Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Signal Lamp Assembler Recipe does not distinguish between microblocks #16773

Closed
3 tasks done
NamesAreAPain opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks done

Comments

@NamesAreAPain
Copy link

Your GTNH Discord Username

Atlantisspy

Your Pack Version

2.6.1

Your Server

private server

Java Version

Java 20

Type of Server

Vanilla Forge

Your Expectation

While crafting Railcraft signal lamps in an assembler, I inserted stacks of the requested ingredients (1 glass pane, 1 iron plate, 1 Inverted Green Lamp Notch, 1 Inverted Yellow Lamp Notch, 1 Inverted Red Lamp Notch)x64 expecting it to consume 1 from each stack as it crafted the 16 signal lamps

The Reality

It only took from the green lamp notches pile. Recognizing it was probably microblocks being buggy, I attempted the craft with 3 dirt notches instead of the inverted lamp notches. Sure enough, that works too. Effectively, at the moment, the assembler recipe for signal lamps is glass pane, iron plate, 3x any forge microblock notch

Your Proposal

Ideally, the recipe would remain the same, but avoid the microblock confusion problems. If fixing that proves to be too invasive of a fix, simply making the recipe take whole inverted lamps and giving a stack of signal lamps at a time would probably not drastically change the overall cost of building RailCraft networks.

Final Checklist

  • I have searched this issue tracker and there is nothing similar already. Posting on a closed issue saying the bug still exists will prompt us to investigate and reopen it once we confirm your report.
  • I can reproduce this problem consistently by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
  • I have asked other people and they confirm they also have this problem by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
@NamesAreAPain NamesAreAPain added Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed Bug: Minor labels Jul 17, 2024
@chochem
Copy link
Member

chochem commented Nov 8, 2024

was fixed by GTNewHorizons/NewHorizonsCoreMod#984

@chochem chochem closed this as completed Nov 8, 2024
@chochem chochem added Type: Recipe and removed Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed labels Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants