-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Throwing InterruptException to download task not a good idea #81
Comments
It looks like the Downloads code normally provides 2 APIs for this. One difficult option is to call
Or an easy option is to call |
Yeah, but this feels inadequate... can't think of a good way to have parallel requests and keep track of the easy handle without Downloads.jl exposing some nicer way to do that. I have put up JuliaLang/Downloads.jl#256 with a solution that we discussed for JuliaLang/Downloads.jl#255. We can probably switch to something like that once it is available? |
Detect if we are using a newer version of Download.jl that supports interrupting of requests natively and use that instead of throwing `InterruptException`. ref: JuliaLang/Downloads.jl#256 and JuliaLang/Downloads.jl#259 fixes: #81
Detect if we are using a newer version of Download.jl that supports interrupting of requests natively and use that instead of throwing `InterruptException`. ref: JuliaLang/Downloads.jl#256 and JuliaLang/Downloads.jl#259 fixes: #81
Interrupting the download task by scheduling an InterruptException on to it, like what we do here is not a good idea. It can lead to data race conditions and corruption.
We need to replace it with something that is safe. Ref JuliaLang/Downloads.jl#255
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: