Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Narraw (regular) search is working, but open search is not? #1921

Open
Ming339-uw opened this issue Dec 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Narraw (regular) search is working, but open search is not? #1921

Ming339-uw opened this issue Dec 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Ming339-uw
Copy link

Ming339-uw commented Dec 8, 2024

log_2024-12-07_21-57-58-open.txt
log_2024-12-07_22-20-38-regular.txt

- Describe the issue or question:
Hi, our group just started to try to implement the Fragpipe workflow, we like the speed and the open search feature! However, we recently ran into one bizarre issue: We would like to test drive an Ecoli peptide library and generate one run from a QE. However, if we run an open search, no result is generated (as the protein prophet commended there is no result generated). However, we run a regular narrow search we get over 5000 peptides. Would you mind helping to give us a clue what might be wrong? Both searches used the same database and the same raw files.

Thanks a lot

@fcyu fcyu self-assigned this Dec 8, 2024
@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Dec 8, 2024

There are almost no identifications from your data:

-----|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------
     |  MS1   (Old)  |  MS1   (New)  |  MS2   (Old)  |  MS2   (New)  
-----|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------
 Run |  Median  MAD  |  Median  MAD  |  Median  MAD  |  Median  MAD  
 001 | Not enough data to perform mass calibration. Using the uncalibrated data.
-----|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------
Finding the optimal parameters:
-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------
  MS2  |    5  |    7  |   10  |   15  |   20  |   25  |   30  |   50  
-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------
 Count |      1|      0| skip rest
-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------
-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------
 Peaks | 300_0 | 200_0 | 175_0 | 150_1 | 125_1 | 100_1 
-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------
 Count |      1|      1|      1|      1|      1|      1
-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------
-------|-------
 Int.  |    1  
-------|-------
 Count |      0
-------|-------
-------|-------
 Rm P. |    0  
-------|-------
 Count |      1
-------|-------

Please double check your parameter settings and databases.

Best,

Fengchao

@Ming339-uw
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the fast reply. I added the variable modification (dimethylation) and I get some results. So just being curious, if some universal modification (e.g dimethylation on N-term and K) exists and I did not specify that in the open search, will open search give out near 0 id? like what I experienced?

@fcyu
Copy link
Member

fcyu commented Dec 9, 2024

If your samples have chemical labeling, you should add them as car mod. Because most peptides will have one or more of those modifications.

Best,

Fengchao

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants