You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #1192 we add support for the Sign_extend and Repeat symbols, avoiding to build many unnecessary intermediate terms that clutter the union-find. However there are still performance issues, in particular with sign-extensions to (very) large bit-widths because we are still representing the resulting bit-vector as an explicit concatenation at the semantic value level. In particular, this adds a large constant factor to any solving involving such values.
We should consider representing repetitions explicitly in bit-vector semantic values. Since we need semantic values to be canonical, it might be too expensive/complicated to handle arbitrary repetitions, but we can at least handle repetitions of single bits, which would be enough for the sign_extend case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #1192 we add support for the
Sign_extend
andRepeat
symbols, avoiding to build many unnecessary intermediate terms that clutter the union-find. However there are still performance issues, in particular with sign-extensions to (very) large bit-widths because we are still representing the resulting bit-vector as an explicit concatenation at the semantic value level. In particular, this adds a large constant factor to any solving involving such values.We should consider representing repetitions explicitly in bit-vector semantic values. Since we need semantic values to be canonical, it might be too expensive/complicated to handle arbitrary repetitions, but we can at least handle repetitions of single bits, which would be enough for the
sign_extend
case.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: