You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The following comment was received during the review of the NIEM-based Code List Specification being developed for the NATO Core Data Framework (NCDF):
Example D-5 documents two methods of binding at schema-time a code list in the same example. This is a bit unclear at first, since from the example you can’t say whether both methods are needed in all cases, of whether they are indeed alternatives, as intended. I would suggest to split it in two examples.
Proposed solution: Split Schema examples into 2 separate appendices; one defining the complex code list binding, and the other defining 2 simple code list bindings. This will entail additional narrative to clarify that they describe different sets of constraints.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The following comment was received during the review of the NIEM-based Code List Specification being developed for the NATO Core Data Framework (NCDF):
Example D-5 documents two methods of binding at schema-time a code list in the same example. This is a bit unclear at first, since from the example you can’t say whether both methods are needed in all cases, of whether they are indeed alternatives, as intended. I would suggest to split it in two examples.
Proposed solution: Split Schema examples into 2 separate appendices; one defining the complex code list binding, and the other defining 2 simple code list bindings. This will entail additional narrative to clarify that they describe different sets of constraints.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: