Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

In some case, flux-adding and LART does not agree with each other. (emission w/ scattering) #448

Open
HajimeKawahara opened this issue Dec 31, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

In some case, flux-adding and LART does not agree with each other. (emission w/ scattering) #448

HajimeKawahara opened this issue Dec 31, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@HajimeKawahara
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone
undefined version

Comments

@HajimeKawahara
Copy link
Owner

HajimeKawahara commented Dec 31, 2023 •
edited
Loading

In tests/integration/unittests_long/twostream/twostream_spectrum_test.py (emission w/ scattering) , flux-adding and LART agree well with each other, but in some case, I found they gave different results and I do not why. See Jupiter_cloud_model_using_amp_debug.py when I was developing the mieclouds implementation. I postpone this issue to the future fix because mieclouds focuses on a scattered light spectrum.

Figure_1
@HajimeKawahara HajimeKawahara added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 31, 2023
@HajimeKawahara HajimeKawahara added this to the v1.6 milestone Dec 31, 2023
@HajimeKawahara HajimeKawahara self-assigned this Dec 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@HajimeKawahara HajimeKawahara

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
undefined version
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@HajimeKawahara