preview server SDK 1.13, noticeType 16, BT-71-Lot

[mDrozdAT]

Hi devs

I have error msg (response from CVS server)
'Reserved participation' (BT-71-Lot) is mandatory (in '16 – Contract notice – general directive, standard regime')

But i have it included in xml which is sent at CVS for validation

Is this piece of XML correct ? If yes is everything allright at CVS server ?

<cac:TenderingTerms>
    <cac:ProcurementLegislationDocumentReference>
      <cbc:ID>CrossBorderLaw</cbc:ID>
      <cbc:DocumentDescription languageID="DEU">some description</cbc:DocumentDescription>
    </cac:ProcurementLegislationDocumentReference>
    <cac:TendererQualificationRequest>
      <cac:SpecificTendererRequirement>
        <cbc:TendererRequirementTypeCode listName="exclusion-grounds-source">epo-procurement-document</cbc:TendererRequirementTypeCode>
      </cac:SpecificTendererRequirement>
    </cac:TendererQualificationRequest>
  </cac:TenderingTerms>

Thanks for answer

[bertrand-lorentz]

The XML snippet does not contain the field BT-71-Lot: this field uses the element cbc:TendererRequirementTypeCode, but with the attribute listName="reserved-procurement"

It seems you've put BT-806-Procedure instead, but this field should be at the procedure level, not under cac:ProcurementProjectLot

So the snippet should be something like:

<cac:TenderingTerms>
    <cac:ProcurementLegislationDocumentReference>
      <cbc:ID>CrossBorderLaw</cbc:ID>
      <cbc:DocumentDescription languageID="DEU">some description</cbc:DocumentDescription>
    </cac:ProcurementLegislationDocumentReference>
    <cac:TendererQualificationRequest>
      <cac:SpecificTendererRequirement>
        <cbc:TendererRequirementTypeCode listName="reserved-procurement">none</cbc:TendererRequirementTypeCode>
      </cac:SpecificTendererRequirement>
    </cac:TendererQualificationRequest>
  </cac:TenderingTerms>

[mDrozdAT]

ok. This section i have correct (BT-806-Procedure)
So this is different.
Currently iam using 1.11 and there is no issue.
in 1.13 conflict appear during creating XML
BT-821-Lot is new Field and BT-771-Lot is more complex.
Those 3 fields (BT-71/821/771-Lot) creating my issues and overwriting each others.
Now i found it under the example. cn_24_FRA_comments.xml
this is good example for me. Thanks for give me at right path (even its not exactly that :)