You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What if We are Not Biological Machines and Human Nature is the Biggest AI Risk of All? | Metavalent Stigmergy
In this down-to-earth and transcendent discussion between Dr’s Zubin Damanian and Federico Faggin, below, it’s easy to conclude that Arthur C. Clarke got it completely right, again, in his timeless computer character HAL 9000:
Due to micro and macro symmetries we observe throughout virtually all of natural phenomena -- at least that portion which we're capable of observing -- might it not make sense that there would be similarly reflective symmetries into the paradoxically inaccessible and yet addressable quantum realm? That is to say, holographic principles applied in a quantum context? It seems that which is referred to as "part-whole" and "whole-on" is consistent with the principle of holography in which, every chip of film contains the whole. If so, this seems like a nice integration point with other active, intersecting theories. Thanks again for such a fantastic, inspiring discussion!
What if We are Not Biological Machines and Human Nature is the Biggest AI Risk of All? | Metavalent Stigmergy
In this down-to-earth and transcendent discussion between Dr’s Zubin Damanian and Federico Faggin, below, it’s easy to conclude that Arthur C. Clarke got it completely right, again, in his timeless computer character HAL 9000:
https://metavalent.com//metavalent/2021/04/07/07-20-45-Human-AI-Risk.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: