You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I tend to keep all my local branches and to archive them to an "Archive" folder. I would be nice if I could could fold it in Gitnuro.
Describe the solution you'd like
Show directories with branches in the directories underneath and be able to fold
Example, local branches:
Foo/a
Foo/b
Would give:
v Foo
a
b
Or:
> Foo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've seen Sourcetree doing this and could be nice to have. I'm not really sure about if we want to allow multiple levels (like having Foo/bar/a into 3 levels):
↓ Foo
↓ Bar
a
Or just one (It would be less organized but would make it easier to navigate)
↓ Foo
Bar/a
I'd go for the second option as it feels like the best UX and not that often the tags are split into 3 "sections". What are your thoughts?
My choice would be to go with the multiple levels option, so that when Gitnuro will rule the versioning world and be used with huge (and complex) projects, everything will already be done ! ;-)
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I tend to keep all my local branches and to archive them to an "Archive" folder. I would be nice if I could could fold it in Gitnuro.
Describe the solution you'd like
Show directories with branches in the directories underneath and be able to fold
Example, local branches:
Foo/a
Foo/b
Would give:
Or:
> Foo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: