Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Retrain models to latest version of Spacy #11

Closed
dsarmiento84 opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Retrain models to latest version of Spacy #11

dsarmiento84 opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
libraries versions A new version of something (spaCy/tensorflow) comes out

Comments

@dsarmiento84
Copy link

Hi,

Im bumbing with this warning:
Model 'xx_use_lg' (0.3.2) requires spaCy v2.1,<2 and is incompatible with the current spaCy version (2.3.2)

Can you please retrain the models for this specific version or handle some guidlines to do it?

Thanks.
MartinoMensio added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2020
@MartinoMensio
new version: fixing spacy warning on version check.
d0d3c97 
This addresses #11 #8 #5. SpaCy wants the version specification to match the major.minor.

Also added docker example
@MartinoMensio
Copy link
Owner

Hi @dsarmiento84 ,
Thank you for creating the issue. As I mentioned in other issues (#8 #5) the warning can be ignored.
However, I just uploaded a 0.3.3 version that correctly declares the model compatibility.

Please install the new version and let me know if it solves your problem.

Best,
Martino

@dsarmiento84
Copy link
Author

Thanks @MartinoMensio the warning is gone now.

Best regards
Diego

@MartinoMensio MartinoMensio added the libraries versions A new version of something (spaCy/tensorflow) comes out label Mar 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
libraries versions A new version of something (spaCy/tensorflow) comes out
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@MartinoMensio @dsarmiento84