationConcept-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:cccev-InformationConcept-skos-prefLabel a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The preferred lexical label for a resource, in a given language. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - -""" ; - sh:name "Pref label" ; - sh:path skos:prefLabel . - -core-shape:cccev-Requirement-cccev-hasRequirement a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:Requirement ; - sh:description "A more specific Requirement that is part of the Requirement." ; - sh:name "Has requirement" ; - sh:path cccev:hasRequirement ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cccev-Requirement-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:cccev-Requirement-skos-prefLabel a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The preferred lexical label for a resource, in a given language. - -WG approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Pref label" ; - sh:path skos:prefLabel . - -core-shape:cpov-ContactPoint-cpov-email a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The email of the Organisation. - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Email" ; - sh:path cccev:email . - -core-shape:cpov-ContactPoint-cpov-telephone a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A telephone number through which the Contact Point can be contacted. -""" ; - sh:name "Telephone" ; - sh:path cccev:telephone . - -core-shape:cpov-ContactPoint-cv-address a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class locn:Address ; - sh:description """Associates any Resource with the corresponding Address. - -Additional Information: -Asserting the address relationship implies that the Resource has an Address. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Address" ; - sh:path cccev:address ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cpov-ContactPoint-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:cpov-ContactPoint-epo-hasContactName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A short text by which a contact is known or referred to. - -WG Approval: 27/01/2022""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has contact name" ; - sh:path :hasContactName . - -core-shape:cpov-ContactPoint-epo-hasFax a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description "The fax number used to reach a person or an organisation." ; - sh:name "Has fax" ; - sh:path :hasFax . - -core-shape:cpov-ContactPoint-epo-hasInternetAddress a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """The main web page used by the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 01/06/2023 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has internet address" ; - sh:path :hasInternetAddress . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-cv-birthDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description "The point in time on which the Person was born." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Birth date" ; - sh:path cccev:birthDate . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-cv-registeredAddress a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class locn:Address ; - sh:description """The registered address relationship links a Resource with the legally registered Address. - -Additional Information: -It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Registered address" ; - sh:path cccev:registeredAddress ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-dct-alternative a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """Any name by which an individual is known other than their full name. -WG 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:name "Alternative" ; - sh:path dcterms:alternative . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-epo-hasCountryOfBirth a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:country ; - sh:description """The country in which the Person was born. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has country of birth" ; - sh:path :hasCountryOfBirth . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-epo-hasNationality a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:country ; - sh:description """ -""" ; - sh:name "Has nationality" ; - sh:path :hasNationality . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-epo-isBeneficialOwnerOf a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Business ; - sh:description """A role of any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the organisation or on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted. -Additional Information: -This role is defined in the directive EU 2015/849 and it's beyond the scope for public eProcurement domain. -WG approval 14/09/2021""" ; - sh:name "Is beneficial owner of" ; - sh:path :isBeneficialOwnerOf ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-foaf-familyName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """The hereditary surname of a family. -""" ; - sh:name "Family name" ; - sh:path foaf:familyName . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-foaf-givenName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """The name(s) that identify the Person within a family with a common surname. -""" ; - sh:name "Given name" ; - sh:path foaf:givenName . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-foaf-name a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description "The complete name of the Person as one string." ; - sh:name "Name" ; - sh:path foaf:name . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-person-birthName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """Family name of the Person given upon their birth. -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:name "Birth name" ; - sh:path person:birthName . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-person-patronymicName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """Name based on the given name of the Person's father. -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:name "Patronymic name" ; - sh:path person:patronymicName . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-person-placeOfBirth a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class dcterms:Location ; - sh:description "The Location where the Person was born." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Place of birth" ; - sh:path person:placeOfBirth ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cpv-Person-person-placeOfDeath a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class dcterms:Location ; - sh:description "The Location where the Person died." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Place of death" ; - sh:path person:placeOfDeath ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:cv-Channel-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:cv-Channel-epo-hasAddressURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has address u r l" ; - sh:path :hasAddressURL . - -core-shape:cv-Channel-epo-hasEndpointIdentifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:name "Has endpoint identifier" ; - sh:path :hasEndpointIdentifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:dct-Location-adms-identifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description "Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Identifier" ; - sh:path adms:identifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:dct-Location-epo-hasCountryCode a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:country ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has country code" ; - sh:path :hasCountryCode . - -core-shape:dct-Location-epo-hasNutsCode a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:nuts ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has nuts code" ; - sh:path :hasNutsCode . - -core-shape:dct-Location-locn-address a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class locn:Address ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Address" ; - sh:path locn:address ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:dct-Location-locn-geographicIdentifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description """A URI that identifies the Location. - -Additional Information: -GeoNames.org provides stable, widely recognised identifiers for more than 10 million geographical names that can be used as links to further information. For example, http://sws.geonames.org/593116/ identifies the Lithuanian capital Vilnius. Unfortunately these URIs cannot easily be automatically deduced since the URI scheme uses simple numeric codes. Finding a GeoNames identifier for a Location is almost always a manual process. Where such identifiers are known or can be found, however, it is recommended that they be used. - -Where the Location Class is used to identify a country, if the geonames URI is not known, the recommendation is to use DBpedia URIs of the form http://dbpedia.org/resource/ISO_3166-1:XX where XX is the ISO 3166 two character code for the country. - -The EU's Publication Office diverges from ISO 3166-1 and uses EL and UK for Greece and the United Kingdom respectively. DBpedia sticks to the ISO codes and so the correct URIs for these countries are: - -- http://dbpedia.org/resource/ISO_3166-1:GR -- http://dbpedia.org/resource/ISO_3166-1:GB -even when the geographic name is given as EL or UK. - -The use of a URIs has added advantages: - -- it can be used by automated systems to look up additional data (linked data); -- a triple store may store only one copy of the URI, whereas if a string is used, a copy of that string is always stored for each and every person in the database. Thus, in large data sets, the saving on memory capacity and the improvement in transmission efficiency can be substantial. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Geographic identifier" ; - sh:path locn:geographicIdentifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:dct-Location-locn-geographicName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A textual description for a Location. - -Additional Information: -The INSPIRE Data Specification on Geographical Names provides a detailed model for describing a 'named place', including methods for providing multiple names in multiple scripts. This is beyond what is necessary for the Core Location Vocabulary but, importantly, the concept of a geographic name used here is consistent. - -A geographic name is a proper noun applied to a spatial object. Taking the example used in the INSPIRE document (page 15), the following are all valid geographic names for the Greek capital: - -- "Aθnνa"@gr-Grek (the Greek endonym written in the Greek script) -- "Athína"@gr-Latn (the standard Romanisation of the endonym) -- "Athens"@en (the English language exonym) -INSPIRE has a detailed (XML-based) method of providing metadata about a geographic name and in XML-data sets that may be the most appropriate method to follow. When using the Core Location Vocabulary in data sets that are not focussed on environmental/geographical data (the use case for INSPIRE), the Code datatype or a simple language identifier may be used to provide such metadata. - -The country codes defined in ISO 3166 may be used as geographic names and these are generally preferred over either the long form or short form of a country's name (as they are less error prone). The Publications Office of the European Union recommends the use of ISO 3166-1 codes for countries in all cases except two: - -- use 'UK' in preference to the ISO 3166 code GB for the United Kingdom; -- use 'EL' in preference to the ISO 3166 code GR for Greece. -Where a country has changed its name or no longer exists (such as Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia etc.) use the ISO 3166-3 code. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Geographic name" ; - sh:path locn:geographicName . - -core-shape:dct-Location-locn-geometry a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class locn:Geometry ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Geometry" ; - sh:path locn:geometry ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-definesCatalogueProvider a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :CatalogueProvider ; - sh:description "Relation indicating an AccessTerm has a CatalogueProvider." ; - sh:name "Defines catalogue provider" ; - sh:path :definesCatalogueProvider ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-definesCatalogueReceiver a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :CatalogueReceiver ; - sh:description "Relation indicating an AccessTerm has a CatalogueReceiver." ; - sh:name "Defines catalogue receiver" ; - sh:path :definesCatalogueReceiver ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-definesOfflineAccessProvider a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :OfflineAccessProvider ; - sh:description "Relation indicating an AccessTerm has an OfflineAccessProvider." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines offline access provider" ; - sh:path :definesOfflineAccessProvider ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider ; - sh:description "Relation indicating an AccessTerm has a ProcurementProcedureInformationProvider." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines procurement procedure information provider" ; - sh:path :definesProcurementProcedureInformationProvider ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-hasAdditionalInformationDeadline a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description """The time limit for requesting further information. - -Additional information: - -This is generally used to indicate the deadline for Economic Operators to request further information of the procedure before the submission deadline. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13 Additional Information Deadline. - -WG Approval 09/06/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has additional information deadline" ; - sh:path :hasAdditionalInformationDeadline . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-hasDocumentRestrictionJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:communication-justification ; - sh:description """An explanation about the reasons why some procurement documents are restricted. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-707 Documents Restricted Justification. - -WG Approval 09/03/2021 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has document restriction justification" ; - sh:path :hasDocumentRestrictionJustification . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-hasPublicAccessURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """Web page where the procurement documents can be downloaded. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-15 Documents URL. - -WG Approval 09/03/2021 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has public access u r l" ; - sh:path :hasPublicAccessURL . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-hasRestrictedAccessURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """The internet address with information on accessing the restricted (part of the) procurement document. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-615 Documents Restricted URL. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has restricted access u r l" ; - sh:path :hasRestrictedAccessURL . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-involvesProcurementDocument a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcurementDocument ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Involves procurement document" ; - sh:path :involvesProcurementDocument ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-isProcurementDocumentRestricted a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """The access to certain procurement documents is restricted. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-14 Documents Restricted. - -WG Approval 10/10/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is procurement document restricted" ; - sh:path :isProcurementDocumentRestricted . - -core-shape:epo-AccessTerm-epo-refersToPlannedPart a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :PlannedProcurementPart ; - sh:name "Refers to planned part" ; - sh:path :refersToPlannedPart ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AgentInRole-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-AgentInRole-dct-title a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 -""" ; - sh:name "Title" ; - sh:path dcterms:title . - -core-shape:epo-AgentInRole-epo-contextualisedBy a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcurementObject ; - sh:description "The place of the AgentInRole in the procurement is expressed by a ProcurementObject." ; - sh:name "Contextualised by" ; - sh:path :contextualisedBy ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AgentInRole-epo-exposesChannel a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:Channel ; - sh:name "Exposes channel" ; - sh:path :exposesChannel ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AgentInRole-epo-hasContactPointInRole a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:ContactPoint ; - sh:name "Has contact point in role" ; - sh:path :hasContactPointInRole ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AgentInRole-epo-playedBy a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class foaf:Agent ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Played by" ; - sh:path :playedBy ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AwardCriterion-epo-hasAwardCriteriaStatedInProcurementDocuments a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has award criteria stated in procurement documents" ; - sh:path :hasAwardCriteriaStatedInProcurementDocuments . - -core-shape:epo-AwardCriterion-epo-hasAwardCriterionType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:award-criterion-type ; - sh:description """Category of award criterion. - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has award criterion type" ; - sh:path :hasAwardCriterionType . - -core-shape:epo-AwardCriterion-epo-hasFixedValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description "This corresponds in the eForms to BT-541 Award Criterion Number in association with BT-5422 Award Criterion Number Fixed." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has fixed value" ; - sh:path :hasFixedValue . - -core-shape:epo-AwardCriterion-epo-hasFixedValueType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:number-fixed ; - sh:description """The method to interpret the fixed value as pertaining to a total or unit. - -WG Approval 17/09/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has fixed value type" ; - sh:path :hasFixedValueType . - -core-shape:epo-AwardDecision-epo-comprisesAwardOutcome a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :AwardOutcome ; - sh:description "Incorporates AwardOutcome." ; - sh:name "Comprises award outcome" ; - sh:path :comprisesAwardOutcome ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AwardDecision-epo-hasAdditionalNonAwardJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Further justification for the non award . - -Additional information: -This is generally used when the non award reason code is set to "Other". - -WG: 18/01/2022""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has additional non award justification" ; - sh:path :hasAdditionalNonAwardJustification . - -core-shape:epo-AwardDecision-epo-hasAwardDecisionDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description """The official date of the award decision. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-1451 Winner Decision Date. - -WG Approval 09/01/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has award decision date" ; - sh:path :hasAwardDecisionDate . - -core-shape:epo-AwardEvaluationTerm-epo-hasAwardCriteriaEvaluationFormula a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The mathematical equation or any other description used for complicated weighing of criteria (e.g. non-linear weighing, the analytic hierarchy process) when a weighing cannot be expressed per criterion. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-543 Award Criteria Complicated.""" ; - sh:name "Has award criteria evaluation formula" ; - sh:path :hasAwardCriteriaEvaluationFormula . - -core-shape:epo-AwardEvaluationTerm-epo-hasAwardCriteriaOrderJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The justification for only indicating the award criteria's order of importance, not their weighing. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-733 Award Criteria Order Justification.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has award criteria order justification" ; - sh:path :hasAwardCriteriaOrderJustification . - -core-shape:epo-AwardEvaluationTerm-epo-hasOverallCostAwardCriteriaPonderation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """The weighting given to cost. - -Additional Information: -This weighting covers usually all cost criteria against price or quality criteria.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has overall cost award criteria ponderation" ; - sh:path :hasOverallCostAwardCriteriaPonderation . - -core-shape:epo-AwardEvaluationTerm-epo-hasOverallPriceAwardCriteriaPonderation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """The weighting given to price. - -Additional Information: -This weighting covers usually all price criteria against cost or quality criteria.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has overall price award criteria ponderation" ; - sh:path :hasOverallPriceAwardCriteriaPonderation . - -core-shape:epo-AwardEvaluationTerm-epo-hasOverallQualityAwardCriteriaPonderation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """The weighting given to quality. - -Additional Information: -This weighting covers usually all quality criteria against price or cost criteria.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has overall quality award criteria ponderation" ; - sh:path :hasOverallQualityAwardCriteriaPonderation . - -core-shape:epo-AwardOutcome-epo-comprisesTenderAwardOutcome a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :TenderAwardOutcome ; - sh:description "Incorporates TenderAwardOutcome." ; - sh:name "Comprises tender award outcome" ; - sh:path :comprisesTenderAwardOutcome ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AwardOutcome-epo-hasAwardStatus a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:winner-selection-status ; - sh:description """Indicates whether the lot is awarded, not awarded or still open. -WG Approval 03/12/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has award status" ; - sh:path :hasAwardStatus . - -core-shape:epo-AwardOutcome-epo-hasAwardedValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The value of the procurement provided by the Award Decision. - -Additional Information: -Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. - -In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum awarded value. - -WG Approval 10/12/2019""", - "Used in F18 (and other standard forms) which is out of scope. We will need to reuse them for the Contract." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has awarded value" ; - sh:path :hasAwardedValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AwardOutcome-epo-hasBargainPrice a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The value of procured supplies that have used a particularly advantageous opportunity available for a very short time at a value considerably lower than normal market prices. - -WG approval 23/05/2023""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has bargain price" ; - sh:path :hasBargainPrice ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-AwardOutcome-epo-hasNonAwardJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:non-award-justification ; - sh:description """On hold; Enumeration. - - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has non award justification" ; - sh:path :hasNonAwardJustification . - -core-shape:epo-Business-epo-hasBeneficialOwner a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:Person ; - sh:description """A role of any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the organisation or on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted. -Additional Information: -This role is defined in the directive EU 2015/849 and it's beyond the scope for public eProcurement domain. -WG approval 14/09/2021""" ; - sh:name "Has beneficial owner" ; - sh:path :hasBeneficialOwner ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Business-epo-hasBusinessSize a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:economic-operator-size ; - sh:description """The category of the business depending on number of employees and turnover. - -Additional information: - -See Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. - -WG Approval 28/05/2020 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has business size" ; - sh:path :hasBusinessSize . - -core-shape:epo-Business-epo-isListedCompany a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Public companies listed on a stock exchange and subject to disclosure requirements (either by stock exchange -rules or through law or enforceable means), which impose requirements to ensure adequate transparency of -beneficial ownership. - -Additional Information: - -In eForms this indicator is used when the nationality of beneficial owner is not provided because the Economic Operator is registered in a regulated market that is subject to disclosure requirements consistent with Union law or subject to equivalent international standards which ensure adequate transparency of ownership information. - -WG Approval 21/11/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is listed company" ; - sh:path :isListedCompany . - -core-shape:epo-Buyer-epo-delegatesAncillaryActivitiesTo a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcurementServiceProvider ; - sh:description """Entrusts ancillary purchasing activities to ProcurementServiceProvider. - -Additional Information: -Directive 2014/24/EU describes ancillary purchasing activities as activities consisting in the provision of support to purchasing activities, in particular in the following forms: - -(a) technical infrastructure enabling contracting authorities to award public contracts or to conclude framework agreements for works, supplies or services; - -(b) advice on the conduct or design of public procurement procedures; - -(c) preparation and management of procurement procedures on behalf and for the account of the contracting authority concerned;""" ; - sh:name "Delegates ancillary activities to" ; - sh:path :delegatesAncillaryActivitiesTo ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Buyer-epo-exposesInvoiceeChannel a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:Channel ; - sh:name "Exposes invoicee channel" ; - sh:path :exposesInvoiceeChannel ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Buyer-epo-hasActivityDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """In the ePO ontology a taxonomy with all activities, based on different classifications (COFOG, UTILITIES, NACE), will be provided. In ePO this field is to be used exclusively to complement the definition attached to the MainActivityCode. - -However, in eForms there is the code "other" to cover undefined activities. For mapping to this eForms feature one could also use this property. -""" ; - sh:name "Has activity description" ; - sh:path :hasActivityDescription . - -core-shape:epo-Buyer-epo-hasBuyerProfile a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """Website address where the buyer publishes information on its procurement procedures and general information. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-508 Buyer Profile URL. - -WG approval 04/05/2018 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has buyer profile" ; - sh:path :hasBuyerProfile . - -core-shape:epo-Buyer-epo-indicatesInvoiceeContactPoint a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:ContactPoint ; - sh:name "Indicates invoicee contact point" ; - sh:path :indicatesInvoiceeContactPoint ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Buyer-epo-isContractingEntity a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Role of entities, which: - -(a) are contracting authorities or public undertakings and which pursue one of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14 of the Directive 2014/25/EU. - -(b) when they are not contracting authorities or public undertakings, have as one of their activities any of the activities referred to in Articles 8 to 14, or any combination thereof and operate on the basis of special or exclusive rights granted by a competent authority of a Member State. - -Additional Information - -The indicator is needed in order to discriminate between those contracts where the Contracting Entity acts as a Contracting Authority undergoing the limits and the rules of Directive 24 and those where it acts as a Contracting Entity, with certain relaxed constraints. -For example, the Contracting Entities have different thresholds for the application of Directive 24 if compared with Contracting Authorities. - -WG Approval 28/04/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is contracting entity" ; - sh:path :isContractingEntity . - -core-shape:epo-Buyer-epo-signsAwardDecision a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :AwardDecision ; - sh:name "Signs award decision" ; - sh:path :signsAwardDecision ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ConcessionEstimate-epo-hasCalculationMethod a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Formula for obtaining values. - -Additional Information: -The possible values are monetary values, ranking scores, criterion weighting. - -WG Approval 25/05/2018""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has calculation method" ; - sh:path :hasCalculationMethod . - -core-shape:epo-ConcessionEstimate-epo-hasConcessionEstimatedValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has concession estimated value" ; - sh:path :hasConcessionEstimatedValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ConcessionEstimate-epo-hasEstimatedBuyerConcessionRevenue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The expected payments made by the buyer to the economic operator awarded the concession that are not directly related to the use of the concession. - -Additional Information: -For example the public buyer pays a yearly fee to provide a ticketing solution to the public. The fee the public pays for every ticket sold through the solution is not included in this estimation but in the estimation of the user concession revenue. - -This corresponds to BT-160 in eForms. - -WG Approval 07/01/2020""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated buyer concession revenue" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedBuyerConcessionRevenue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ConcessionEstimate-epo-hasEstimatedUserConcessionRevenue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The estimated revenue coming from the use of the concession. - -Additional Information: -Revenues are for example fees and fines. For example, the fees and fines coming from the cars using a motorway. - -This corresponds to BT-162 in eForms. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated user concession revenue" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedUserConcessionRevenue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-bindsBuyer a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Buyer ; - sh:description "Provides legal constraint on the Buyer." ; - sh:name "Binds buyer" ; - sh:path :bindsBuyer ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-bindsContractor a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Contractor ; - sh:description "Provides legal constraint on the Contractor." ; - sh:name "Binds contractor" ; - sh:path :bindsContractor ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-hasContractConclusionDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """The date the contract was signed by the last signatory party. - -Additional Information: -In exceptional cases contracts may be concluded without signature and therefore another date may be used. The date of contract conclusion is always later than the end of any standstill period. -This concept is not to be confused with the date of completion/end of the contract. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-145 Contract Conclusion Date. - -WG Approval 09/01/2020""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has contract conclusion date" ; - sh:path :hasContractConclusionDate . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-hasContractValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has contract value" ; - sh:path :hasContractValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-hasEntryIntoForceDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """The date on which the contract enters into force. - -Additional information: - -This is generally the date on which the fulfillment of the contract begins. - -This corresponds in eForms to - -WG approval 05/11/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has entry into force date" ; - sh:path :hasEntryIntoForceDate . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-hasEstimatedDuration a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Duration ; - sh:description """Relation indicating a Contract has an estimated Duration. - -Additional Information - -When the Lot uses a Technique the contract estimated duration applies to the Technique. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated duration" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedDuration ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-hasLotReference a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has lot reference" ; - sh:path :hasLotReference ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-hasPurpose a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Purpose ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has purpose" ; - sh:path :hasPurpose ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-includesTender a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Tender ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-3202 Contract Tender Identifier. -""" ; - sh:name "Includes tender" ; - sh:path :includesTender ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-isFundedBy a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Fund ; - sh:description """Funding is provided either completely or partially by a Fund. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BG - 61 EU Funds (specified per Lot) and to BG - 611 Contract EU Funds (applied per Contract lot) -Funds may change between the lot and the contract, for example in the case of an emergency crisis, a contract may be financed by a budget that was not foreseen in the call. - -""" ; - sh:name "Is funded by" ; - sh:path :isFundedBy ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-isSubjectToContractSpecificTerm a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ContractSpecificTerm ; - sh:name "Is subject to contract specific term" ; - sh:path :isSubjectToContractSpecificTerm ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-signedByBuyer a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Buyer ; - sh:name "Signed by buyer" ; - sh:path :signedByBuyer ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Contract-epo-signedByContractor a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Contractor ; - sh:name "Signed by contractor" ; - sh:path :signedByContractor ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractLotCompletionInformation-epo-describesLotCompletion a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Describes lot completion" ; - sh:path :describesLotCompletion ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractLotCompletionInformation-epo-hasPaymentValueDiscrepancyJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has payment value discrepancy justification" ; - sh:path :hasPaymentValueDiscrepancyJustification . - -core-shape:epo-ContractLotCompletionInformation-epo-providesContractTotalPaymentValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """Additional Information: -This corresponds to BT-779 in eForms. """ ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Provides contract total payment value" ; - sh:path :providesContractTotalPaymentValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractLotCompletionInformation-epo-providesContractTotalPenaltyValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """ -Additional Information: -This corresponds to BT-782 in eForms. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Provides contract total penalty value" ; - sh:path :providesContractTotalPenaltyValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractLotCompletionInformation-epo-refersToContract a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Contract ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Refers to contract" ; - sh:path :refersToContract ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-definesContractDuration a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Duration ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Duration." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines contract duration" ; - sh:path :definesContractDuration ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-definesContractPeriod a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Period ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a Period." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines contract period" ; - sh:path :definesContractPeriod ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-definesPaymentExecutor a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :PaymentExecutor ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a PaymentExecutor." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines payment executor" ; - sh:path :definesPaymentExecutor ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-definesSpecificPlaceOfPerformance a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class dcterms:Location ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ContractTerm has a specific place of performance." ; - sh:name "Defines specific place of performance" ; - sh:path :definesSpecificPlaceOfPerformance ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-definesSubcontractingTerm a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :SubcontractTerm ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a term has a subterm." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines subcontracting term" ; - sh:path :definesSubcontractingTerm ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasAdditionalContractNature a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:contract-nature ; - sh:description """Additional type of acquisition taken into consideration in the contract. - -WG Approval 11/06/2020 - -""" ; - sh:name "Has additional contract nature" ; - sh:path :hasAdditionalContractNature . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasBroadPlaceOfPerformance a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:other-place-service ; - sh:description """Geopolitical zone where the contract can be executed. - -Additional Information - -Used for setting restrictions that cannot be established with one country code or a geographical zone identifier (like NUTS), because they have a broader scope (geographical, economic, political, other). -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has broad place of performance" ; - sh:path :hasBroadPlaceOfPerformance . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasContractNatureType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:contract-nature ; - sh:description """Subject of the acquisition. - -WG Approval 11/06/2020 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has contract nature type" ; - sh:path :hasContractNatureType . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasEInvoicing a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Electronic means will be used for invoicing in the post-award process. - -Additional Information: -This attribute is used for standard form mappings. - -WG Approval 12/09/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e invoicing" ; - sh:path :hasEInvoicing . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasEInvoicingPermission a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:permission ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e invoicing permission" ; - sh:path :hasEInvoicingPermission . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasEOrdering a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Electronic means will be used for requesting and purchasing in the post-award process. - -WG Approval 12/09/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e ordering" ; - sh:path :hasEOrdering . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasEPayment a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Electronic means must be used for paying. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e payment" ; - sh:path :hasEPayment . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasLegalFormRequirement a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The legal form to be taken by a Contractor. - -Additional Information: -Generally, this is defined to cover the case where an Organisation Group is involved. -Note that the codelist provided at national level should be used.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has legal form requirement" ; - sh:path :hasLegalFormRequirement . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasMaximumNumberOfRenewals a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The maximum number of times the contract can be renewed. - -Additional Information - -By renewing, the buyer reserves the right (i.e. not an obligation) to renew the contract (i.e. extend its duration) without a new procurement procedure. -For example, a contract may be valid for one year and the buyer may keep a possibility to renew it (e.g. once, twice) for another three months, if he is content with the services he received. - -PLEASE REVIEW THIS DEFINITION AGAIN WITH THE WORKING GROUP. It was originally taken from eForms. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has maximum number of renewals" ; - sh:path :hasMaximumNumberOfRenewals . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasOptions a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description "The buyer reserves the right (not an obligation) for additional purchases from the contractor (while the contract is valid)." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has options" ; - sh:path :hasOptions . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasOptionsDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The motivation and details about additional purchases that the buyer may undertake while the contract is valid. - -WG Approval 09/04/2019 """ ; - sh:name "Has options description" ; - sh:path :hasOptionsDescription . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasPaymentArrangement a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Information about financial clauses that will govern some economic aspects of the execution of the contract. - -Additional Information: These clauses usually refer to financial and payment provisions. - -This type of information should be structured instead of a free text in order to reuse it an ideal world. Unfortunately this is an information that in the real life no one is willing to provide pro-actively. - -WG Pending of discussion with eForms""" ; - sh:name "Has payment arrangement" ; - sh:path :hasPaymentArrangement . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasPerformanceConditions a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The particular conditions and additional information related to the execution of the contract. - -Additional Information: - -For example, specific information about the place of performance, intermediary deliverables, compensation for damages, intellectual property rights. - -WG approval 15-01-2019""" ; - sh:name "Has performance conditions" ; - sh:path :hasPerformanceConditions . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasPlaceOfPerformanceAdditionalInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Further details on the location of the execution of the contract. - -WG Approval 30/07/2019""" ; - sh:name "Has place of performance additional information" ; - sh:path :hasPlaceOfPerformanceAdditionalInformation . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasRenewalDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Any other information about the renewal(s). - -WG approval 16/04/2019 """ ; - sh:name "Has renewal description" ; - sh:path :hasRenewalDescription . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-hasReservedExecution a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:applicability ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has reserved execution" ; - sh:path :hasReservedExecution . - -core-shape:epo-ContractTerm-epo-isRenewalIndicator a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Indicates whether the contract is subject to a renewal clause. -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is renewal indicator" ; - sh:path :isRenewalIndicator . - -core-shape:epo-Contractor-epo-needsToBeAWinner a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Winner ; - sh:description """The Contractor must be a Winner. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Needs to be a winner" ; - sh:path :needsToBeAWinner ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-definesPrize a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Prize ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a DesignContestRegimeTerm has a Prize." ; - sh:name "Defines prize" ; - sh:path :definesPrize ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-hasFollowupContract a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Any subsequent service contract will be awarded to the winner or, in the case of a design contest, winners. - -WG Approval 29/08/2019 """ ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has followup contract" ; - sh:path :hasFollowupContract . - -core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-hasFollowupContractInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Further information about follow-up contracts, prizes and payments (for example non-monetary prizes, payments given for participation). - -WG Approval 03/09/2019""" ; - sh:name "Has followup contract information" ; - sh:path :hasFollowupContractInformation . - -core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-hasParticipationPayment a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Details on payments to participants -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has participation payment" ; - sh:path :hasParticipationPayment . - -core-shape:epo-DesignContestRegimeTerm-epo-isJuryDecisionBinding a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description "Indicates whether the procuring entity is bound to apply the decision of the jury." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is jury decision binding" ; - sh:path :isJuryDecisionBinding . - -core-shape:epo-DirectAwardTerm-epo-hasDirectAwardJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:direct-award-justification ; - sh:description """List of reasons for using a procedure which allows awarding contracts directly without publishing a notice. - -WG Approval 28/05/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has direct award justification" ; - sh:path :hasDirectAwardJustification . - -core-shape:epo-DirectAwardTerm-epo-hasJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An explanation about the reasons for using the concept. -WG Approval 5/11/2019 -""" ; - sh:name "Has justification" ; - sh:path :hasJustification . - -core-shape:epo-DirectAwardTerm-epo-refersToPreviousProcedure a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Procedure ; - sh:description """Reference to a previous procedure. - -Additional Information: -In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. - -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Refers to previous procedure" ; - sh:path :refersToPreviousProcedure ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-DirectAwardTerm-epo-refersToPreviousProcedureLot a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:description """Reference to one or more Lots in a previous procedure. - -Additional Information: -In the case of Direct Award Terms, this property points to a previous Procedure justifying the use of Direct Award without a prior publication. - -This corresponds in the eForms to BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier - -WG Approval 22/11/2019 14:33:55""" ; - sh:name "Refers to previous procedure lot" ; - sh:path :refersToPreviousProcedureLot ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-DirectContract-epo-resultsFromLotAwardOutcome a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :LotAwardOutcome ; - sh:name "Results from lot award outcome" ; - sh:path :resultsFromLotAwardOutcome ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Document-adms-identifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description "Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class." ; - sh:name "Identifier" ; - sh:path adms:identifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Document-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-Document-dct-issued a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description """Date of formal issuance of the resource. - -Additional information: -This is generally used for modules other than eNotice. -The xsd:dateTime here means that we can provide either xsd:date, xsd:dateTime, or xsd:timeStamp or any other variant of time expression. This extension needs to be encoded/automated in the ontology and in the application profile. -Why is it like this? Because UML cannot handle such expressions of disjunctive property ranges. - -WG approval 26/01/2023""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Issued" ; - sh:path dcterms:issued . - -core-shape:epo-Document-dct-title a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Title" ; - sh:path dcterms:title . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-associatedWith a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Document ; - sh:description """The document to which a document is associated. - -WGM 01/03/2022 -""" ; - sh:name "Associated with" ; - sh:path :associatedWith ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasAccessURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """Location where the resource can be accessed. - -WG approval 07/04/2022""" ; - sh:name "Has access u r l" ; - sh:path :hasAccessURL . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasDispatchDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """Date of transmission of a record to an organisation. - -WG Approval 12/05/2020""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has dispatch date" ; - sh:path :hasDispatchDate . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasElectronicDigest a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Document ; - sh:name "Has electronic digest" ; - sh:path :hasElectronicDigest ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasElectronicSignature a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ElectronicSignature ; - sh:name "Has electronic signature" ; - sh:path :hasElectronicSignature ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasOfficialLanguage a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:language ; - sh:description """The language(s) in which the instances of the given concepts are officially available. These linguistic versions are equally legally valid. - -WG Approval 03/10/2019 - -""" ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has official language" ; - sh:path :hasOfficialLanguage . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasPublicationDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """Date of formal public issuance of the document. - -WG approval 20/06/2023""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has publication date" ; - sh:path :hasPublicationDate . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasReceptionDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """Notes: Date when a record is acknowledged by an organisation. - -WG Approval 12/05/2020""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has reception date" ; - sh:path :hasReceptionDate . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasUUID a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description """A universally unique identifier for an instance of this document. - -WG Approval 12/05/2020""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has u u i d" ; - sh:path :hasUUID ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasUnofficialLanguage a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:language ; - sh:description """The language translation(s) in which the instances of the given concepts are available. These linguistic versions are not an official translation, they are provided only for information. - -WG Approval 03/10/2019 -""" ; - sh:name "Has unofficial language" ; - sh:path :hasUnofficialLanguage . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-hasVersion a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A number that identifies a specific state of a document. - -WG approval: 18/11/2021 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has version" ; - sh:path :hasVersion . - -core-shape:epo-Document-epo-refersToPrevious a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Document ; - sh:name "Refers to previous" ; - sh:path :refersToPrevious ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-DynamicPurchaseSystemTechnique-epo-hasDPSScope a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:dps-usage ; - sh:description """Explanation as to whether a dps is used and by whom. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - -The codelist to be used is at-voc:dps-usage which is available at http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/dps-usage""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has d p s scope" ; - sh:path :hasDPSScope . - -core-shape:epo-ElectronicSignature-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-ElementChangeDescription-epo-hasElementReference a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """Reference to the class instance in the current notice. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier, BT-786 Review Notice Section Identifier and BT-1501 Modification Previous Notice Section Identifier.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has element reference" ; - sh:path :hasElementReference . - -core-shape:epo-ElementChangeDescription-epo-hasPreviousVersionOfElementReference a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """Reference to the class instance in the previous version of the notice, which was changed. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has previous version of element reference" ; - sh:path :hasPreviousVersionOfElementReference . - -core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreement-epo-resultsFromLotAwardOutcome a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :LotAwardOutcome ; - sh:name "Results from lot award outcome" ; - sh:path :resultsFromLotAwardOutcome ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasBuyerCategoryDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A classification of buyers participating in a framework agreement. - -Additional Information: -Buyers that can use the Framework Agreement not mentioned by name. - -For example, the classification "all hospitals in the Tuscany region" is used instead of naming each individual buyer. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-111 Framework Buyer Categories. - -WG Approval 2019-05-06""" ; - sh:name "Has buyer category description" ; - sh:path :hasBuyerCategoryDescription . - -core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasDurationExtensionJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The explanation of the reason why the framework agreement has an extended duration. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-109 Framework Duration Justification. -The justification for exceptional cases when the duration of the framework agreement exceeds the legal limits. - -Four years in the case of the general procurement Directive, seven years in the case of the defence Directive, and eight years in the case of the sectoral Directive. - -WG Approval 26/09/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has duration extension justification" ; - sh:path :hasDurationExtensionJustification . - -core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasFrameworkAgreementType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:framework-agreement ; - sh:description """The form of framework agreement used in a procurement procedure. - -Addition information: - -A concept to distinguish the different types of framework agreement, which are: -1. Framework agreement without reopening of competition, -2. Framework agreement with reopening of competition, or -3. Framework agreement partly without reopening of competition. - -WG Approval 19/09/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has framework agreement type" ; - sh:path :hasFrameworkAgreementType . - -core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has launch framework agreement maximum value" ; - sh:path :hasLaunchFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasLaunchGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has launch group framework agreement maximum value" ; - sh:path :hasLaunchGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-FrameworkAgreementTerm-epo-hasMaximumParticipantsNumber a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The maximum number of participants in the framework agreement. - -Additional Information: -Maximum number of tenderers who may be awarded a contract within the framework agreement. - -The number is a positive integer. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-113 Framework Maximum Participants Number. - -WG Approval 2019-02-05""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has maximum participants number" ; - sh:path :hasMaximumParticipantsNumber . - -core-shape:epo-Fund-adms-identifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description "Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Identifier" ; - sh:path adms:identifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Fund-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-Fund-dct-title a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 -""" ; - sh:name "Title" ; - sh:path dcterms:title . - -core-shape:epo-Fund-epo-hasFundProgramme a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:EU-programme ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has fund programme" ; - sh:path :hasFundProgramme . - -core-shape:epo-Fund-epo-hasURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """The identifier of a resource. - -Additional Information - -For example: - -1. The URL of the system from where to access the procurement documents; -2. The URL of the system for the submission of tender documents; -3. The URL of the system from where to download a tool to communicate with the Buyer; -4. The URL of the system used by a Technique to allow Economic Operators to exchange information with the Buyer (e.g. eAuction and DPS Systems) -5. The URL of the system used to exchange information between Buyer and EO for questions and clarifications; - -WG Approval 30/09/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has u r l" ; - sh:path :hasURL . - -core-shape:epo-GreenProcurement-epo-fulfillsRequirement a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:environmental-impact, - at-voc:green-public-procurement-criteria ; - sh:description """The requirement to which the concept meets. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 -""", - """The requirement to which the concept meets. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - -""" ; - sh:name "Fulfills requirement" ; - sh:path :fulfillsRequirement . - -core-shape:epo-GreenProcurement-epo-usesCleanVehicleDirective a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description "The procurement falls within the scope of the European Parliament and Council 2009/33/EC (Clean Vehicles Directive – CVD)." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Uses clean vehicle directive" ; - sh:path :usesCleanVehicleDirective . - -core-shape:epo-InnovativeProcurement-epo-fulfillsRequirement a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:innovative-acquisition ; - sh:description """The requirement to which the concept meets. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - -""" ; - sh:name "Fulfills requirement" ; - sh:path :fulfillsRequirement . - -core-shape:epo-JuryMember-epo-playedBy a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class foaf:Person ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Played by" ; - sh:path :playedBy ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Lot-epo-isSubjectToLotSpecificTerm a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :LotSpecificTerm ; - sh:name "Is subject to lot specific term" ; - sh:path :isSubjectToLotSpecificTerm ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Lot-epo-specifiesProcurementCriterion a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcurementCriterion ; - sh:name "Specifies procurement criterion" ; - sh:path :specifiesProcurementCriterion ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-concernsLot a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:description "Relates to Lot." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Concerns lot" ; - sh:path :concernsLot ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has approximate framework agreement value" ; - sh:path :hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasAwardedEstimatedValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The estimated value that can be spent as provided by the Award Decision. - -Additional Information: -This property is used for framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems. -Different cases of awarded values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 - -""", - "Used in F18 (and other standard forms) which is out of scope. We will need to reuse them for the Contract." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has awarded estimated value" ; - sh:path :hasAwardedEstimatedValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description "This refers to BT-660 in eForms." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has framework agreement estimated value" ; - sh:path :hasFrameworkAgreementEstimatedValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has framework agreement maximum value" ; - sh:path :hasFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasNonAwardedContractNumber a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The number the contract would have had if it had been awarded. - -Additional information: - -This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. - -WG agreement: 06/09/2022 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has non awarded contract number" ; - sh:path :hasNonAwardedContractNumber . - -core-shape:epo-LotAwardOutcome-epo-hasNonAwardedContractTitle a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The title the contract would have had if it had been awarded. - -Additional information: - -This field is provided to support the data provided in the TED Standard Forms, and it should be discontinued in the future. - -WG agreement: 06/09/2022""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has non awarded contract title" ; - sh:path :hasNonAwardedContractTitle . - -core-shape:epo-LotGroup-adms-identifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description """A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - -Additional Information - -For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. - -WG Approval 12/11/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Identifier" ; - sh:path adms:identifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotGroup-epo-setsGroupingContextForLot a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Sets grouping context for lot" ; - sh:path :setsGroupingContextForLot ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotGroup-epo-specifiesProcurementCriterion a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcurementCriterion ; - sh:name "Specifies procurement criterion" ; - sh:path :specifiesProcurementCriterion ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotGroupAwardInformation-epo-describesLotGroup a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :LotGroup ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Describes lot group" ; - sh:path :describesLotGroup ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-LotGroupAwardInformation-epo-hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description "This corresponds to BT-156 in the eForms." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has group framework agreement maximum value" ; - sh:path :hasGroupFrameworkAgreementMaximumValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome-epo-resultsFromUsingCandidateList a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :SelectedCandidateList ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Results from using candidate list" ; - sh:path :resultsFromUsingCandidateList ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-MonetaryValue-epo-hasAmountValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description "The numeric value of the amount, including decimals." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has amount value" ; - sh:path :hasAmountValue . - -core-shape:epo-MonetaryValue-epo-hasCurrency a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:currency ; - sh:description """The identifier of the currency as in the standard code list used. - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has currency" ; - sh:path :hasCurrency . - -core-shape:epo-MonetaryValue-epo-hasCurrencyCodeListAgencyID a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Identifier of the agency that maintains the currency code list used. -WG approval 13/04/2021""" ; - sh:name "Has currency code list agency i d" ; - sh:path :hasCurrencyCodeListAgencyID . - -core-shape:epo-MonetaryValue-epo-hasCurrencyCodeListAgencyName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Name of the agency that maintains the currency code list used. -WG approval 13/04/2021""" ; - sh:name "Has currency code list agency name" ; - sh:path :hasCurrencyCodeListAgencyName . - -core-shape:epo-MonetaryValue-epo-hasCurrencyCodeListID a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Concept scheme URI used for the currency code list. -WG approval 13/04/2021""" ; - sh:name "Has currency code list i d" ; - sh:path :hasCurrencyCodeListID . - -core-shape:epo-MultipleStageProcedureTerm-epo-hasEstimatedInvitationToExpressInterestDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """The estimated date of dispatch of the invitations to confirm interest. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-631 Dispatch Invitation Interest.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated invitation to express interest date" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedInvitationToExpressInterestDate . - -core-shape:epo-MultipleStageProcedureTerm-epo-hasEstimatedInvitationToTenderDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """The estimated date of dispatch of the invitations to submit tenders in two (or more) stage procedures. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-130 Dispatch Invitation Tender. - -WG Approval 01/10/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated invitation to tender date" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedInvitationToTenderDate . - -core-shape:epo-MultipleStageProcedureTerm-epo-hasMaximumNumberOfCandidates a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """Maximum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. - -WG Approval 22/08/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has maximum number of candidates" ; - sh:path :hasMaximumNumberOfCandidates . - -core-shape:epo-MultipleStageProcedureTerm-epo-hasMinimumNumberOfCandidates a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """Minimum number of candidates to be invited for the second stage of the procedure. - -WG Approval 22/08/2019 """ ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has minimum number of candidates" ; - sh:path :hasMinimumNumberOfCandidates . - -core-shape:epo-MultipleStageProcedureTerm-epo-hasNoNegotiationNecessary a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """The buyer reserves the right to award the contract on the basis of the initial tenders without any further negotiations. - -Additional information: -See Article 29(4) of Directive 2014/24/EU. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has no negotiation necessary" ; - sh:path :hasNoNegotiationNecessary . - -core-shape:epo-MultipleStageProcedureTerm-epo-hasQualificationSystemDuration a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Duration ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has qualification system duration" ; - sh:path :hasQualificationSystemDuration ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-MultipleStageProcedureTerm-epo-hasQualificationSystemRenewalDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has qualification system renewal description" ; - sh:path :hasQualificationSystemRenewalDescription . - -core-shape:epo-MultipleStageProcedureTerm-epo-hasSuccessiveReduction a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """The number of solutions or tenders will be reduced in iterative evaluations for multiple staged procedures. - -Additional information: -This refers to multiple-stage procedures (included two-stage procedures, at least). Open Procedures can be seen as one-stage procedures. -WG Approval 22/08/2019 """ ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has successive reduction" ; - sh:path :hasSuccessiveReduction . - -core-shape:epo-NonDisclosureAgreementTerm-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-NonDisclosureAgreementTerm-epo-isNonDisclosureAgreementRequired a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is non disclosure agreement required" ; - sh:path :isNonDisclosureAgreementRequired . - -core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-hasAccessibilityDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """The date at which unpublished data shall be published. - -WG Approval 11/06/2020""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has accessibility date" ; - sh:path :hasAccessibilityDate . - -core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-hasConfidentialityJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A narrative explanation of why data is not published. - -Additional Information: -This element is generally used when the non-publication-justification code chosen is "other". - -WG Approval 09/11/2021 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has confidentiality justification" ; - sh:path :hasConfidentialityJustification . - -core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-hasNonPublicationJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:non-publication-justification ; - sh:description """The reason why data is not published. -WG Approval 11/06/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has non publication justification" ; - sh:path :hasNonPublicationJustification . - -core-shape:epo-NonPublishedInformation-epo-hasNonPublishedInformationIdentifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has non published information identifier" ; - sh:path :hasNonPublishedInformationIdentifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-conformsToLegalBasis a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:legal-basis ; - sh:description """The Notice was designed in accordance with the given legal basis. - -Additional Information: -This Notice can be used for Procedures which do not have the same legal basis. -This holds for standard forms.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Conforms to legal basis" ; - sh:path :conformsToLegalBasis . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-conformsToSpecificLegalBasis a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:legal-basis ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Conforms to specific legal basis" ; - sh:path :conformsToSpecificLegalBasis . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasAdditionalInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Supplementary data about the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 15/10/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has additional information" ; - sh:path :hasAdditionalInformation . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasEFormsSubtype a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e forms subtype" ; - sh:path :hasEFormsSubtype . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasESenderDispatchDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description """The date and time the notice was transmitted electronically by the eSender to the Publications Office of the European Union. - -Additional Information: -Typically, eSenders include national Official Journals, Buyers sending a large number of electronic Notices, public or private bodies acting on behalf of Buyers and eProcurement software developers. - -WG approval 20/06/2023""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e sender dispatch date" ; - sh:path :hasESenderDispatchDate . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasFormNumber a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has form number" ; - sh:path :hasFormNumber . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasFormType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:form-type ; - sh:description """A categorisation of the steps in which the Notice is used. - -WG Approval 12/05/2020 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has form type" ; - sh:path :hasFormType . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasLongTitle a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has long title" ; - sh:path :hasLongTitle . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasNonPublishedInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :NonPublishedInformation ; - sh:name "Has non published information" ; - sh:path :hasNonPublishedInformation ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasNoticeChangeInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :NoticeChangeInformation ; - sh:name "Has notice change information" ; - sh:path :hasNoticeChangeInformation ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasNoticePublicationNumber a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has notice publication number" ; - sh:path :hasNoticePublicationNumber . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasNoticeType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:notice-type ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has notice type" ; - sh:path :hasNoticeType . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasOJSIssueNumber a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has o j s issue number" ; - sh:path :hasOJSIssueNumber . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-hasOJSType a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has o j s type" ; - sh:path :hasOJSType . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-isBasedOnImplementingRegulation a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:legal-basis ; - sh:description """Indicates under which regulation a notice is created. - -WG Acceptance 06/09/2022""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is based on implementing regulation" ; - sh:path :isBasedOnImplementingRegulation . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-refersToLot a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Refers to lot" ; - sh:path :refersToLot ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-refersToNotice a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Notice ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Refers to notice" ; - sh:path :refersToNotice ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Notice-epo-refersToProcedure a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Procedure ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Refers to procedure" ; - sh:path :refersToProcedure ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeAwardInformation-epo-hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has approximate framework agreement value" ; - sh:path :hasApproximateFrameworkAgreementValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeAwardInformation-epo-hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The maximum value which can be spent through all the framework agreements announced in this notice, including options and renewals of contracts. - -Additional information: - -The value provided is a threshold value that implicity means that it cannot be exceeded however it may not be reached during the execution of a contract. - -The Framework Agreements in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. - -This corresponds to the BT-118 in eForms. - -WG Approval 03/12/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has maximum framework agreement awarded value" ; - sh:path :hasMaximumFrameworkAgreementAwardedValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeAwardInformation-epo-hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The highest received tender value for the procurement. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to section II.1.7.3. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has procurement highest received tender value" ; - sh:path :hasProcurementHighestReceivedTenderValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeAwardInformation-epo-hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The lowest received tender value for the procurement. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to section II.1.7.2. according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1986.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has procurement lowest received tender value" ; - sh:path :hasProcurementLowestReceivedTenderValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeAwardInformation-epo-hasTotalAwardedValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The awarded value of all lots announced in this notice, including options and renewals. - -Additional information: -The values of the individual Lots awarded under a framework agreement and mentioned in this notice are included. - -The values of the individual lots announced in a CAN are to be traced back and added to provide this value. - -This corresponds to the BT-161 in eForms. - -WG Approval 03/12/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has total awarded value" ; - sh:path :hasTotalAwardedValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasAdditionalInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Supplementary data about the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 15/10/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has additional information" ; - sh:path :hasAdditionalInformation . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasChangeDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Explanatory text about the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 30/09/2019""" ; - sh:name "Has change description" ; - sh:path :hasChangeDescription . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasChangeJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:change-corrig-justification ; - sh:description """The motives for the change. - -WG 5/11/2019 - -The codelist to be used is at-voc:change-corrig-justification which is available at -http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/change-corrig-justification""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has change justification" ; - sh:path :hasChangeJustification . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasChangeReasonDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Explanatory text about why the element is altered. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-762 Change Reason Description.""" ; - sh:name "Has change reason description" ; - sh:path :hasChangeReasonDescription . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasElementChange a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ElementChangeDescription ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has element change" ; - sh:path :hasElementChange ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-hasProcurementDocumentChangeDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description """The date and time of the change. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-719 Change Procurement Documents Date - -WG Approval 5/11/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has procurement document change date" ; - sh:path :hasProcurementDocumentChangeDate . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-isProcurementDocumentChanged a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """One or more procurement documents have been changed. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-718 Change Procurement Documents - -WG Approval 05/11/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is procurement document changed" ; - sh:path :isProcurementDocumentChanged . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-refersToEFormSectionIdentifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Refers to e form section identifier" ; - sh:path :refersToEFormSectionIdentifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-NoticeChangeInformation-epo-refersToPreviousNotice a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Notice ; - sh:description """ -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-758 Change Notice Version Identifier.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Refers to previous notice" ; - sh:path :refersToPreviousNotice ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-OfferIssuer-epo-distributesOffer a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Offer ; - sh:name "Distributes offer" ; - sh:path :distributesOffer ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-OpeningTerm-epo-definesOpeningPlace a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class locn:Address ; - sh:description """The place where the tenders will be publicly opened. - -WG Approval 10-10-2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines opening place" ; - sh:path :definesOpeningPlace ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-OpeningTerm-epo-hasOpeningDateTime a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description """Date and time for the opening of tenders. - -WG Approval 12/03/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has opening date time" ; - sh:path :hasOpeningDateTime . - -core-shape:epo-OpeningTerm-epo-hasOpeningDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Further information about the opening of tenders. - -Additional Information -For example, who may participate in the opening and whether any authorization is needed. - -WG Approval 12/03/2019""" ; - sh:name "Has opening description" ; - sh:path :hasOpeningDescription . - -core-shape:epo-OpeningTerm-epo-hasOpeningURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """The identifier of the address of the Opening of Tenders. -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has opening u r l" ; - sh:path :hasOpeningURL . - -core-shape:epo-OrganisationGroup-epo-hasGroupType a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Form of collaboration agreement between organisations. - -Additional Information: -This is not a legal type; not to be mistaken with epo:hasLegalFormType which may also be used for Organisation Groups. - -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:name "Has group type" ; - sh:path :hasGroupType . - -core-shape:epo-OrganisationGroup-epo-hasMember a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class org:Organization ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has member" ; - sh:path :hasMember ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-OrganisationGroup-epo-leadBy a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class org:Organization ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Lead by" ; - sh:path :leadBy ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ParticipationCondition-epo-hasReservedProcurement a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:reserved-procurement ; - sh:description """Explanation as to whether a procurement may be reserved for the participation of certain types of organisation. - -Additional information: -This property corresponds in eForms to the BT-71 -WG Approval 09/11/2021 -""" ; - sh:name "Has reserved procurement" ; - sh:path :hasReservedProcurement . - -core-shape:epo-ParticipationConditionsSummary-epo-describesObjectiveParticipationRules a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Describes objective participation rules" ; - sh:path :describesObjectiveParticipationRules . - -core-shape:epo-ParticipationConditionsSummary-epo-describesVerificationMethod a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Describes verification method" ; - sh:path :describesVerificationMethod . - -core-shape:epo-ParticipationConditionsSummary-epo-hasReservedProcurement a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:reserved-procurement ; - sh:description """Explanation as to whether a procurement may be reserved for the participation of certain types of organisation. - -Additional information: -This property corresponds in eForms to the BT-71 -WG Approval 09/11/2021 -""" ; - sh:name "Has reserved procurement" ; - sh:path :hasReservedProcurement . - -core-shape:epo-ParticipationRequestTerm-epo-definesParticipationRequestProcessor a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ParticipationRequestProcessor ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ParticipationRequestTerm has a ParticipationRequestProcessor." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines participation request processor" ; - sh:path :definesParticipationRequestProcessor ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ParticipationRequestTerm-epo-definesParticipationRequestReceiver a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ParticipationRequestReceiver ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ParticipationRequestTerm has a ParticipationRequestReceiver." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines participation request receiver" ; - sh:path :definesParticipationRequestReceiver ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Period-epo-hasBeginning a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description "The date and time on which this period begins." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has beginning" ; - sh:path :hasBeginning . - -core-shape:epo-Period-epo-hasEnd a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description "The date and time at which this period ends." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has end" ; - sh:path :hasEnd . - -core-shape:epo-Period-epo-hasTimePeriod a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:timeperiod ; - sh:description """ - -""" ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has time period" ; - sh:path :hasTimePeriod . - -core-shape:epo-PlannedProcurementPart-epo-foreseesProcurementObject a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcurementObject ; - sh:description """Relation indicating the instance of a Procurement Object that is planned. - -Additional Information: -The properties of the Procurement Object that is foreseen should be read as foreseen properties. -For example, Procedure isSMESuitable should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeSMESuitable. -For example, Procedure isFundedBy should be read as Procedure foreseesToBeFundedBy.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Foresees procurement object" ; - sh:path :foreseesProcurementObject ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-PlannedProcurementPart-epo-foreseesTechnique a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Technique ; - sh:name "Foresees technique" ; - sh:path :foreseesTechnique ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-PlannedProcurementPart-epo-hasPlannedDuration a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Duration ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has planned duration" ; - sh:path :hasPlannedDuration ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-PlannedProcurementPart-epo-hasPlannedPeriod a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Period ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has planned period" ; - sh:path :hasPlannedPeriod ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Prize-epo-hasPrizeRank a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The position of the prize (e.g. first place, second place) in a design contest list of prizes. - -WG Approval 29/08/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has prize rank" ; - sh:path :hasPrizeRank . - -core-shape:epo-Prize-epo-hasPrizeValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The monetary value of a prize, if any, for the winner (or runners-up) of the design contest. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds to BT-644 in eForms. - -WG Approval 29/08/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has prize value" ; - sh:path :hasPrizeValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-hasAcceleratedProcedureJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The reasons why the procedure is accelerated. - -Additional Information: -A procedure is accelerated to cover needs of extraordinary circumstances ie earthquake relief. - -WG Approval 09/06/2020 - -""" ; - sh:name "Has accelerated procedure justification" ; - sh:path :hasAcceleratedProcedureJustification . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-hasMainFeature a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Main features of the procedure and information about where the full rules for the procedure can be found. - -Additional Information: -This information should be given when the procedure is not one of those mentioned in the procurement directives. This can be the case for example for concessions, for social and other specific services, and in case of voluntary publication of procurement procedures below the EU procurement thresholds.""" ; - sh:name "Has main feature" ; - sh:path :hasMainFeature . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-hasProcedureType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:procurement-procedure-type ; - sh:description """Identification of the Procedure used. - -WG Approval 09/06/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has procedure type" ; - sh:path :hasProcedureType . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-hasProcurementScopeDividedIntoLot a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has procurement scope divided into lot" ; - sh:path :hasProcurementScopeDividedIntoLot ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-involvesBuyer a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Buyer ; - sh:name "Involves buyer" ; - sh:path :involvesBuyer ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-isAccelerated a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Statement about the fact that the procedure will be reduced due to a state of urgency. - -Additional Information - -This modifies the time limit for the receipt of requests to participate or the receipt of tenders. - -WG Approval 20/08/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is accelerated" ; - sh:path :isAccelerated . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-isDesignContest a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """A competition which enables the buyer to acquire a plan or design via a jury. - -Additional information: -Design contests have traditionally mostly been used in the fields of town and country planning, architecture and engineering or data processing, other purposes, such as to obtain plans for financial engineering - -The contest may include or not the award of prizes; - -WG approval 04-02-2021 """ ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is design contest" ; - sh:path :isDesignContest . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-isExecutedByProcurementServiceProvider a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcurementServiceProvider ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is executed by procurement service provider" ; - sh:path :isExecutedByProcurementServiceProvider ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-isJointProcurement a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Multiple buyers procure together within the same procedure. - -Addition Information: -In case the joint procurement involves buyers from different countries, the national law is specified by the epo:hasCrossBorderLaw in the ProcedureTerm . """ ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is joint procurement" ; - sh:path :isJointProcurement . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-isResponsibilityOfBuyer a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Buyer ; - sh:description """ -""" ; - sh:name "Is responsibility of buyer" ; - sh:path :isResponsibilityOfBuyer ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-isSubjectToProcedureSpecificTerm a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcedureSpecificTerm ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is subject to procedure specific term" ; - sh:path :isSubjectToProcedureSpecificTerm ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Procedure-epo-specifiesProcurementCriteriaSummary a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ProcurementCriteriaSummary ; - sh:name "Specifies procurement criteria summary" ; - sh:path :specifiesProcurementCriteriaSummary ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-definesBudgetProvider a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :BudgetProvider ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has a BudgetProvider." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines budget provider" ; - sh:path :definesBudgetProvider ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-definesInformationProvider a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :AuxiliaryParty ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has an information provider." ; - sh:name "Defines information provider" ; - sh:path :definesInformationProvider ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-definesLotGroup a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :LotGroup ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has a LotGroup." ; - sh:name "Defines lot group" ; - sh:path :definesLotGroup ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-definesMediator a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Mediator ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a ProcedureTerm has a Mediator." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines mediator" ; - sh:path :definesMediator ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-hasCrossBorderLaw a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The applicable law when buyers from different countries procure together within one procurement procedure. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-09 Cross Border Law.""" ; - sh:name "Has cross border law" ; - sh:path :hasCrossBorderLaw . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-hasGroupLotEvaluationMethod a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Description of how lots and groups of lots are evaluated against one another in the procedure. - - - -""" ; - sh:name "Has group lot evaluation method" ; - sh:path :hasGroupLotEvaluationMethod . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-hasLotAwardCombination a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The contracting authority reserves the right to award contracts combining lots or groups of lots. - -Additional Information: -This property contains information about the Lots concerned. -This property is required by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). - -WG approval 23/08/2022 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has lot award combination" ; - sh:path :hasLotAwardCombination . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-hasMaximumLotSubmissionAllowed a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The total number of lots for which one Tenderer can submit Tenders. - -Additional information: -This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). - -WG approval 12/12/2018 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has maximum lot submission allowed" ; - sh:path :hasMaximumLotSubmissionAllowed . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-hasMaximumNumberOfLotsToBeAwarded a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The maximum number of lots for which contract(s) can be awarded to one tenderer. - -Additional information: -This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). - -WG Approval 22/08/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has maximum number of lots to be awarded" ; - sh:path :hasMaximumNumberOfLotsToBeAwarded . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-hasNationalProcedureRules a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:name "Has national procedure rules" ; - sh:path :hasNationalProcedureRules . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-isAwardedByCPB a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Procedure is awarded by a Central Purchasing Body. - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is awarded by c p b" ; - sh:path :isAwardedByCPB . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-isOneLotOnlyAllowed a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Indicates whether tenders may be submitted for only one Lot. - -Additional information: -This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms). - -WG approval 23/08/2022 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is one lot only allowed" ; - sh:path :isOneLotOnlyAllowed . - -core-shape:epo-ProcedureTerm-epo-isSubmissionForAllLotsAllowed a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Indicates whether tenders may be submitted for all Lots. - -Additional information: -This field is used to complement the SubmissionTerms (which are at the Lot level) for the Procedure level which is covered by the regulation (EU)-2015-1986 (modeled in the TED Standard Forms) - -WG approval 23/08/2022 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is submission for all lots allowed" ; - sh:path :isSubmissionForAllLotsAllowed . - -core-shape:epo-ProcessPlanningTerm-epo-hasAwardDateScheduled a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """Planned date for the award decision. -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has award date scheduled" ; - sh:path :hasAwardDateScheduled . - -core-shape:epo-ProcessPlanningTerm-epo-hasEstimatedContractNoticePublicationDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """Foreseen date for publication of Contract Notice. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms BT-127 Future Notice. - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated contract notice publication date" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedContractNoticePublicationDate . - -core-shape:epo-ProcessPlanningTerm-epo-hasEstimatedTenderInvitationDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """The planned date for the dispatch of the invitations to submit tenders. -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated tender invitation date" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedTenderInvitationDate . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementCriteriaSummary-epo-indicatesPerformingStaffInformationRequirement a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Indicates performing staff information requirement" ; - sh:path :indicatesPerformingStaffInformationRequirement . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementCriterion-epo-hasConstraint a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:Constraint ; - sh:name "Has constraint" ; - sh:path :hasConstraint ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementCriterion-epo-hasFormula a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The mathematical equation or any other description used for complicated weighing of criteria (e.g. non-linear weighing, the analytic hierarchy process) when a weighing cannot be expressed per criterion. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-543.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has formula" ; - sh:path :hasFormula . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementCriterion-epo-hasPerformingStaffQualificationInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:requirement-stage ; - sh:description """Explanation as to if and/or when information of the persons to carry out the contract is to be provided. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - -The codelist to be used is at-voc:requirement-stage which is available at http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/requirement-stage -""" ; - sh:name "Has performing staff qualification information" ; - sh:path :hasPerformingStaffQualificationInformation . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementCriterion-epo-hasWeightValueType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:number-weight ; - sh:description """No definition. Waiting on CCCEV alignment. - - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has weight value type" ; - sh:path :hasWeightValueType . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementElement-adms-identifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description """A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - -Additional Information - -For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. - -WG Approval 12/11/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Identifier" ; - sh:path adms:identifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementElement-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementElement-dct-title a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Title" ; - sh:path dcterms:title . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementElement-epo-hasEstimatedValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """A forecast of the value of the procurement before competition. - -Additional Information: -Different cases of estimated values may refer to a lot, the global value of the procedure, or of a combinatorial value of a group of lots. -The forecast is calculated by the buyer and covers all revenues whether coming from the buyer or third parties. -See for example recital (19), Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and other articles from the rest of Directives about procurement. - -In the case of framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems this refers to the maximum estimated value. - -This property corresponds to BT-27 in eForms (for Lot and Procedure) and can be used for BT-157 (for LotGroup). - -WG Approval 05/12/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated value" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementElement-epo-hasInternalIdentifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:name "Has internal identifier" ; - sh:path :hasInternalIdentifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementElement-epo-usesChannel a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:Channel ; - sh:name "Uses channel" ; - sh:path :usesChannel ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-foreseesConcession a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ConcessionEstimate ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Foresees concession" ; - sh:path :foreseesConcession ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-foreseesContractSpecificTerm a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ContractSpecificTerm ; - sh:name "Foresees contract specific term" ; - sh:path :foreseesContractSpecificTerm ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-fulfillsStrategicProcurement a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :StrategicProcurement ; - sh:name "Fulfills strategic procurement" ; - sh:path :fulfillsStrategicProcurement ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasAdditionalInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Supplementary data about the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 15/10/2019""" ; - sh:name "Has additional information" ; - sh:path :hasAdditionalInformation . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasLegalBasis a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:legal-basis ; - sh:description """The legal basis under which the procurement procedure takes place. - -Additional Information: -For example European Directives or Regulations, national law - -WG 09/11/2021 - -The codelist to be used is at-voc:legal-basis which is available at http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/legal-basis -""" ; - sh:name "Has legal basis" ; - sh:path :hasLegalBasis . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasLegalBasisDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:name "Has legal basis description" ; - sh:path :hasLegalBasisDescription . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasPurpose a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Purpose ; - sh:description "Relation indicating the Purpose of a concept." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has purpose" ; - sh:path :hasPurpose ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-hasRecurrenceDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Any additional information about the recurrence of the Procurement. - -Additional Information: -For example estimated timing of the Procedure. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-95 Recurrence Description. - -(WG approval 2019-01-16) -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has recurrence description" ; - sh:path :hasRecurrenceDescription . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-isCoveredByGPA a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Specifies whether the Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) applies. - -Additional information: -The GPA aims to establish a multilateral framework of balanced rights and obligations relating to public contracts with a view to achieving the liberalization and expansion of world trade. - -This corresponds in the e Forms to BT-115 GPA Coverage. - -WG Approval 15/10/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is covered by g p a" ; - sh:path :isCoveredByGPA . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-isFundedBy a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Fund ; - sh:description """Funding is provided either completely or partially by a Fund. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BG - 61 EU Funds (specified per Lot) and to BG - 611 Contract EU Funds (applied per Contract lot) -Funds may change between the lot and the contract, for example in the case of an emergency crisis, a contract may be financed by a budget that was not foreseen in the call. - -""" ; - sh:name "Is funded by" ; - sh:path :isFundedBy ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-isRecurrent a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """The Procurement being notified is likely to be included in another procedure in the foreseeable future. - -Additional Information: - -For example, a regularly re-tendered municipal service. This does not include awarding multiple contracts within a single qualification system, framework agreement, or a dynamic purchasing system. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-94 Recurrence. - -WG Approval 12/05/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is recurrent" ; - sh:path :isRecurrent . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-isSMESuitable a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """The Lot is suitable for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). - -Additional Information - -This allows the buyer to make emphasis on the fact that the procedure has been designed having SMEs in mind. This indicator is also to be reflected in the selection criteria. - -For example, number of employees and turnover are applicable to the definition of an SME. - -WG Approval 15/10/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is s m e suitable" ; - sh:path :isSMESuitable . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-isSubjectToTerm a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Term ; - sh:name "Is subject to term" ; - sh:path :isSubjectToTerm ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-isUsingEUFunds a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """The procurement foresees funding by the Union. - -Additional Information: -The funding may cover the whole procurement or part of the procurement. - -For example the European Structural and Investment Funds or grants awarded by the European Union. - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is using e u funds" ; - sh:path :isUsingEUFunds . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementObject-epo-usesTechnique a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Technique ; - sh:name "Uses technique" ; - sh:path :usesTechnique ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementProcessInformation-epo-concernsLot a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:description "Relates to Lot." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Concerns lot" ; - sh:path :concernsLot ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementProcessInformation-epo-concernsProcedure a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Procedure ; - sh:description "Relates to Procedure." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Concerns procedure" ; - sh:path :concernsProcedure ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementProcessInformation-epo-isCompetitionTerminated a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """No further contracts will be awarded in this procedure. - -Additional Information: -This can be instantiated in the post award phase. - -PIN for Competition needs to be signaled. This field can be used even if no contracts are awarded in the contract award notice. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-756 PIN Competition Termination.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is competition terminated" ; - sh:path :isCompetitionTerminated . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementProcessInformation-epo-isDPSTerminated a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """End of the Dynamic Purchase System (DPS). - -Additional Information: This property can be used in the contract award notice even if no contracts are awarded. - -WG Approval 22/11/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is d p s terminated" ; - sh:path :isDPSTerminated . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementProcessInformation-epo-isToBeRelaunched a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Indicator of whether the procurement object is to be relaunched. - -Additional information: -This can be instantiated in the post award phase. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-634 Procurement Relaunch. - -WG Approval: 18/01/2022 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is to be relaunched" ; - sh:path :isToBeRelaunched . - -core-shape:epo-ProcurementServiceProvider-epo-actsOnBehalfOf a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Buyer ; - sh:description "Represents." ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Acts on behalf of" ; - sh:path :actsOnBehalfOf ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ProfessionalSuitabilitySummary-epo-describesProfession a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Describes profession" ; - sh:path :describesProfession . - -core-shape:epo-ProfessionalSuitabilitySummary-epo-describesProfessionRelevantLaw a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Describes profession relevant law" ; - sh:path :describesProfessionRelevantLaw . - -core-shape:epo-ProfessionalSuitabilitySummary-epo-hasServiceReservedToParticularProfession a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has service reserved to particular profession" ; - sh:path :hasServiceReservedToParticularProfession . - -core-shape:epo-Project-adms-identifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description """A unique identifier of the instance of the concept. - -Additional Information - -For example, in the case of the Procurement Identifier, this could be the European Public Procurement Identifier, and/or any other identifier provided by the buyer, the service provider or any other stakeholder. - -WG Approval 12/11/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Identifier" ; - sh:path adms:identifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-PurchaseContract-epo-followsRulesSetBy a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :FrameworkAgreement ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Follows rules set by" ; - sh:path :followsRulesSetBy ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-PurchaseContract-epo-resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MiniCompetitionAwardOutcome ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Results from mini competition award outcome" ; - sh:path :resultsFromMiniCompetitionAwardOutcome ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Purpose-epo-hasAdditionalClassification a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:cpv ; - sh:name "Has additional classification" ; - sh:path :hasAdditionalClassification . - -core-shape:epo-Purpose-epo-hasMainClassification a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:cpv ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has main classification" ; - sh:path :hasMainClassification . - -core-shape:epo-Purpose-epo-hasTotalQuantity a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Quantity ; - sh:description """The number of units required. - -Additional Information: -The quantity needs to go along with the unit. - - - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has total quantity" ; - sh:path :hasTotalQuantity ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-QualificationCriteriaSummary-epo-hasConditionVerificationMethod a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:name "Has condition verification method" ; - sh:path :hasConditionVerificationMethod . - -core-shape:epo-QualificationCriteriaSummary-epo-hasQualificationCondition a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:name "Has qualification condition" ; - sh:path :hasQualificationCondition . - -core-shape:epo-Quantity-epo-hasQuantityValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description "The numeric value of the quantity, including decimals." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has quantity value" ; - sh:path :hasQuantityValue . - -core-shape:epo-Quantity-epo-hasUnitCode a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:measurement-unit ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has unit code" ; - sh:path :hasUnitCode . - -core-shape:epo-Quantity-epo-hasUnitDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A narrative explanation defining the units of items being counted - -Additional information: This could be for example individual items or pack or two. - -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:name "Has unit description" ; - sh:path :hasUnitDescription . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewDecision-epo-hasConfirmedIrregularityType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:irregularity-type ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-791 Review Irregularity Type""" ; - sh:name "Has confirmed irregularity type" ; - sh:path :hasConfirmedIrregularityType . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewDecision-epo-hasDecisionDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """The date of the review decision. - -Additional information: -This attribute corresponds to the BT-787 Review Date in eForms. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has decision date" ; - sh:path :hasDecisionDate . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewDecision-epo-hasRemedyValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-793 Review Remedy Value.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has remedy value" ; - sh:path :hasRemedyValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewDecision-epo-hasReviewDecisionType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:review-decision-type ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-790 Review Decision Type.""" ; - sh:name "Has review decision type" ; - sh:path :hasReviewDecisionType . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewDecision-epo-providesRulingOnRemedy a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:remedy-type ; - sh:description "States the measures to be taken after a review procedure." ; - sh:name "Provides ruling on remedy" ; - sh:path :providesRulingOnRemedy . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewDecision-epo-resolvesReviewRequest a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ReviewRequest ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Resolves review request" ; - sh:path :resolvesReviewRequest ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewIrregularitySummary-epo-hasIrregularityType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:irregularity-type ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-636 Buyer Review Requests Irregularity Type""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has irregularity type" ; - sh:path :hasIrregularityType . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewIrregularitySummary-epo-hasReviewIrregularityCount a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The number of requests for a given irregularity. - -Additional information: -This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-635 Buyer Review Requests Count.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has review irregularity count" ; - sh:path :hasReviewIrregularityCount . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewObject-epo-hasElementReference a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """Reference to the class instance in the current notice. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-13716 Change Previous Notice Section Identifier, BT-786 Review Notice Section Identifier and BT-1501 Modification Previous Notice Section Identifier.""" ; - sh:name "Has element reference" ; - sh:path :hasElementReference . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewObject-epo-hasReviewURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """The internet address of the documents concerning the review instance. - -Additional information: -This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-794 Review URL. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has review u r l" ; - sh:path :hasReviewURL . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewObject-epo-refersToPreviousReview a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ReviewObject ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-785 "Review Previous Identifier".""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Refers to previous review" ; - sh:path :refersToPreviousReview ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequest-epo-hasAllegedIrregularityType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:irregularity-type ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-791 Review Irregularity Type -""" ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has alleged irregularity type" ; - sh:path :hasAllegedIrregularityType . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequest-epo-hasNumberOfReviewRequests a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description "The number of requests the buyer received to review any of its decisions." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has number of review requests" ; - sh:path :hasNumberOfReviewRequests . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequest-epo-hasRequestDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """The date when the review request was submitted. - -Additional information: -This attribute corresponds to the BT-787 Review Date in eForms. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has request date" ; - sh:path :hasRequestDate . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequest-epo-hasReviewRequestFee a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-795 Review Request Fee.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has review request fee" ; - sh:path :hasReviewRequestFee ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequest-epo-hasWithdrawalDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:date ; - sh:description """The date and time when the request for review was withdrawn. - -Additional information: -This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-797 Review Request Withdrawn Date.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has withdrawal date" ; - sh:path :hasWithdrawalDate . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequest-epo-hasWithdrawalReason a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The explanation for withdrawing the request for review. - -Additional information: -This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-798 Review Request Withdrawn Reasons""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has withdrawal reason" ; - sh:path :hasWithdrawalReason . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequest-epo-isWithdrawn a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """The review request was withdrawn. - -Additional information: -This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-796 Review Request Withdrawn.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is withdrawn" ; - sh:path :isWithdrawn . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequest-epo-requestsRemedyType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:remedy-type ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-792 Review Remedy Type""" ; - sh:name "Requests remedy type" ; - sh:path :requestsRemedyType . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequestSummary-epo-concernsReviewSummaryForLot a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:description """Relates to Lot review summary. - -Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BT-13722 Buyer Review Lot Identifier.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Concerns review summary for lot" ; - sh:path :concernsReviewSummaryForLot ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequestSummary-epo-hasReviewIrregularitySummary a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ReviewIrregularitySummary ; - sh:description """Additional information: -This relation corresponds in eForms to BG-613 Buyer Review Requests""" ; - sh:name "Has review irregularity summary" ; - sh:path :hasReviewIrregularitySummary ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-ReviewRequestSummary-epo-hasTotalNumberOfComplainants a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The number of economic operators that requested the buyer to review any of its decisions (e.g. the technical specifications, award decision), as set out in Art. 1(5) of Directive 89/665/EEC and Directive 92/13/EEC. - -Additional information: -This attribute corresponds in eForms to BT-712 Buyer Review Complainants - -WG Approval 11/04/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has total number of complainants" ; - sh:path :hasTotalNumberOfComplainants . - -core-shape:epo-Reviewer-epo-hasReviewBodyType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:review-body-type ; - sh:name "Has review body type" ; - sh:path :hasReviewBodyType . - -core-shape:epo-SecurityClearanceTerm-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-SecurityClearanceTerm-epo-hasDeadline a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description """The deadline by which the security clearance must be submitted to the buyer. - -WG Approval 12/09/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has deadline" ; - sh:path :hasDeadline . - -core-shape:epo-SecurityClearanceTerm-epo-isSecurityClearanceRequired a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is security clearance required" ; - sh:path :isSecurityClearanceRequired . - -core-shape:epo-SelectedCandidateList-epo-containsCandidate a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Candidate ; - sh:name "Contains candidate" ; - sh:path :containsCandidate ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-SelectedCandidateList-epo-hasStartDate a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Period ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has start date" ; - sh:path :hasStartDate ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-SelectionCriteriaSummary-epo-describesMinimumLevelOfStandards a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Describes minimum level of standards" ; - sh:path :describesMinimumLevelOfStandards . - -core-shape:epo-SelectionCriteriaSummary-epo-hasSelectionCriteriaStatedInProcurementDocuments a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has selection criteria stated in procurement documents" ; - sh:path :hasSelectionCriteriaStatedInProcurementDocuments . - -core-shape:epo-SelectionCriterion-epo-hasSelectionCriteriaUsage a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:usage ; - sh:description """ -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-748 Selection Criteria Used.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has selection criteria usage" ; - sh:path :hasSelectionCriteriaUsage . - -core-shape:epo-SelectionCriterion-epo-hasSelectionCriterionType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:selection-criterion ; - sh:description """The classification of the selection criteria. - - -Additional Information: - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-747 Selection Criteria Type. - -WG Approval 09/11/2021 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has selection criterion type" ; - sh:path :hasSelectionCriterionType . - -core-shape:epo-SelectionCriterion-epo-isUsedForCandidateRestriction a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """The criterion will be used to select the candidates to be invited for the second stage of a multistage procedure. - -Additional Information: -This property is only used if a maximum number of candidates was foreseen in the procedure. -This corresponds in eForms to BT-40 Selection Criteria Second Stage Invite""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is used for candidate restriction" ; - sh:path :isUsedForCandidateRestriction . - -core-shape:epo-SocialProcurement-epo-fulfillsRequirement a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:social-objective ; - sh:description """The requirement to which the concept meets. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - -""" ; - sh:name "Fulfills requirement" ; - sh:path :fulfillsRequirement . - -core-shape:epo-SpecificDuration-time-numericDuration a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description "Value of a temporal extent expressed as a number." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Numeric duration" ; - sh:path time:numericDuration . - -core-shape:epo-SpecificDuration-time-unitType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class time:TemporalUnit ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Unit type" ; - sh:path time:unitType . - -core-shape:epo-StrategicProcurement-epo-hasNonAccessibilityCriterionJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Reason for not applying accessibility criteria. - -Additional information: -This corresponds in eForma to BT-755 Accessibility Justification. - -WG Approval 05/03/2019""" ; - sh:name "Has non accessibility criterion justification" ; - sh:path :hasNonAccessibilityCriterionJustification . - -core-shape:epo-StrategicProcurement-epo-hasStrategicProcurementDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Self-explanatory text about a concept. -""" ; - sh:name "Has strategic procurement description" ; - sh:path :hasStrategicProcurementDescription . - -core-shape:epo-StrategicProcurement-epo-includesAccessibilityCriterion a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:accessibility ; - sh:description """Explanation as to whether accessibility Criterion are used or not. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - -""" ; - sh:name "Includes accessibility criterion" ; - sh:path :includesAccessibilityCriterion . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractTerm-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractTerm-epo-hasMaximumShare a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """The maximum proportion of something to be distributed. - -Additional Information: -In the case of subcontracting the share may refer to the proportion of works, services or supplies being subcontracted. - -WG Approval 17/09/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has maximum share" ; - sh:path :hasMaximumShare . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractTerm-epo-hasMinimumShare a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """The minimum proportion of something to be distributed. - -Additional Information: -In the case of subcontracting the share may refer to the proportion of works, services or supplies being subcontracted. - -WG Approval 17/09/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has minimum share" ; - sh:path :hasMinimumShare . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractTerm-epo-hasMinimumSubcontractorsProposedObligation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """The minimum percentage of the contract value that the contractor must subcontract. - -Additional information: -This is used for the competitive procedure described in Title III of Directive 2009/81/EC. - -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has minimum subcontractors proposed obligation" ; - sh:path :hasMinimumSubcontractorsProposedObligation . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractTerm-epo-hasSubcontractingInvolved a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """List of Subcontractors and the subject matter they cover are required. - -Additional Information: -The tenderer will ned to supply this information in the tender. - -WG Approval 28/02/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has subcontracting involved" ; - sh:path :hasSubcontractingInvolved . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractTerm-epo-hasSubcontractingObligation a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:subcontracting-obligation ; - sh:description """The requirement the tender must meet with regard to subcontracting parts of the contract. -WG Approval 09/11/2021 - -""" ; - sh:name "Has subcontracting obligation" ; - sh:path :hasSubcontractingObligation . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractTerm-epo-hasSubcontractorsProposedAboveObligation a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """The maximum percentage of the contract value that the contractor must subcontract. - -Additional information: -This is used for the competitive procedure described in Title III of Directive 2009/81/EC. - -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has subcontractors proposed above obligation" ; - sh:path :hasSubcontractorsProposedAboveObligation . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractingEstimate-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractingEstimate-epo-hasEstimatedPercentage a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:decimal ; - sh:description """The estimated proportion foreseen to be subcontracted. - -WG Approval 07/01/2020""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated percentage" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedPercentage . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractingEstimate-epo-hasSubcontractingEstimatedValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The estimated value of a single subcontract. - -This relates to BT-553 in eForms. - -WG Approval 01/09/2020 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has subcontracting estimated value" ; - sh:path :hasSubcontractingEstimatedValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-SubcontractingEstimate-epo-hasSubjectMatter a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Description of the share of the contract that is to be subcontracted. - -Additional infromation: -This can be an aggregate of several subcontracts. - -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:name "Has subject matter" ; - sh:path :hasSubjectMatter . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasAbnormallyLowTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """Tenders received that were found irregular and non-acceptable due to an abnormally low price or cost. - -Additional Information -The definition implies that abnormally Low Tender Lots are Inadmissible Tender Lots. - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has abnormally low tenders" ; - sh:path :hasAbnormallyLowTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasEEAReceivedTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The amount of tenders received from economic operators in other EEA countries other than the country of the buyer. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e e a received tenders" ; - sh:path :hasEEAReceivedTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasEUReceivedTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description "The amount of tenders received from economic operators in other EU countries other than the country of the buyer." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e u received tenders" ; - sh:path :hasEUReceivedTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasElectronicTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """Electronic Tender Lots received. - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has electronic tenders" ; - sh:path :hasElectronicTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasEstimatedTotalSubcontracts a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The estimated amount of work to be subcontracted in the contract resulting from the lot. -WG Approval 09/11/2021""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has estimated total subcontracts" ; - sh:path :hasEstimatedTotalSubcontracts . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasHighestReceivedTenderValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """Amount of the Tender with the highest value. - -Additional Information -The value must correspond to an admissible tender. For example, tenders compliant with the procurement document requirements, not having an abnormally low price or cost, etc. - - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 - - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has highest received tender value" ; - sh:path :hasHighestReceivedTenderValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasInadmissibleTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """Tenders received that cannot be awarded due to non-compliance to procurement document requirements or having an abnormally low price or cost. - -Additional Information: -Non-compliance with a Procurement Document requirements include exclusion grounds, selection criteria and submission deadline, etc. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has inadmissible tenders" ; - sh:path :hasInadmissibleTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasLowestReceivedTenderValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """Amount of the Tender with the lowest value. - -Additional Information -The value must correspond to an admissible tender. For example, tenders compliant with the procurement document requirements, not having an abnormally low price or cost, etc. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has lowest received tender value" ; - sh:path :hasLowestReceivedTenderValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasMediumTenderPerLots a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """Tenders from medium-sized enterprise. - -Additional Information: - -See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has medium tender per lots" ; - sh:path :hasMediumTenderPerLots . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasNonEEAReceivedTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The amount of tenders received from economic operators in non-EEA countries. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019 15:20:36""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has non e e a received tenders" ; - sh:path :hasNonEEAReceivedTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasNonEUReceivedTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The amount of tenders received from economic operators in non-EU countries. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has non e u received tenders" ; - sh:path :hasNonEUReceivedTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasNumberOfTenderersInvited a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """Number of economic operators invited to tender. - -Additional Information -This may be used for single-stage procedures or to indicate the number of candidates invited to tender in multi-stage procedures. - -WG Approval 01/12/2020 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has number of tenderers invited" ; - sh:path :hasNumberOfTenderersInvited . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasOtherCountriesReceivedTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has other countries received tenders" ; - sh:path :hasOtherCountriesReceivedTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasReceivedMicroTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The amount of tenders received from a micro enterprise. - -Additional Information: - -See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has received micro tenders" ; - sh:path :hasReceivedMicroTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasReceivedParticipationRequests a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The amount of applications to participate from economic operators. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has received participation requests" ; - sh:path :hasReceivedParticipationRequests . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasReceivedSmallTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """Tenders from small enterprise. - -Additional Information: - -See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has received small tenders" ; - sh:path :hasReceivedSmallTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasReceivedSubmissionType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:received-submission-type ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has received submission type" ; - sh:path :hasReceivedSubmissionType . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasReceivedTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The total amount of tenders received. - -WG Approval 12/12/2019""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has received tenders" ; - sh:path :hasReceivedTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasSMEReceivedTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The amount of tenders received from micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. - -Additional Information: - -See Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. -The ReceivedSMETenderLots is used when the size of the company is not exactly knokn. - -WG Approval 05/03/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has s m e received tenders" ; - sh:path :hasSMEReceivedTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-hasUnverifiedTenders a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """Offers received for which it has not been verified if they are admissible or inadmissible (e.g. because award criteria have been evaluated for all tenders and admissibility is checked only for the winning tender). - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has unverified tenders" ; - sh:path :hasUnverifiedTenders . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionStatisticalInformation-epo-summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :AwardOutcome ; - sh:description """Relates to submission for the given competition, either at Lot level or Mini-Competition level. - -WG approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Summarises information for award outcome" ; - sh:path :summarisesInformationForAwardOutcome ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-definesTenderProcessor a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :TenderProcessor ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a SubmissionTerm has a TenderProcessor." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines tender processor" ; - sh:path :definesTenderProcessor ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-definesTenderReceiver a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :TenderReceiver ; - sh:description "Relation indicating a SubmissionTerm has a TenderReceiver." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Defines tender receiver" ; - sh:path :definesTenderReceiver ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasEAuctionURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """The internet address of the electronic auction. - -Additional Information: - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-123 Electronic Auction URL.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e auction u r l" ; - sh:path :hasEAuctionURL . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasECataloguePermission a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:permission ; - sh:description """The extent to which electronic catalogues may be used in tenders. - -WG Approval 03/10/2019 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e catalogue permission" ; - sh:path :hasECataloguePermission . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasESubmissionPermission a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:permission ; - sh:description """The requirements as to what extent electronic submission is allowed. - -WG Approval 03/10/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has e submission permission" ; - sh:path :hasESubmissionPermission . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasGuaranteeDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Information on the financial commitment required from the economic operator. - -Additional Information: -1. This information may include the amount and the way of delivering of the guarantee -2. The financial commitment may be retained by the buyer in the case the tenderer withdraws the submitted information (i.e. tender, expression of interest and request for participation, but not request for clarifications) before the award of the contract or does not sign the contract. -3. Usual modalities are bonds, cheques, loans, other. - -WG Approval 21/07/20 -""" ; - sh:name "Has guarantee description" ; - sh:path :hasGuaranteeDescription . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasLanguage a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:language ; - sh:description """Language in which the submitted information is to be expressed. - -WG Approval 21/07/2020 - -""" ; - sh:name "Has language" ; - sh:path :hasLanguage . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasLateSubmissionInformationDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A narrative text explaining the content of the economic operator information that can be submitted late. - -Additional Information -This does not apply to requests for clarifications. -""" ; - sh:name "Has late submission information description" ; - sh:path :hasLateSubmissionInformationDescription . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasLateSubmissionPermission a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:missing-info-submission ; - sh:description """Whether economic operator-related information can be supplemented even after the submission deadline. - -Additional Information -This is specific to the information on the economic operator and not the actual offer. This does not apply to the requests for clarification. - -WG Approval 21/07/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has late submission permission" ; - sh:path :hasLateSubmissionPermission . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasNonElectronicSubmissionDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Textual explanation of how non-electronic information is to be presented. - -WG Approval 21/07/2020 - -""" ; - sh:name "Has non electronic submission description" ; - sh:path :hasNonElectronicSubmissionDescription . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasNonElectronicSubmissionJustification a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:communication-justification ; - sh:description """ -Reason for not accepting electronic information. - -WG Approval 21/07/2020 -""" ; - sh:name "Has non electronic submission justification" ; - sh:path :hasNonElectronicSubmissionJustification . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasReceiptDeadline a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description """The time limit for receiving submissions. - -Additional Information -This is the deadline by which the buyer must receive submissions (e.g. tenders, requests to participate, clarifications, etc.) and is not the time at which the information is submitted by the economic operator. -This attribute should be used for standard forms mappings. - -WG Approval 21/07/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has receipt deadline" ; - sh:path :hasReceiptDeadline . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasReceiptExpressionDeadline a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:description """Time limit for receipt of expressions of interest. - -Pending of review by the WG - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has receipt expression deadline" ; - sh:path :hasReceiptExpressionDeadline . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasReceiptParticipationRequestDeadline a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has receipt participation request deadline" ; - sh:path :hasReceiptParticipationRequestDeadline . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasReceiptPreliminaryMarketConsultationDeadline a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has receipt preliminary market consultation deadline" ; - sh:path :hasReceiptPreliminaryMarketConsultationDeadline . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasReceiptTenderDeadline a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:dateTime ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has receipt tender deadline" ; - sh:path :hasReceiptTenderDeadline . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasSubmissionURL a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """ -Additional Information: -This corresponds to the eForms BT-18 Submission URL. - -This corresponds in eForms to BT-509 Organisation eDelivery Gateway.""" ; - sh:name "Has submission u r l" ; - sh:path :hasSubmissionURL . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasTenderSubcontractingInformation a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:subcontracting-indication ; - sh:description """The information about subcontracting that must be indicated in the tender. - -WG Approval 10/10/2019 - -""" ; - sh:name "Has tender subcontracting information" ; - sh:path :hasTenderSubcontractingInformation . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasTenderValidityPeriod a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Period ; - sh:description """The relation indicating until when a tender instance is applicable. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has tender validity period" ; - sh:path :hasTenderValidityPeriod ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-hasVariantPermission a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:permission ; - sh:description """The obligation or possibility for tenderers to submit variants or not. - -Additional Information: - -Variants are alternative ways to fulfil the buyer's needs as opposed to solutions indicated in the procurement documents. - -eForms: Whether tenderers are required, allowed or forbidden to submit tenders which fulfil the buyer's needs differently than as proposed in the procurement documents. - -Additional Information: - -Further conditions for submitting variant tenders are in the procurement documents. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has variant permission" ; - sh:path :hasVariantPermission . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-isAdvancedElectronicSignatureRequired a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Advanced or qualified electronic signature or seal (as defined in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014) is required. - - - -The submitted information is required to be signed electronically. - -Additional Information: - -Signature can be defined as "data in electronic form which is attached to or logically associated with other data in electronic form and which is used by the signatory to sign. -For more details on the meaning and uses of electronic signature you may consult different authoritative sources, a relevant one being for instance the Regulation (EU) 910/2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market. - -WG Approval 21/07/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is advanced electronic signature required" ; - sh:path :isAdvancedElectronicSignatureRequired . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-isGuaranteeRequired a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """The submitted information must include a financial commitment to be used in case of default. - -Additional Information: -See the additional information provided in the definition of the 'Guarantee Description' element. - -WG Approval 21/07/20 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is guarantee required" ; - sh:path :isGuaranteeRequired . - -core-shape:epo-SubmissionTerm-epo-isMultipleTenderSubmissionAllowed a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Tenderers may submit more than one competing tenders. - -WG Approval 10/10/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is multiple tender submission allowed" ; - sh:path :isMultipleTenderSubmissionAllowed . - -core-shape:epo-System-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-System-epo-isOwnedByAgent a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class foaf:Agent ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is owned by agent" ; - sh:path :isOwnedByAgent ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Technique-dct-description a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """An account of the resource. - -Additional Information: -Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the resource. - -WG Approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Description" ; - sh:path dcterms:description . - -core-shape:epo-Technique-epo-hasUsage a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:usage ; - sh:description """The codelist to be used is at-voc:usage which is available at http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/usage -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has usage" ; - sh:path :hasUsage . - -core-shape:epo-Technique-epo-hasValidityPeriod a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Period ; - sh:description """The relation indicating until when a given instance of a concept is applicable. - -WG approval 30/05/2023 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has validity period" ; - sh:path :hasValidityPeriod ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-foreseesConcession a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ConcessionEstimate ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Foresees concession" ; - sh:path :foreseesConcession ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-foreseesSubcontracting a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :SubcontractingEstimate ; - sh:name "Foresees subcontracting" ; - sh:path :foreseesSubcontracting ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-hasElectronicSubmission a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description "Transmission of tenders is possible by electronic means of communication. " ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has electronic submission" ; - sh:path :hasElectronicSubmission . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-hasFinancialOfferValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:description """The value offered by the Tenderer for a Lot. - -Additional Information: -This value is normally the one awarded for a winning Tender Lot. In case of negotiated procedures the original financial value may be reviewed and the offer updated. - -This corresponds to BT-720 in eForms.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has financial offer value" ; - sh:path :hasFinancialOfferValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-hasItemCountryOfOrigin a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:country ; - sh:description """The source country of the product or service. - -Additional Information: - -The country of origin can be provided by the buyer as a requirement or by the tenderer information of the item to be provided. - -WG Approval 07/01/2020 - -The codelist to be used is at-voc:country which is available at http://publications.europa.eu/resource/dataset/country""" ; - sh:name "Has item country of origin" ; - sh:path :hasItemCountryOfOrigin . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-hasSubcontracting a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:applicability ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has subcontracting" ; - sh:path :hasSubcontracting . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-isSubjectToGrouping a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :LotGroup ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is subject to grouping" ; - sh:path :isSubjectToGrouping ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-isSubmitedBy a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Tenderer ; - sh:description """Relation indicating the submission of a tender by an economic operator. -WG approval 18/05/2021""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is submited by" ; - sh:path :isSubmitedBy ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-isSubmittedForLot a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Lot ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is submitted for lot" ; - sh:path :isSubmittedForLot ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-isVariant a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:boolean ; - sh:description """Alternative solution to fulfil the buyer's needs as opposed to solutions indicated in the procurement documents. - -Additional Information: - -The permission to offer variants is only allowed if specified in a Contract Notice or a Prior Information Notice that used as a means for calling for a competition. -The buyer lays out minimum requirements in the procurement documents that must be respected by tenderers submitting variants. - -WG Approval 29/05/2019 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is variant" ; - sh:path :isVariant . - -core-shape:epo-Tender-epo-specifiesSubcontractors a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Subcontractor ; - sh:name "Specifies subcontractors" ; - sh:path :specifiesSubcontractors ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-TenderAwardOutcome-epo-concernsTender a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Tender ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Concerns tender" ; - sh:path :concernsTender ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-TenderAwardOutcome-epo-hasAwardRank a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The position of the tender (i.e. whether the tender ended up first, second, third, etc.) in a design contest, some framework agreements with multiple winners (e.g. cascades) or an innovation partnership. - -Additional Information: -This corresponds in eForms to BT-171 Tender Rank. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has award rank" ; - sh:path :hasAwardRank . - -core-shape:epo-TenderAwardOutcome-epo-indicatesAwardToWinner a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Winner ; - sh:description "Reveals the winner to whom the tender award outcome is attributed." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Indicates award to winner" ; - sh:path :indicatesAwardToWinner ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-epo-comprisesTender a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Tender ; - sh:description "Incorporates Tender." ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Comprises tender" ; - sh:path :comprisesTender ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-epo-hasTotalValue a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :MonetaryValue ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has total value" ; - sh:path :hasTotalValue ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-TenderGroup-epo-isSubmittedForLotGroup a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :LotGroup ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Is submitted for lot group" ; - sh:path :isSubmittedForLotGroup ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-Tenderer-epo-substantiatesExclusionGround a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :ExclusionGround ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Substantiates exclusion ground" ; - sh:path :substantiatesExclusionGround ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-VehicleInformation-epo-concernsGreenProcurement a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :GreenProcurement ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:minCount 1 ; - sh:name "Concerns green procurement" ; - sh:path :concernsGreenProcurement ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:epo-VehicleInformation-epo-hasCleanVehicles a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The number of all clean vehicles that have either been purchased, leased, rented, hired-purchased or their use has been contractually committed to for the provision of a purchased service. - -Additional Information -In the European Union, the legal requirements and scope for the provision of these vehicles or services are covered by Directive 2009/33/EC. - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has clean vehicles" ; - sh:path :hasCleanVehicles . - -core-shape:epo-VehicleInformation-epo-hasTotalVehicles a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The number of all vehicles (regardless of whether clean or not) that have either been purchased, leased, rented, hired-purchased or their use has been contractually committed to for the provision of a purchased service. - -Additional Information - -In the European Union, the legal requirements and scope for the provision of these vehicles or services are covered by Directive 2009/33/EC. - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has total vehicles" ; - sh:path :hasTotalVehicles . - -core-shape:epo-VehicleInformation-epo-hasZeroEmissionVehicles a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:integer ; - sh:description """The number of all zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles that have either been purchased, leased, rented, hired-purchased or their use has been contractually committed to for the provision of a purchased service. - -Additional Information - -In the European Union, the legal requirements and scope for the provision of these vehicles or services are covered by Directive 2009/33/EC. - -WG Approval 28/07/2020 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has zero emission vehicles" ; - sh:path :hasZeroEmissionVehicles . - -core-shape:epo-VehicleInformation-epo-specifiesCleanVehicleDirectiveContractType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:cvd-contract-type ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Specifies clean vehicle directive contract type" ; - sh:path :specifiesCleanVehicleDirectiveContractType . - -core-shape:epo-VehicleInformation-epo-specifiesCleanVehicleDirectiveVehicleCategory a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:vehicle-category ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Specifies clean vehicle directive vehicle category" ; - sh:path :specifiesCleanVehicleDirectiveVehicleCategory . - -core-shape:epo-Winner-epo-needsToBeATenderer a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :Tenderer ; - sh:description "The Winner must be a Tenderer." ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Needs to be a tenderer" ; - sh:path :needsToBeATenderer ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:foaf-Agent-adms-identifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description "Links a resource to an adms:Identifier class." ; - sh:name "Identifier" ; - sh:path adms:identifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:foaf-Agent-dct-title a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A name given to the resource. - -WG approval 30/05/2023""" ; - sh:name "Title" ; - sh:path dcterms:title . - -core-shape:foaf-Agent-epo-hasAlias a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Acronym or alternative name of the Agent. -WG Approval 25/03/2021""" ; - sh:name "Has alias" ; - sh:path :hasAlias . - -core-shape:foaf-Agent-epo-ownsSystem a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class :System ; - sh:name "Owns system" ; - sh:path :ownsSystem ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:locn-Address-epo-hasCountryCode a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:country ; - sh:description """ -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has country code" ; - sh:path :hasCountryCode . - -core-shape:locn-Address-epo-hasNutsCode a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:nuts ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has nuts code" ; - sh:path :hasNutsCode . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-addressArea a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """The name or names of a geographic area or locality that groups a number of addressable objects for addressing purposes, without being an administrative unit. - -Additional Information: -This would typically be part of a city, a neighbourhood or village, e.g. Montmartre.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Address area" ; - sh:path locn:addressArea . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-addressID a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:description """A globally unique identifier for each instance of an Address. - -Additional Information: -The concept of adding a globally unique identifier for each instance of an address is a crucial part of the INSPIRE data spec. A number of EU countries have already implemented an ID (a UUID) in their Address Register/gazetteer, among them Denmark. OASIS xAL also includes an address identifier. It is the address Identifier that allows an address to be represented in a format other than INSPIRE whilst remaining conformant to the Core Vocabulary. - -The INSPIRE method of representing addresses is very detailed, designed primarily for use in databases of addresses. Whilst data that is published in full conformance with the INSPIRE data structure can be made available using the Location Core Vocabulary the reverse is not true since the Core Vocabulary allows much greater flexibility. - -Many datasets that include address data as one piece of information about something else are likely to have that data in simpler formats. These might be tailored to the specific need of the dataset, follow a national norm, or make use of a standard like vCard. - -To provide maximum flexibility in the Core Vocabulary, whilst remaining interoperable with INSPIRE Address Guidelines (which EU Member States are obliged to use), the Location Core Vocabulary provides the extra property of full address and makes use of INSPIRE's addressID.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Address i d" ; - sh:path locn:addressID ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-adminUnitL1 a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """The name or names of a unit of administration related to the exercise of jurisdictional rights, for local, regional and national governance. Level 1 refers to the uppermost administrative unit for the address, almost always a country. - -Additional Information: -Best practice is to use the ISO 3166-1 code but if this is inappropriate for the context, country names should be provided in a consistent manner to reduce ambiguity. For example, either write 'France' or 'FRA' consistently throughout the dataset and avoid mixing the two. The Country controlled vocabulary from the Publications Office can be reused for this.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Admin unit l1" ; - sh:path locn:adminUnitL1 . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-adminUnitL2 a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """The name or names of a unit of administration related to the exercise of jurisdictional rights, for local, regional and national governance. Level 2 refers to the region of the address, usually a county, state or other such area that typically encompasses several localities. - -Additional Information: -Some recommended codelists from the EU Publications Office include: Administrative Territorial Units (ATU), NUTS and Local Administrative Units (LAU). The first arrondissement of Paris is for example expressed as "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/atu/FRA_AR_PAR01" in the ATU controlled vocabulary. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Admin unit l2" ; - sh:path locn:adminUnitL2 . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-fullAddress a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """The complete address written as a formatted string. - -Additional Information: -Use of this property is recommended as it will not suffer any misunderstandings that might arise through the breaking up of an address into its component parts. This property is analogous to vCard's label property but with two important differences: (1) formatting is not assumed so that, unlike vCard label, it may not be suitable to print this on an address label, (2) vCard's label property has a domain of vCard Address; the fullAddress property has no such restriction. An example of a full address is "Champ de Mars, 5 Avenue Anatole France, 75007 Paris, France".""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Full address" ; - sh:path locn:fullAddress . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-locatorDesignator a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """A number or a sequence of characters which allows a user or an application to interpret, parse and format the locator within the relevant scope. A locator may include more locator designators. - -Additional Information: -In simpler terms, this is the building number, apartment number, etc. For an address such as "Flat 3, 17 Bridge Street", the locator is "flat 3, 17".""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Locator designator" ; - sh:path locn:locatorDesignator . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-locatorName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """Proper noun(s) applied to the real world entity identified by the locator. - -Additional Information: -The locator name could be the name of the property or complex, of the building or part of the building, or it could be the name of a room inside a building. - -The key difference between a locator and a locator name is that the latter is a proper name and is unlikely to include digits. For example, "Shumann, Berlaymont" is a meeting room within the European Commission headquarters for which locator name is more appropriate than locator.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Locator name" ; - sh:path locn:locatorName . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-postCode a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The post/zip code of an address. (INSPIRE's definition is "A code created and maintained for postal purposes to identify a subdivision of addresses and postal delivery points.") - -Additional Information: -Post codes are common elements in many countries' postal address systems. One of the many post codes of Paris is for example "75000".""" ; - sh:name "Post code" ; - sh:path locn:postCode . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-postName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description "The key postal division of the address, usually the city. (INSPIRE's definition is \"One or more names created and maintained for postal purposes to identify a subdivision of addresses and postal delivery points.) For example, \"Paris\"." ; - sh:name "Post name" ; - sh:path locn:postName . - -core-shape:locn-Address-locn-thoroughfare a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:langString ; - sh:description """An address component that represents the name or names of a passage or way through from one location to another. A thoroughfare is not necessarily a road, it might be a waterway or some other feature. - -Additional Information: -For example, "Avenue des Champs-Élysées".""" ; - sh:name "Thoroughfare" ; - sh:path locn:thoroughfare . - -core-shape:locn-Geometry-cv-coordinates a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description "The coordinate list." ; - sh:name "Coordinates" ; - sh:path cccev:coordinates . - -core-shape:locn-Geometry-cv-latitude a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description "The latitude." ; - sh:name "Latitude" ; - sh:path cccev:latitude . - -core-shape:locn-Geometry-cv-longitude a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description "The longitude." ; - sh:name "Longitude" ; - sh:path cccev:longitude . - -core-shape:org-Organization-cv-address a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class locn:Address ; - sh:description """Associates any Resource with the corresponding Address. - -Additional Information: -Asserting the address relationship implies that the Resource has an Address.""" ; - sh:name "Address" ; - sh:path cccev:address ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:org-Organization-cv-registeredAddress a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class locn:Address ; - sh:description """The registered address relationship links a Resource with the legally registered Address. - -Additional Information: -It is the address to which formal communications can be sent, such as the postal address. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Registered address" ; - sh:path cccev:registeredAddress ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasBuyerLegalType a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:buyer-legal-type ; - sh:description """A category that indicates the right of an Organisation to play the role of a buyer. - -Additional Information: -The category also effects the rules that the buyer has to abide to within the public procurement procedure. -WG 07/09/2021 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has buyer legal type" ; - sh:path :hasBuyerLegalType . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasBuyerLegalTypeDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Self-explanatory text about the Buyer Legal Type. - -Additional information: -This field is used when the Buyer Legal Type is not available in the controlled list at-voc:buyer-legal-type . This is necessary in to cover data provided in the TED Standard Forms. It shall be deprecated in the future. - -WG Approval 06/09/2022""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has buyer legal type description" ; - sh:path :hasBuyerLegalTypeDescription . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasInternetAddress a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype xsd:anyURI ; - sh:description """The main web page used by the instance of the concept. - -WG Approval 01/06/2023 -""" ; - sh:name "Has internet address" ; - sh:path :hasInternetAddress . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasLegalFormType a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The classification of an Organisation according to legislation. - -Additional Information: -Generally, this is defined for Tenderers who want to submit as an Organisation Group. -Note that the codelist provided at national level should be used. -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has legal form type" ; - sh:path :hasLegalFormType . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasLegalIdentifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:name "Has legal identifier" ; - sh:path :hasLegalIdentifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasLegalName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The officially registered name of an organisation. - -WG Approval 10/01/2023""" ; - sh:name "Has legal name" ; - sh:path :hasLegalName . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasMainActivity a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:main-activity ; - sh:description """The principal sectoral area in which an organisation operates. - -Additional information: - -The activities associated with buyers are derived from the top level of the Classification of the functions of the government (COFOG) from the United Nations Statistics Division. - -The activities associated with buyer are derived from sectors explicitly falling within the sectoral directive (2014/25/EU Art. 8 - Art. 14). - -WG Approval 05/05/2020 - -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has main activity" ; - sh:path :hasMainActivity . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasMainActivityDescription a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """Self-explanatory text about the Main Activity . - -Additional information: -This field is used when the Main Activity is not available in the controlled list at-voc:main-activity-type . This is necessary in to cover data provided in the TED Standard Forms. It shall be deprecated in the future. - -WG Approval 06/09/2022 -""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has main activity description" ; - sh:path :hasMainActivityDescription . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasOrganisationUnitName a sh:PropertyShape ; - rdfs:isDefinedBy core-shape:core-shape ; - sh:datatype rdf:PlainLiteral ; - sh:description """The name of a subpart of an organisation. - -Additional Information: -E.g. the relevant department of a large organisation. - -We added this attribute in case of eProcurement notices where the Buyer is actually a part of an Organization and the rest of the properties apply to the rest of the Organisation as well.""" ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has organisation unit name" ; - sh:path :hasOrganisationUnitName . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasPrimaryContactPoint a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class cccev:ContactPoint ; - sh:name "Has primary contact point" ; - sh:path :hasPrimaryContactPoint ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasRegistrationCountry a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class at-voc:country ; - sh:maxCount 1 ; - sh:name "Has registration country" ; - sh:path :hasRegistrationCountry . - -core-shape:org-Organization-epo-hasTaxIdentifier a sh:PropertyShape ; - sh:class adms:Identifier ; - sh:name "Has tax identifier" ; - sh:path :hasTaxIdentifier ; - sh:sparql [ sh:select " SELECT ?this ?that WHERE { ?this ?that . ?that ?this .} " ] . - -core-shape:core-shape a owl:Ontology ; - cc:attributionName "European Union" ; - cc:attributionURL ; - dcterms:abstract "This artefact provides the datashape specification. " ; - dcterms:created ""^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:description "This module provides the definitions for the eProcurement ontology core. Procurement data has been identified as data with a high-reuse potential. Given the increasing importance of data standards for eProcurement, a number of initiatives driven by the public sector, the industry and academia have been kick-started in recent years. Some have grown organically, while others are the result of standardisation work. The vocabularies and the semantics that they are introducing, the phases of public procurement that they are covering, and the technologies that they are using all differ. These differences hamper data interoperability and thus its reuse by them or by the wider public. This creates the need for a common data standard for publishing procurement data, hence allowing data from different sources to be easily accessed and linked, and consequently reused."@en ; - dcterms:issued "2023-08-09"^^xsd:date ; - dcterms:license ; - dcterms:rights "The Commission’s reuse policy is implemented by Commission Decision2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330,14.12.2011, p. 39 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj). Unlessotherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This means that reuse is allowed, provided that appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated." ; - dcterms:title "eProcurement Ontology - core"@en ; - bibo:status "Semantic Specification Realease" ; - vann:preferredNamespacePrefix "epo" ; - vann:preferredNamespaceUri "http://data.europa.eu/a4g/ontology#" ; - rdfs:seeAlso , - , - , - ; - owl:imports :core, - :core-restriction, - cccev:, - , - at-voc:, - dcterms:, - , - , - , - , - , - org:, - , - foaf:, - ; - owl:incompatibleWith "3.1.0" ; - owl:priorVersion "3.1.0" ; - owl:versionIRI core-shape:core-shape-4.0.0 ; - owl:versionInfo "4.0.0" ; - skos:changeNote """This version is automatically generated from ePO_CM.xml on - 2023-08-09""" . -