Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

build compatibility layer with the bot #173

Open
trz42 opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

build compatibility layer with the bot #173

trz42 opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
change Change to be made difficulty:easy priority:high
Milestone
eessi-2023.04

Comments

@trz42
Copy link
Contributor

trz42 commented Mar 31, 2023

Use PRs #163 (bot/build.sh), #166, #167, #168, #169 to build compatibility layer with the bot. Might also look into https://github.com/trz42/compatibility-layer/tree/new_cl_spring_2023 for an attempt to get these PRs working together. The latter may contain a few tweaks necessary on some bot instances.
@trz42 trz42 added this to the eessi-2023.04 milestone Mar 31, 2023
@trz42
Copy link
Contributor Author

trz42 commented Apr 3, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Made an attempt to build with #177 (see NorESSI#7). Failed with some sync issue (likely a typo in an ansible script). Will rerun the build to check if it works against pilot.eessi-hpc.org/2023.04 and pilot.nessi.no/2023.04.

@trz42
Copy link
Contributor Author

trz42 commented Apr 3, 2023

New attempt is NorESSI#8

@boegel
Copy link
Contributor

boegel commented Jun 14, 2023

Autonomously building the compat layer worked for 2023.06 (cfr. #188), but creating the proper tarball failed because of a bug in the last part of the bot/build.sh script which was added in #163 and tweaked in #177 - cfr. #189

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
change Change to be made difficulty:easy priority:high
Projects
None yet
Milestone
eessi-2023.04
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@boegel @trz42