Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please linter #65

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2024
Merged

Please linter #65

merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2024

Conversation

CyberDem0n
Copy link
Owner

it was crying about evb maybe uninitialized

it was crying about evb maybe uninitialized
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 89.431% (-0.1%) from 89.532%
when pulling e13ff52 on uninitialized-evb
into f023c55 on master.

@CyberDem0n CyberDem0n merged commit 6cf0e6d into master May 27, 2024
12 checks passed
@CyberDem0n CyberDem0n deleted the uninitialized-evb branch May 27, 2024 13:32
hughcapet pushed a commit to zalando-pg/bg_mon that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2024
it was crying about evb maybe uninitialized
hughcapet added a commit to zalando-pg/bg_mon that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2024
* Please linter (CyberDem0n#65)
   it was crying about evb maybe uninitialized

* Compatibility with PG17 beta1 (CyberDem0n#66)
- new signature of InitPostgres()
- new backend types: "slotsync worker" and "walsummarizer"
- adjust tests to include these new features

* Add handling of "logical replication parallel worker" (CyberDem0n#67)

it was introduced in PG16 and responsible for parallel apply.

Besides that split logical replication worker to "apply" and "tablesync" workers, like it was done in PG17.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alexander Kukushkin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants