Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OGSv1.2 to Oncopeltus fasciatus private haplotype browsers #278

Open
mpoelchau opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

Add OGSv1.2 to Oncopeltus fasciatus private haplotype browsers #278

mpoelchau opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mpoelchau
Copy link
Contributor

OGS v1.2 is here: https://i5k.nal.usda.gov/bio_data/836678

The community wants to review these assemblies, and having the OGS on each haplotype will likely help. The OGS will need to be remapped first.

@mpoelchau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@amcooksey
Copy link

added OGS (new version is 1.3) and 454 and Trinity transcriptome tracks to Apollo

@mpoelchau
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @amcooksey! Can you update the metadata for the transcriptome tracks:

Track 1, hap1:

Track 1, hap2:

Track 2, hap 1:

Track 2, hap 2:

@mpoelchau
Copy link
Contributor Author

For the OGS, can you:

@amcooksey
Copy link

for the OGS, the jbrowse/data/names directory is already there. I ran flatfiletojson.sh on scinet already. do I need to run it again?

@amcooksey
Copy link

updated metadata

@mpoelchau
Copy link
Contributor Author

ah okay. The name index wasn't working so I assumed the directory hadn't been updated. Instead it looks like it only has indexes for the Lifted Maternal and early embryonic 454 transcriptome. You could just run the name indexing part on its own and just specify the OGS (no need to index the transcriptome tracks). It might be possible to just run flatfile2json.sh on the OGS track (not sure if it will create a duplicate track though).

@amcooksey
Copy link

updated OGS 1.3 indexing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants