New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

sha256 is ~ 6x slower than python version #91

Closed

jonalm opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 1 comment

jonalm commented Nov 3, 2023

On python 3.11.6

In [1]: import random

In [2]: import hashlib

In [3]: def calc_sha(bytes_):
   ...:     sha = hashlib.sha256()
   ...:     sha.update(bytes_)
   ...:     return sha
   ...:

In [4]: bytes_ =random.randbytes(10000)

In [5]: %timeit calc_sha(bytes_)
3.93 µs ± 13.5 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100,000 loops each)

On julia 1.10 beta

julia> using SHA
julia> using BenchmarkTools
julia> @btime sha256(a) setup=a=rand(UInt8, 10000);
  25.584 μs (4 allocations: 352 bytes)

Author

jonalm commented Nov 3, 2023

duplicate of #90

jonalm closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment