You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The default -basic version corresponds to the -simple artefact with only 'part of' relationships (BFO:0000050)
This is potentially confusing. Most users think of "relationship" as being an edge in a graph, not as an existential restriction, so this makes it sound like we filter is-as.
Note also that releases such as uberon-basic includes quite non-basic relationships like mutually_spatially_disjoint_with. Yes, those of us who are OWL gurus know that this is an annotation assertion that is a shortcut for a complex OWL axiom. But for many users, this is just an edge that will confuse them.
This is poorly written as it conflicts obo syntax relationships (non-is-a graph edges) with existential restrictions (these coincide 99% of the time). With the former interpretation the Uberon basic graph is not a DAG, violating basic. With the latter it is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://oboacademy.github.io/obook/reference/release-artefacts/
This is potentially confusing. Most users think of "relationship" as being an edge in a graph, not as an existential restriction, so this makes it sound like we filter is-as.
Note also that releases such as uberon-basic includes quite non-basic relationships like
mutually_spatially_disjoint_with
. Yes, those of us who are OWL gurus know that this is an annotation assertion that is a shortcut for a complex OWL axiom. But for many users, this is just an edge that will confuse them.The original basic profile was defined here:
https://owlcollab.github.io/oboformat/doc/obo-syntax.html#6
This is poorly written as it conflicts obo syntax relationships (non-is-a graph edges) with existential restrictions (these coincide 99% of the time). With the former interpretation the Uberon basic graph is not a DAG, violating basic. With the latter it is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: