You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, there are explicit and implicit layers. The current layer ordering is to make it App->implicit->explicit->driver.
But certain layers that wish to 'extend' the capabilities of the driver will be put in the wrong spot of this chain.
One solution is to introduce a new layer type, "Driver" layer. They act and behave like implicit layers, as they would always be enabled but are loaded as close to the driver as is possible.
From further discussions about implicit layer ordering, I do not believe that there is a strong reason for this feature to exist. As such, I'm closing the issue.
Currently, there are explicit and implicit layers. The current layer ordering is to make it App->implicit->explicit->driver.
But certain layers that wish to 'extend' the capabilities of the driver will be put in the wrong spot of this chain.
One solution is to introduce a new layer type, "Driver" layer. They act and behave like implicit layers, as they would always be enabled but are loaded as close to the driver as is possible.
Related issue #328
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: