efbc:TermCode lack in T02 ?

[rengit62]

Hi lab !
in T02 form :

CONDITIONS OTHER THAN REVENUE ALLOCATION (0001) and REWARDS AND PENALTIES became

       <efac:ContractTerm>
		<efbc:TermCode listName="contract-detail">all-rev-tic</efbc:TermCode>
		<efbc:TermDescription languageID="ENG">CONDIZIONI CAPESTRO</efbc:TermDescription>
	</efac:ContractTerm>
	<efac:ContractTerm>
		<efbc:TermCode listName="rewards-penalties">rew-pen</efbc:TermCode>
		<efbc:TermDescription languageID="ENG">O PAGHI O TI DENUNCIO</efbc:TermDescription>
	</efac:ContractTerm>

Good, but what for Revenues allocation , that is OPP-032-Tender ? It remains 'alone' without efbc:TermCode and it gives , of course , xsd Error :

<efac:ContractTerm>
    <efbc:TermPercent>400</efbc:TermPercent>
</efac:ContractTerm>

Can you tell me how to catch the 'third' <efbc:TermCode ?
Thanks and regards
Renato

[YvesJo]

There is no associated field defined and this element should be generated systematically as soon as a percentage for revenue allocation is specified. This may not be currently implemented in the editor demo.

[rengit62]

We do not use editor demo. We take 'inspiration' from editor demo especially in front-end, but we are building an new application based entirely on SDK.
What do you mean with "this element should be generated systematically as soon as a percentage for revenue allocation is specified" ?
When the mandatory field OPP-032-Tender is filled, a second xml tag has to be generated ?
like <efbc:TermCode listName="contract-detail">all-rev-tic</efbc:TermCode> ?
It is a special rule for this notice or this field ? or for OPP-032-Tender ?

[rengit62]

Hi Lab
I found an example notice Subtype T02 t02_ESP.xml and inside it the block :

<efac:ContractTerm>
    <efbc:TermCode>all-rev-ic</efbc:TermCode>
    <efbc:TermIndicator>true</efbc:TermIndicator>
    <efbc:TermPercent>100</efbc:TermPercent>
</efac:ContractTerm>

I did not found anywhere, except in that notice, the string "all-rev-ic", I guess there no codelist in which is defined.
Anyway as you wrote that the termCode should be generated systematically when TermPercent is specified ( it is mandatory, also .. ) , should I 'hardcode' all-rev-ic or anyValue ?
Bye
Renato

[YvesJo]

Hi,
The T02 mark-up example is incorrect and needs to be updated, "expected value should be "all-rev-tic" from the contract-detail codelist. Also efbc:TermIndicator has been inaccurately added to all terms. This will get fixed in a next release.