Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for loading CRS in GeoJSON & Update to Meshes.jl v0.46 #95

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

eliascarv
Copy link
Member

@eliascarv eliascarv commented Jul 2, 2024

Part of #87

@eliascarv eliascarv requested a review from juliohm July 2, 2024 18:26
@eliascarv eliascarv changed the title Add support for loading CRS in GeoJSON Add support for loading CRS in GeoJSON & Update to Meshes.jl v0.46 Jul 2, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.59259% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.71%. Comparing base (f2a9827) to head (700b3b3).

Files Patch % Lines
src/conversion.jl 92.59% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #95      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.61%   94.71%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        1077     1078       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1019     1021       +2     
+ Misses         58       57       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

test/gis.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Júlio Hoffimann <[email protected]>
@juliohm juliohm merged commit 721c8ae into master Jul 2, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@juliohm juliohm deleted the epsg-crs branch July 2, 2024 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants