Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Returning RMSE in addition to residuals rather than printing it, and a few questions #309

Open
nicmazza opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nicmazza
Copy link

Hi,
First of all, I love this tool, thanks to everyone who worked on it!

I have been using the package for a bit, and I was wondering if it would make sense to have the linKK return the RMSE in addition to the residuals.
This might be good as it would then possible to store all linkk rmse when doing batch fittings of files and stored in a table with the filename and other useful informations, which can be useful for example when looking back at old data to make sure the dataset was of good quality.

Then, for the questions :)
I have read the code, but I am not sure I fully understand that function (I am not the most skilled programmer :) ). It seems that it only calculates the rmse when M is a multiple of 10 and prints it out rather than returning it, which seems odd to me but I am probably not understanding either the function itself or the linkk algorithm.
I have another probably simple question: could you please explain to me the reason the residuals are returned divided by the module of Z, rather as the point by point distance between the two profiles? Maybe I am not following what the eval_linkk function does?
What would be the formula to calculate rmse from the provided residuals.

Thanks,

Best

@nicmazza nicmazza added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
@nicmazza and others