You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 2, 2020. It is now read-only.
The ADuM54xx isolators don't follow current conventions, leading to contributors wasting time following existing style. They should be updated to follow current conventions.
Hi @karlp - thank you for bringing attention to this. Unfortunately, breaking changes to schematic symbols (such as stacking GND pins) won't be made until we start organizing for v6. I've added this as a milestone.
DanSGiesbrecht
changed the title
Isolator: ADuM54xx don't follow conventions and are bad examples
Isolator: ADuM54xx don't follow the KLC
Oct 30, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The ADuM54xx isolators don't follow current conventions, leading to contributors wasting time following existing style. They should be updated to follow current conventions.
Originall noted as a comment on #1791 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: