Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add warning to avoid naming a parameter beginning with a number #11606

Open
3 tasks done
surfingoldelephant opened this issue Dec 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks done
Labels
issue-doc-bug Issue - error in documentation needs-triage Waiting - Needs triage

Comments

@surfingoldelephant
Copy link

Prerequisites

  • Existing Issue: Search the existing issues for this repository. If there is an issue that fits your needs do not file a new one. Subscribe, react, or comment on that issue instead.
  • Descriptive Title: Write the title for this issue as a short synopsis. If possible, provide context. For example, "Typo in Get-Foo cmdlet" instead of "Typo."
  • Verify Version: If there is a mismatch between documentation and the behavior on your system, ensure that the version you are using is the same as the documentation. Check this box if they match or the issue you are reporting is not version specific.

Links

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.core/about/about_functions?view=powershell-7.4#functions-with-parameters
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.core/about/about_functions_advanced_parameters?view=powershell-7.4

Summary

While PowerShell allows a function parameter name to begin with a number, it should almost always be avoided.

Due to how - followed by a number is parsed in argument mode, using the parameter in a normal manner isn't possible. PS users should be warned to avoid this type of naming as it makes code harder to call/reuse.

The issue is not apparent when writing the code/defining the command and may not be apparent to potential callers either.

Details

function TestFunction { param ([switch] $100, [string] $200) "100: $100"; "200: $200" }

{ TestFunction -100 }.Ast.EndBlock.Statements[0].PipelineElements[0].CommandElements[-1]
# StringConstantExpressionAst:
#     StringConstantType : BareWord
#     Value              : -100
#     StaticType         : System.String

{ TestFunction -200 Foo }.Ast.EndBlock.Statements[0].PipelineElements[0].CommandElements[1, 2]
# StringConstantExpressionAst:
#     StringConstantType : BareWord
#     Value              : -200
#     StaticType         : System.String

# StringConstantExpressionAst:
#     StringConstantType : BareWord
#     Value              : Foo
#     StaticType         : System.String

-100 and -200 are both parsed as bareword (unquoted) arguments, not parameters. This limitation is mentioned in the Language Specification, albeit the first-parameter-char syntax suggests PowerShell outright does not support parameter names beginning with a number, which isn't accurate.

A parameter can be named beginning with a number, it just can't be used normally.

One workaround is hash table splatting:

# Broken.
TestFunction -100

# 100: False
# 200: -100

# OK.
# Quoting the key isn't mandatory for this particular case, but is
# generally good practice when the intention is to specify a string.
$ht = @{ '100' = $true } 
TestFunction @ht

# 100: True
# 200:

Another workaround, applicable to .ps1 script files, is to call the file with powershell.exe -File or pwsh -File, since the initial parsing of the parameter becomes irrelevant once the command line string is constructed by PS.

Suggested Fix

In about_Functions and about_Functions_Advanced_Parameters:

  • Add a warning that it is generally best to avoid naming a parameter beginning with a number as using the parameter normally (Command -Parameter) isn't possible.
    • Note that this affects any parameter-supporting command type, not just functions.
    • It applies to both advanced and non-advanced/simple commands.
  • Make a note of the hash table splatting workaround in case the reader encounters someone else's code with this issue.
@surfingoldelephant surfingoldelephant added issue-doc-bug Issue - error in documentation needs-triage Waiting - Needs triage labels Dec 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
issue-doc-bug Issue - error in documentation needs-triage Waiting - Needs triage
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant