<cbc:ActivityType>railway services</cbc:ActivityType> #84
-
Message from our coders: examples/notices/veat_25.xml cac:ContractingActivity ActivityType doesn't exist in fields.json. Should this be ActivityTypeCode? I think this is related to the same issue I raised earlien in the discussion: BTs are missing links to codelists. At least that's what I think... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thank you for your feedback. This is a mistake in the example notice veat_25.xml. It should indeed use
This also requires the correction of the "Buyer Legal Type" (BT-11), otherwise the value "rail" is not allowed. For example:
The example will be corrected in the next version of the SDK. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thank you for your feedback.
This is a mistake in the example notice veat_25.xml. It should indeed use
cbc:ActivityTypeCode
, as follows:This also requires the correction of the "Buyer Legal Type" (BT-11), otherwise the value "rail" is not allowed. For example:
The example will be corrected in the next version of the SDK.