Should we improve computation of figures and the result description?

[mmerdes]

Computation of figures

Currently, the figures displayed in the dashboard are mostly created in the backend and included in the result,
but some parts are actually done in the frontend, e.g. formatting of titles or rendering of the badges (e.g. 'low currentness').
Would it make sense to create the whole figure in the backend?

Result description

Currently, the textual result description lacks a reference to the topics and attributes used for the indicator,
for example:

"The ratio of the features (all: 1034299.9) compared to features with expected tags (matched: 276785.2) is 0.27. Around 25-75% of the features match the expected tags."

This makes it hard to make sense of the description.
Should we improve this by including topic and attribute names?

[mmerdes]

@matthiasschaub @joker234 @Gigaszi @mcauer @Hagellach37
What do you think?