You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This plugin is very useful to play with models or with forcing in direct style. Do you have further plans with it? E.g. cubical presheaves?
I have a couple of questions:
It does not support (co)fixpoints: were there particular difficulties to support them? The guard condition?
It seems that more possible interpretations of the universes have been investigated nowadays (I'm thinking e.g. to Sattler's construction of universes in presheaves, or also the "optimization" interpreting Prop by Prop and Type(i) by Type(i) in case the Hom are proof-irrelevant). There is also the combination with realisability (e.g. @ppedrot's "pre-prefascist" variant with parametricity). Do you have plans in this direction?
Also, I wonder whether you'd be interested in moving the plugin to coq-community. Other limitations I collected include the support for polymorphism (which naively would require mapping universes of the source to universes of the target?) and the support for the new term constructors Int, Float, Array, but that's maybe not a limitation enough to make it more visible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi coq-forcing developers,
This plugin is very useful to play with models or with forcing in direct style. Do you have further plans with it? E.g. cubical presheaves?
I have a couple of questions:
Prop
byProp
andType(i)
byType(i)
in case theHom
are proof-irrelevant). There is also the combination with realisability (e.g. @ppedrot's "pre-prefascist" variant with parametricity). Do you have plans in this direction?Also, I wonder whether you'd be interested in moving the plugin to coq-community. Other limitations I collected include the support for polymorphism (which naively would require mapping universes of the source to universes of the target?) and the support for the new term constructors
Int
,Float
,Array
, but that's maybe not a limitation enough to make it more visible.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: