You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are are large number of orphan terms that only have root in the base that brought them in. UniMod (MOD:00003) and DeltaMass (MOD:00947).
In PSI-MOD 1.029.0, this amounts to
MOD:00003 (UniMod): 28 orphans
MOD:00947 (DeltaMass): 60 orphans
My proposal is to deprecate orphan terms that are:
abiological (e.g. MOD:00508, a UniMod orphan term for gas-phase ions generated in the mass spectrometry process)
unsupported by literature reference (MOD:00958, a DeltaMass orphan term for a crosslink between Arg and His sidechains with loss of "5"
And to properly fix terms that are incomplete such as:
DeltaMass orphan MOD:00971 that describes oxohistidine from a properly referenced manuscript
Unimod Orphan MOD:00576 that described crotonylation... here I will convert to something like "crotonylated residue" on amino acid X. The addition of child terms for each modified residue will come in the future.
Does anyone have strong reasons why I shouldn't do this? I assume that answer will be no, but always good to throw the question out into the ether.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are are large number of orphan terms that only have root in the base that brought them in. UniMod (MOD:00003) and DeltaMass (MOD:00947).
In PSI-MOD 1.029.0, this amounts to
My proposal is to deprecate orphan terms that are:
And to properly fix terms that are incomplete such as:
Does anyone have strong reasons why I shouldn't do this? I assume that answer will be no, but always good to throw the question out into the ether.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: