You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It has the other advantage of having one construct that works for all data structures (lists, vectors, hash-tables…): in doubt, just use for… over:
Let's give some explicit examples of using for:for and not this:
(for:for ((x over <your data structure>))
(print …))
The above is not as friendly for new users who are not yet familiar with the syntax for common data structures and might even be confusing with a non standard syntax of <your data structure>. Let's make it friendlier.
WDYT
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Let's give some explicit examples of using
for:for
and not this:The above is not as friendly for new users who are not yet familiar with the syntax for common data structures and might even be confusing with a non standard syntax of
<your data structure>
. Let's make it friendlier.WDYT
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: