You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The MNIST nn have 1,199,882 parameters, for an accuracy of 0.9893 +/- 0.01 (keras fit, epochs=12, batch_size=168)
To compare with, the cifar model have 1,250,858 parameters, and reach 0.7888 +/- 0.03 accuracy in epochs=20, batch_size=140
I am not sure but I think we can either optimize our optimization parameters for MNIST and reach 0.999 acc, or decide that is not really useful in our case and go for a smaller/faster model ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The MNIST nn have 1,199,882 parameters, for an accuracy of 0.9893 +/- 0.01 (keras fit, epochs=12, batch_size=168)
To compare with, the cifar model have 1,250,858 parameters, and reach 0.7888 +/- 0.03 accuracy in epochs=20, batch_size=140
I am not sure but I think we can either optimize our optimization parameters for MNIST and reach 0.999 acc, or decide that is not really useful in our case and go for a smaller/faster model ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: