You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
- Describe the issue or question:
Hi, our group just started to try to implement the Fragpipe workflow, we like the speed and the open search feature! However, we recently ran into one bizarre issue: We would like to test drive an Ecoli peptide library and generate one run from a QE. However, if we run an open search, no result is generated (as the protein prophet commended there is no result generated). However, we run a regular narrow search we get over 5000 peptides. Would you mind helping to give us a clue what might be wrong? Both searches used the same database and the same raw files.
Thanks a lot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the fast reply. I added the variable modification (dimethylation) and I get some results. So just being curious, if some universal modification (e.g dimethylation on N-term and K) exists and I did not specify that in the open search, will open search give out near 0 id? like what I experienced?
log_2024-12-07_21-57-58-open.txt
log_2024-12-07_22-20-38-regular.txt
- Describe the issue or question:
Hi, our group just started to try to implement the Fragpipe workflow, we like the speed and the open search feature! However, we recently ran into one bizarre issue: We would like to test drive an Ecoli peptide library and generate one run from a QE. However, if we run an open search, no result is generated (as the protein prophet commended there is no result generated). However, we run a regular narrow search we get over 5000 peptides. Would you mind helping to give us a clue what might be wrong? Both searches used the same database and the same raw files.
Thanks a lot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: