You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
By having a CA that can also work with ECC we are opting the user to choose between the existing solution (of using RSA certificates) vs a more efficient solution which is computationally less intensive and still provides for a sufficient degree of security.
In turn, we would have to consider if a user that prefers efficiency over privacy-enhancement would also have to provide PoW #3 in its certificates. Also should ECC certificates be accepted by other users if that PoW doesn't exist in such users' certificates? Should an efficiency oriented portion of the user population use the same P2P relay servers then?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
By having a CA that can also work with ECC we are opting the user to choose between the existing solution (of using RSA certificates) vs a more efficient solution which is computationally less intensive and still provides for a sufficient degree of security.
In turn, we would have to consider if a user that prefers efficiency over privacy-enhancement would also have to provide PoW #3 in its certificates. Also should ECC certificates be accepted by other users if that PoW doesn't exist in such users' certificates? Should an efficiency oriented portion of the user population use the same P2P relay servers then?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: