Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we align with FOAF? #188

Open
FabienGandon opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Should we align with FOAF? #188

FabienGandon opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@FabienGandon @andreiciortea @Antoine-Zimmermann @gnardin
Labels
alignment Related to the alignment with other vocabularies high priority ontology Related to the ontology itself question Further information is requested
Milestone
V3.2.2.1

Comments

@FabienGandon
Copy link
Contributor

Should we align HMAS with FOAF?
Starting for instance with:
foaf:Agent
foaf:Group
foaf:Organization
etc. http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
@FabienGandon FabienGandon added question Further information is requested ontology Related to the ontology itself alignment Related to the alignment with other vocabularies labels Nov 24, 2023
@FabienGandon FabienGandon added this to the V3.2.2.1 milestone Nov 24, 2023
@Antoine-Zimmermann
Copy link
Contributor

For alignments with external vocabularies, I suggest we use external files. E.g. hmas-foaf.ttl, hmas-prov.ttl, hmas-org.ttl, etc. If one wants to interoperate with FOAF-based datasets. Also, anyone can create their own alignment with their preferred vocabulary in the same way, without the need to update anything at either end of the alignment.

This was referenced Nov 25, 2023
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@FabienGandon FabienGandon

@andreiciortea andreiciortea

@Antoine-Zimmermann Antoine-Zimmermann

@gnardin gnardin

Labels
alignment Related to the alignment with other vocabularies high priority ontology Related to the ontology itself question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
V3.2.2.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@FabienGandon @andreiciortea @Antoine-Zimmermann @gnardin