-
Hi Lab ! but in validation they are alternative : as in field.json : "id" : "BT-131(d)-Lot", "id" : "BT-1311(d)-Lot", Bye |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
I guess the rules are initially evaluated (and with an empty form both fields appear as mandatory) and not reevaluated afterwards (hence not preventing the specification of the second field once the first one has been specified) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi,
These deadlines are alternative one from the other. Current rules enforce the existence of one or the other of these dates. It looks like wit the current set, not all situations are covered and an additional rule should be put in place to ensure that at least one of the two is specified. We still have to look into it.