Replies: 17 comments 5 replies
-
I think it can be achieved with macro. So I'm personally for the unification. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for chiming in, @yegor-mialyk. To clarify, it's not the matter of unifying or not. I can add this functionality (I hope) to the unified dialog, The question is whether I can reduce complexity by dropping this functionality if it is not really popular. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've never used it either, but then I didn't know about it until know. I guess I need to spend more time going through the Help files. I use incremental search a lot in other editors, like Visual Studio. This feature could be more useful if it worked like incremental search, i.e. without the dialog. If I had a vote I would vote No, to reduce complexity and make things easier for you. 😄 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks. Yeah, incremental search is sometimes convenient, though I do not use it often even where it works. Anyway, it's a completely different story. I think I've seen a request for incremental search in Far elsewhere. I believe it was before GitHub times. Maybe worth creating a feature request here for proper tracking. The main advantage of removing unused features is improving maintainability. Implementing something once maybe tedious but doable. Having to keep it working while adding other, more useful features, this is where it gets nasty. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ребят, сорян что по-русски, но, думаю, вы язык вспомните... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not an expert in LUA, but here is a sample that works for me:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Воркараунд предложен выше Егором.
Не, не слышал. Чё енто?
А сколько из них пользуются этой фичóй? Сколько вообще о ней знают? Если серьёзно, is your grievance substantial, или просто заклеймить типичных представителей Кровавого Ынтерпрайзу? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes. If this feature is actually used by one percent of the population, then it's better to publish Egor's macro, maybe even include it into the distribution, and avoid complicating the implementation (which in this place, as Mr. Alabuzhev gently put it, is rather convoluted.) If it's half of the population, it better works out of the box. Let me ask in my turn, did you really need this answer? Did I tell you something new? P.S. Regarding whether I asked the right person, well, it's a public discussion and as such, the question is not to you only. I started this discussion with the express purpose of collecting opinions, to poll the audience so to say. Если кому родной язык...
Да. Если реально пользуется этой фичей один процент населения, то можно опубликовать Егоров макрос, может быть, включить его в дистрибуцию, и не усложнять код (который в этом месте, как аккуратно высказался г. Алабужев, довольно запутанный). Если это половина населения, то лучше, чтобы это работало из коробки. Спрошу в свою очередь, Вам действительно нужен был этот ответ? Я сообщил что-то новое? P.S. Насчёт "по адресу", это публичная дискуссия, так что вопрос обращён не только к Вам. Я начал эту дискуссию специально для того, чтобы собрать мнения, проголосовать, так сказать. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I for one have used this quite a lot since forever and I'm somewhat perplexed that it just got the unceremonious boot all of a sudden. If the macro is to be considered an adequate substitute, then it has to accept any character, just the way the original feature did. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Лучше подойдёт. http://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=5&topic=51024&start=680#14 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Код 'запутанный', но выкидывание несколькихз строчек не сделало его проще. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Да не горит и я как бы даже не настаиваю. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
[Writing in English for the benefit of other people here.]
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The ultimate macros that restore the removed functionality: -- See https://forum.farmanager.com/viewtopic.php?p=173468#p173468
Macro {
area="Viewer"; key="/\\S/";
action=function() Keys("F7 AKey") end;
}
Macro {
area="Viewer"; key="CtrlV ShiftIns";
action=function() Keys("F7 AKey") end;
} Ideally, we should have these included in the package and mentioned in the changelog, so that people like me who used the functionality aren't left guessing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Would be nice, thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you all, See #625. Interestingly, we already had View.ShiftInsSearch.lua (with slightly different behavior). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
FarManager/far/FarEng.hlf.m4
Lines 2855 to 2856 in 8891d36
Do we want to support this feature after refactoring Viewer to use unified Search dialog? I've never used it but who am I to judge?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions