BT-722-Contract mismatch definition ?

[rengit62]

Hi Lab
in 25.json, 29.json
{
"id" : "BT-722-Contract",
"contentType" : "field",
"displayType" : "TEXTAREA",
"description" : "Contract EU Funds Programme",
"_label" : "field|name|BT-722-Contract"
}

in fields.json
"id" : "BT-722-Contract",
"parentNodeId" : "ND-ContractEUFunds",
"name" : "Contract EU Funds Programme",
"btId" : "BT-722",
"xpathAbsolute" : "/*/ext:UBLExtensions/ext:UBLExtension/ext:ExtensionContent/efext:EformsExtension/efac:NoticeResult/efac:SettledContract/efac:Funding/cbc:FundingProgramCode",
"xpathRelative" : "cbc:FundingProgramCode",
"xsdSequenceOrder" : [ { "cbc:FundingProgramCode" : 2 } ],
"type" : "code",
"legalType" : "CODE",

"sdkVersion" : "1.6.0"

Bye
Renato

[YvesJo]

I guess this UI display choice has been elected for usability purpose so that the user may type some letters and get an extract of possible values from the long codelist for which a dropdown would not be appropriate.

[rouschr]

Yes this looks similar and had been answered below.

[rengit62]

Yes Yves, the nice effect that you wrote is done in Notice Editor by the tom-select.js.
But with or without tom-select.is, with the current definition of "BT-722-Contract" there is an error as in jpg ErrorNoticeType25_2.jpg, and the combo is not populated with codelist value , jpg ErrorNoticeType25_1.jpg

Instead setting
"id" : "BT-722-Contract",
"contentType" : "field",
"displayType" : "COMBOBOX",
"description" : "Contract EU Funds Programme",
"_label" : "field|name|BT-722-Contract"
}

we get the list :

besides that, BT-262 is a very very long list of supplies, services, and is defines as
"id" : "BT-262-Lot",
"contentType" : "field",
"displayType" : "COMBOBOX",
"description" : "Main Classification Code",
"_label" : "field|name|BT-262-Lot"

Bye !
Renato

[YvesJo]

Thanks Renato for these details.
I will raise this to my colleagues for them to look at it.

[rouschr]

The message with:
TypeError: this.formElement.populate is not a function at CodeInputField.populate (notice-type-definition.js:457:22)
looks like a bug.
For the field "BT-722-Contract" (of type code) the codelist is "eu-programme".
In the NTD 25 we have:

    "id" : "BT-722-Contract",
            "contentType" : "field",
            "displayType" : "TEXTAREA",
            "description" : "Contract EU Funds Programme",
            "_label" : "field|name|BT-722-Contract"

TEXTAREA
So here the NTD (notice-types definition data) is faulty, and as we are now aware of this, we will change this and similar cases from TEXTAREA to COMBOBOX to avoid this problem.
Probably something to change for the notice-types data of SDK 1.8.0.
This could also be something we could automatically detect earlier.