We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In static mbf setup, in case that there is no more buffers assert is called:
erpc/erpc_c/setup/erpc_setup_mbf_static.cpp
Line 70 in 5c2c6b7
erpc/erpc_c/setup/erpc_setup_mbf_dynamic.cpp
Line 33 in 5c2c6b7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe it is just because this function does not return pointer but class? hence should be fixed with #416
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
If you didn't find answer in existing open/closed issues you may ask here
In static mbf setup, in case that there is no more buffers assert is called:
erpc/erpc_c/setup/erpc_setup_mbf_static.cpp
Line 70 in 5c2c6b7
In dynamic, if allocation failed then the NULL pointer will be set as buffer:
erpc/erpc_c/setup/erpc_setup_mbf_dynamic.cpp
Line 33 in 5c2c6b7
I would expect in both cases to return error. Why is current implementation as is? (or it is a bug?)
Steps you didn't forgot to do
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: